Media Analysis of Sexist Humor Content about Culture of Uang Panai on Social Media

The development of social media, particularly TikTok, has changed the way culture and social values are represented in digital spaces. This study aims to analyze the representation of sexist humor in bride price cultural content on the TikTok platform using Stuart Hall's representation theory. The method used is a qualitative approach with media analysis of video content depicting humorous narratives related to the practice of bride price in Bugis society. The results of the study show that humor content on TikTok represents women as objects of economic transactions through the “unboxing” format that resembles consumer culture. Humor in this content functions as a normalization mechanism that makes messages with sexist and patriarchal nuances more acceptable to audiences. Furthermore, this representation also reflects the reproduction of patriarchal ideology in digital spaces, where men are portrayed as holders of economic power while women are positioned as objects to be 'acquired.' Nevertheless, the meaning formed is dynamic because the audience plays an active role in the process of meaning-making through interaction on social media. This study asserts that social media is not only a space for entertainment but also an arena for the construction of meaning that influences the formation of gender perceptions and culture in society.

Digital Medi, Humor Sexist, Uang Panai, Representation

1. Ahmad, & Andaryuni, L. (2025). Peran Uang Panai dalam Membentuk Ketimpangan Sosial di Masyarakat Bugis (Teori Talcott Parsons). SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 4(11), 3668–3676. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v4i11.4984 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Apyunita, D., Ramly, & Aziz. (2023). Cerminan Sosial Tradisi Suku Bugis-Makassar dalam Film Uang Panai’ Maha(R)L. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Sastra, 9(1), 274–291. https://e-journal.my.id/onoma [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Aziz, N. A., & Lestari, P. (2018). PERGESERAN MAKNA BUDAYA UANG PANAI’ SUKU BUGIS (STUDI MASYARAKAT KELURAHAN MACINNAE, KECAMATAN PALETEANG, KABUPATEN PINRANG, SULAWESI SELATAN). Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi, 7(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/DOI:https://doi.org/10.21831/e-societas.v7i6.12678 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barta, S., Belanche, D., Fernández, A., & Flavián, M. (2023). Influencer marketing on TikTok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Brandl, E., & Colleran, H. (2024). Does bride price harm women? Using ethnography to think about causality. In Evolutionary Human Sciences (Vol. 6). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2024.21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Demirci, J. R. (2024). About Research: Conducting Better Qualitative Interviews. Journal of Human Lactation, 40(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231213651 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Difa, A. B., & Setyawan, A. G. (2024). REPRESENTASI DALAM MEDIA DAN BUDAYA: PERSPEKTIF TEORI STUART HALL. Prodi Studi Agama-Agama, 2(2), 83–90. https://e-journal.lp2m.uinjambi.ac.id/ojp/index.php/jsa/article/view/5538 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ford, Thomas E, Boxer, Christie F, Armstrong, Jacob, & Edel, Jessica R. (2008). More Than “Just a Joke”: The Prejudice-Releasing Function of Sexist Humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hall, S., Nixon, S., & Evans, J. (1997). Representation Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Culture, media, and identities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ilmiawan, Khaer, F., & Akbar, A. (2025). Dekonstruksi Makna Uang Panai: Perspektif Semiotika Dalam Konteks Gender Dan Budaya. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2), 2988–344. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/lektur.v8i2.23779 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mappatunru, A., & Ismail Zainuddin, S. (2023). Komodifikasi Perempuan dalam Tradisi Uang Panai. Jurnal Anropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 25(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v25.n1.p67-77.2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rifqi, M., & Rahmadi, I. (2025). Literature Review: Strategi Penggunaan Humor pada Iklan Layanan Masyarakat. Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif, 5(2), 2131–2142. https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.1423 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Rinaldi, Nugara, A. B., & Ismail, L. (2023). Uang Panai Sebagai Harga Diri Perempuan Suku Bugis Bone: Antara Adat Dan Agama. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Undiksha, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jpsu.v5i1.64559 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Communication Strategies among Promoters During MATTA Fair 2025
• An Examination of Colleen Ballinger’s Experience in Social Media: Cancel Culture Chronicle
• Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
• Social Media Use on Mental Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults in Port Harcourt City
• (Un)Successful Error Repairs in L2 Communication