Sustainable Co-creation and Co-learning for Craft Appropriation: An Experience with Mashru Craft of Gujarat

The word ‘craft’ itself symbolizes a construct of sustainability. Though, the extent of sustainability depends on numerous factors like material, production technique, product quality, fair wages and many more. Today we can see a tremendous upsurge in demand of indigenous products. These consumers are more sensitive and mindful not only towards product but also towards product production process and associated narratives. Due to this, greater number of artisans and designers are coming together for cocreation which is opening new avenues for craft appropriation and co-learning. This is changing the traditional pedagogy of knowledge sharing, knowledge creation and helping in foundation of better-knit, self-sufficient inclusive society. In this study, researcher has shared her lived experiences of cocreation with a Mashru weaver - Babu bhai Manodia from Bhujodi village of Kutch district of Gujarat. The entire narration is based on a socio-ecological prototyping of Mashru fabric where a small motif was developed to understand its technical know-how and design possibility. Due to limitation of shafts in existing pit loom, this frugal approach was adopted. With the existing materials from immediate surrounding, product prototype was created. It was an experiential approach of inclusive cocreation that foster indigenous innovation and combine technical, social, and ecological component for interventions that deepen equity, resilience, and sustainability. This experience enabled smooth sharing of tacit and design knowledge between the artisan and designer at same level and space. It helped in appropriating knowledge and skill from simple to complex level.

Sustainability, Co-creation, Co-learning, Mashru, Craft appropriation, Skill appropriation

1. Kumari, P. (2021). Innovation in design of traditional Mashru textile for product diversification (Doctoral dissertation). The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, India. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Manzini, E. (2009). New design knowledge. Design Studies, 30(1), 4–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2–3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007002017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Fletcher, K. (2016). Craft of use: Scenario thinking for fashion. In K. Fletcher & M. Tham (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sustainability and fashion (pp. 157–170). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bhowmick, N. (2019). Co-creation in crafts. Journal of Design Strategies, 12(2), 45-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Puffer, S. M. (1995). Management Across Cultures: Insights from Fiction and Practice. Blackwell Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. A Cosmopolitan Localism Prospects for a Sustainable Local Development and the Possible Role of Design, Ezio Manzini (pp 448-453), Design Studies A Reader Edited by Hazel Clark David Brody (2009), Berg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. (2012). Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth. Jossey Bass / John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Nimkulrat, N. (2010). Hands-on intellect. Journal of Visual Art Practice, 9(3), 217-229. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Journey Through Craceland: Micro-Ecological Breakdown in Jim Crace’s Being Dead
• The Introvert’s Toolkit
• Explore the Potential Benefits of Popularizing Ink Wash Painting Art Style in Video Games
• “An Worthwhile Review of Niosmes”
• Consumer Behaviour Towards Clothing Brands: Role of Fashion Bloggers and Influencers