High-Quality Development of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises: A Review from the Perspective of Social Value

Against the backdrop of high-quality development becoming a central orientation of China’s economic governance, the development of Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) has attracted growing scholarly attention because these firms simultaneously embody market-oriented operational attributes and public missions. From a social value perspective, this study critically reviews the literature on the high-quality development of Chinese SOEs. The review shows that the existing literature has evolved along three major lines: mixed-ownership reform and governance optimization, digital transformation and organizational capability upgrading, and the extension of evaluation boundaries through ESG performance and social value creation. Overall, the research trajectory has shifted from traditional performance evaluation toward multidimensional assessments of development quality, and from analyses centered on institutional reform to an integrated institution-capability-outcome perspective. However, important limitations remain, including blurred conceptual boundaries, the lack of a unified measurement framework, and insufficient integration of explanatory mechanisms. In particular, social value still lacks stable and replicable operational indicators. Future research should therefore strengthen conceptual integration and indicator refinement, deepen mechanism identification and heterogeneity analysis across different SOE types, and broaden both methodological approaches and comparative perspectives. This review clarifies the intellectual trajectory of the literature on the high-quality development of Chinese SOEs and provides a basis for future theoretical development and empirical inquiry.

Chinese state-owned enterprises; high-quality development; social value

1. Cai, C., Tu, Y., & Li, Z. (2023). Enterprise digital transformation and ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104692. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cardinale, R., Landoni, M., & Mi, Z. (2024). Global state-owned enterprises in the 21st century: Rethinking their contribution to structural change, innovation, and public policy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 68, 468-472. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Curi, C., Mancuso, P., & Scarpa, A. (2025). State-owned enterprises: A bibliometric review and research agenda. Finance Research Letters, 74, 106749. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Huang, S., Xiao, H., & Wang, X. (2018). On the high-quality development of state-owned enterprises . China Industrial Economics, (10), 19-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Jin, X., & Wu, Y. (2024). How does digital transformation affect the ESG performance of Chinese manufacturing state-owned enterprises? Based on the mediating mechanism of dynamic capabilities and the moderating mechanism of the institutional environment. PLOS ONE, 19(5), e0301864. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Li, C. (2024). Measurement, analysis and suggestions for the high-quality development of state-owned enterprises. Journal of Xihua University (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 43(3), 102-113. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Liao, H., Wang, D., Zhu, L., & Zhao, J. (2022). Equity reform and high-quality development of state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China in the new era. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913672. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lin, K. J., Lu, X., Zhang, J., & Zheng, Y. (2020). State-owned enterprises in China: A review of 40 years of research and practice. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 31-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Liu, K., Wang, J., Liu, L., & Huang, Y. (2023). Mixed-ownership reform of SOEs and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 80, 1618-1641. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lo, D., Gao, L., & Lin, Y. (2022). State ownership and innovations: Lessons from the mixed-ownership reforms of China’s listed companies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 60, 302-314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Meelen, T., & Sluijs, J. P. (2025). Government-owned enterprises and sustainability: Review and research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 122, 103994. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. OECD. (2024). OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1-2), 62-77. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Tian, Z., Zhu, B., & Lu, Y. (2023). The governance of non-state shareholders and corporate ESG: Empirical evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Xue, Z., Li, K., Ban, Q., & Li, J. (2025). How ESG and digitalization drive high-quality enterprise development: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 17(11), 4999. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Zhang, S. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance and the moderation of mixed-ownership reform: The evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 2195-2210. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zhang, S., Zhang, W., Chen, F., & Guo, B. (2023). Does the mixed-ownership reform of Chinese state-owned enterprises improve their total factor productivity? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 82, 102182. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zhang, X., Yu, M., & Chen, G. (2020). Does mixed-ownership reform improve SOEs’ innovation? Evidence from state ownership. China Economic Review, 61, 101450. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhang, Y., & Liu, D. (2024). China’s mixed-ownership reform and SOE profitability. Economic Analysis and Policy, 83, 496-520. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zhao, Y., & Mao, J. (2023). Mixed blessing: Mixed ownership reform and innovation behaviour of Chinese state-owned enterprises. Finance Research Letters, 56, 104092. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria