The Effect of Tangibility on Customer Loyalty in Zimbabwe’s Hardware Industry

In Zimbabwe’s hardware industry, tangibility is the cornerstone of customer loyalty, as the physical quality, durability, and reliability of products not only build trust but also transform one-time buyers into lifelong patrons. This sector is experiencing growth driven by urbanization, infrastructure development, and construction activity. Despite its potential, many retail hardware businesses struggle to retain customers, highlighting the need to understand service quality dimensions—particularly tangibility. Grounded in the SERVQUAL model and guided by a pragmatist philosophy, the research employs a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to examine the relationship between tangibility and customer loyalty. A cross-sectional survey design was employed, targeting a stratified sample of 330 respondents across various hardware outlets. The study revealed that customers in Zimbabwe’s hardware industry place strong importance on tangible factors such as product reliability, store layout, and product quality. These physical cues significantly influence customer loyalty, with elements like visually appealing facilities, organized layouts, and product demonstrations fostering trust and encouraging repeat patronage. Qualitative insights reinforced these findings, with participants emphasizing the importance of sensory experiences, brand presentation, and physical infrastructure in shaping customer perceptions.
The study highlights tangibility as a critical driver of customer loyalty in Zimbabwe’s hardware industry. Product reliability, store layout, and visible service cues are shown to be strategic assets that foster trust and repeat patronage, even amid economic challenges such as inflation and currency instability. The findings emphasize that retailers should invest in tangible service elements to enhance engagement and competitiveness, while policymakers should support frameworks that strengthen consumer confidence. For scholars, the research enriches service quality literature by linking empirical evidence with theory. Overall, the study advocates for tangibility as a pathway to resilience, differentiation, and sustainable loyalty in the evolving retail landscape.

Tangibility Customer Loyalty Hardware Industry

1. Agarwal, R., & Singh, R. (2016). Impact of service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction in retail banking sector. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, M., Ali, M., & Ali, M. (2021). Service quality and customer satisfaction: A study of the banking sector. Journal of Business and Management [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chikazhe, L., Chikazhe, T., & Chikazhe, M. (2022a). Service quality and customer satisfaction in Zimbabwean retail. Journal of African Business [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chikazhe, L., Chikazhe, T., & Chikazhe, M. (2022b). The role of tangibility in service delivery: Evidence from Zimbabwe. African Journal of Marketing Management [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gupta, A., & Rokade, V. (2023). Tangibility and service quality: A study of retail environments. Journal of Retail and Consumer Services [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Irfan, M., Shamsudin, F. M., & Hadi, N. U. (2016). Service quality and customer satisfaction in the retail sector: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Isikli, E., Aydin, H., Celik, M., & Gumus, S. (2017). The relationship between service quality and customer loyalty: A study in the Turkish retail sector. Journal of Business Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kim, S., Fan, X., Chang, Y., & Park, J. (2023). The impact of tangibility on customer satisfaction in service industries. Journal of Services Marketing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kofi, A., & Wilberforce, M. (2018). Service quality and customer loyalty in Ghana’s retail hardware sector. African Journal of Business Management [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lee, J., Kim, H., & Park, S. (2022). Stratified sampling in service quality research: A methodological review. Journal of Applied Research in Business and Economics [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Malik, M. E., Hadi, N. U., & Gaadar, K. (2018). Tangibility and its influence on customer loyalty in the service industry. International Journal of Business and Social Science [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Manhiwa, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors in Zimbabwe’s hardware industry. Zimbabwe Journal of Business Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Muchaendepi, W., Mbohwa, C., & Mhlanga, S. (2019). Pragmatism in African business research: A contextual approach. Journal of African Business [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Osman, Z., & Sentosa, I. (2018). SERVQUAL model and customer satisfaction in Malaysian retail. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Panda, T. K., & Das, S. (2022). Tangibility in service marketing: A conceptual review. Journal of Services Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Reheul, A. M., Van Caneghem, T., & Verbruggen, S. (2019). Measuring service quality in retail: A SERVQUAL application. Journal of Retail and Consumer Services [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Shariff, M. N. M., Ahmad, N. H., & Zainol, F. A. (2025). Tangibility and service quality in emerging markets: A comparative study. International Journal of Emerging Markets [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sureshchandar, G. S. (2013). Customer-centric service scapes: A conceptual framework. Journal of Services Research [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Taramax. (2020). Housing boom in Zimbabwe: A post-dollarization analysis. Zimbabwe Economic Review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Yee, R. W. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2017). The impact of service tangibility on customer loyalty: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Services Marketing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Yilmaz, V., & Ari, E. (2017). The effects of service quality on customer loyalty: A study in the Turkish retail sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Study on Utilisation on Vidiyal Payanam with Special Reference to Udumalpet
• Influence of Sales Promotional Strategies on Water Purifier Purchase: A Study
• Voluptatem exercitat
• Beatae voluptatum eanfjnjfnjnj
• Analysis of Marketing Strategies in Newbridge College During Covid-19 Pandemic