Decentralization, Governance, and Rural Change

Authors

Stephen M. Muthoni

School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Social Science , Tharaka University, Marimanti (Kenya)

Amon M. Karanja

Department of Geography, Masinde Muliro University of Sciences, Kakamega (Kenya)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400554

Subject Category: geography

Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 7796-7805

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-22

Accepted: 2026-04-27

Published: 2026-05-18

Abstract

This study examines the spatial impacts of decentralization on rural service delivery and the evolving geography of rural economies in the context of globalization and agro-industrial transformation. The study was guided by two research questions: (i) how decentralization influences the spatial distribution and accessibility of public services in rural areas, and (ii) how globalization and agro-industrialization reshape rural economic geographies. A qualitative meta-synthesis and integrative conceptual review design was adopted, drawing on ten recent peer-reviewed journal articles (2014–2023) in political geography, rural studies, and development studies. Data were analyzed through thematic synthesis and comparative interpretation of cross-contextual findings. The findings reveal that decentralization enhances service delivery responsiveness, spatial accessibility, and local participation where fiscal autonomy, institutional capacity, and accountability mechanisms are strong. However, significant territorial disparities persist, as regions with limited administrative capacity and weak economic bases experience constrained service provision, reinforcing uneven spatial development. Furthermore, globalization and agro-industrial transformation have reconfigured rural economies through integration into global value chains, the emergence of agro-industrial clusters, and the expansion of rural–urban linkages. These processes have generated hybrid rural economies characterized by diversification, commercialization, and increased connectivity, but have also intensified socio-spatial inequalities and marginalized resource-poor regions. The study concludes that decentralization and globalization operate as interconnected multi-scalar processes that reshape rural governance and economic systems in uneven ways. Effective policy interventions require strengthening local institutional capacity, promoting spatial equity, and ensuring inclusive integration of rural areas into global economic systems.

Keywords

Decentralization, Rural Service Delivery, Globalization, Agro-Industrialization

Downloads

References

1. Agrawal, A., & Ribot, J. C. (1999). Accountability in decentralization: A framework with South Asian and West African cases. The Journal of Developing Areas, 33(4), 473–502. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Antràs, P. (2020). De-globalisation? Global value chains in the post-COVID-19 age. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Awortwi, N. (2021). Decentralisation and service delivery in Africa: The challenges of institutional coordination. Public Administration and Development, 41(3), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1903 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barcus, H., Jones, R., & Schmitz, S. (2022). Rural transformations and rural–urban linkages in a global context. Journal of Rural Studies, 91, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.02.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Crook, R. C., & Manor, J. (1998). Democracy and decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, accountability and performance. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Faguet, J.-P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kate, M. (2023). Devolution and health service delivery in Kenya: Progress and challenges. African Journal of Public Administration, 15(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kosec, K., & Mogues, T. (2016). Decentralization and the local provision of public goods: Evidence from rural Ethiopia. World Development, 82, 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Neilson, J., Pritchard, B., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2014). Global value chains and global production networks in the changing international political economy: An introduction. Review of International Political Economy, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.873369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4), 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Regional development policy and decentralisation in developing countries. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264801234-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Otieno, P. (2023). County-level disparities and development outcomes in Kenya’s devolved system. Journal of African Development Studies, 12(1), 78–95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Reardon, T., & Barrett, C. B. (2000). Agro-industrialization, globalization, and international development: An overview of issues, patterns, and determinants. Agricultural Economics, 23(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00272.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Reardon, T., Timmer, C. P., Barrett, C. B., & Berdegué, J. (2009). The rise of supermarkets in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(5), 1140–1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01327.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Robinson, G. M. (2018). Geographies of agriculture: Globalisation, restructuring and sustainability (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623352 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Ezcurra, R. (2011). Is fiscal decentralization harmful for economic growth? Evidence from the OECD countries. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(4), 619–643. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Gill, N. (2003). The global trend towards devolution and its implications. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rondinelli, D. A., Nellis, J. R., & Cheema, G. S. (1989). Decentralization in developing countries: A review of recent experience. World Bank Staff Working Papers, 581. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sirite, P., Mwangi, J., & Karanja, L. (2025). Fiscal decentralization and healthcare delivery in Kenya: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 38(1), 22–39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wagana, D. M., Iravo, M. A., & Nzulwa, J. D. (2016). Effect of devolved governance on service delivery in Kenya. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 5(9), 178–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Woods, M. (2007). Engaging the global countryside: Globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography, 31(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507079503 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Woods, M. (2011). Rural. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles