Women as Custodians of Intangible Cultural Heritage: An Empirical Study of Cultural Participation and Continuity in Chettinad, Tamil Nadu

This study examined women as custodians of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) practices in Chettinad, Tamil Nadu, India with a focus on socio-cultural reproduction and cultural continuity. From the primary survey (N=126), the study develops a Cultural Participation Index (CPI) and examined the cultural practices of heritage conservation and transmission as outcomes of the regional women's participation and contribution. The present study conceptualises cultural participation as a mediating process between structural conditions, such as family type, migration and digital access, and outcomes of cultural sustainability, focusing on the perspectives of ICH and gender-based cultural agency. which. The findings show that although the level of cultural participation is mostly moderate, there is a strong relationship with familial and social contexts, with joint-family structures supporting a higher participation and preserving traditions across generations. Contrary to the linear understanding of cultural erosion, migration does not seriously affect the continuity of cultural practices across different spatial contexts; instead, it maintains resilience and adaptability of cultural practices. The study goes further to underscore the new role of digital connectivity as an enabling mechanism in the sustenance of cultural knowledge and practices. The results of the study substantiate UNESCO’s Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) framework, which specifically emphasises community involvement and intergenerational transmission. The study contributes to broader debates on gender, heritage and community identity by positioning women as agents of cultural reproduction, and demonstrating how cultural reproduction can be found in everyday practices that resist change in fast-transforming socio-economic contexts. The results also support the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, such as SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), and SDG 4 (Quality Education).

Women and Heritage, Heritage Agents, Cultural continuity

1. [Agarwal, 1997] Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/135457097338799 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. [Anthias, 2012] Anthias, F. (2012). Transnational mobilities, migration research and intersectionality. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 2(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10202-011-0032-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. [Arizpe, 2020] Arizpe, L. (2020). Culture, diversity and heritage: Major studies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40779-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. [Bebbington et al., 2021] Bebbington, A., Abdulai, A.-G., Humphreys Bebbington, D., Hinfelaar, M., & Sanborn, C. (2021). Governing extractive industries: Politics, histories, ideas. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. [Blake, 2015] Blake, J. (2015). International cultural heritage law. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. [Blake, 2020] Blake, J. (2020). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage in the 21st century. International Journal of Cultural Property, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739120000119 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. [Bortolotto, 2011] Bortolotto, C. (2011). From objects to processes: UNESCO’s “intangible cultural heritage”. Journal of Museum Ethnography, 23, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. [Bourdieu, 1984] Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. [Bourdieu, 1986] Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. [Brook, 2020] Brook, O. (2020). Spatial equity and cultural participation. Cultural Trends, 29(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2020.1729950 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. [Chari, 2004] Chari, S. (2004). Fraternal capital. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. [Cohen & Sirkeci, 2021] Cohen, J. H., & Sirkeci, I. (2021). Cultures of migration. University of Texas Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. [Daskon & Binns, 2021] Daskon, C., & Binns, T. (2021). Culture and sustainable livelihoods. Sustainability, 13(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020660 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. [Deacon et al., 2004] Deacon, H., Dondolo, L., Mrubata, M., & Prosalendis, S. (2004). The subtle power of intangible heritage. HSRC Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. [Desai & Andrist, 2010] Desai, S., & Andrist, L. (2010). Gender scripts and marriage. Demography, 47(3), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. [Drotner et al., 2021] Drotner, K., Dziekan, V., Parry, R., & Schrøder, K. (2021). The Routledge handbook of museums, media and communication. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. [Duxbury et al., 2021] Duxbury, N., Kangas, A., & De Beukelaer, C. (2021). Cultural policies for sustainable development. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2019.1664245 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. [Gallo & Scrinzi, 2021] Gallo, E., & Scrinzi, F. (2021). Migration and social reproduction. The Sociological Review, 69(2), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120960907 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. [Giaccardi, 2012] Giaccardi, E. (2012). Heritage and social media. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. (Girard & Nijkamp, 2022] Girard, L. F., & Nijkamp, P. (2022). Heritage and sustainability. Sustainability, 14(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. [Hafstein, 2018] Hafstein, V. (2018). Making intangible heritage. Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. [Harrison et al., 2020] Harrison, R., DeSilvey, C., Holtorf, C., Macdonald, S., & Morgan, J. (2020). Heritage futures. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13xpsfp [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. [Kabeer, 1999] Kabeer, N. (1999). Women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. [Kenderdine, 2021] Kenderdine, S. (2021). Digital heritage. Digital Applications in Archaeology, 20, e00165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. [Kurin, 2004] Kurin, R. (2004). Safeguarding heritage. Museum International, 56(1–2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00459.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. [Labadi, 2020] Labadi, S. (2020). Heritage and globalisation. International Journal of Heritage Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1678053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. [Lenzerini, 2011] Lenzerini, F. (2011). Intangible heritage law. European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. [Levitt, 2001] Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. (Meier & Frey, 2020] Meier, H., & Frey, B. (2020). Heritage and sustainability. Sustainability, 12(22), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229300 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. [Momsen, 2009] Momsen, J. (2009). Gender and development. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. [O’Brien et al., 2020] O’Brien, D., Laurison, D., Miles, A., & Friedman, S. (2020). Cultural participation. Cultural Trends. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2019.1654436 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. [Rao, 2012] Rao, N. (2012). Gender roles in India. Economic and Political Weekly. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. [Ray & Qayum, 2020] Ray, R., & Qayum, S. (2020). Cultures of servitude. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. [Rudner, 1994] Rudner, D. (1994). Caste and capitalism. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. [Sarkar, 2021] Sarkar, S. (2021). Family and migration. Journal of Family Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1734235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. [Shah, 1998] Shah, A. (1998). The family in India. Orient Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. [Smith, 2006] Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. [Smith & Akagawa, 2009] Smith, L., & Akagawa, N. (2009). Intangible heritage. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. [Soini & Birkeland, 2014] Soini, K., & Birkeland, I. (2014). Cultural sustainability. Geoforum, 51, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. [Soini & Dessein, 2016] Soini, K., & Dessein, J. (2016). Culture and sustainability. Sustainability, 8(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. [Throsby, 2021] Throsby, D. (2021). Economics and culture. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. [Uberoi, 2006] Uberoi, P. (2006). Freedom and destiny. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. [Vertovec, 2009] Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. [UNESCO, 2003] UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. https://ich.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. [UNESCO, 2022] UNESCO. (2022). Intangible cultural heritage and sustainable development. https://ich.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar