Suami Budi and	Family Well-Being: A Conceptual Framework of Culturally Grounded Husband Leadership

This paper aims to develop a conceptual framework of suami budi as a culturally grounded form of husband leadership and to examine its role in shaping family well-being. While contemporary family research increasingly emphasizes relational and emotional dimensions of marriage, the literature remains largely Western-centric, with limited integration of indigenous value systems. Addressing this gap, the present study conceptualizes suami budi, rooted in Malay cultural philosophy, as a multidimensional construct comprising budi bicara (wise judgment), budi bahasa (respectful communication), and budi pekerti (moral conduct). Drawing on emotional intelligence, ethical leadership, and relational theories, the proposed framework positions relationship quality as a mediating mechanism linking husband leadership to family well-being outcomes. The key contribution of this paper lies in extending family and leadership literature by embedding culturally specific values into a theoretically grounded model. The framework offers important implications for both theory and practice and provides a foundation for future empirical validation across diverse cultural contexts.

Keywords

suami budi, husband leadership, family well-being, emotional intelligence, cultural values

Downloads

PDF JATS XML

References

1. Ahmad, N. A., & Ismail, H. N. (2022). Cultural values and leadership practices in Malaysian society. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(9/10), 789–803. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Andrepati, A., Sharma, R., & Verma, P. (2025). Emotional intelligence and marital satisfaction: A dyadic approach to family resilience. Journal of Family Relations, 42(1), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0005678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bachman, J. R., Bipp, T., & Kleingeld, A. (2023). Contextualizing leadership research: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 34(5), 101678. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Banks, G. C., Fischer, T., Gooty, J., & Stock, G. (2021). Ethical leadership: Mapping the terrain for concept cleanup and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(2), 101471. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2021). A meta-analytic review of authentic and ethical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(3), 101378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Barbosa, I., Duarte, A. P., & Filipe, J. A. (2024). Integrating leadership and well-being: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 11(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-07-2023-0192 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bhoir, A., & Sinha, S. (2024). Systematic literature reviews in management research: Methodological insights and future directions. Management Review Quarterly, 74(2), 567–590. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00345-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Celidwen, Y., & Keltner, D. (2023). Kin relationality and ecological belonging: A cultural psychology of Indigenous transcendence. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 994508. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.994508 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chen, X. (2025). Advancing conceptual research in social sciences: Methodological rigor and theory building. Journal of Theoretical Social Research, 12(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41, 745–783. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Chua, R. Y., Kadirvelu, A., Yasin, S., & Park, M. S. A. (2021). An exploratory model of family resilience processes and functioning: A cultural perspective of the Semai Indigenous communities in Perak, Malaysia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(6), 567–582. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Coronado-Maldonado, I., & Benítez-Márquez, M. D. (2023). Emotional intelligence, leadership, and teams: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Cotrim, T. P., & Gomes, J. F. S. (2024). Conceptual development and empirical validation in organizational research: Bridging the gap. European Management Journal, 42(2), 210–220. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Crandall, A., Magnusson, B. M., & Novilla, M. L. B. (2024). A conceptual model of family well-being: Integrating relational and social dimensions. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 16(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12543 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Czakert, J. P., & Berger, J. (2024). Leadership and well-being: A meta-analytic review of underlying mechanisms. Current Psychology, 43(5), 3890–3905. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Defriend, C., & Cook, C. M. (2024). Reawakening of Indigenous matriarchal systems: A feminist approach to organizational leadership. Healthcare Management Forum, 37(3), 160–163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704231210255 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. (2021). Leadership and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2023). Dyadic coping and relationship functioning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 37(1), 12–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Fischer, R., Boer, D., & Harms, P. (2022). Cultural values and leadership effectiveness: A meta-analytic review. Journal of World Business, 57(1), 101274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Gao, N., Liu, Y., Tang, X., et al. (2025). Emotional and behavioral dynamics in family interactions. arXiv preprint. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ghumman, S., Kaur, H., & Singh, L. (2025). Relational processes and family cohesion: The mediating role of emotional regulation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(3), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407524123001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hashim, R., & Hassan, Z. (2022). Cultural values and Malay identity: Revisiting the concept of budi. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 53(2), 245–260. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta- analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2021). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? Journal of Management, 47(2), 442–468. