Teacher Effectiveness, Classroom Learning Environment, and Academic Performance of Junior High School Students

Authors

Apriljun D. Lamasan

Graduate School Holy Cross of Davao College (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100500261

Subject Category: Social Science

Volume/Issue: 10/5 | Page No: 3765-3774

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-05-16

Accepted: 2026-05-21

Published: 2026-05-29

Abstract

Poor academic performance is a problem in education. The study aimed to determine the significance of teacher effectiveness and classroom learning environment as causes of student academic performance. Diagnostic research design was employed. Using simple random technique, 200 junior high school students were surveyed. Data were gathered and analyzed using multiple linear regression. Findings revealed that teacher effectiveness and classroom learning environment significantly causes the criterion, partially affirming Social Cognitive Theory. Further studies are recommended to explore additional variables such as student motivation, parental involvement, socio-economic status, and learning habits, and to conduct qualitative research for additional themes, while teachers and school administrators may collaborate to strengthen instructional strategies, classroom management, and assessment practices through professional development and improved learning environments.

Keywords

Teacher effectiveness, classroom learning environment, academic performance, junior high school students

Downloads

References

1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Department of Science and Technology – Philippine Health Research Ethics Board. (2023). National ethical guidelines for health and health-related research. https://ethics.healthresearch.ph/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hou, R., Fütterer, T., Bühler, B., Bozkir, E., Gerjets, P., Trautwein, U., & Kasneci, E. (2024). Automated assessment of encouragement and warmth in classrooms leveraging multimodal emotional features and ChatGPT. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15310 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2021). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720985396 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Naquila, A., & Curayag, E. (2025). Effectiveness of teachers’ classroom styles and students’ learning engagement. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 47(4). https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=31930 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. OECD. (2020). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rahman, A., & Putri, D. (2024). Classroom climate and student motivation in Indonesian secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Studies, 18(2), 55–68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Republic of the Philippines. (2012). Republic Act No. 10173: Data Privacy Act of 2012. Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers (3rd ed.). ASCD. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Triola, M. F. (2018). Elementary statistics (13th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Villaluz, A. V., & Lagunday, R. (2025). Classroom management and learners’ academic performance. GEO Academic Journal, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.56738/issn29603986.geo2025.6.127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wang, M. T., Degol, J. L., Amemiya, J., Parr, A., & Guo, J. (2020). Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 57, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100912 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zhang, W., Sun, J., & Yao, H. (2025). The impact of learning efficiency on teaching evaluation in urban-rural interactive classrooms: A moderated mediation model. BMC Psychology, 13, 962. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03313-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles