Post-Colonial Debates on Women’s Education in Malaysia and Myanmar: A Comparative Analysis
Authors
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (Malaysia)
Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (Malaysia)
The Centre for the Promotion of Knowledge and Language Learning, Universiti Malaysia Sabah (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0227
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 2800-2814
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-16
Accepted: 2026-04-21
Published: 2026-05-11
Abstract
This article examines the polemics surrounding the role and direction of women’s education in the post-colonial era in Malaysia and Myanmar through a comparative analytical approach. In both contexts, women’s education has often been presented as an instrument of social progress and national development; however, it has simultaneously been constrained by colonial legacies, patriarchal structures, and post-independence political interests. This study aims to explore how educational policies, state discourse, and social transformations have shaped the opportunities and limitations of women’s education in both countries since independence. Using a qualitative approach based on the analysis of historical documents, educational policies, institutional reports, and academic literature, this article traces the similarities and differences in the trajectories of women’s education in Malaysia and Myanmar. The findings indicate that although both countries share colonial experiences and nation-building agendas, their approaches to women’s education have evolved differently. In Malaysia, women’s education has been more integrated into the framework of national development and social mobility, whereas in Myanmar, political instability and authoritarian rule have constrained the potential of education as a tool for women’s emancipation. This article argues that women’s education in the post-colonial context is not merely a space of liberation, but also a site of power negotiation among the state, cultural norms, and women’s own aspirations. The study contributes to academic discussions on education and gender in Southeast Asia by highlighting the importance of comparative analysis in understanding the complex dynamics of post-colonial societies.
Keywords
Women’s Education; Postcolonial Feminism; Nation-Building; Gender and Power
Downloads
References
1. Aikman, S., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). Practising gender equality in education. Oxfam GB. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alexander, M. J., & Mohanty, C. T. (1997). Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Altbach, P. G. (1971). Education and neocolonialism. Comparative Education Review, 15(2), 237–249. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Arba’iyah Mohd Noor. (2010). Tan Sri Dr Hajah Aishah Ghani: Penggerak kemajuan wanita UMNO. Sarjana, 25(3), 125–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ariffin, J. (1999). Feminism in Malaysia: A historical and present perspective of women’s struggles in Malaysia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 22(4), 417–423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2002). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures (2nd ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Aslam, M. (2013). Empowering women: Education and the pathways of change (Monitoring Report No. 2013/4). UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Berma, M. (2020). Kesaksamaan gender tanggungjawab semua. Berita Harian. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Clementi, A., & Crisp, R. (2020). Reality or rhetoric: The role of education in achieving gender equality in Myanmar. ANU Undergraduate Research Journal. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Connell, R. (2009). Gender: In world perspective (2nd ed.). Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Education for All: The year 2000 assessment. (1999, May). Ministry of Education, Myanmar. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Fernandez, J. L. (n.d.). Women and education in Malaysia. School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Gar Gar. (2024). Digital struggle and resistance in the Myanmar revolution. Association for Progressive Communications. https://www.apc.org/en/blog/digital-struggle-and-resistance-myanmar-revolution [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gervais, N. S., Aung, S., & Spreelung, A. (2024). Education in post-coup Myanmar: A shattered landscape with resilient actors. The Research Institute on Contemporary Southeast Asia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Harriden, J. (2012). The authority of influence: Women and power in Burmese history. NIAS Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Hasnah Hussin. (2017). Isu pendidikan wanita Melayu dalam akhbar dan majalah Melayu, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. 1920-an hingga 1940-an. Jurnal Sejarah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. IPSOS. (2018). Key issues faced by women and misperceptions of women's empowerment in Malaysia. IPSOS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Jayawardena, K. (1986). Feminism and nationalism in the Third World. Zed Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Jaysawal, N., & Saha, S. (2023). Role of education in women empowerment. International Journal of Applied Research, 9(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Lall, M. (2020). Myanmar’s education reforms: A pathway to social justice? UCL Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Maznah, M. (2001). Malay women and the politics of Islam in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 7(1), 5–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather: Race, gender and sexuality in the colonial contest. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30, 61–88. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Mohanty, C. T., Russo, A., & Torres, L. (1991). Third world women and the politics of feminism. Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Muhammad Amnan Ibrahim. (2022). Kesedaran kesamarataan gender semakin meningkat. Sinar Harian. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Muhammad Ridzuan Idris, & Arba’iyah Mohd Noor. (2014). Perkembangan sekolah perempuan Melayu di Negeri-negeri Melayu Bersekutu 1896–1941. Jurnal Sejarah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Ng, C., Maznah, M., & Tan, B. H. (2006). Feminism and the women’s movement in Malaysia: An unsung (r)evolution. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Ong, A. (1990). State versus Islam: Malay families, women’s bodies, and the body politic. American Ethnologist, 17(2), 258–276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Reddy, P. (2021). Women empowerment through education. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 9(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Rosnani Hashim. (1996). Educational dualism in Malaysia: Implications for theory and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 40(5), 653–670. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Skidmore, M. (2004). Karaoke fascism: Burma and the politics of fear. University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. South, A. (2008). Ethnic politics in Burma: States of conflict. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. South, A. (2021). Towards emergent federalism in post-coup Myanmar. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 43(3), 439–460. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Steinberg, D. I. (2010). Burma/Myanmar: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Thawnghmung, A. M. (2022). The Myanmar military coup and the resistance. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. UK Parliament. (2000, April 5). House of Commons debates (Vol. 347, cc201–21WH). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. United Nations. (1979). Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. United Nations. (1993). Vienna declaration and programme of action. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Unterhalter, E. (2007). Gender, schooling and global social justice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study