Evaluating Digital Transformation Adoption on Sustainability Outcomes in Construction Projects in the UAE

The construction industry in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is undergoing rapid transformation driven by digital innovation and sustainability imperatives. This study evaluates the impact of digital transformation adoption on sustainability outcomes in construction projects. By integrating advanced technologies such as Building Information Modeling (BIM), Internet of Things (IoT), and data analytics, organizations aim to improve environmental, economic, and social performance. This study employed a quantitative, hypothesis-driven survey design under a positivist paradigm and deductive approach, guided by the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework. The population comprised contractors involved in sustainable construction projects in the UAE, based on licensed and classified construction firms listed by the UAE Ministry of Infrastructure Development. The sample size determination based on a population of 11,676 contractors, the required sample size was 371 respondents. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire survey, distributed electronically to targeted contractor managers, supported by official access to company lists and facilitated through the licensing sector to enhance reach and participation. The study analyzed data using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS. Findings indicate that digital transformation enhances sustainability outcomes and identifies key drivers and barriers within the UAE context. The findings provide insights for practitioners and policymakers seeking to align digital initiatives with sustainable development goals.

Digital Transformation, Sustainability Outcomes

1. Abiodun, T. S., et al. (2023). Driving smartness for organizational performance through Industry 4.0: A systems perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(9), 40-63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adebowale, O. J., & Agumba, J. N. (2023). A scientometric analysis and review of construction labour productivity research. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(7), 1903-1923. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ahmad, E. (2024). The convergence of Education 4.0 and Industry 4.0: A Twin Peaks model. Journal of Innovative Digital Transformation, 1(1), 68–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alami, Y., & El Idrissi, I. (2022). Students' adoption of e-learning: Evidence from a Moroccan business school in the COVID-19 era. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 40(1), 54-78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alassafi, H. T., Alkhowaiter, W. R., & Alzahrani, A. A. (2024). HVAC maintainability risks in healthcare facilities: A design optimization perspective. Facilities, 42(15/16), 30-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ali Mohamad, T., et al. (2023). How artificial intelligence impacts the competitive position of healthcare organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(8), 49-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Alieva, J., & Powell, D. J. (2023). The significance of employee behaviours and soft management practices to avoid digital waste during a digital transformation. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 14(1), 1-32. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Alizadehsalehi, S., & Yitmen, I. (2023). Digital twin-based progress monitoring management model through reality capture to extended reality technologies (DRX). Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 12(1), 200-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dabash, O. S. (2023). The Implementation of Agile Project Management Using BIM Influences on the Construction Industry in The UAE Sector (Master's thesis, The British University in Dubai).‏ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dabash, O. S. (2023). The Implementation of Agile Project Management Using BIM Influences on the Construction Industry in The UAE Sector (Master's thesis, The British University in Dubai). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. El Khatib, M., Al Ali, S., Alharam, I., Alhajeri, A., Peneva, G., Angelova, J., & Shanaa, M. (2023). Drafting a digital transformation strategy for project management sector–empirical study on UAE. Strategies for Policy in Science & Education/Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika, 31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ghobakhloo, M., & Ching, N. T. (2019). Adoption of digital technologies in manufacturing SMEs and sustainability outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hamani, K. (2019). Developing a corporate sustainability performance evaluation model of the UAE construction contractors (Doctoral dissertation, Heriot-Watt University). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hummieda, A., Bouabid, A., Moawad, K., & Mayyas, A. (2023). The UAE’s energy system and GHG emissions: pathways to achieving national goals by 2050. Clean Energy, 7(5), 962-980. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Khansaheb, K. S. H. A. (2024, March). The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing sustainability: The case of UAE smart cities. In BUiD Doctoral Research Conference 2023: Multidisciplinary Studies (pp. 235-242). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kolasani, S. (2023). Innovations in digital, enterprise, cloud, data transformation, and organizational change management using agile, lean, and data-driven methodologies. International Journal of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, 4(4), 1-18.‏ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. MMC, Smart Building Technologies, 2024. Digital Transformation Leading To Sustainability In The Landscape of UAE.https://mmcgbl.com/digital-transformation-leading-to-sustainability/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mohamed Hashim, M. A., Tlemsani, I., & Duncan Matthews, R. (2022). A sustainable university: Digital transformation and beyond. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 8961-8996.‏ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Oke, A. E., Aliu, J., Jamir Singh, P. S., Onajite, S. A., Kineber, A. F., & Samsurijan, M. S. (2023). Application of digital technologies tools for social and sustainable construction in a developing economy. Sustainability, 15(23), 16378.‏ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Nitzl, C., Ringle, C. M., & Howard, M. C. (2022). Beyond a tandem analysis of measurement models and structural models in PLS-SEM. Journal of Business Research, 147, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• IFRS S1 and S2: A Global and Indian Perspective with Implications for Auditors
• A Study on Consumer Attitudes and Buying Behavior towards organic Food Products
• India’s Transfer Pricing Framework: Evolution, Challenges, and Future Directions
• Application of Statistical Methods in Business Administration: A Quantitative Study on Organizational Performance
• Decoding Fintech Adoption: The Role of Trust, Risks and Perceived Benefits