Enhancing MSME Performance through Dynamic Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Mediating Role of Transformational Leadership

Micro, Small, and Medium-sized Enterprises (MSMEs) are the foundation of the economy, driving long-term economic growth, job creation, and innovation. They account for most firms in most nations and make considerable contributions to national GDP, export revenues, and community development. Considering dominance in the national economy, the profitability and long-term viability of MSMEs are inseparably linked to the quality of leadership within these businesses. Effective leadership plays a pivotal role in guiding strategic direction, fostering innovation, managing limited resources, and navigating volatile market conditions. Hence, this study aims to achieve two primary objectives: (i) to examine the impact of dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on MSMEs performance, and (ii) to ascertain the mediating effect of transformational leadership on the relationship between dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation and MSMEs performance. A total of 146 responses were returned and found usable for final analysis using the PLS-SEM technique. The findings revealed that there is no significant direct effect between dynamic capabilities and MSMEs performance but there is a significant direct effect on entrepreneurial orientation on MSMEs performance. Furthermore, the results indicate that transformational leadership does not mediate the relationship between dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation with MSME performance.

Dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation, transformational leadership, performance

1. Adriani, F., & Thaib, L. (2024). The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on various indicators of company performance: The mediating role of management team support. Medcave Journal of Business Management, 3, 112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Açıkdilli, G., & Ayhan, D. Y. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation in the new product development. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(11), 144-150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adriani, F., & Thaib, L. (2024). The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on various indicators of company performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, 11(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Adhiatma, A., Fachrunnisa, O., & Rahayu, T. (2022). Creating digital ecosystem for small and medium enterprises: The role of dynamic capability, agile leadership and change readiness. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(5), 941–959. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Al Mamun, A., Fazal, S. A., & Muniady, R. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, commitment, and business performance: An empirical study among Malaysian micro-enterprises. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 23(1), 1850004. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Al-Mamary, Y. H. S., & Abdulrab, M. (2017). The role of transformational leadership as a mediator between entrepreneurial orientation and performance of SMEs in Yemen. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, 4(1), 35–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Amaleshwari, U., & Jeevitha, R. (2024). Analysing the impact of entrepreneurial orientation on sustainable business performance using hierarchical linear regression. Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2024(1), Article 580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Anwar, M., Fatima, M., Haider, S., & Saeed, M. (2023). Impact of transformational leadership on employees' job performance: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 7(2), 221–235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bailey, K., & Breslin, D. (2021). The COVID-19 Pandemic: What can we learn from past research in organizations and management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 3–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bailey, K., & Breslin, D. (2020). The implications of entrepreneurial leadership in dynamic environments. Journal of Business Research, 113, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Covin, J. G., Rigtering, J. C., Hughes, M., Kraus, S., & Cheng, C. F. (2019). Twenty-five years of entrepreneurial orientation research: Past development and future directions. Journal of Business Research, 110, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (1999). Entering the field of social entrepreneurship. In Social Entrepreneurship: Your Guide to Starting the Business of Your Dreams. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Eikelenboom, M., & de Jong, M. (2019). Sustainable innovation in SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Graham, M., & Moore, J. (2021). Leadership in digital transformation initiatives. Journal of Business Research, 130, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Gupta, V. K. (2015). Construct clarity in entrepreneurial orientation research: Past contributions and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1129–1157. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hanna, K.-K. E. (2024). The role of dynamic capabilities in developing innovation-related capabilities. International Journal of Innovation Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2011). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using SMARTPLS 3. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ismail, M. S., Jaini, A., & Isa, C. R. (2021). Performance of micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs): A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(6), 294–308. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Jalali, S. H., & Sardari, S. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and strategic performance of small businesses: The mediating role of resilience. International Journal of Business Excellence, 24(2), 137–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Mahfud, T., Sudhartio, L., & Mulyana, B. (2020). The influence of entrepreneurial orientation and dynamic capabilities on firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 939–948. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1–25 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Ministry of Entrepreneur Development and Cooperatives. (2019). Dasar Keusahawanan Negara 2030 (DKN 2030). Putrajaya: Ministry of Entrepreneur Development and Cooperatives (MEDAC). Available at: https://www.medac.gov.my/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ng, C., & Hamilton, R. (2020). Customer perceptions of AI-based service. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3–4), 314–339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nguyen, T. V., Le, P. B., & Ngo, L. V. (2023). Linking transformational leadership to organizational performance: The mediating role of knowledge sharing and organizational commitment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 315–337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Pereira, A., Santos, B., & Costa, C. (2023). Customized performance management systems in SMEs: Aligning with unique structures, resources, and strategic flexibility. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(2), 123–145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Puspitawati, H., Suryani, T., & Fauzan, A. (2020). The role of transformational entrepreneurship in mediating leadership and innovation on business performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24(3), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Pezeshkan, A., Smith, L. M., Fainshmidt, S., & Apriliyanti, I. D. (2023). Revisiting dynamic capabilities research: A systematic review and agenda for future research. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Qomariah, W., Wiguna, R., Martini, M., & Thamrin. (2023). Digital transformation in SMEs: Mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 35(2), 124–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sajjad, A., Ibrahim, Y., Shamsuddin, J., & Sharif, S. (2023). Impact of entrepreneurial orientation on SME performance: The moderating role of environmental turbulence. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(5), 18-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Shamsudeen, K., Keat, O. Y., Hassan, Z., & Razak, N. A. (2022). Dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial orientation and performance of micro-enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(1), 52–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Siangchokyoo, N., Klinger, R. L., & Campion, E. D. (2020). Follower transformation as the linchpin of transformational leadership theory: A systematic review and future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Sun, W., Chen, K., & Mei, J. (2024). Integrating the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities: A Comprehensive Framework for Sustaining Competitive Advantage in Dynamic Markets. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 12(9), 1-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Urban, B., & Wood, E. (2017). Creative industries and SME innovation: The mediating role of absorptive capacity. Management Dynamics, 26(2), 15–30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Van Dun, D. H., & Kumar, S. (2023). Leading digital transformation: The role of transformational leadership in technology adoption. Journal of Business Research, 159, 113674. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Van de Wetering, R., Kurnia, S., & Kotusev, S. (2020). Strategic alignment between IT flexibility and dynamic capabilities: An empirical investigation. Information Systems Journal, 30(4), 678–705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Wales, W. J. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation: A review and synthesis of promising research directions. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 3–15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Ximena, L., Robledo, A., & Silva, L. (2020). EO and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Latin America. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(5), 741–765. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar