Oil Subsidy and Poverty Reduction in Nigeria: An Empirical Assessment of Economic and Social Implications

Authors

Prof Ademola Azeez

Department of Political Science College of Social and Management Sciences Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti Ekiti State, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Olaleye I. Oluseyi

Department of Political Science College of Social and Management Sciences Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti Ekiti State, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Olalekan Samuel Fatokun

Department of International Relations and Diplomacy College of Social and Management Science Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti Ekiti State, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500173

Subject Category: Policy Economy

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 2484-2490

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-04-29

Accepted: 2026-05-05

Published: 2026-05-26

Abstract

This study interrogates the complex relationship between oil subsidy policies, poverty dynamics, and economic development in Nigeria within the broader context of resource governance and social welfare. For decades, fuel subsidies have been positioned as a redistributive mechanism intended to cushion the effects of energy price volatility on citizens, particularly the poor. However, recent policy shifts, most notably the removal of fuel subsidies in 2023, have exposed underlying structural contradictions in the Nigerian economy. Drawing on secondary data from national and international sources, as well as contemporary empirical literature (2022-2025), this study adopts a descriptive and analytical approach to examine how subsidy regimes influence poverty levels, inflation, and household welfare. The analysis reveals that while subsidies historically provided short-term relief through reduced transportation and energy costs, their long-term impact has been limited by inefficiency, fiscal leakage, and regressive benefit distribution. Conversely, subsidy removal has generated immediate macroeconomic adjustments, including sharp increases in fuel prices, rising inflation, and declining real incomes, thereby intensifying poverty and economic vulnerability, particularly among urban and informal sector populations. The findings suggest that neither subsidy retention nor abrupt removal, in isolation, offers a sustainable pathway to poverty reduction. Rather, the effectiveness of subsidy reform depends on the presence of strong institutional frameworks, targeted social protection mechanisms, and transparent reinvestment of public savings. The study concludes by advocating for a balanced policy approach that prioritizes human development, equity, and long-term economic resilience.

Keywords

Oil Subsidy; Poverty; Nigeria; Inflation; Economic Development; Welfare Policy; Energy Pricing; Social Protection; Fiscal Policy; Human Development

Downloads

References

1. Adegbite, T. A. (2019). Fuel subsidy and economic development in Nigeria. Energy Economics Review, 45(2), 112–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2024). Annual economic report 2023. Central Bank of Nigeria. https://www.cbn.gov.ng [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Coady, D., Parry, I., Le, N. P., & Shang, B. (2023). Global fossil fuel subsidies remain large: An update based on country-level estimates. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 00149. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). Africa energy outlook 2023. IEA Publications. https://www.iea.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. International Monetary Fund. (2023). Nigeria: Fuel subsidy reform and economic outlook. IMF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). Nigeria: Staff report for the 2024 Article IV consultation. IMF. https://www.imf.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2023). Nigeria poverty and inequality report 2022. NBS. https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2024). Consumer price index report (2024). NBS. https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Onyema, C., & Nwankwo, S. (2021). Oil subsidy and inequality in Nigeria. African Development Review, 33(4), 567–580. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023). Reforming fossil fuel subsidies: A review of best practices. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Human development report 2023/2024: Breaking the gridlock. UNDP. https://hdr.undp.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2023). Measuring fossil fuel subsidies in the context of sustainable development. UNEP. https://www.unep.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Udo, E. J., Okon, E. O., & Etim, R. S. (2025). Evaluating the inflationary consequences of fuel subsidy removal: An econometric approach to price transmission in Nigeria. Journal of African Economic Studies, 12(1), 45–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. World Bank. (2022). Nigeria poverty assessment. World Bank Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. World Bank. (2023). Nigeria development update: Seizing the opportunity. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. World Bank. (2024). Poverty and equity brief: Nigeria. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Yusuf, A., & Resnick, D. (2020). Political economy of fuel subsidy reform. Energy Policy, 138, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles