Early Implementation of the Matatag Science Curriculum in Junior High School: Teachers’ Competence, Challenges, and Coping Mechanisms

The implementation of the MATATAG Science curriculum represents a significant reform in Philippine basic education, emphasizing foundational competencies and streamlined learning content. Understanding how teachers navigate this transition is essential for ensuring effective curriculum delivery. A mixed-methods approach using an explanatory sequential design was employed to examine teachers’ competence, the challenges encountered, and the coping mechanisms utilized during the early implementation of the MATATAG Science curriculum in public junior high schools in the Division of Valencia City. Quantitative data were gathered from 31 Grade 7 and Grade 8 Science teachers using an adapted survey questionnaire, while qualitative insights were obtained from six selected participants through semi-structured interviews. Findings revealed that teachers demonstrated a very high level of competence across most domains, particularly in pedagogical competence and assessment practices, while instructional delivery showed relatively lower ratings. Challenges were found to often affect implementation, with classroom management and curriculum-related difficulties being the most prominent, while training and professional support challenges were moderately experienced. Correlation analysis indicated no significant overall relationship between competence and challenges, suggesting that external factors such as classroom conditions and institutional support significantly influence implementation outcomes. Qualitative findings identified four major coping mechanisms: instructional adaptation, collaboration, resourcefulness, and personal resilience. These results highlight that while teachers are highly competent, sustained support systems, improved classroom conditions, and targeted professional development are essential to enhance curriculum implementation. Strengthening both teacher capacity and institutional support is crucial for achieving the intended goals of the MATATAG Science curriculum.

MATATAG curriculum, teacher competence, implementation challenges, coping mechanisms, science education.

1. Abbasi, S., Abbasi, P., Alvi, H., Junejo, S., & Shaharbano. (2025). The Impact of ICT on teacher Professional Development: a Quantitative study. Indus Journal of Social Sciences., 3(1), 668–682. https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i1.770 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akhmetova, G., Bizhkenova, A., Ryspayeva, D., Gerfanova, E., & Zhukenova, A. (2023). Kazakhstani In-Service Schoolteachers’ perceptions of differentiated learning in heterogeneous EFL classrooms. World Journal of English Language, 13(9), 18. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n9p18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aldanese, P. G. B., & Limpot, M. Y. (2023). The Mediating Effects of Classroom Management and the Relationship between Differentiated Instruction in Teaching and Student Engagement. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 44(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v44i4966 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Jarf, R. (2024). A model for alleviating work pressures and enhancing teachers’ resilience. Journal of Psychology and Behavior Studies, 4(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.32996/jpbs.2024.1.11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alvizo, J. (2025). Teaching that Listens: Exploring the Heart of Learner-Centered Pedagogy through Senior High School Teachers’ Voices. Journal of Educational Analytics, 4(3), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.55927/jeda.v4i3.317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Borreo, R. (2023). Competence and Challenges Encountered by Teacher-Researchers: Basis for Research Capacity Building. Current Perspectives in Educational Research, 6(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.46303/cuper.2023.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Capacio, L. J. A., Celesio, G. A., & Naparan, G. B. (2021). Teachers’ experiences in online teaching and learning modality. EduLine Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 1(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.eduline399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chen, J. J., Li, Z., Rodrigues, W., & Kaufman, S. (2022). Thriving Beyond Resilience Despite Stress: A psychometric evaluation of the newly developed teacher Stress Scale and Teacher Thriving Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 862342. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862342 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dandanon, T. (2025). Teachers’ competence and the implementation of the K to 12 curriculum in Sibagat 2 District, division of Agusan Del Sur. Pantao, International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss0403369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DeCoito, I., & Estaiteyeh, M. (2022). Online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: exploring science/STEM teachers’ curriculum and assessment practices in Canada. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00048-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Del Carmen Romero-García, M., Buzón-García, O., & García, B. A. (2024). Towards a sustainable school culture. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(3), 649. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2928 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Elardo, A. L. A. (2025). Teachers’ Preparedness, needs and challenges in the implementation of Matatag curriculum. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(5), 334–337. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2025.v05i05.020 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Granada, G. D., & Oco, R. M. (2024). Classroom management and teaching competencies of elementary teachers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, 07(03). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i03-50 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Haji, O., Alochere, B. J., Mokua, T. K., & Asiimwe, S. (2025). Teacher Competencies and digital Effectiveness: A flipped classroom in Zanzibar Lower-Secondary Schools. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.45571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jeptepkeny, A., & Keter, J. (2025a). Teacher training and Professional development: Assessing the quality of teacher training programs and ongoing professional development initiatives in improving teaching practices in Kenya. East African Journal of Education Studies, 8(3), 726–737. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.8.3.3718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jeptepkeny, A., & Keter, J. (2025b). Teacher training and Professional development: Assessing the quality of teacher training programs and ongoing professional development initiatives in improving teaching practices in Kenya. East African Journal of Education Studies, 8(3), 726–737. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.8.3.3718 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Jumao-As, J. (2025). Teacher’s Classroom Management Strategies for Effective Student Engagement: Problems and Interventions. International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.37082/ijirmps.v13.i4.232688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Loseñara, J. M., & Jugar, R. R. (2023). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge of diploma in professional education graduates teaching biology. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i1.24070 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Lutsenko, O., & Seminikhyna, N. (2023). NAVIGATING CHALLENGES AND MAXIMISING OPPORTUNITIES: ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING IN LARGE UNIVERSITY CLASSES. Humanities Science Current Issues, 2(65), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.24919/2308-4863/65-2-43 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Maraveles, J., & Ducot, L. (2025). Challenges encountered by teachers in the implementation of the MATATAG curriculum. Psychology and Education a Multidisciplinary Journal, 40(5), 723–732. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.400510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Marchan, C. B., Tenerife-Cañete, J. J., Añora, H., & Pinili, L. (2025). Instructional practices and challenges of teachers in supporting special needs students in inclusive settings. International Journal of Educational Studies, 8(3), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.53935/2641533x.v8i3.366 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Montero, R., & Ducot, L. (2025). Exploring the challenges in implementing the MATATAG curriculum. Psychology and Education a Multidisciplinary Journal, 46(10), 1410–1424. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.461010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Naquila, A., & Curayag, E. (2025). Effectiveness of teachers’ classroom styles and students’ learning engagement. Psychology and Education a Multidisciplinary Journal, 47(4), 498–501. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.470405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Nasution, I. N., & Indrasari, S. Y. (2024a). Twenty years of Change : A Systematic literature review of Indonesian teachers’ responses to curriculum change. Jurnal Kependidikan Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 10(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i1.10633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Nasution, I. N., & Indrasari, S. Y. (2024b). Twenty years of Change : A Systematic literature review of Indonesian teachers’ responses to curriculum change. Jurnal Kependidikan Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 10(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i1.10633 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ndikumana, Y., Mugabo, L. R., & Nsabimana, A. (2024a). Exploring the challenges and strategies for enhancing biotechnology instruction in a modularized context at University of Rwanda-College of Science and Technology. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ndikumana, Y., Mugabo, L. R., & Nsabimana, A. (2024b). Exploring the challenges and strategies for enhancing biotechnology instruction in a modularized context at University of Rwanda-College of Science and Technology. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Nihayah, R. W., Dina, W. F., Wijayanti, D., & Asyah, A. N. (2023). HOW DOES GRANTING TEACHER AUTONOMY INFLUENCE CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION? LESSONS FROM INDONESIA’S CURRICULUM REFORM IMPLEMENTATION. Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v16i1.768 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Prado, L., & Asparin, A. (2025). Teachers’ perception and challenges in implementing MataTag curriculum. Psychology and Education a Multidisciplinary Journal, 44(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.440209 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Pratiwi, D. D., Wahyudi, W. E., & Kuswanto, C. W. (2025). Implementation Independent Curriculum on Competencies Professionalism of RA Teachers in Bandar Lampung. KOMUNITA Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 4(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.60004/komunita.v4i2.183 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Samson, V., & Yango, A. (2023). Effectiveness of learning management system, teachers’ techno-pedagogical skills, and students’ learning engagement in Senior High School at the University Of Perpetual Help System-Jonelta Campuses. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 44, 220–240. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v44i1.8949 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Sanchez, S. E., & Mananquil, V. G. (2024). Teachers’ Coping Mechanisms in In-Person Classes. Polaris Global Journal of Scholarly Research and Trends, 3(2), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.58429/pgjsrt.v3n2a111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Santos, B. (2025). Reimagining Science Education through Student-Led Dynamics. Psychology and Education a Multidisciplinary Journal, 44(8), 1074–1091. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.440805 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Saro, J. M., Montejo, C. B., Sucong, J. A., Bustamante, M. F. O., & Perez, J. B. (2024). A qualitative exploration on the perceived impact of the MATATAG curriculum on basic education teaching in the school year 2024-2025. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.62225/2583049x.2024.4.4.3134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Sayadi, D., & Pangandaman, H. (2025). Technology-Enhanced Science Teaching for 21st-Century Learning: A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Strategies and Their Alignment with SDG 4. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i3.29379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Seleke, Z. (2024). ICT Enhanced Approaches for Student centred Learning: A case of accounting Education pedagogy implementation at a selected university in South Africa. Journal of Education and Learning Technology, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.2024521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Stevenson, E. M., Dawborn-Gundlach, M., Van Driel, J., & Krell, M. (2025). Supporting secondary school science teachers to teach science inquiry skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 21(7), em2670. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16614 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sulistiani, S. M., Amrullah, & Thohir, L. (2025). Implementation of Scientific Approach in Teaching English at SMAN 1 Batukliang Academic Year 2024/2025. Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF), 5(3), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.29303/jeef.v5i3.864 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Supriyadi, S., Suhandi, A., Samsudin, A., Setiawan, A., Ridwan, I. M., & Andriyanto, A. (2025). Synthesized research on computer modeling in Science Education: Addressing pedagogical challenges and implementation barriers. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 13(1), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v13i1.42608 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sutacio, M. P., & Ubayubay, R. M. (2025). Information Communication Technology Proficiency and Quality Teaching among Teachers in Laguindingan District. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, 08(05). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v8-i05-11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tam, C., & Hui, C. K. (2023). Teachers curating virtual exhibitions for learning Visual Arts: A Study of Impact and Effectiveness. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 42(3), 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Toledo, F. L. (2023). Differentiated Instruction for an Enhanced Students’Academic Performance in Science 10 (PHYSICS). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 2831–2846. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Zhang, L., Li, J., & Zhang, S. (2025). The effects of teacher interpersonal behaviours, peer collaboration, Help‐Seeking attitudes, academic engagement, and learning outcomes in Technology‐Supported Collaborative EFL classrooms. European Journal of Education, 61(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zhao, X. (2024). The impact of collaborative learning on teacher professional development and individual growth within team collaboration. Research and Advances in Education, 3(2), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.56397/rae.2024.02.03 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study