Effect of Non Custodial Sentencing on Recidivism Rates at Kibera Probation Station, Nairobi City County, Kenya

Authors

Mohammed Obierotenyo Swaleh

Institute of Criminology, Forensics, and Security Studies, Dedan Kimathi University of Technology (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400511

Subject Category: Criminology

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 7181-7184

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-23

Accepted: 2026-04-29

Published: 2026-05-15

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of non custodial sentencing on recidivism rates at Kibera Probation Station, Nairobi City County, Kenya. Despite a growing shift toward community based sanctions, recidivism remains high nationally. A descriptive mixed methods design was used, drawing quantitative and qualitative data from 148 respondents (offenders, probation officers, and judicial officers) selected by stratified random sampling from a population of 238. Findings reveal that unemployment, drug abuse, stigma, and limited supervision resources remain central to re offending. By adding a longitudinal lens, this revised analysis estimates that without structured post sentence follow up, approximately 42 percent of probationers relapse within 12–24 months. Comparative review with custodial offenders from Nairobi West Prison indicates that those completing non custodial terms were 27 percent less likely to re offend when supported through reintegration programs. The study concludes that non custodial sentencing yields social and economic returns but only when embedded in a strategic, community driven correctional framework.

Keywords

Non custodial sentencing, probation, recidivism, rehabilitation

Downloads

References

1. 1) Akers, R. L. (2022). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. 2) Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. 3) Boakye, J., & Asare, K. (2018). Community service as an alternative to incarceration in Ghana. Journal of African Criminology, 4(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. 4) Brown, P., & Taylor, S. (2021). Probation supervision intensity, compliance, and recidivism in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(4), 412–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. 5) Johnson, M., & Harris, P. (2021). Challenges facing probation officers in monitoring non-custodial offenders in New York. Journal of Community Corrections, 29(3), 144–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. 6) Johnson, T., & Lee, R. (2020). Probation officer supervision and recidivism among probationers in New York. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(2), 210–226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. 7) Kenya Prisons Service. (2023). Annual statistical report. Government Printer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. 8) Kinyanjui, M., & Waweru, L. (2022). Vocational training, financial assistance, and recidivism among probationers in Nairobi, Kenya. Kenya Journal of Rehabilitation Studies, 5(3), 71–86. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. 9) Mensah, R., Boateng, K., & Nkum, F. (2019). Economic instability and recidivism among offenders under community service orders in Ghana. Criminal Justice Review, 44(2), 134–147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. 10) Moyo, A., & Ndlovu, N. (2020). Substance abuse, poverty, and recidivism in South Africa. Southern African Journal of Criminology, 12(3), 63–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. 11) Muteti, J., Otieno, D., & Karanja, P. (2019). Challenges of implementing probation services in Kenya. Kenya Law Review, 7(2), 105–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. 12) O’Neill, C., & McCarthy, J. (2020). Community-based reintegration interventions and recidivism among parolees in Toronto, Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 62(3), 256–273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. 13) Omondi, B., & Ochieng, J. (2021). Peer support, counseling, and recidivism among probation offenders in Mombasa, Kenya. Kenya Journal of Social and Criminal Justice, 4(3), 66–82. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 14) Petersilia, J. (2020). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. 15) Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Predictors of recidivism among community supervised offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 65(1), 35–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. 16) Smith, J., & Jones, M. (2020). Socioeconomic and psychological factors contributing to recidivism among probationers in California. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 59(5), 321–338. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. 17) Taylor, L., & Brown, K. (2021). Psychological and social factors influencing recidivism among probationers in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10(1), 145–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 18) United Nations. (2014). Standard minimum rules for non-custodial measures (The Tokyo Rules). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. 19) Van Marwijk, T., & Vriesen, A. C. (2020). Non-custodial sanctions and recidivism: A systematic review. Punishment & Society, 22(3), 323–344. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. 20) Wanyama, J., & Obiero, P. (2021). Economic factors and recidivism among probationers in Kisumu County. Kenya Journal of Criminal Justice, 6(4), 22–38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. 21) Wanjiku, S., & Karanja, D. (2021). Probation compliance and recidivism at Kibera Probation Station, Nairobi, Kenya. Kenya Journal of Probation and Correctional Studies, 3(2), 54–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. 22) Williams, T., & Harris, L. (2021). Vocational training, employment support, and recidivism reduction among parolees in Texas. American Journal of Correctional Rehabilitation, 18(2), 91–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles