Development and Validation of an Adaptive E-Learning Module Website for Teaching Genetics Vocabulary

Authors

Charisse Mae Manatad

Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education; MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City (Philippines)

Monera Salic-Hairulla

Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education; MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City (Philippines)

Ariel Ellare

Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education; MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City (Philippines)

Vanjoreeh Madale

Department of Science and Mathematics Education, College of Education; MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City (Philippines)

Eddie Mondejar

Department of Science and Mathematics, College of Science and Mathematics; MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500217

Subject Category: Biology

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 3083-3092

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-02

Accepted: 2026-05-08

Published: 2026-05-27

Abstract

Genetics remains a challenging topic in Biology because it involves abstract concepts and technical vocabulary that learners often find difficult to understand. This study aimed to develop and validate an adaptive e-learning module website for teaching genetics vocabulary among secondary learners. Using a developmental research design with a quantitative evaluation approach, the study identified weak vocabulary under heredity and genetics and used these as the basis for developing three differentiated module versions: easy, average, and hard. The website was designed to direct learners to an appropriate module based on their pretest performance and guide them through vocabulary-focused activities. The developed website was evaluated using the SMOG Index for readability and expert validation for content quality and technical acceptability. Eight validators participated in the evaluation, composed of five content experts and three ICT experts. Results showed that the three modules were suitable for secondary learners, with SMOG scores of 8.46, 8.86, and 9.62. Content validation showed very high ratings in concept development and context, while ICT validation indicated highly acceptable functionality and accessibility, with excellent ratings in browser compatibility, mobile design-access, and privacy. Overall, the adaptive e-learning module website was found to be readable, content-valid, and technically acceptable for supporting genetics vocabulary instruction.

Keywords

adaptive learning, e-learning module website

Downloads

References

1. Abulkhair, J., Salic-Hairulla, M., Alcopra, A., Malayao, S., & Ellare, A. (2024). Development and validation of video lessons as supplementary materials in teaching heredity among Grade 10 students. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 1(6), 303–310. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aliyeva, T., & Çakır, H. (2025). Digital accessibility in education: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, 10(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.53850/joltida.1467629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Balo, V. T. M., & Sanchez, J. M. P. (2025). Evaluation of educational assessment module for flexible STEM education. STEM Education, 5(1), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barrientos, A. P., Salic-Hairulla, M. A., Malayao, S. O., Jr., Bazer, S. C., & Bagaloyos, J. P. (2024). Development and evaluation of digital interactive Mendelian genetics comic stories (DIMenGeComs) for enhancing conceptual understanding of high school students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(3S), 1293–1302. DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2024.803088S. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Colegado, J. C. (2025). Digital innovations in science education in the Philippines: A scoping review of teaching practices and tools. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6549–6556. DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0479. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dolojan, R. (2024). Android-based learning materials in genetics. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(4), 443–456. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14020533. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gligorea, I., Cioca, M., Oancea, R., Gorski, A.-T., Gorski, H., & Tudorache, P. (2023). Adaptive learning using artificial intelligence in e-learning: A literature review. Education Sciences, 13(12), 1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121216 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Laguindab, D. A. M., Salic-Hairulla, M. A., Madale, V. A., Dinoro, A. P., & Adamat, L. A. (2025). Development of SIMredity: An interactive strategic intervention material in teaching non-Mendelian genetics to Grade 9 learners. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(10), 6267–6279. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Machová, M., & Ehler, E. (2023). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in genetics: Origins and solutions. Journal of Biological Education, 57(3), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1933136 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mino, L. J. D., Limetares, F. F. D., Pitogo, J. D., & Nabua, E. B. (2026). Bridging learning gaps in general chemistry: Diagnostic insights into mastery and self-efficacy. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(12), 3258–3276. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200249 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nurdin, A. M., Gofur, A., Sapta Sari, M., & Munzil. (2025). Technology-supported differentiated biology education: Trends, methods, content, and impacts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), em2598. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16044 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ojo, A. T. (2024). Examination of secondary school students’ conceptual understanding, perceptions, and misconceptions about genetics concepts. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), em0185. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14095 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pitogo, J. D., Limetares, F. F. D., Mino, L. J. D., & Nabua, E. B. (2026). Assessing conceptual understanding and misconceptions of the periodic table among Grade 10 learners: A diagnostic approach. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(12), 3186–3196. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200244 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Putri Azrai, E., Aulya, N. R., Suryanda, A., & Safitri, F. A. (2025). Eco-STEAM: A STEAM-based digital learning website for ecosystem topics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 15(2), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.3065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sangur, K., Zubaidah, S., & Sulisetijono. (2025). A systematic literature review of mobile learning trends in biology education over ten years. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101429 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ula, A., Setyono, P., Yamtinah, S., & Havyarimana, C. (2025). Validity of the content of science e-module based on problem based learning containing ethnoscience to improve students’ critical thinking ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 13(1), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v13i1.41509 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles