Financial Sustainability as a Structural Challenge in Malaysian Public Higher Learning Institutions: An Institutional Theory Perspective

Financial sustainability has emerged as one of the most pressing structural challenges confronting Malaysian public higher learning institutions (HLIs). Although there has been a strong articulation of policy commitments in successive national blueprints, the financial structure of public universities in Malaysia has continued to be characterised by a strong and structural reliance on government grants, decreasing per-student spending, and insufficient ability to generate autonomous income. This conceptual paper, based on Institutional Theory and in particular the terms of institutional logics and loose coupling, critically discusses the nature, factors, and implications of financial unsustainability in Malaysian public HLIs. This analysis has shown that financial sustainability is not simply a fiscal management issue but an even more institutional phenomenon influenced by conflicting logics of academic mission and market accountability. The paper goes further to explore how Malaysia Higher Education Blueprint 2026-2035 (MHEB 2026-2035) and the New Funding Formula (NFF) reconfigure the financial governance terrain, escalating institutional demands on public universities to diversify their revenue streams and achieve performance-based results. In its argument, the paper contends that it is not only necessary to technically reform funding mechanisms but also contextually sensitive institutional strategies that align competing organisational logics in order to achieve financial sustainability in the Malaysian context. Moreover, the analysis contributes to the higher education finance literature as it provides a policy-synthesized, theoretically based analysis of financial sustainability within a developing-country setting.

financial sustainability, Malaysian public universities

1. Ahmad, A. R., Jamaludin, M. A. I., Sapry, H. R. M., & Jameel, A. S. (2023). Designing strategies framework for effective funding formula implementation at Malaysian public universities. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(6), e002359. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i6.2359 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, A. R., Jamaludin, M. A. I., & Sapry, H. R. M. (2024). Development of New Funding Formula in Malaysian Public Universities. In N. Mansour & L. Bujosa (Eds.), Islamic Finance: Contributions to Management Science (pp. 517-525). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48770-5_41 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bernama. (2026, January 27). *RPTM 2026-2035 to strengthen IPT governance, benefit students - Higher Education DG*. Retrieved from https://bernama.com/misc/rss/news.php/news.php?id=2517304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Baker, I. (2024). Institutional logics as a theoretical framework: A comparison of performance based funding policies in the United Kingdom, Germany, and France. Higher Education Policy, *37*(1), 73 88. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-022-00295-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bernama. (2026, February 11). AUKU must remain dynamic, evolve with changing times - Zambry. https://bernama.com/en/general/news.php?id=2522643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dougherty, K. J., & Natow, R. S. (2020). Performance-based funding for higher education: How well does neoliberal theory capture neoliberal practice? Educational Policy, *34*(4), 605 637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818807321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fowles, J. (2014). Funding and focus: Resource dependence in public higher education. Research in Higher Education, 55(3), 272-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9311-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 232-263). University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Idris Jusoh, D. S. (2016, October 27). Minister to meet public university vice-chancellors on reducing independence on govt. Astro Awani. https://international.astroawani.com/malaysia-news/minister-meet-public-university-vicechancellors-reducing-independence-govt-120711 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Jaafar, J. A., Latiff, A. R. A., Daud, Z. M., & Osman, M. N. H. (2023). Does revenue diversification strategy affect the financial sustainability of Malaysian public universities? A panel data analysis. Higher Education Policy, 36(1), 116-143. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00247-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kivisto, J. (1999). Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education. Higher Education, *38*(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003703214848 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Makki, A. A., & Al-Filali, I. Y. (2024). Modeling the strategic enablers of financial sustainability in Saudi higher education institutions using an integrated decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory–interpretive structural modeling approach. Sustainability, 16(2), 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020685 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mamat, S., Nik Ahmad, N. N., & Mohd Said, J. (2021). Financial sustainability in Malaysian public universities: Coping with or embracing change? Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(5), 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-09-2020-0157 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ministry of Education Malaysia (MoE). (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Ministry of Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MoHE). (2016). University Transformation Programme (UniTP) Purple Book: Enhancing University Income Generation, Endowment and Waqf. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MoHE). (2026). Malaysia Higher Education Blueprint 2026-2035. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.mohe.gov.my/en/rptm-muat-turun [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nik Ahmad, N. N., Ismail, S., & Siraj, S. A. (2019). Financial sustainability of Malaysian public universities: Officers' perceptions. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(2), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2017-0140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). The financial sustainability of higher education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f544ccfe-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). (2024). Financial sustainability of the UK higher education sector. Universities UK. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.co.uk/industries/government-public-sector/education/financial-sustainability-of-uk-higher-education-sector.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Schiller, D., & Liefner, I. (2007). Higher education funding reform and university-industry links in developing countries: The case of Thailand. Higher Education, 54(4), 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9011-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tolbert, P. S. (1985). Institutional environments and resource dependence: Sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher education. Administrative science quarterly, 1-13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study