Teachers’ Implementation of Integrative Curriculum, Practices and Innovative Instructional Strategies
Authors
Guimaras State University (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1026EDU0267
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 10/26 | Page No: 3395-3413
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-04-29
Accepted: 2026-05-04
Published: 2026-05-26
Abstract
This descriptive-correlational study determined the extent of implementation of the integrative curriculum, teachers’ practices, and innovative instructional strategies among secondary schools in the Schools Division of Iloilo City, Philippines, for the school year 2025–2026. The respondents were 125 Junior and Senior High School Social Studies teachers. The independent variables included sex, age, grade level taught, position, educational attainment, and length of service, while the dependent variables were the extent of implementation of the integrative curriculum, teaching practices, and innovative instructional strategies. Data were gathered using a researcher-made questionnaire that underwent validity and reliability testing, yielding acceptable reliability coefficients. Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, rank, and mean were used, while inferential statistics including Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis H test, and Spearman Rho correlation were employed. All statistical analyses were processed using SPSS at a 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed that teachers demonstrated a very high extent of integrative curriculum implementation, very high levels of integrative teaching practices, and very high innovative instructional strategies in instruction. No significant differences were found in the extent of implementation, practices, and innovative instructional strategies when teachers were classified according to sex, age, grade level taught, position, and educational attainment. However, a significant difference was observed in innovative instructional strategies when classified according to length of service, with teachers having ten years or less of experience showing higher level of innovative instructional strategies. Significant positive relationships were found among curriculum implementation, teaching practices, and innovative instructional strategies, indicating that effective implementation of the integrative curriculum enhances instructional practices and fosters creative teaching.
Keywords
Integrative Curriculum, Teaching Practices, Innovative Instructional Strategies, Social Studies, Secondary Education
Downloads
References
1. Adewale, S. (2024). The nexus between teachers’ demographic characteristics and utilisation of 21st-century collaborative teaching strategies in classrooms. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.6.22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ahmed, I., & Ishtiaq, S. (2021). Reliability and validity: Importance in medical research. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 71(10), 2401–2406. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.06-861 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Agoncillo, R. (2020). Relevant component of the integrated approach for teachers’ teaching practices, improving teachers’ competence in education. The Education Quarterly, 2. The Department of Education Publication. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Andersson, M., Boateng, K., & Abos, P. (2024). Validity and Reliability: The Extent to Which Your Research Findings Are Accurate and Consistent. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Barroga, E., Matanguihan, G. J., Furuta, A., Arima, M., Tsuchiya, S., Kawahara, C., Takamiya, Y., & Izumi, M. (2023). Conducting and writing quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 38(37). https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e291 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Chadafi, M., Rasuan, Z. B., & Novrieta, D. (2024). The correlation between students’ achievement in using adjectives and their ability in writing descriptive text. EEDJ English Education Journal, 3(2), 65– [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. https://doi.org/10.32923/eedj.v3i2.4471 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Clayback, K., Williford, A., & Vitiello, V. (2022). Identifying teacher beliefs and experiences associated with curriculum implementation fidelity in early childhood education. Prevention Science, 24, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01414-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Crisostomo, L., Uenoyama, S., Sagisaka, K., & Tomita, A. (2020). Comparison of astronomy school education curricula between Philippines and Japan. Revista Latino-Americana de Educação em Astronomia, (29), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.37156/relea/2020.29.087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Del Yunting, J., Santos, M., Ampong, A., Mejos, D., & Monreal, J. (2025). Evaluating teachers’ perceptions on the first year of MATATAG curriculum implementation among selected schools: A quantitative analysis. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.47139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Domingo, L. (2025). Secondary teachers’ level of ICT integration in lesson delivery: Basis for the development of a training program. Pantao (International Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences). https://doi.org/10.69651/pijhss0403405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ercan, G., & Çubukçu, Z. (2023). Curriculum implementation approaches of secondary school English teachers: A case study. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi-2021-0006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Espiritu, D., & Abao-An, D. (2025). Developing innovative strategies for inclusive education: Focus on teaching strategies. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i4-04 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Michael Fullan. (2016). The New Meaning of Educational Change. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Gregorio, L. G. (2022). DepED Order No. 21, s.2019, the implementing rules and regulations of the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013, highlights the importance of an integrative approach in the curriculum. The Educative News Educational Magazine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Igarashi, T., & Suryadarma, D. (2023). Foundational mathematics and reading skills of Filipino students over a generation. International Journal of Educational Development, 96, 102688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. King, S., Wang, L., Nylen, B., & Enders, O. (2023). Prevalence of research design in special education: A survey of peer-reviewed journals. Remedial and Special Education, 44(6), 480–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231152453 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Marek, M. C., Lizárraga-Dueñas, L. I., Woulfin, S. L., Wetzel, M. M., & Muñoz, E. (2024). A framework for curriculum literacy in initial teacher preparation: Policy, practices, and possibilities. Journal of Teacher Education, 76(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871241263803 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Montalvo, T. E. (2022). DepED’s implementation of integrative curriculum approach: Interconnectedness of various subjects in its K–12 program. The Educative News Educational Magazine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Muhlisin, M., Sofi, M. J., Shobirin, M., & Deporos, S. R. C. (2023). The quality improvement assistantship program for Madrasa education in Mindanao, the Philippines. Dimas Jurnal Pemikiran Agama Untuk Pemberdayaan, 23(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.21580/dms.2023.231.14950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Musofer, R. P., & Lingard, B. (2020). Bourdieu and position-making in a changing field: Enactment of the national curriculum in Australia. The Curriculum Journal, 32(3), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.88 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Okyere, M. (2025). Critical analysis of Michael Fullan’s theory of curriculum: A systematic review of its strengths, weaknesses, relevance to contemporary curriculum change, and application to Ghana’s standards-based and common core curriculum reforms. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7442040/v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Rogan, J., & Grayson, D. J. (2003). Towards a theory of curriculum implementation with particular reference to science in developing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1171–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145819 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Rogayan, D. V., & Mendoza, Ma. S. G. (2023). Internationalization practices and preparations: A case of a state university in Central Luzon, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research, 4(11), 3950–3965. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.11.15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Sinakou, E., Donche, V., & Van Petegem, P. (2023). Teachers’ profiles in education for sustainable development: Interests, instructional beliefs, and instructional practices. Environmental Education Research, 30, 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2168622 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Suroso, S., Solaiman, S. M., & Fanani, A. (2024). The relationship between the effectiveness of school principal leadership in improving the quality of education. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia (JPAII), 5(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.37251/jpaii.v5i2.885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Tan, L., & Wei, B. (2024). How science teachers deal with STEM education: An explorative study from the lens of curriculum ideology. Science Education, 109(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21904 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Valido, J. (2025). Teaching practices in reading skills of primary grade learners and class reading performance in Filipino: Foundation for an enhanced reading instructional program. International Journal of Education Humanities and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.54922/ijehss.2025.0919 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. William, F. (2024). Mastering validity and reliability in academic research: Meaning and significance. International Journal of Research Publications, 144(1), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001441320246160 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Yang, Y., & Zhang, L.-X. (2023). Building professional resilience: School music teachers’ instructional practice development under curriculum reform. Research Studies in Music Education, 47(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X231209692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study