Developing Epistemic Fluency: Bridging Theory and Practice in Pre-University Chemistry Education through Design Thinking

Authors

Usha Devi Ramasundram

Faculty of Educational Sciences and Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) (Malaysia)

Johari Surif

Faculty of Educational Sciences and Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500218

Subject Category: Chemistry

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 3093-3107

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-02

Accepted: 2026-05-08

Published: 2026-05-27

Abstract

Epistemic fluency, understood as the capacity to navigate, integrate, and apply multiple forms of knowledge, is increasingly recognised as a critical outcome of science education. Despite this, many students continue to experience difficulty in transferring theoretical knowledge to practical contexts, highlighting a persistent disconnect between conceptual understanding and application. This study investigates how design thinking, conceptualised through a sociocultural lens, supports the development of epistemic fluency among pre-university chemistry students. Adopting a qualitative case study approach, data were collected from six’ students through project proposals, written reports, and classroom observations during a design thinking intervention. The data were analysed thematically to examine shifts in students’ epistemic practices. Findings indicate that students initially demonstrated fragmented understanding and limited ability to apply disciplinary knowledge. However, through collaborative engagement, iterative problem-solving, and interaction with authentic tasks, students progressively developed the capacity to move between theoretical, procedural, and experiential knowledge forms. The study highlights the role of social interaction, guided participation, and artefact construction in mediating learning, supporting the view that epistemic development is socially situated. It contributes to the literature by positioning design thinking as a sociocultural pedagogical approach that fosters epistemic fluency and enhances meaningful learning in chemistry education.

Keywords

Epistemic fluency, design thinking, sociocultural learning

Downloads

References

1. Abelha, M., Fernandes, S., Mesquita, D., Seabra, F., & Ferreira-Oliveira, A. T. (2020). Graduate employability and competence development in higher education-A systematic literature review using PRISMA. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12155900 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bernhard, J., Carstensen, A. K., Davidsen, J., & Ryberg, T. (2019). Practical Epistemic Cognition in a Design Project - Engineering Students Developing Epistemic Fluency. IEEE Transactions on Education, 62(3), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2912348 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bhola, S., & Parchoma, G. (2016). Threshold concepts and conceptual change processes. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 1, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Calavia, M. B., Blanco, T., Casas, R., & Dieste, B. (2023). Making design thinking for education sustainable: Training preservice teachers to address practice challenges. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47(December 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101199 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, X., Li, P., Hruska, E., & Liu, F. (2023). Δ-Machine learning for quantum chemistry prediction of solution-phase molecular properties at the ground and excited states. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13417–13428. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cp00506b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hashim, A. M., Aris, S. R. S., & Fook, C. Y. (2019). Promoting empathy using design thinking in project-based learning and as a classroom culture. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 14–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Karpudewan, M., & Kulandaisamy, Y. (2018). Malaysian teachers’ insights into implementing green chemistry experiments in secondary schools. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.06.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kijima, R., Yang-Yoshihara, M., & Maekawa, M. S. (2021). Using design thinking to cultivate the next generation of female STEAM thinkers. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00271-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kranz, D., Schween, M., & Graulich, N. (2022). Patterns of reasoning - exploring the interplay of students’ work with a scaffold and their conceptual knowledge in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(2), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2rp00132b [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L. (2021). The Curious Construct of Active Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2017). Teaching and Learning for Epistemic Fluency. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education: Innovation, Knowledgeable Action and Actionable Knowledge (Vol. 14, pp. 553–590). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4369-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. McLaughlan, R., & Lodge, J. M. (2019). Facilitating Epistemic Fluency through Design Thinking: A Strategy for the Broader Application of Studio Pedagogy within Higher Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1461621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nakiboglu, C., Rahayu, S., Nakiboğlu, N., & Treagust, D. F. (2023). Exploring senior high-school students’ understanding of electrochemical concepts: patterns of thinking across Turkish and Indonesian contexts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00124e [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nzomo, C., Rugano, P., Njoroge Mungai, J., & Gitonga Muriithi, C. (2023). Inquiry-based learning and students’ self-efficacy in Chemistry among secondary schools in Kenya. Heliyon, 9(1), e12672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12672 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Orozco, M., Boon, M., & Susarrey Arce, A. (2023). Learning electrochemistry through scientific inquiry. Conceptual modelling as learning objective and as scaffold. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2047894 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Panke, S. (2020). Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. van Dinther, R., de Putter, L., & Pepin, B. (2023). Features of Immersive Virtual Reality to Support Meaningful Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1537–1546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c01069 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. van Dulmen, T. H. H., Visser, T. C., Pepin, B., & McKenney, S. (2023). Teacher and student engagement when using learning materials based on the context of cutting-edge chemistry research. Research in Science and Technological Education, 41(4), 1617–1638. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2070147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). Vygotsky ’s Sociocultural Theory. Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, 2007, 26925. http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.phpURL ID=26925&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Wan, D., & Subramaniam, R. (2023). Harnessing indigenous scientific discovery in medicinal chemistry to promote selected nature of science attributes among Chinese high school students: case of Artemisinin. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(3), 1055–1076. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00011G [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Wan Yunus, F., & Mat Ali, Z. (2018). Attitude towards Learning Chemistry among Secondary School Students in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, 3(9), 63. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajbes.v3i9.61 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles