Strategies and Initiatives that Low Income Parents Implement with School Administration to Enable their Children Access High Quality Public High Schools. A Case of Kajulu, Kisumu East Sub-County, Kenya, East Africa

Authors

Ogolla Nichanor Achola

School of Education, Maseno University (Kenya)

Achieng, Sybil Jane

School of Education, Maseno University (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0249

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 3122-3145

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-18

Accepted: 2026-04-23

Published: 2026-05-18

Abstract

Access to high-quality education is a critical factor in determining academic success and future opportunities for students. However, low-income families often face significant obstacles when seeking access to high-quality public high schools, perpetuating disparities in academic achievement. To address these challenges, low-income parents employ various strategies and initiatives. Despite existing research in different contexts, there is a lack of studies specifically focused on low-resource settings like Kenya, particularly in Kajulu. This study aimed to investigate the strategies and initiatives used by low-income parents in Kajulu, Kisumu East, Kenya, to enable their children's access to high-quality public high schools. Through mixed-methods research design, using both quantitative and qualitative approaches, this study targeted five mixed public secondary schools in Kajulu including Obwolo, Okok, Oasis of hope, Kassagam and Kibos secondary schools. Questionnaires for students and teachers, interviews with key informants (head teachers, education officer, and parents), and focus group discussions with various stakeholders were utilized to ensure maximum data capture. The study conducted in Kajulu, Kisumu East, Kenya, revealed a range of strategies employed by low-income parents to enhance access to high-quality public high schools for their children. These strategies include active involvement in decision-making, networking within the community, school assessment through open days and online research, participation in parent-teacher meetings, exploration of government-sponsored programs, collaboration with community organizations, seeking financial assistance and advocacy, and forming parental support networks. These strategies collectively aim to ensure equal opportunities for quality education, regardless of financial limitations, geographical challenges, language barriers and limited resources and information. The decision-making processes of these parents are influenced by factors such as academic reputation, school proximity, and extracurricular activities. The data findings were analyzed using statistical techniques for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data. The study recommended that parental involvement and advocacy be strengthened to foster strong partnerships between parents, school administrators, teachers, and stakeholders and empower them with knowledge, resources, and opportunities to actively engage in their children's education. This research is essential in promoting equitable educational opportunities and empowering communities for positive change.

Keywords

partnerships between parents, school administrators, teachers, and stakeholders and empower

Downloads

References

1. Adu, E. O., & Ngibe, M. (2020). Continuous use of e-learning platforms in higher education: A qualitative study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(3), 201–206. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adeoye, I. A., & Adeoye, B. F. (2020). Digital literacy and self-efficacy as predictors of students’ engagement in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Akala, W. J. (2021). Revisiting education reform in Kenya: A case of competency-based curriculum (CBC). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Boateng, R., Mbrokoh, A. S., Boateng, S. L., Senyo, P. K., & Ansong, E. (2019/2020). Determinants of e-learning adoption among students in developing countries. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Briggs, X. S., & Domínguez, S. (2022). Housing, neighborhoods, and school choice: Toward integrated policy approaches. Urban Affairs Review, 58(4), 1123–1145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chigona, A., & Chigona, W. (2021). The digital divide and student performance in African schools. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3461–3475. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chigwada, J. P. (2020). Rural ICT access and its impact on education in Africa. African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Science, 30(2), 123–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chen, J., & Lee, S. (2018/2020). Parental involvement and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Epstein, J. L. (Updated discussions, 2020). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (Updated analysis, 2020). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis revisited. Educational Psychology Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hirschman, D. (2020). Community partnerships and educational outcomes in low-income settings. Sociology of Education, 93(4), 290–306. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Johnson, M. T., Smith, R., & Brown, L. (2019/2021). Financial barriers to educational access among low-income families. Journal of Education Policy, 36(5), 623–640. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kaliisa, R., & Picard, M. (2019/2021). Mobile learning policy and practice in Sub-Saharan Africa. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2019/2021). Blended learning effectiveness in African universities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lipman, P. (Updated relevance, 2021). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2020). Investigating students’ behavioral intention to adopt and use mobile learning in higher education. Computers in Education Journal, 59, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mwangi, C. N., & Ireri, A. M. (2021). Parental involvement and academic achievement in Kenyan secondary schools. African Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 567–575. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nganga, L. (2021). Digital inclusion and equity in Kenyan education. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102441. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. OECD. (2020). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. OECD. (2023). Equity and inclusion in education: Finding strength through diversity. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Okello, G., Jones, C., & Bonareri, M. (2020). Socioeconomic factors affecting educational access in Kenya. Journal of African Education Studies, 15(2), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Smith, T. M., Wohlstetter, P., & Farrell, C. C. (2020). School choice and educational equity: Current trends and challenges. Educational Policy, 34(1), 3–28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Surum, J., Kiaritha, E. N., & Mulambula, S. M. (2022). Parental involvement and student resilience in Kenyan schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. World Bank. (2022). Transforming education systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles