A Comparative Analysis of Employment Injury benefits for Migrant Workers: Evidence from Selected Developed and Developing Economies

This paper examines the entitlement of employment injury benefits (EIBs) for migrant workers through a comparative analysis of selected developed economies, namely Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, with reference to Malaysia as a receiving country. The study aims to identify key features of effective social security systems that ensure adequate protection of migrant workers in cases of workplace injury. Adopting a qualitative comparative legal methodology, the research analyses national legal frameworks, institutional arrangements, and benefit structures, drawing on data from international organizations including the International Labour Organization (ILO), the World Bank, and the Mutual Information System on Social Protection (MISSOC). The findings indicate that comprehensive coverage, non-discriminatory access, integrated institutional coordination, and the inclusion of rehabilitation benefits are critical components of effective EIB systems. In contrast, Malaysia’s framework demonstrates gaps, particularly in relation to migrant worker coverage and benefit adequacy. The paper further highlights the role of social security agreements (SSAs) in enhancing cross-border protection. It concludes that aligning domestic frameworks with international labour standards and adopting selected best practices can significantly strengthen the protection of migrant workers’ right to social security.

Employment Injury Benefits; Migrant Workers

1. Ajani, G. (2019). Legal transplants. In A. Marciano & G. B. Ramello (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of law and economics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_731 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asher, M. G., & Zen, F. (2015). Social protection in ASEAN: Challenges and initiatives for post-2015 vision. ERIA Discussion Paper Series. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Broomfield, L. (2014). Migrant access to social security: Policies and practice in the United Kingdom. Home Office. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Business Sweden. (2018). The Swedish social security system: Establishment guide. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cairns, J. W. (2013). Watson, Walton and the history of legal transplants. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 41, 637–667. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. European Commission. (2014). Migrant access to social security and healthcare: Policies and practice. European Migration Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. European Commission. (2018a). Your social security rights in Germany. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. European Commission. (2018b). Your social security rights in Sweden. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. European Commission. (2018c). Your social security rights in the United Kingdom. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. European Migration Network. (2014). Migrant access to social security: Policies and practice in Sweden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. (1996). Seventh Book of the Social Code: Statutory accident insurance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. (n.d.). Organisation of the ministry. https://www.bmas.de [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Greenback 2.0. (2017). Johor Bahru report: Migrant workers’ remittances from Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Guyton, G. P. (1999). A brief history of workers' compensation. The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal, 19, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Tsutsui, K. (2005). Human rights in a globalizing world: The paradox of empty promises. American Journal of Sociology, 110(5), 1373–1411. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hathaway, O. A. (2002). Do human rights treaties make a difference? The Yale Law Journal, 111(8), 1935–2042. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Husa, J. (2018). Developing legal systems, legal transplants, and path dependence. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 6(2), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxy008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. International Labour Organization. (2016a). ILO technical note: Germany. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. International Labour Organization. (2016b). ILO technical note: Sweden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. International Labour Organization. (2016c). ILO technical note: United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. International Labour Organization. (2016d). Review of labour migration policy in Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. International Trade Union Confederation. (n.d.). About ITUC. https://www.ituc-csi.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kamal Halili Hassan, M. F. A. R., Nordin, R., & Abdul Rahim, R. (2018). Malaysia with the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Aftermath of the United States withdrawal. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 8(10), 868–880. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Legrand, P. (1997). The impossibility of legal transplants. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 4, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mihi-Ramírez, A., Ojeda-González, S., Miranda-Martel, M. J., & Agoh, E. (2016). The contribution of migration to economic growth: Evidence from Spain. Open Economics, 1(1), 124–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. MISSOC. (2020). Comparative tables on social protection systems. https://www.missoc.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Müller, A., Mayer, M. M., & Bauer, N. (2014). Social security for third-country nationals in Germany. Federal Office for Migration and Refugees. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Munoz Moreno, R., Del Carpio, X. V., Testaverde, M., Moroz, H. E., Loo, C., Smith, R. L., Ozden, C., Karakurum-Ozdemir, K., & Yoong, P. S. (2015). Malaysia economic monitor: Immigrant labor. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. OECD. (2014). Migration policy debates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Pasadilla, G. O. (2013). Social security for migrant labor in the Greater Mekong Subregion (ARTNeT Working Paper No. 122). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Scruggs, L., Minkler, L., et al. (2013). Implementation of the human right to social security around the world. In L. Minkler (Ed.), The state of economic and social human rights. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Siems, M. (2009). The taxonomy of interdisciplinary legal research. Journal of Commonwealth Law and Legal Education, 7(1), 5–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Siems, M. (2018). Malicious legal transplants. Legal Studies, 38(1), 103–119. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Siems, M. (2019). The power of comparative law. American Journal of Comparative Law, 67(4), 861–888. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Social Security Administration. (2018a). Social security programs throughout the world: Asia and the Pacific. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Social Security Administration. (2018b). Social security programs throughout the world: Europe. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Social Security Administration. (2018c). Social security programs throughout the world: Germany. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Social Security Administration. (2018d). Social security programs throughout the world: United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Social Security Administration. (2018e). Social security programs throughout the world: Sweden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Teubner, G. (1998). Legal irritants: Good faith in British law. Modern Law Review, 61, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. van Ginneken, W. (2013). Social protection for migrant workers. European Journal of Social Security, 15(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Watson, A. (1993). Legal transplants: An approach to comparative law (2nd ed.). University of Georgia Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Weissbrodt, D., & Mason, M. (2014). Compliance of the United States with international labor law. Minnesota Law Review, 98, 1842–1890. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. World Bank. (2013). Immigrant labor. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. World Bank. (n.d.). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria