Perceived Impacts of Pagpapahalaga sa Kalikasan Project: A Qualitative Inquiry into Eastern Visayas State University’s Community Engagement at Villaconzoilo Farm Resort

This study examines the impact of the Pagpapahalaga sa Kalikasan project implemented by Eastern Visayas State University (EVSU) at Villaconzoilo Farm Resort, focusing on how ecological solid waste management (ESWM) training influenced the lived experiences of community partners. A qualitative phenomenological research design was employed, involving purposively selected employees and members of the resort who directly participated in the training. Data were gathered by means of semi-structured interviews and analyzed through Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. Findings revealed that the training facilitated value-based environmental awareness, strengthened workplace waste management practices, and promoted sustained pro-environmental behavior among participants. In addition, the study highlights how university-led community engagement initiatives can generate broader institutional and social impacts beyond knowledge acquisition. The study contributes to sustainability and community engagement research by emphasizing the role of culturally grounded environmental values, workplace-embedded experiential learning, and the influence of transient stakeholders in sustainability initiatives. Moreover, the study provides practical insights for improving SUC-led environmental programs and strengthening university–community partnerships in disaster-prone regions.

ecological solid waste management; community engagement; experiential learning; environmental sustainability; qualitative impact assessment.

1. Acosta Castellanos, P. M., Queiruga-Dios, A., Hernández Encinas, A. et al. (2020). Environmental Education in Environmental Engineering: Analysis of the Situation in Colombia and Latin America. Sustainability, 12(18), 7239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Agboola, O. P., Ilke, C., & Mislat Alsharif, A. (2026). The role of sustainability-integrated curricula in promoting sustainable practices among university students. Cogent Social Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2026.2623311 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2023). A systematic mixed studies review of civic engagement outcomes in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2135688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G. et al. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science 16, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cajurao, E., Cajurao, I., & Jamora, Jr., R. C. (2024). Sustainability-Integrated Ecology Lessons: Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Attitudes and Perceptions Toward Sustainable Development. Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER), 5(6), 286-298. https://doi.org/10.37251/ijoer.v5i6.1253 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chen, F.-H., Tsai, C.-C., Chung, P.-Y. et. al. (2022). Sustainability Learning in Education for Sustainable Development for 2030: An Observational Study Regarding Environmental Psychology and Responsible Behavior through Rural Community Travel. Sustainability, 14(5), 2779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/rec/COLPRA-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/993677732/Creswell-2018-Book-Qualitative-Inquiry-and-Research-Design-Choosing-Among-Five-Approaches [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. David J. O. (2025) Redefining assessment for sustainability: a reflective approach to curriculum transformation in environmental education. Front. Educ. 10:1553999. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1553999 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (5th ed.). Open University Press. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/623279049/The-Good-Research-Guide-5th-Edition [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Drissi, M., Meftah, S. & Skalli, L. (2025). The role of universities in implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs) a case study of Hassan first university 2018–2023. Discover Sustainability, 6, 926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01547-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P. et al. (2016). Impact Evaluation in Practice, Second Edition. World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/4659ef23-61ff-5df7-9b4e-89fda12b074d/content [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Husin, A., Helmi, H., Nengsih, Y.K. et al. (2025). Environmental education in schools: sustainability and hope. Discover Sustainability, 6, 41 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00837-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kayombo, J. J., Iftekhar, S. N., & Mashaza, L. G. (2025). Integrating Environmental Education for Sustainability: Bridging Theory, Practice, and Political Engagement in Tanzanian Secondary Schools. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 9(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.6033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315793484_Experiential_Learning_Experience_as_the_source_of_Learning_and_Development_Second_Edition [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mezirow, J. (2018). Transformative learning theory. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (2nd ed., pp. 114–128). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/543e84ed-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Pénzesné Kónya, E., & Haigh, M. (2021). Introduction: Environmental Sustainability Education for a Changing World. In: Pénzesné Kónya, E., Haigh, M., Křeček, J. (eds) Environmental Sustainability Education for a Changing World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66384-1_1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Popoola, O. O., Ighodaro, I. D., & Nkonki-Mandleni, B. (2025). Advancing sustainable development goals through community engagement in higher education. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 14(1), 91-116. Retrieved from https://isdsnet.com/ijds-v14n1-04.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Rieckmann, M. (2018). Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in education for sustainable development. In A. Leicht et al. (Eds.), Issues and trends in education for sustainable development, pp. 39–59. UNESCO Publishing. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261802 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Shange, H.S., Zogli, L.-K.J. & Dlamini, B.I. (2025). ‘Green campus initiatives and strategies for sustainability in higher education’, Transformation in Higher Education 10(0), a364. https://doi.org/10.4102/the.v10i0.364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shutaleva, A. (2023). Experiential learning as principle of environmental education. Web of Conferences, 420, 10010. Retrieved from https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/57/e3sconf_ebwff2023_10010.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sterling, S., Glasser, H., Rieckmann, M. et al. (2017). '“More than scaling up”: a critical and practical inquiry into operationalizing sustainability competencies', Envisioning futures for environmental and sustainability education, pp. 153-168. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313493164_10_More_than_scaling_up_a_critical_and_practical_inquiry_into_operationalizing_sustainability_competencies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Suryadi, L. H., Anggoro, D. D., & Ferdhianzah, H. J. (2025). Strengthening the strategic role of university research and community engagement bodies in advancing regional collaboration. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 8(10), 4978–4990. Retrieved from https://ijcsrr.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/11-0710-2025.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Taylor, E. W., & Cranton, P. (2012). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. UNESCO. (2019). Framework for the implementation of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) beyond 2019. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370215 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wen, J., Wan, C., Ye, Q. et al. (2023). Disaster Risk Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation and Their Linkages with Sustainable Development over the Past 30 Years: A Review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 14, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00472-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Fluoride Toxicity through Groundwater Consumption and Its Rural Health Consequences: Field Evidence from Western Uttar Pradesh
• Environmental Mental Models of Pre-service Science Educators
• Strategy for Managing to Reduce Environmental Risks of Produced Water Discharges from Oil Production. Case Study: “Kizombaa Platform” in Block 15, Coastal Zaire Province, Angola (2019-2021).