ESG Integration and Tax Governance in Malaysia: A Systematic Review of Environmental Regulations, Corporate Governance, and Social Responsibility
Authors
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Melaka (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Melaka (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Melaka (Malaysia)
Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Cawangan Melaka (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100400589
Subject Category: Accounting
Volume/Issue: 10/4 | Page No: 8305-8319
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-22
Accepted: 2026-04-28
Published: 2026-05-20
Abstract
This systematic review investigates the interplay between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations and tax practices in Malaysia, in particular, environmental regulations, corporate governance practices, and social responsibility practices. Although Malaysia plans to achieve a 45 percent reduction of its carbon intensity and the attainment of net-zero emission by 2030 and 2050 respectively, the relationship between ESG considerations and tax governance has not been studied thoroughly. This review is based on a systematic analysis of 50 highly relevant peer-reviewed articles published since 2017 through which the existing research on the impact of ESG dimensions on tax planning, compliance, and transparency in Malaysian corporations has been synthesized. The results indicate that corporate governance practices, especially the board diversity, independence, and gender representation, have a great impact on improving tax compliance and the quality of ESG disclosures. Laws on the environment encourage tax incentives like the Green Investment Tax Credit (GITA) which has the shortcoming of insufficient use and lack of penalty provisions. Social responsibility programs are associated with less aggressive tax avoidance and greater stakeholder trust, although there is a varying perception of CSR-tax relationships between different stakeholder groups. ESG reporting systems have improved the transparency of tax governance that is still not consistent because of voluntary reporting and differences in sectors. The regulative framework is biased to incentives as opposed to penalties, and enforcement failures to provide overall ESG-tax alignment. The contribution that this review makes to the literature is the context-specific insight into the ESG-tax dynamics in Malaysia, the identification of gaps in research, and practical guidance to the policymakers, business executives, and future researchers. The results are useful in the formulation of a combined framework that will harmonize sustainability goals with financial commitments in the emerging economies.
Keywords
ESG, tax governance, environmental regulations
Downloads
References
1. Adinehzadeh, R., Jaffar, R., Shukor, Z. A., & Rahman, M. R. C. A. (2018). The mediating role of environmental performance on the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and environmental disclosure. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14(1), 153-183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Agustina, R. P., & Barokah, Z. (2024). Women on boards and ESG performance: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia and Malaysia. Corporate Governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alyasa-Gan, S. S., Che-Yahya, N., & Bahrudin, N. Z. (2024). ESG practices disclosure and initial performance of Malaysian IPOs. Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 21(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. ANUA, N. A. M., & MUHMAD, S. N. (2025). Corporate governance and carbon emission performance: Evidence in Malaysian. Universiti Malaysia Terengganu Journal of Undergraduate Research, 7(1), 66-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ariffin, Z. Z., Sulaiman, A. J., Bidin, Z., & Jamil, C. Z. M. (2023). Green tax policy model: Towards green growth environment. CPA, 39(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Aziz, N. H. A., Latiff, A. R. A., Alshdaifat, S., Osman, M. N. H., & Azmi, N. A. (2023). ESG disclosure and firm performance: Evidence after the revision of Malaysian code of corporate governance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 13(12). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Do board composition attributes lead to better environmental, social and governance performance in Malaysia? (2023). Asian Journal of Accounting & Governance, 20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. E-Vahdati, S., Wan-Hussin, W. N., & Ariffin, M. S. M. (2023). The value relevance of ESG practices in Japan and Malaysia: Moderating roles of CSR award, and former CEO as a board chair. Sustainability, 15(3), 2728. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Greggi, M. (2024). The ESG criteria impact on taxation. Preprints. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Greggi, M. (2025). The impact of ESG criteria on taxation. International Tax Studies, 8(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Gribnau, H. (2025). Sustainable tax governance: A shared responsibility. Social Science Research Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hamoudah, M. M. (2025). Strategic integration of management accounting practices into ESG risk and reporting: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(6), 833-846. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Hashfi, M. H. A. (2024). Beyond sustainability. Scientax: Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Perpajakan Indonesia, 5(2), 131-147. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Hashim, H. N. M., Bakar, N. A., Husin, S. M., Darbis, N. D. A., & Mahmood, A. (2024). Thematic analysis of assessment criteria for ESG reporting within Malaysian utilities sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 14(11). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Hikal, H. M. M., Abubakr, A. A. M., Musa, A. M. H., Abdelraheem, A. A. E., & Adam, M. (2025). Sustainability auditing and reporting in Malaysia: Strengthening transparency, accountability, and corporate responsibility. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(4), 1068-1078. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Hui, W. Y., & Brahmana, R. K. (2017). Do Malaysian listed companies mitigate climate-change for tax planning? [Unpublished manuscript]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Husain, M. M., Razali, M. N., Jasimin, T. H., & Hamid, M. Y. (2025). Assessing the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) framework on the performance of listed real estate companies in Malaysia. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Ibrahim, K., Jais, M., Isa, A. H. M., & Jaffary, M. A. S. A. (2024). Unveiling the green truth: How transparent are Malaysian manufacturing companies about their carbon footprint. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 14(4), 20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Ibrahim, M. T., Ibrahim, S. N. S., & Johari, M. H. (2023). The assessment of corporate social responsibilities reporting among Malaysian public listed companies in consumer product and services industries based on Bursa Malaysia CSR framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 13(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Iwani, A., Fatini, S., Saffiah, U. N., & Rani, M. H. A. (2024). Legal assessment of environmental, social, and governance integration for renewable energy success in Malaysia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, VIII(XII), 3689-3699. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Jaffar, R., RaziAziendeh, R., Shukor, Z. A., & Rahman, M. R. C. A. (2018). Environmental performance: Does corporate governance matter? Jurnal Pengurusan UKM Journal of Management, 52, 133-143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Khan, N. J. M., & Ali, H. M. (2023). Addressing sustainability challenges as part of director's duty in Malaysia. International Journal of Law and Management. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Kurniawan, M. (2023). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on company performance. Daengku. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Lee, L., Lau, W., & Yip, T. (2023). Do environmental, social and corporate governance practices enhance Malaysian public-listed companies’ performance? International Journal of Innovation and Industrial Economics, 15(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Lee, S. P., Isa, M., & Shaiban, M. S. (2025). Corporate governance and greenwashing: The moderating role of political connection and sensitive industries. SAGE Open, 15(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Lum, P., & Shalini, J. (2025). Tax governance and transparency: Deep diving into the Malaysian tax corporate governance framework programme. Deleted Journal, 31(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Mahmudi, T. M. T., Widiyati, D., & Priyanto, P. (2025). Systematic literature review: The influence of environment, social, and governance on tax avoidance. Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(5), 496-515. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Mgammal, M. H., Bardai, B., & Ismail, K. N. I. K. (2018). Corporate governance and tax disclosure phenomenon in the Malaysian listed companies. Corporate Governance, 18(5), 779-808. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Milne, J. E. (2024). Environmental taxation and ESG: Silent partners. In Sustainable Taxation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Ming, K. L. Y., Vaicondam, Y., Mustafa, A. M. A. A., Roslan, S. N. M., Shen, Y., Chopra, K., & Khanna, P. (2024). ESG integration and financial performance: Evidence from Malaysia's leading companies. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(5), 487-494. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Mukhtar, B., Shad, M. K., Lai, F., & Waqas, A. (2023). Empirical analysis of ESG-driven green innovation: The moderating role of innovation orientation. Management & Sustainability Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Mukhtar, B., Shad, M. K., Woon, L. F., & Waqas, A. (2023). ESG practices to foster green innovation with moderating role of innovation orientation: A conceptual framework for the manufacturing organizations. Research Square. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Mukhtaruddin, M., Novriansa, A., & Siahaan, H. M. A. (2025). Environmental, social and governance, and tax avoidance: Study in ASEAN countries. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 15(6), 996-1010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Mustapha, M. Z., Zakaria, Z., Rahim, N. M., & Wahab, N. A. (2023). Competitive strategies for corporate sustainability. Foresight Russia, 17(4), 45-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Pantamee, A. A., Mohamad, S., Sibghatullah, A., Keong, O. C., Vu, H. M., & Mutira, P. (2024). Role of corporate social and environmental responsibilities in addressing sustainable development goals: Evidence from Malaysian manufacturing firms. Sustainability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Radzi, M. S. N. M., Ariffin, R. A. M., Aziz, H. A., Ghadas, Z. A. A., & Anas, A. (2024). Re-appraising the tax exemption of social enterprises (SEs) in Malaysia: Selected tax exemption theories. Jambe Law Journal, 7(2), 455-479. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Ramasamy, S., & Yen, Y. Y. (2023). The effect of environmental, social and governance criteria on the corporate value of listed companies in Malaysia. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 13(5), 338-352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Rasyad, R. K., Afgani, K. F., & Ali, Q. (2024). Effects of ESG on firm performance and firm value: A study of Indonesian and Malaysian listed companies. Journal of International Management Studies, 1(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Razali, M. W. M., Lau, E., Yau, D. L. I., & Bm, R. A. R. (2024). Are environmental responsibility companies socially responsible? Evidence from tax planning activities. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 14(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Razali, M. W. M., Sandimalai, S., Lee, D. I. Y., & Lunyai, J. (2022). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and tax planning: A study on Malaysian listed companies. International Business Research, 15(10), 30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. RUHAINI, Rohisyam, H. N., Borhan, N. A., & Malik, H. K. A. (2025). Towards a sustainable growth: How environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors and firm attributes drive financial success in the FTSE4G Bursa Malaysia firms. International Journal of Business and Society, 26(2), 530-547. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Samidi, N. S., & Kwan, J. H. (2024). Assessing factors influencing ESG ratings in Malaysian companies: An empirical study. Paper Asia, 40(6b), 280-288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Shahrom, Z. R., & Kunhibava, S. (2023). Sustainable finance: A study on Malaysia's regulatory framework on sustainable banking and its implementation by selected Islamic banks in Malaysia in support of sustainable development goals. Journal of Islamic Finance and Management Research, 5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Suffian, M. T. M., Shamsudin, S. M., Sanusi, Z. M., & Hermawan, A. A. (2017). Malaysian code of corporate governance and tax compliance: Evidence from Malaysia. Management & Accounting Review, 16(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Sulaiman, N. N., Omar, A. J., Pakir, F., & Mohamad, M. (2024). Evaluating environmental, social and governance (ESG) practice among Malaysian public listed construction companies using FTSE Russell rating model. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 15(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Tang, K. H. D. (2023). A review of environmental, social and governance (ESG) regulatory frameworks: Their implications on Malaysia. Tropical Aquatic and Soil Pollution, 3(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. The moderating effect of women directors on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from Malaysia. (2023). Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Wong, W. (2024). The relationship between environmental, social and governance practice and corporate financial performance of Malaysian public listed companies. International Journal of Innovation and Business Strategy, 19(2), 1-27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Zeijden, F. V. D., & Myronicheva, H. (2023). Where and how do tax and "environmental, social and governance" factors intersect? European Taxation, 63(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. Zulkifli, N., Taufik, N. N. A. A., Islam, M. K., Jaaffar, A. H., & Radzi, H. M. (2023). Exploring the customers perception on ESG towards Malaysian electricity utility company. European Proceedings of Finance and Economics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Role of Value and Growth Stocks in Portfolio Returns: Insights From the Nigerian Stock Market
- The Impact of Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Profitability on Firm Value Moderated by Firm Size
- Assessment of the Impact of Environmental Operating Costs on Return on Assets: Evidence from Listed Breweries in Nigeria
- Mobile Money and Digital Financial Services Ecosystem in Adamawa State
- A Quantitative Approach of Professional Skepticism and Fraud Detection among Malaysian Internal Auditors