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Holt-Lunstad, J. (2021). The major health implications of social connection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(3), 251–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2020). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ismail, N. A., Rahman, A. A., & Karim, M. R. (2023). Indigenous values and leadership practices in Malaysian contexts. Asian Journal of Business Research, 13(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Jackson, T. (2021). Cultural values and leadership effectiveness: A global perspective. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 28(3), 521–540. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Jogulu, U. (2021). Cross-cultural leadership: Insights and implications. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(5), 765–780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2020). Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 21st century: A critical review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 199–223. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Kelly, D., & Nicholson, A. (2022). Ancestral leadership: Place-based intergenerational leadership. Leadership, 18(1), 140–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Kenttä, G., & Virtaharju, P. (2023). The role of contextual factors in leadership and well-being: A multidisciplinary perspective. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 18(6), 1456–1468. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541231123456 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Kocyigit, M. (2025). Emotional regulation and couple well-being: Reducing relational stress through adaptive strategies. Journal of Family Psychology, 39(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Lee, A., Lyubovnikova, J., Tian, A. W., & Knight, C. (2023). Servant leadership: A meta- analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(3), 399–427. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Lemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2022). Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 148–187. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Li, J. (2021). Incorporating indigenous cultural values into mainstream organizational research: A call for contextual relevance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 52(4), 321–336. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221211012345 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Li, Y., Huang, L., Naseem, S., & Shen, Q. (2025). Emotional intelligence and well-being: The mediating role of work-family support. Frontiers in Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2020). Emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(5), 493–512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Miller, D. (2007). Paradigm prison, or in praise of atheoretic research. Strategic Organization, 5(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007077551 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Molina-Moreno, M., García-López, E., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2024). Emotional intelligence and family functioning: A longitudinal study on cohesion and relational stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 38(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Simpson, J. A. (2022). Regulation processes in intimate relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 607–633. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Overall, N. C., Hammond, M. D., McNulty, J. K., & Russell, B. C. (2022). The social psychology of intimate relationships: Pathways to health and well-being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(4), e12661. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Pandey, A. (2025). A systematic literature review on employee well-being. Acta Psychologica. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Ponnapalli, A., Fisher, T., & Turner, K. M. T. (2023). Exploring Indigenous community conceptions of parent wellbeing: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3585. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Prime, H., Wade, M., & Browne, D. T. (2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during crisis contexts. American Psychologist, 75(5), 631–643. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Putung, S. H., & Azahari, R. (2021). Husband’s leadership and its relation to family functionality: A discussion. International Research Journal of Shariah, Muamalat and Islam (IRJSMI), 3(7), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Rahim, A. A., Said, M. F., & Karim, N. A. (2022). Revisiting Malay values in contemporary society: The relevance of budi. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 12(4), 150–162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Rahman, F. A., Yusof, M., & Salleh, N. M. (2023). Revisiting Malay cultural constructs in modern organizational contexts. Asian Journal of Social Science, 51(2), 233–248. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2021). Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Sajjad, A., Eweje, G., & Tappin, D. (2023). Integrative leadership research: Addressing fragmentation and advancing theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2105–2118. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3221 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035–1064. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Tjimuku, M. (2025). Emotional intelligence and psychological capital: A systematic review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2021). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 101495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Walsh, F. (2021). Family resilience: A dynamic systems framework. Family Process, 60(3), 825–839. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Washington, S. A., & Johnson, L. (2023). Toward culturally sustaining/revitalizing Indigenous family-school-community leadership. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1192095. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Yusof, N. M., & Abdullah, H. (2023). Cultural philosophy and leadership identity in Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Suami Budi and Family Well-Being: A Conceptual Framework of Culturally Grounded Husband Leadership

Authors

Article Information

Publication Timeline

Abstract

Keywords

Downloads

References

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles