AI-Driven Risk Management in OBOR Infrastructure Projects

AI-Driven Risk Management in OBOR Infrastructure Projects

Lai Mun Keong^*

Faculty of Accountancy, Finance and Business, Tunku Abdul Rahman University of Management and Technology, Jalan Genting Klang, Setapak, 53300, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

*Corresponding Author

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9020099

Received: 26 January 2025; Accepted: 30 January 2025; Published: 05 March 2025

ABSTRACT

The “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) initiative, now widely referred to as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), represents one of the most ambitious infrastructure and economic development projects in modern history, encompassing over 140 participating countries. Despite its potential for fostering global connectivity and economic growth, OBOR projects face significant risks, including financial, operational, geopolitical, and environmental uncertainties. This study explores the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to revolutionize risk management in OBOR infrastructure projects, addressing challenges such as cost overruns, project delays, and political instability.

By leveraging AI technologies such as machine learning, natural language processing, predictive analytics, and risk assessment models, stakeholders can enhance their ability to identify, quantify, and mitigate risks in real-time. AI tools offer unparalleled capabilities in processing vast amounts of data from multiple sources, including financial reports, satellite imagery, and social media, to predict and analyse risks. For instance, AI-driven algorithms can monitor geopolitical developments to assess the likelihood of conflicts or trade disruptions affecting project timelines. Similarly, predictive models can forecast weather patterns and environmental hazards, enabling project planners to implement proactive strategies for mitigating potential disruptions.

This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data analysis and qualitative case studies of OBOR infrastructure projects that have successfully implemented AI-driven risk management solutions. The findings demonstrate that AI significantly enhances decision-making accuracy, improves resource allocation, and reduces the probability of adverse events. Case studies from railway and port construction projects in Southeast Asia and Central Asia illustrate how AI tools have enabled project managers to optimize operations, minimize delays, and reduce costs.

However, the study also identifies challenges associated with integrating AI into OBOR projects, including the high cost of technology adoption, the need for skilled professionals, and ethical concerns surrounding data privacy and algorithmic transparency. Moreover, disparities in digital infrastructure and AI readiness among OBOR partner countries pose additional barriers to widespread implementation. These challenges highlight the need for strategic investments in capacity-building and collaborative frameworks to ensure equitable access to AI technologies.

The study concludes that AI has the potential to transform risk management practices in OBOR infrastructure projects, fostering greater efficiency, resilience, and sustainability. Policymakers and project stakeholders are encouraged to prioritize AI integration by establishing supportive regulatory environments, incentivizing innovation, and fostering partnerships between technology providers and infrastructure developers. Future research should focus on developing localized AI solutions tailored to the specific needs and contexts of OBOR partner countries, ensuring that the benefits of AI-driven risk management are accessible to all.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Risk Management, One Belt One Road (OBOR) Initiative, Infrastructure Projects, Predictive Analytics, Geopolitical Risks, Sustainable Development, Digital Transformation

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), originally introduced as the “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) by China in 2013, seeks to improve global connectivity through large-scale infrastructure projects across Asia, Europe, and Africa. However, the ambitious scope of OBOR infrastructure projects is accompanied by significant risks, including political instability, financial uncertainties, operational inefficiencies, and environmental challenges (Gong, 2019). Effective risk management is critical for ensuring the successful completion of these projects, particularly given their complexity and the diverse geopolitical contexts in which they operate.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative technology capable of enhancing risk management processes. AI’s ability to process vast amounts of data and generate predictive insights can aid decision-makers in identifying and mitigating risks in real-time. For instance, machine learning algorithms can analyze historical data to forecast project delays, while natural language processing tools can monitor geopolitical developments to predict disruptions (Zhang et al., 2021). The integration of AI into OBOR projects presents an opportunity to optimize resource allocation, improve operational efficiency, and enhance the sustainability of large-scale infrastructure development.

Despite the potential benefits of AI, its adoption in OBOR infrastructure projects remains limited due to challenges such as high implementation costs, limited technical expertise, and varying levels of digital infrastructure among participating countries. This study aims to explore the role of AI-driven risk management in mitigating these challenges and promoting the success of OBOR projects.

Problem Statement

The OBOR initiative faces significant risks that threaten the timely and cost-effective completion of its projects. Traditional risk management practices often rely on manual processes and historical data, limiting their ability to adapt to dynamic and complex risk environments (Li et al., 2020). The lack of effective risk management strategies has resulted in cost overruns, project delays, and failed initiatives in several OBOR regions.

AI has the potential to address these issues by providing advanced tools for real-time risk analysis and mitigation. However, the adoption of AI in OBOR infrastructure projects is hindered by barriers such as insufficient technological readiness, ethical concerns, and disparities in digital infrastructure among participating countries. There is a pressing need for research to examine how AI-driven risk management can be effectively implemented in the context of OBOR projects.

Research Objectives

This study aims to:

1. Examine the current state of risk management practices in OBOR infrastructure projects.
2. Explore the potential of AI technologies in mitigating risks and improving project outcomes.
3. Identify the challenges associated with implementing AI-driven risk management in OBOR projects.
4. Propose strategies to enhance the adoption of AI in OBOR-related risk management.

Research Questions

1. What are the key risks faced by OBOR infrastructure projects?
2. How can AI technologies improve risk management processes in these projects?
3. What are the barriers to adopting AI-driven risk management in OBOR projects?
4. What strategies can be employed to overcome these barriers and promote the integration of AI in OBOR initiatives?

Hypotheses

H1: AI-driven risk management significantly reduces project delays in OBOR infrastructure projects.

H2: The adoption of AI improves the cost efficiency of OBOR projects.

H3: Technological readiness and digital infrastructure positively influence the adoption of AI in OBOR risk management.

Significance of the Study

This study contributes to the growing body of research on the intersection of AI and large-scale infrastructure projects, offering insights into how AI can revolutionize risk management practices. Policymakers and project stakeholders will benefit from understanding the potential applications of AI in reducing risks and enhancing project outcomes. The findings will also inform strategies for addressing challenges associated with AI adoption, thereby promoting the success and sustainability of OBOR initiatives.

Furthermore, this research highlights the importance of technological readiness and cross-border collaboration in leveraging AI for global infrastructure development. By advancing knowledge in this area, the study supports the broader goals of the OBOR initiative, including economic integration, connectivity, and shared development.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Introduction

This chapter critically reviews the existing body of knowledge on AI-driven risk management, focusing specifically on its application in Belt and Road Initiative (OBOR) infrastructure projects. The review highlights risk management challenges in OBOR projects, the potential of AI to address these challenges, barriers to its implementation, and critical factors for success. The integration of leadership, economic considerations, and behavioral theories is also discussed, ensuring alignment with the multidimensional challenges of OBOR initiatives.

Risk Management Challenges in OBOR Projects

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) connects multiple regions with diverse political, economic, and cultural landscapes. Infrastructure projects under this initiative frequently encounter risks, including political instability, regulatory uncertainty, funding challenges, and natural disasters (Gong, 2019). These risks, coupled with the cross-border nature of OBOR projects, necessitate more robust and dynamic risk management systems.

Lai and Chok (2022) emphasized that leadership and cultural alignment are critical for managing these risks effectively. A lack of cohesive risk frameworks and coordination among participating countries has historically led to delays and financial losses. Traditional approaches often fail to provide the agility and real-time insights required to manage OBOR risks, especially in regions with volatile geopolitical environments.

Role of Artificial Intelligence in Risk Management

Artificial intelligence has emerged as a transformative tool for risk management, offering capabilities such as predictive analytics, real-time monitoring, and data-driven decision-making. According to Zhang et al. (2021), AI can process large volumes of structured and unstructured data, enabling project managers to anticipate risks and mitigate them proactively. For instance, machine learning algorithms can predict project delays by analyzing historical data, while natural language processing tools can assess geopolitical developments.

The effectiveness of AI systems in risk management is further supported by behavioral models such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Chok and Lai (2022) found that perceived usefulness and ease of use are critical determinants of employee adoption of AI technologies in organizational contexts. This is particularly relevant for OBOR projects, where diverse stakeholders must collaborate using shared digital tools.

Furthermore, AI technologies can foster transparency and collaboration by providing a centralized platform for risk assessments. Zhao et al. (2022) noted that such systems enable better communication and coordination among stakeholders, which is essential for managing the multifaceted risks associated with OBOR infrastructure projects.

Critical Success Factors for AI Adoption in OBOR Projects

Successful integration of AI in OBOR risk management depends on several critical factors. Leadership plays a pivotal role in driving technological innovation and aligning organizational goals with AI adoption (Lai & Chok, 2022). Leaders who embrace a customer-centric approach and foster a culture of innovation are more likely to overcome resistance to change.

Economic factors also influence AI adoption. High implementation costs and disparities in digital infrastructure among OBOR countries can limit access to AI technologies. Chok and Lai (2022) suggested that governments and private sector entities should invest in capacity-building initiatives to address these barriers. Additionally, collaborative partnerships between developed and developing nations can facilitate technology transfer and knowledge sharing.

Behavioral factors, such as trust in AI systems, also play a crucial role. Chok et al. (2022) highlighted that trust and emotional alignment are significant predictors of technology adoption in consumer contexts. Similarly, fostering trust among stakeholders in OBOR projects can accelerate the integration of AI into risk management processes.

Barriers to AI Implementation in OBOR Projects

Despite its potential, AI adoption in OBOR projects faces several challenges. Economic disparities among partner countries often result in uneven access to technology and expertise. Additionally, ethical concerns related to data privacy and ownership pose significant barriers to AI implementation (Gong, 2019). Collecting and processing data from multiple jurisdictions requires careful navigation of legal and regulatory frameworks.

Resistance to change is another common barrier. Zhao et al. (2022) found that organizations with rigid hierarchies and outdated workflows struggle to adopt AI technologies. Furthermore, the lack of skilled personnel with expertise in both AI and risk management exacerbates these challenges.

Strategies for Effective AI-Driven Risk Management

To address these barriers, several strategies have been proposed. First, investments in digital infrastructure and capacity-building initiatives are critical. Lai et al. (2020) suggested that training programs focusing on AI applications in risk management can enhance organizational readiness and stakeholder engagement.

Second, establishing standardized frameworks for AI-driven risk management can promote consistency and trust among OBOR participants. Collaborative efforts between governments, private sector entities, and international organizations can also address ethical and regulatory concerns. Chok and Lai (2022) emphasized the importance of aligning AI adoption strategies with organizational goals and stakeholder expectations to ensure seamless implementation.

Finally, fostering a culture of innovation and adaptability can mitigate resistance to change. Leadership plays a crucial role in this process, as leaders who demonstrate entrepreneurial traits are more likely to champion the adoption of AI technologies (Lai et al., 2020).

Gaps in the Literature

While existing studies highlight the potential of AI in risk management, limited research explores its specific application in the context of OBOR projects. Most studies focus on general infrastructure or organizational contexts without addressing the unique geopolitical and cultural complexities of OBOR. Additionally, few studies examine the behavioral and leadership factors influencing AI adoption in multinational projects. This research seeks to fill these gaps by exploring the role of AI-driven risk management in OBOR initiatives and proposing actionable strategies for overcoming adoption barriers.

While studies such as Zhang et al. (2021) highlight the potential of AI in infrastructure risk management, there remains a significant gap in:

1. Tailored strategies for AI implementation in OBOR partner countries with varying levels of technological readiness.
   2. Research on cultural and behavioral factors influencing stakeholder acceptance of AI-driven systems.
   3. Empirical studies addressing geopolitical complexities unique to cross-border OBOR projects.

Conclusion

This chapter reviewed key themes in the literature on AI-driven risk management, focusing on challenges in OBOR projects, the potential of AI technologies, and critical success factors for adoption. It also highlighted gaps in the literature, providing a foundation for subsequent chapters that will address these gaps through empirical research.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Introduction

This chapter outlines the research methodology used to investigate the role of AI-driven risk management in OBOR infrastructure projects. It describes the research design, population, sample size, data collection methods, data analysis techniques, and ethical considerations. The chapter ensures a systematic approach to addressing the research questions and hypotheses outlined in Chapter 1.

Research Design

This study adopts a mixed-methods research design, combining qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of AI-driven risk management in OBOR projects. A mixed-methods design is appropriate because it enables the integration of numerical data with contextual insights, ensuring a holistic analysis of complex phenomena (Creswell & Creswell, 2018).

• Quantitative Approach: A survey questionnaire was used to collect data on perceptions of AI-driven risk management from stakeholders involved in OBOR projects.
• Qualitative Approach: Semi-structured interviews with key decision-makers provided deeper insights into the challenges and opportunities of AI adoption in risk management.

Population and Sampling

Population

The target population comprises professionals involved in OBOR infrastructure projects, including project managers, engineers, policymakers, and AI technology specialists across participating countries.

Sampling Technique

A purposive sampling technique was employed to select participants with expertise or experience in AI, risk management, or OBOR infrastructure projects. This approach ensures the inclusion of stakeholders who can provide relevant insights (Patton, 2015).

Sample Size

For the quantitative component, 200 participants were targeted to ensure statistical validity. For the qualitative component, 20 participants were selected for in-depth interviews, as smaller sample sizes are suitable for qualitative research to achieve data saturation (Guest, Bunce, & Johnson, 2006).

Data Collection Methods

Primary Data Collection

Primary data were collected through surveys and interviews.

• Survey Instrument: A structured questionnaire was developed, incorporating items adapted from validated scales, such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989), to measure perceptions of AI-driven risk management.
• Interviews: Semi-structured interviews focused on understanding the implementation barriers, critical success factors, and organizational readiness for AI adoption in OBOR projects.

Secondary Data Collection

Secondary data were collected from scholarly articles, reports, and government publications to support the primary findings. Studies such as Chok and Lai (2022) and Gong (2019) provided a theoretical foundation for analysing AI adoption in risk management.

Research Instrumentation

• Quantitative Survey: The survey questionnaire included Likert-scale items (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) to assess variables such as perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and intention to adopt AI systems in OBOR projects (Davis, 1989; Venkatesh & Davis, 2000).
• Qualitative Interviews: An interview guide was prepared to explore participants’ views on leadership, cultural factors, and the economic implications of AI adoption in OBOR projects (Lai & Chok, 2022).

Data Analysis Techniques

Quantitative Data Analysis

Survey data were analyzed using statistical techniques, including descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and regression analysis, to examine relationships between variables. SPSS was used for data processing and hypothesis testing (Field, 2018).

Qualitative Data Analysis

Interview data were analyzed thematically using NVivo software. Themes were identified based on recurring patterns, such as barriers to AI adoption, critical success factors, and stakeholder collaboration. Thematic analysis ensured the integration of diverse perspectives (Braun & Clarke, 2006).

Hypotheses Testing

The following hypotheses were tested:

• H1: Perceived usefulness positively influences the intention to adopt AI-driven risk management systems in OBOR projects.
• H2: Leadership effectiveness moderates the relationship between perceived ease of use and AI adoption.
• H3: Economic disparities negatively impact the implementation of AI-driven risk management systems.

The hypotheses were tested using regression analysis to determine the significance and strength of relationships between variables.

Ethical Considerations

Ethical guidelines were strictly adhered to during the research process:

1. Informed Consent: Participants were informed about the research objectives, and their consent was obtained before data collection.
2. Confidentiality: Participant data were anonymized to protect their privacy.
3. Voluntary Participation: Participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without consequences.

Ethical approval was obtained from the research ethics committee of the host institution before initiating data collection.

Limitations of the Methodology

While the mixed-methods design provides comprehensive insights, certain limitations exist:

1. Purposive sampling may limit the generalizability of findings.
2. The reliance on self-reported data in surveys may introduce response bias.
3. Variability in AI adoption across different OBOR regions may affect the comparability of results.

Conclusion

This chapter detailed the research design, population, sampling, data collection methods, and analysis techniques used in this study. It also outlined the ethical considerations and limitations of the methodology. The next chapter will present the findings and results derived from the data collected.

DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS, AND RESULTS

Introduction

This chapter presents the analysis of the data collected, along with the key findings and results. Quantitative data are analysed using statistical methods, while qualitative data are examined through thematic analysis. The results are presented in alignment with the research objectives and hypotheses outlined in Chapter 1, providing insights into the role of AI-driven risk management in OBOR infrastructure projects.

Demographic Profile of Respondents

Quantitative Data Demographics

The survey collected responses from 200 stakeholders involved in OBOR projects, including project managers, engineers, and AI specialists.

Table 4.1 summarizes the demographic characteristics

Qualitative Data Demographics

A total of 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with OBOR decision-makers. Participants included leaders from China and partner countries, reflecting diverse perspectives on AI implementation.

Quantitative Data Analysis

Descriptive Statistics

The survey data were analyzed to assess stakeholder perceptions of AI-driven risk management. Table 4.2 highlights the mean and standard deviation of key variables:

These findings suggest a generally positive perception of AI-driven systems in OBOR projects, with high scores for perceived usefulness and leadership support.

Correlation Analysis

Correlation analysis was conducted to examine relationships between variables. Table 4.3 presents the results:

The results show strong, positive correlations, indicating that higher perceived usefulness and leadership support are associated with increased intention to adopt AI systems.

Table 4.3: Regression Analysis Results

Hypotheses Testing

Regression analysis was conducted to test the hypotheses:

H1: Perceived usefulness positively influences the intention to adopt AI-driven risk management systems.

• Regression coefficient: β = 0.68, p < 0.001
• Result: Hypothesis supported.

H2: Leadership effectiveness moderates the relationship between perceived ease of use and AI adoption.

• Interaction effect: β = 0.45, p = 0.002
• Result: Hypothesis supported.

Qualitative Data Analysis

Thematic Analysis

Qualitative data from interviews were analyzed thematically. Three main themes emerged:

1. Challenges of AI Implementation in OBOR Projects

Participants highlighted challenges such as cultural differences, lack of technical expertise, and high implementation costs. These align with the findings of Lai and Chok (2022) regarding leadership and cultural factors.

2. Critical Success Factors

Leadership commitment, economic stability, and cross-border collaboration were identified as critical to successful AI adoption. These findings echo earlier research by Gong (2019) on risk management in international projects.

3. AI’s Potential in Mitigating Risks

Respondents emphasized the ability of AI systems to provide real-time data analytics, predictive modeling, and automated decision-making, reducing uncertainties in infrastructure projects.

Participant Quotations

Key quotes from interviews include:

• “AI provides actionable insights that traditional risk management systems cannot match.” (Participant 5)
• “Cross-border collaboration remains a significant challenge, but AI has the potential to bridge gaps.” (Participant 12)

DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS

The findings suggest that AI-driven risk management systems are perceived as highly effective tools for mitigating risks in OBOR projects. The strong correlation between perceived usefulness and intention to adopt AI supports the TAM framework (Davis, 1989).

Leadership emerged as a key moderator, consistent with the research of Lai and Chok (2022), emphasizing the need for visionary leaders to drive AI adoption. The qualitative analysis further highlights the importance of addressing cultural and economic disparities, aligning with Gong (2019) and other OBOR studies.

Conclusion

This chapter analysed both quantitative and qualitative data to address the research objectives. The results confirm the hypotheses and underscore the critical role of AI in enhancing risk management practices in OBOR infrastructure projects. Chapter 5 will provide a comprehensive conclusion and recommendations based on these findings.

CONCLUSION

Summary of the Study

This study aimed to explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in risk management within China’s One Belt One Road (OBOR) infrastructure projects. Guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the research examined how key factors such as perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, leadership, and cultural differences influence the adoption of AI-driven systems. Through a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews, the study provided insights into stakeholder perceptions and the operational challenges of implementing AI-based risk management solutions.

The findings indicate that AI systems are perceived as valuable tools for enhancing risk identification, analysis, and mitigation in OBOR projects. Leadership support, cultural alignment, and economic stability emerged as critical enablers for successful adoption. These results align with prior research, such as Lai and Chok (2022), which emphasized leadership and cultural factors in technology adoption.

Key Findings

AI’s Role in Risk Management

The study confirmed that AI technologies significantly enhance the efficiency of risk management processes in OBOR infrastructure projects. Advanced capabilities such as real-time data analytics, predictive modeling, and automated decision-making provide actionable insights that traditional systems cannot offer. These findings are consistent with Davis (1989), who highlighted the importance of perceived usefulness in technology adoption.

The Influence of Leadership and Cultural Factors

Leadership support was found to moderate the relationship between perceived ease of use and intention to adopt AI systems, reflecting its critical role in driving organizational change. Additionally, cultural differences and cross-border collaboration challenges were identified as barriers to AI implementation. These results align with the research of Chok and Lai (2022), which underscored the importance of leadership and cultural considerations in technology-driven initiatives.

Technology Acceptance and Stakeholder Perceptions

The quantitative data revealed strong correlations between perceived usefulness, ease of use, and intention to adopt AI systems. These findings validated the applicability of the TAM framework in understanding stakeholder behaviour in the OBOR context.

Future research should focus on:
1. Developing localized AI solutions tailored to the specific geopolitical and cultural contexts of OBOR regions.
2. Exploring the potential of integrating complementary technologies, such as blockchain, for enhancing transparency and IoT for real-time monitoring.
3. Assessing the long-term impact of AI adoption on cost efficiency and project sustainability.

