Managing Digital Study-Abroad Conversion Through Content Credibility and Consultation Responsiveness: A Contextual Organizational Diagnosis of NST

Authors

Lu Xin

Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaAzman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Poh-Chuin Teo

Azman Hashim International Business School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500231

Subject Category: Management

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 3388-3394

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-06

Accepted: 2026-05-11

Published: 2026-05-28

Abstract

Small digital study-abroad consultancies can now receive enquiries from short-video platforms without opening branch offices, but the commercial result is often uneven. This article discusses that problem through Neo Sing-Trend Pte. Ltd. (NST), a Singapore-based digital education consultancy for Chinese students considering universities in Singapore and Malaysia. NST's enquiry volume rose from 397 in 2021 to 1,317 in 2025. Over the same period, its best conversion year remained 2022, when the enquiry-to-contract rate was 12.03 percent; by 2025 the rate had fallen to 4.10 percent. The diagnosis uses internal performance records, one structured focus group, content and workflow review notes, SWOT interpretation, fishbone analysis, and a likelihood-consequence risk matrix. The strongest bottlenecks were not the lack of traffic, but weak credibility signals in short-video content and delayed follow-up once families entered private consultation channels. Platform adaptation, client filtering, knowledge resources, and adviser workload also mattered, but they were less immediate intervention priorities. The article provides a practical diagnostic framework for small adviser-led education service firms that need to connect digital trust-building with disciplined enquiry management.

Keywords

digital study-abroad consultancy; enquiry-to-contract conversion

Downloads

References

1. Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Caruelle, D., Lervik-Olsen, L., & Gustafsson, A. (2023). The clock is ticking - Or is it? Customer satisfaction response to waiting shorter vs. longer than expected during a service encounter. Journal of Retailing, 99(2), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2023.03.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cheng, G., Li, W., He, M., & Liao, L. (2024). Exploring consumer responses to official endorsement: Roles of credibility and attractiveness attributes in live streaming. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1371343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1371343 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, Article 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gan, J., Shi, S., Filieri, R., & Leung, W. K. S. (2023). Short video marketing and travel intentions: The interplay between visual perspective, visual content, and narration appeal. Tourism Management, 99, Article 104795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104795 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Harrison, M. I., & Shirom, A. (1999). Organizational Diagnosis and Assessment: Bridging Theory and Practice. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hochstein, R. E., Harmeling, C. M., & Perko, T. (2025). Toward a theory of consumer digital trust: Meta-analytic evidence of its role in the effectiveness of user-generated content. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53(4), 1034-1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00982-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management - Guidelines. ISO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Meng, L., Kou, S., Duan, S., & Bie, Y. (2024). The impact of content characteristics of short-form video ads on consumer purchase behavior: Evidence from TikTok. Journal of Business Research, 183, Article 114874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114874 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.167 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Valenti, A., Yildirim, G., Vanhuele, M., Srinivasan, S., & Pauwels, K. (2023). Advertising's sequence of effects on consumer mindset and sales: A comparison across brands and product categories. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 435-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles