Writing with AI: ESL Undergraduates’ Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, and QuillBot reflects the growing role of digital technologies in transforming language learning and academic writing practices. In line with the broader shift toward technology-enhanced learning, this study examines how English as a Second Language (ESL) undergraduates use AI tools in academic writing and explores their perceptions of AI-assisted learning. A group of ESL undergraduate students participated in a post-task survey after using AI tools to complete academic writing assignments. The study investigates patterns of AI use across different stages of the writing process, namely pre-writing, drafting, and revision, and evaluates students’ perceptions in terms of usefulness, ease of use, writing confidence, and learner autonomy. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses were analysed thematically. The findings indicate that AI tools are primarily used for idea generation, language support, and grammatical improvement, especially during drafting and revision. Students reported increased efficiency and confidence, although varying levels of dependence were also observed. While most participants viewed AI as a valuable learning aid, concerns regarding overdependence, reduced originality, and academic integrity were also identified. Importantly, students tended to conceptualise AI as a writing partner rather than a replacement for human effort. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) theory, the study highlights how perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use influence AI adoption, while learner autonomy mediates responsible engagement with AI tools. The findings suggest that AI-assisted writing, when pedagogically scaffolded, can enhance ESL learners’ writing development without undermining independent learning. The study offers practical implications for integrating AI tools ethically and effectively in ESL writing instruction.

Artificial intelligence, ESL writing, AI-assisted writing, learner autonomy, academic writing

1. Bahri, H., & Mahadi, T. S. T. (2016). Google Translate as a supplementary tool for learning Malay: A case study at Universiti Sains Malaysia. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(3), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.7575/aac.alls.v.7n.3p.161 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Marzuki, A. G., et al. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on ESL students’ writing performance. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Sharmithashini, M., & Hashim, H. (2025). Sustaining ESL writing development with AI-driven automated feedback systems: A systematic review. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Wang, Y., & Han, J. (2024). The impact of AI-based feedback on ESL students’ writing performance and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100167. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT for academic writing: A study of its capabilities and implications. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11170-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zulkefli, N. H., & Ismail, H. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence and learner autonomy in ESL writing classrooms. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(2), 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Revolutionizing Library Services in Nairobi: Ethical Implications and Future Trends in User Interaction
• ESPYREAL: A Mobile Based Multi-Currency Identifier for Visually Impaired Individuals Using Convolutional Neural Network
• Comparative Analysis of AI-Driven IoT-Based Smart Agriculture Platforms with Blockchain-Enabled Marketplaces
• AI-Based Dish Recommender System for Reducing Fruit Waste through Spoilage Detection and Ripeness Assessment
• SEA-TALK: An AI-Powered Voice Translator and Southeast Asian Dialects Recognition