Contributions of the Study

This research contributes to both academic literature and practical applications:

1. Theoretical Contribution: By extending the TAM framework to the OBOR context, the study provides a nuanced understanding of how technological, organizational, and cultural factors influence AI adoption in large-scale international projects.
2. Practical Contribution: The findings offer actionable insights for policymakers, project managers, and AI developers to address adoption barriers and leverage AI for risk mitigation effectively.

RECOMMENDATIONS

For Policymakers and Project Leaders

• Develop cross-border frameworks that promote cultural understanding and collaboration among OBOR participants.
• Invest in leadership training programs focused on technology adoption and risk management.
• Establish economic incentives and funding mechanisms to support AI implementation in partner countries.

For AI Developers

• Design AI systems that are user-friendly and adaptable to diverse cultural and operational contexts.
• Focus on building trust among stakeholders by ensuring transparency, data security, and accountability in AI-driven risk management processes.

For Future Researchers

• Conduct longitudinal studies to assess the long-term impact of AI adoption on OBOR project outcomes.
• Explore the role of emerging technologies, such as blockchain and IoT, in complementing AI-driven risk management.
• Investigate the influence of geopolitical factors on AI adoption in OBOR projects.

Risk Response and Fallback Framework

This study recommends adopting a layered risk management framework comprising:

1. Risk Identification and Monitoring: AI systems to detect potential geopolitical, environmental, and financial risks.
2. Response Strategies: Immediate mitigation plans such as altering supply chains or reallocating resources during geopolitical tensions.
3. Fallback Mechanisms: Establishing contractual clauses to manage unforeseen project delays or adopting alternative financing models to address cost overruns.

Limitations of the Study

While this study provides valuable insights, certain limitations must be acknowledged:

1. Sample Size and Scope: The research focused on a limited number of stakeholders, which may not fully capture the diversity of perspectives across all OBOR regions.
2. Temporal Constraints: Data collection was conducted within a specific timeframe, which may not reflect evolving stakeholder attitudes or technological advancements.
3. Geopolitical Considerations: The study did not account for the influence of political or regulatory dynamics on AI adoption.

Conclusion

The integration of AI-driven risk management systems in OBOR infrastructure projects holds significant potential for mitigating operational uncertainties and enhancing project outcomes. However, the adoption of such technologies requires a comprehensive approach that addresses leadership, cultural, and economic factors. By bridging the gap between technology and human factors, this research offers a roadmap for leveraging AI to achieve sustainable development in OBOR initiatives.

As the OBOR initiative continues to evolve, the findings of this study serve as a foundation for future research and innovation in technology-driven risk management. The collaborative efforts of stakeholders, supported by leadership and technological advancements, will play a pivotal role in shaping the success of OBOR projects in the years to come.

REFERENCES

1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
2. Chok, N. V., & Lai, M. K. (2022). Examining the Determinants of Employee Adoption and Intention to Use E-HRM: A Framework Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Scopus.
3. Chok, N. V., & Lai, M. K. (2022). The Effects of Lifestyle, Emotions, Brand Trust, Merchandise Visuality on Consumer Spending Intention During COVID-19. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 14(3), 6217–6223.
4. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
5. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
6. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
7. Gong, X. (2019). The Belt and Road Initiative: Risk assessment and management. International Affairs Review, 5(2), 45-59.
8. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
9. Lai, C. S., Law, M. Y., Low, C. S., & Lai, M. K. (2020). Personality Traits as Predictors to Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy with Gender and Family Background as Moderators. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, 9(2), 51–62.
10. Lai, M. K., & Chok, N. V. (2022). Critical Success Factors: Leadership, Customer, Economic Factor, Culture to Business Venture. Science, Education and Innovation in the Context of Modern Problems, 5(4). IMCRA.
11. Li, J., Zhao, L., & Wang, Y. (2020). Managing risks in Belt and Road projects: Insights from risk management theories. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 12(1), 23-34.
12. Zhang, H., Liu, Q., & Chen, W. (2021). Leveraging AI for risk management in infrastructure projects: A review of applications and challenges. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4), 04021022.
13. Zhao, X., Sun, Y., & Wu, Z. (2022). Overcoming barriers to AI adoption in large-scale infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 40(3), 251-264.