SimBegin Course and the Simulation-Based Learning: How is it Perceived and its Potential Impact. The Lesson from SaferBirths Bundle of Care Implementation Project.

Background: The SimBegin® course prepares facilitators to deliver simulation-based training, which was key in the SaferBirths Bundle of Care (SBBC) implementation program in Tanzania. Despite SBBC’s success in reducing maternal and newborn mortality, facilitators’ perspectives on SimBegin® and its scalability remain underexplored
Methods: The study, conducted from April to September 2025 in five regions of Tanzania, used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected via a validated questionnaire, and qualitative data through key informant interviews. Participants were SimBegin®-trained doctors and nurses. Quantitative data were analyzed in Excel, while qualitative data followed Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic approach.
Results: A total of 71 Respondents completed the survey and 16 participated in interview. The median age was 35 years, with most being diploma-level nurses. Face-to-face training was perceived as most effective. Nearly all respondents (99%) considered SimBegin® course essential for facilitator preparation and scaling simulation-based learning. Effective facilitator preparation and repeated training were considered critical for strengthening competence.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that SimBegin® course is key to enhance facilitators skills and confidence to facilitate simulation-based learning. SimBegin® course is critical for scale up of simulation-based lerning.

Simulation-based learning, SimBegin® Course, Facilitators

1. Rodriguez-Paz JM, Kennedy M, Salas E, Wu AW, Sexton JB, Hunt EA, et al. Beyond “see one, do one, teach one”: toward a different training paradigm. BMJ Qual Saf 2009;18:63–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/QSHC.2007.023903. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Rogathi J, Kidayi P. Simulation-based education advocacy for patient safety in a limited resource country, experiences from Tanzania. Eur J Midwifery 2023;7. https://doi.org/10.18332/EJM/172341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Elendu C, Amaechi DC, Okatta AU, Amaechi EC, Elendu TC, Ezeh CP, et al. The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine 2024;103:e38813. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bearman M, Greenhill J, Nestel D. The power of simulation: a large-scale narrative analysis of learners’ experiences. Med Educ 2019;53:369–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/MEDU.13747. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Auerbach M, Stone KP, Patterson MD. The Role of Simulation in Improving Patient Safety 2016:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24187-6_5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Lamé G, Dixon-Woods M. Using clinical simulation to study how to improve quality and safety in healthcare. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2020;6:87. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2018-000370. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Peterson DT, Watts PI, Epps CA, White ML. Simulation Faculty Development: A Tiered Approach. Simulation in Healthcare 2017;12:254–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Vadla MS, Foss B, Torgeirsen K. SimBegin: an evidence-based entry-level facilitator program. Adi Health + Wellness 2024:1–3. https://doi.org/10.54531/FNAB4270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kamala BA, Ersdal HL, Mduma E, Moshiro R, Girnary S, Østrem OT, et al. SaferBirths bundle of care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster implementation project in 30 public health-facilities in five regions, Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res 2021;21:1117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07145-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Kamala BA, Moshiro R, Kalabamu FS, Kjetil T, Guga G, Githiri B, et al. Practice, Experiences, and Facilitators of Simulation-Based Training During One Year of Implementation in 30 Hospitals in Tanzania. SAGE Open Nurs 2025;11. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608241309447. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Shrestha S, Giri SA. Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education 2021;2:25–36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Morata L. An evolutionary concept analysis of futility in health care. J Adv Nurs 2018;74:1289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/JAN.13526. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rahimi S, khatooni M. Saturation in qualitative research: An evolutionary concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud Adv 2024;6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Clarke V, Braun V. Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. Psychologist 2013;26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? Qual Health Res 2016;26:1802–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Haynes J, Bjorland P, Gomo Ø, Ushakova A, Rettedal S, Perlman J, et al. Novel Neonatal Simulator Provides High-Fidelity Ventilation Training Comparable to Real-Life Newborn Ventilation. Children (Basel) 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.3390/CHILDREN8100940. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Vadla MS, Foss B, Torgeirsen K. SimBegin: an evidence-based entry-level facilitator program. Adi Health + Wellness 2024:1–3. https://doi.org/10.54531/FNAB4270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Folkvord SE, Borlaug T, Risa CF. Midwifery students’ experiences after participation in the SimBegin® facilitator course. Nurse Educ Pract 2025;86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Anorue HC, Ekuma JE, Olinya TO, Nwandu LO. Empowering vocational educators instructional delivery through information and communication technology training in universities. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) 2023;17:555–65. https://doi.org/10.11591/EDULEARN.V17I4.20311. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Anbari H, Kerari A. Self-Confidence and Satisfaction in Simulation-Based Learning and Clinical Competence Among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Mixed-Methods Sequential Explanatory Study. Behavioral Sciences 2025;15:984. https://doi.org/10.3390/BS15070984. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kamala BA, Ersdal HL, Moshiro RD, Guga G, Dalen I, Kvaløy JT, et al. Outcomes of a Program to Reduce Birth-Related Mortality in Tanzania. New England Journal of Medicine 2025;392:1100–10. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA2406295;WGROUP:STRING:MMS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Badawi A Al, Alinier G, Nashwan AJ. Tailoring facilitation strategies to enhance learning outcomes in nursing simulations: A practical guide. Qatar Med J 2025;2025. https://doi.org/10.5339/QMJ.2025.89. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wasti SP, Simkhada P, Teijlingen ER van, Sathian B, Banerjee I. The Growing Importance of Mixed-Methods Research in Health. Nepal J Epidemiol 2022;12:1175. https://doi.org/10.3126/NJE.V12I1.43633. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Measuring Waste of Patient Time in Health Care at Non-Digitized Hospital: An Observational Study in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Bangladesh
• Reaffirming Clinical Confidence in Atorvastatin Therapy: A Digital Outreach Case Study from Tamil Nadu, India
• Clinical Manifestations and Therapeutic Response in a Patient with Hypothyroidism: A Case Report
• Eranda (Ricinus Communis) In Gridhrasi (Sciatica): Classical Rationale, Pharmacology and Clinical Evidence- A Narrative Literature Review
• Magnetotherapy in Pain Management: Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Future Perspectives – A Review