International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science

Submission Deadline-17th December 2024
Last Issue of 2024 : Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-05th January 2025
Special Issue on Economics, Management, Sociology, Communication, Psychology: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now
Submission Deadline-20th December 2024
Special Issue on Education, Public Health: Publication Fee: 30$ USD Submit Now

Assessment of Factors of Job Satisfaction among Healthcare Professionals: The Case of the North Gonja District in the Savannah Region of Ghana

  • Domie, Godswill.
  • Nii Teiko Tagoe, Titus.
  • Dodzi, Samuel.
  • Cardinal Newton
  • 2515-2531
  • Dec 18, 2024
  • Healthcare Management

Assessment of Factors of Job Satisfaction among Healthcare Professionals: The Case of the North Gonja District in the Savannah Region of Ghana

*1Domie, Godswill., 2Nii Teiko Tagoe, Titus., 3Dodzi, Samuel., 4Cardinal Newton

1Deputy Director of Administration. Savannah Regional Health Directorate. PhD Student. Graduate School of Business Management, Philippine Christian University, Manila- Philippines

2District Director of Health Services in North Gonja, PhD Student. Graduate School of Business Management, Philippine Christian University, Manila- Philippines

3Acting Head of Administration, Graduate School of Business Management, Philippine Christian University, Manila- Philippines.

4Acting CEO. Sunyani Teaching Hospital, Graduate School of Business Management, Philippine Christian University, Manila- Philippines

*Corresponding Author

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8110195

Received: 27 November 2024; Accepted: 06 December 2024; Published: 17 December 2024

ABSTRACT

Background: Health Professionals manage the day-to-day delivery of healthcare services and other activities of the healthcare system. They do this via planning, directing, organizing, and coordinating health services. The overall job satisfaction of healthcare professionals has been a matter of concern, having been classified by pundits as a key factor underpinning performance, principally where patient care is delivered. This study investigates the factors connected to job dissatisfaction and satisfaction among Health Professionals in both public and private healthcare delivery facilities.

Method: In this study, a census method with a quantitative approach was used. The total population of health professionals in the North Gonja District (204 staff) took part in the study. Hard copy and Google form questionnaires were used for data collection. The hard copies were used to enable those with internet connectivity difficulties to also participate in the study. Descriptive statistics, regression, and correlation tests were run from SPSS to present and analyze data with p-values less or equal to 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean (± Standard Deviation [SD]) age of all respondents was (M = 39.72, SD = ± 5.947) with an age range of 30–58 years. While demographic variables predicted 32.7% of the variance in the outcome variable with F (5, 199) = 10.666, p < .001 with age negatively correlating with job satisfaction (r -.730, p< .01), the independent variables explained 81.5% of the variance in the outcome variable with F (6, 198) = 77.785, p < .001 all of which are statistically significant. Apart from professional growth and manager-employee relationships, all other independent variables negatively impacted job satisfaction with strong correlations. About 68% of respondents were dissatisfied with their jobs (M = 3.84, SD= ±1.495) but with some variation in opinions.

Conclusion: The study concluded that job satisfaction declines with an increase in age, limited job opportunities, one-man show work environment, limited career growth opportunities, imbalanced work, and personal life, lack of appreciation, recognition, and respect, poor safe work environment, bad manager-employee relationships, poor annual performance appraisal, poor remunerations, lack of professional independence, absence of professional development opportunities.

Recommendations: The study recommended that health policymakers, managers, and other stakeholders should focus on the development, implementation, and safeguarding of employee-related job satisfaction policies such as commensurate remuneration and other fringe benefits, regular skills development training, mentorships, or education assistance, and social and mental welfare assistance policies to improve employees working conditions within the health sector

Keywords: Job satisfaction; Healthcare professionals; Census, North Gonja, Savanna Region, Ghana,

Abbreviations: CC- Company Culture, PG- Professional Growth, MR- Manager Relationship, WLB- Work-Life Balance, CB- Compensation and Benefits, JS- Job Satisfaction, OJS- Overall Job Satisfaction

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare professionals are staff who administer the daily operations of healthcare facilities such as planning, directing, organizing, and coordinating health services. Clinical and non-clinical staff ensure that healthcare facilities are sufficiently resourced to perform proficiently (Coursera Staff,2023). Health professionals make and take crucial decisions and actions that impact the good organization, productivity, and overall success or failure of health facilities concerning quality patient care (AHRQ, 2015). Extant literature revealed that job satisfaction drives high accomplishment in healthcare organizations. It has been documented that without highly motivated and satisfied health professionals, the functionality of the healthcare system will be in jeopardy. It has also been asserted that explained, one inescapable factor that expounds the motivational resolve and the loyalty of health workers to be committed to their work and by extension to deliver quality health services is job satisfaction (Khunou and Davhana-Maselesele, 2016; Blaauw et al. (2013). The World Health Organization (WHO) underscored the need for improvement in overall performance, quality service delivery, and influence of the health workforce on the global community as policy directions toward the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) targets especially 3.8 by 2030 (WHO, 2016). WHO’s position has been corroborated by several studies on the nexus between job satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and health worker’s resolve to stay with or quit their jobs (Akuffo et al. 2021; Geta et al. 2021; Merga & Fufa 2019; Mulugeta & Ayele 2015; Temesgen, Aycheh & Leshargie 2018). In Ghana, Akuffo, et al (2021) found 25.7% reported job dissatisfaction which was blamed on poor compensation, lack of financial incentives, and career advancement opportunities. Datuah et al, (2022) also discovered that job category influences job satisfaction, however, the study established that there is no association between gender, age, level of education, and working experience as demographic factors and job satisfaction.

In job satisfaction studies in Ethiopia, Mulugeta and Ayele (2015) found 65.1% job dissatisfaction, Merga and Fufa (2019) found 61.5%, Geta et al. (2021) found 44.8% job dissatisfaction, Scanlan et al. (2021) discovered 17.0% of the same, and others also found 25.7%, 14.8%, and 2.8% job dissatisfaction respectively (Akuffo et al. 2021; Qiu et al. 2021; Singh et al. 2019). Temesgen et al. (2018) in their cross-sectional study in Ethiopia also found 68.3% dissatisfaction among healthcare professionals. Some studies listed inter alia poor work environment (Akuffo et al. 2021; Bonenberger et al. 2014; Kumar et al. 2013; Mulugeta & Ayele 2015), organizational climate or culture (Munyewende, Rispel & Chirwa 2014), work-life balance (Gulavani & Shinde 2014; Jin et al. 2019) bad organizational arrangement which does not address issues of shortage of staff, proper planning of duty schedules and training staff Guan et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2019; Mere et al.,2023). Other studies also discovered poor remuneration and the absence of other fringe benefits (Akuffo et al. 2021; Anand et al. 2022; Khunou & Davhana-Maselesele 2016; Kumar et al. 2013), neglect of training opportunities (Mengistu and Bali, 2015) as contributors to job dissatisfaction among healthcare professionals. Many studies also found some demographic factors such as age, gender, educational qualification, and work experience have negative impacts on health professionals’ job satisfaction (Asegid et al. 2014; Ayalew et al. 2019; Lu et al. 2016).

From extant literature and empirical evidence, it is clear there are varied conclusions on the contributors to job satisfaction among healthcare professionals. To mirror these conclusions in the Ghanaian context and provide a detailed account of the contributors to job dissatisfaction among Ghanaian health professionals, this study sets out to establish factors connected to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among health professionals in the North Gonja District of the Savannah Region and to also assess the gravity of these factors to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among the health professionals.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Job Satisfaction

Job Satisfaction has been variously defined. Some earliest definitions are that job satisfaction is an amalgamation of psychological, physiological, and environmental factors that motivates a person to say I am satisfied with my job (Hoppock, 1935) and is an emotional orientation on the part of an individual toward work roles which they occupy (Vroom, 1964). Statt, (2004) maintained that job satisfaction is the extent to which workers are pleased with the intrinsic rewards they get from their jobs. Armstrong (2006) provides a more comprehensive understanding of job satisfaction when he states that it refers to the attitude and feelings people have about their jobs such that positive and favorable attitudes indicate job satisfaction and negative and unfavorable attitudes indicate job dissatisfaction.

Importance of Job Satisfaction

Job Satisfaction plays a crucial role in shaping employee performance. Herzberg, et al., (1959) and Pushpakumari (2008) noted that when employees are satisfied for a long time through recognition, and reward for responsibility, they become inspired to perform their jobs, and this can bring about achievements. Job satisfaction is found to be directly connected to the satisfaction or otherwise that employees derive from the work itself and related factors. Job satisfaction manifests in high productivity driven by workplace motivation and life satisfaction, implying private lives of employees also affect their job satisfaction (Abuhashesh et al., 2019). Job satisfaction is the definer of employee accomplishments and achievements and is directly related to productivity, work performance, and personal well-being, and often manifests in employees doing the work they like, doing it to the best of their abilities, and being compensated as such (Kaliski, 2007; Aziri, 2011). It explains employee’s emotional conditions about their jobs in terms of their expectations and what they finally get out of performing the job (Cranny, Smith, and Stone, 2014; Ndulue & Ekechukwu, 2016). Aziri, (2011) explained that a dissatisfied employee is a disgruntled and non-performing employee while a satisfied employee is a successful, resourceful, and productive employee. Pietroń-Pyszczek, (2010) and Saranya, (2014) conceded that employee satisfaction and the entirety of the organization’s environment and its activities are strongly associated. Job satisfaction impacts commitment to work and work performance (Yalabik et al., 2013), so to improve employee efficiency and personal satisfaction, job satisfaction is paramount (Weiss, 2002). Woods, (2018) admitted that job security is fundamental to job satisfaction and offers employees firmness of mind to work, but job insecurity can trigger employee anxiety leading to poor performance and low productivity (Artz & Kaya, 2014). Supervisor and employee relationships can also affect job satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Positive supervisor and employee relationships can increase workplace confidence resulting in employees feeling secure, recognized, and valued which can contribute to job satisfaction and by extension high productivity (Essays UK, 2013). Raziq and Maulabakhsh (2015) thus, noted that if work environments allow employees to feel unthreatened to work, that can contribute to the achievement of organizational goals.

Models of Job Satisfaction

Extant literature documents several models or frameworks of job satisfaction. Here we provide a snapshot of four of the models: Christen, Lyer, and Soberman’s Model Of Job Satisfaction, Lawler and Porter’s model of job satisfaction, Locke and Latham’s model of job satisfaction, and Maslow’s model of job satisfaction. Christen, Lyer, and Soberman’s model of job satisfaction consists of the following elements working together to determine job satisfaction. They include job-related factors, role perceptions, Job performance, and firm performance. Christen, Lyer, and Soberman (2006) asserted that in every organization, job-related factors and employee role perceptions affect job satisfaction which further impacts job performance and finally the organization’s overall performance. Lawler and Porter’s model (1967) advanced a model of job satisfaction that, unlike Christen, Lyer, and Soberman’s model, considered the influence of rewards on job satisfaction. According to Lawler and Porter’s model of job satisfaction, other factors rather than intrinsic and extrinsic rewards are directly connected with job satisfaction, because of the employee’s views on the deserved level of pay. Locke and Latham (1990) provide a completely different position by playing down the assumption that the objectives set at the highest level and high expectations for success in work can provide job satisfaction. They contended that achievement and success in performing tasks are what create job satisfaction. Maslow’s job satisfaction model is premised on the Hierarchy of Needs and specifies that one can only be fully satisfied not when that person achieves physiological, safety, love and belonging, and esteem needs but when the person attains self-actualization (Maslow, 1943). Maslow maintained that a person could satisfy the needs of Air, Water, Food, Shelter, Sleep, Clothing, Reproduction (Physiological needs), Personal Security, Employment, Resources, Health, Property (Security needs), Friendship, Intimacy, Family, Sense of connection ( social belonging and love needs), and Respect, Self-Esteem, Status, Recognition, Strength, Freedom ( Esteem needs), but the person is not fully satisfied until the person achieves the desire to become the most that one can be (Self- Actualization needs) (Maslow, 1943).

Empirical Studies on Job Satisfaction

The complexity of the concept of Job Satisfaction with its multifaceted elements including internal and external factors such as work environment, wages (compensation and benefits), working hours, employee autonomy, organizational structure, communication channels between employees and management (Manager-employee relationship), promotion, the work itself and its associated conditions, supervision, relationships with co-workers (social relationships), professional growth, company culture, and organizational justice have been elucidated in extant literature (Armstrong,2006; Opkara, 2002; Herzberg, 1968; Spector, 2008; Lane, Esser, Holte, & Anne, 2010; Revenio Jr., 2016; Ndulue and Ekechukwu.,2016). Empirical evidence abounds to support the influence of managers, supervisors, and leaders on employee satisfaction, commitment, loyalty, and performance through the application of appropriate and inappropriate leadership styles. Timely availability of managers, supervisors, and leaders in responding to and addressing employee needs and concerns, encouraging inventive thinking and knowledge of employees, and open communication are noted to contribute to job satisfaction or otherwise (Schroffel, 1999; Raziq & Maulabakhsh, 2015). In his work, Brenninger, (2015) found four factors that fundamentally provoke employee satisfaction: the manager/supervisor/leader, job design, workplace environment, and performance pay or compensation for work done. Concluding from his study, Soonhee, (2002) advanced that vigorous inclusivity and participation in the operations and activities of an organization and its decision-making process are the triggers of employee motivation and by extension, job satisfaction. Soonhee’s position was confirmed by Golemann et al., (2004) when they illuminated that disregarding the concerns of employees can upshot impulse behaviours and unpredicted outcomes that can influence adverse effects for the organization.

Some studies outside Africa especially in Pakistan, Spain, and Iran on employee job satisfaction lend credence to the complexity of the issue. Rukh, Choudhary, and Abbasi (2015), Viñas-Bardolet, Velazco, and Torrent-Sellens (2013), and Mosadegh Rad and De Moraes (2009) respectively found that the main triggers of job satisfaction or dissatisfaction include promotion, employee relations, their characteristics, manager-employee relations, stress, and job security. The authors also discovered that the job satisfaction of employees was drastically impacted by demographic, financial, and other non-financial factors depending on where the pendulum swings. In Korea for example, Park (2020) in a study on the direct implications of supervisor satisfaction, public service motivation, and job characteristics on job satisfaction intermediated by organizational commitment discovered that all three indicators affect employee job satisfaction. Another study by Abdelmoula and Boudabbous (2021) also identified three indirect factors: achievement, the work itself, and recognition, and four direct factors: salary, relationship with the supervisor and co-workers, working conditions, and company policy that affect job satisfaction. Javed, Balouch, and Hassan, (2014) in their study on job satisfaction concluded that employee empowerment, workplace environment, job loyalty, and job performance have strong relationships with job satisfaction, with employee empowerment alone accounting for 37% of overall job satisfaction. Javed, Balouch, and Hassan, (2014) discovered that employee dissatisfaction accounts for 32% of employee turnover.

Other studies discovered varied factors contributing to fob satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Cheginy, Isfahani, Mohseni, Khakian, and Khosravizadeh (2014) found that personnel’s perceptions of their working conditions, compensation and benefits, supervision mode, coworker relationships, and job content significantly impact job satisfaction. Amoateng Sabeng, Dominic & Mensah, John. (2023) noted that social status, recognition, remuneration, and a conducive work environment affect job satisfaction with job responsibility, employee autonomy, and task identity having strong positive connections with employee job satisfaction. Duah, Evans & Ephraim, Richard & Amoah, Samuel & Addy, Nii Armah. (2023) in their study on job satisfaction and retention of employees in the health sector in Ghana found various factors responsible for job dissatisfaction and retention including imbalanced work and personal life, lack of appreciation, recognition, and respect, and poor safety work environment.

Theoretical Framework for the Study

This study explores the factors responsible for job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among healthcare professionals, a critical dimension of quality healthcare delivery. This study adopts Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory (Maslow, 1943) as its theoretical framework which identifies five human needs; physiological, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization, and posits that people must satisfy all lower-level needs before progressing to deal with the next higher-level needs. Maslow underscored the need for the satisfaction of lower-level needs before the higher ones. This is because, Maslow believes that in human lives, some needs take precedence over others. His assumptions were premised on the fact that a hungry person can never feel secure, so it is important to get food before thinking about one’s security inter alia. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs theory is particularly suited for this study as it accounts for the complex nature of satisfaction and the need for people to understand that until people meet their physiological, safety, love and belonging, and esteem needs, they can never achieve self-actualization which is the level of their overall satisfaction. The following conceptual model illustrates the framework’s components:

Source: BiteSize Learning. https://www.bitesizelearning.co.uk/resources/maslows-hierarchy-of-needs-theory

Conceptual Framework for the Study

The framework assumes that five factors: the Company Culture (CC), Work-life balance (WLB), Manager-employee relationship (MER), Professional Growth (PG), Compensation, and benefits (CB), affect work environments and employees’ level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction. It further presumes that within the workplace, although employee demographic factors are not directly related to the work itself, they moderate the employee’s performance and latently define their levels of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction.

METHODOLOGY

Design and Initial Study Population

This study used a census design method with a quantitative approach. The study was conducted between August and October 2024. The scope of the study was North Gonja District of the Savannah Region of Ghana, and the study population consists of a cross-section of health professionals. North Gonja District has a total population of 204 staff.

Sampling and Sample Size

Since the total population of health professionals in the district is only 204 which is very small, the study conducted a census instead of sampling the population. Thus the total population was used as a sample for the census.

Data Gathering

Data were collected via a hard copy and Google form online questionnaires. The survey instruments were thoroughly evaluated based on extant literature (Payne et al. 2020; Morton et al. 2020; Khunou & Davhana-Maselesele 2016; Khamisa et al. 2015) and consisted mainly of two parts: first, demographic details and second questions requesting responses on job satisfaction. Demographic details included in the questionnaire are age, gender, professional category, level of education, and years of experience as a health services or hospital administrator. The second division of the questionnaire has six dimensions dealing with factors likely to affect an employee’s job satisfaction including company culture (ten items), job satisfaction (thirteen items), professional growth (seven items), manager relationship (five items), compensation and benefits (five items), and work-life balance (five items). The study collected data between August and October 2024.

Reliability and validity

The Reliability and validity of the instrument were measured using the Cronbach Alpha test (Cronbach,1951). The reliability coefficient values of the individual dimensions ranged between 0.752 – 0.797, while the overall reliability coefficient was 0.745, which is considered satisfactory and outstanding (refer to Table 1). Expert judgment and advice were used to secure the validity of the instrument. The instrument was piloted ahead of field data collection.

Table 1. Instrument Reliability Results

S/N Research Instrument (Scale) Number of Items Cronbach Alpha Coefficient
1 Company culture 10 0.744
2 Professional growth 7 0.734
3 Manager relationship 5 0.756
4 Compensation and benefits 5 0.769
5 Work-life balance 5 0.766
6 Job satisfaction 13 0.797
Overall 45 0.745

Data analysis

SPSS version 21 was used to analyze data. Regression and correlation analysis was run to determine the association between demographic variables and job satisfaction and also between the predictor variable (Company culture, Professional growth, Manager relationship, Compensation and benefits, Work-life balance) and Job satisfaction with p-values of less than 0.05; (p<.05) accepted as statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

Administrative permission was obtained from the North Gonja District Health Management Team for the conduct of the study. The consent of all participants was obtained before the data collection. No personal information of participants was contained in the study.

Results

The study recorded a 100% response rate with all 204 participants responding to and submitting the questionnaire. Online Google form questionnaires recorded a 92 (45%) response rate while the rest 112 (55%) were hard copies.

Socio-demographic characteristics of Participants

Variables Categories Frequency Percent (%) Mean SD
Age Up to 40 61 29.9 39.72 5.947
41-45 78 38.2
46-50 39 19.1
51-56 22 10.8
Above 56 4 2
Total 204 100
Gender Male 84 41.2
Female 120 58.8
Total 204 100
Professional Category Clinical staff 146 71.6
Non-clinical staff 58 28.4
Total 204 100
Level of Education Up to SHS 20 9.8
Certificate 33 16.2
Diploma 118 57.8
First Degree 23 11.3
Master’s Degree 10 4.9
Total 204 100
Years of Experience Up to 1 year 47 23
Up to 2 years 40 19.6
Up to 3 years 70 34.3
Above 3 years 47 23
Total 204 100

The study population was largely middle-aged. The mean (± Standard Deviation [SD]) age of all respondents was (M = 39.72, SD = ± 5.947) with an age range of 30–58 years. Most participants were females (58.8%) while (41.2%) were males. The majority of the respondents (71.6%) were Clinical staff while (21.6%) of them were Non-clinical staff. Only 4.9% of the study participants obtained a Master’s Degree, (11.3%) had a First Degree, (57.7%) had a Diploma, 16.2% had a certificate, and 9.8% had educational levels up to Senior high school. For years of work experience, (23%) of the respondents have worked for up to 1 year, (19.6%) for up to 2 years, (34.3%) for up to 3 years, and 23% have worked for over 3 years.

Regression analysis between Demographic Variables and Job Satisfaction

Coefficients

Source B SE B β t p
(Constant) -0.343 0.684 -0.502 0.616
Age -1.57 0.011 0.31 2.156 0.033
Gender 0.479 0.104 0.355 3.664 0
Professional Category 0.702 0.142 0.115 0.72 0.023
Level of Education 0.764 0.136 0.329 1.938 0.045
Years of Experience 0.651 0.011 0.01 0.124 0.001

a. Dependent Variable: Job Satisfaction

The Beta (B) values indicate a strong positive correlation between the demographic and dependent variables and all these associations are statistically significant at p< 0.05. The coefficient results compare the strength of the effect of each independent variable to the dependent variable. The results indicate that for a one-unit increase in age, job satisfaction would decrease by 1.57 units, meaning an increase in age has a negative effect on job satisfaction. However, a one-unit increase in gender, professional category, level of education, and years of experience, would result in all result in positive effects on job satisfaction such that if gender increases by 1 unit, job satisfaction would increase by 0.479 units, and if professional category increases by a unit, job satisfaction would also increase by 0.702 units, and with the level of education, a unit increase would induce a 0.764 unit increase in job satisfaction, while a unit increase in years of experience would see a 0.651 unit increase in job satisfaction.

Model Summaryb

R R Square Adjusted R Square
.346a 0.327 0.078

Predictors: (Constant), Years_of_Experience, Porfessional_Category, Gender, Age, Level_of_Education

Dependent Variable: Job Satisfaction

ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 5.752 5 0.565 10.666 .003b
Residual 42. 580 199 0.716
Total 48.332 204

Dependent Variable: Job Satisfaction

b. Predictors: (Constant), Years_of_Experience, Porfessional_Category, Gender, Age, Leevel_of_Education

The regression tables show the impact of demographic variables on job satisfaction. Th R^2 value of .327 indicates that demographic variables predicted 32.7% of the variance in the outcome variable with F (5, 199) = 10.666, p < .001. The results suggested that all demographic variables predicted job satisfaction with Age (ß -1.57, p < .001), Gender (ß .479, p < .001), Professional Category (ß .702, p < .001), Level of Education (ß .764, p < .001), and Years of Experience (ß .651, p < .001). The results show strong associations and impacts on job satisfaction implying the close relation and association of demographic variables of the respondents and their level of job satisfaction. The R-squared value suggested that demographic variables are strong contenders to demographic variables.

Pearson correlation: Relationship between Demographic variables and Job satisfaction

Age Gender Professional Category Level of Education Years of Experience Internal Job Satisfaction
Overall Job Satisfaction -.730** .660** .658** .658** .775* .657**

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

The correlation results indicate strong negative and positive correlations between demographic variables and overall job satisfaction and these correlations are statistically significant between .01 < r < .05. The correlation between age and overall job satisfaction is strongly negatively correlated (r -.730, p< .01). Gender and overall job satisfaction are strongly positively correlated ( r = .660, p< .01). Between Professional Category and overall job satisfaction is also strongly positively associated ( r =. 658, p< .01). Correlation between Level of Education and Job satisfaction is equally strongly correlated ( r = .658, p< .01) and between Years of Experience, (r = .775, p< .05), and internal Job satisfaction, and overall job satisfaction positively correlated at r = .657, p< .01). The results mean that while an increase in age comes with job dissatisfaction, increases in gender, professional category, level of education, years of experience, and internal job satisfaction rise together.

Regression analysis between Company culture, Professional growth, Manager relationship, Compensation and benefits, and Work-life balance and Job satisfaction
Regression was run to determine the variation between the independent variables and the dependent variable using SPSS. v21.

Model Summary

R R Square Adjusted R Square
.746a 0.815 0.079

Predictors: (Constant), JS, CC, MR, PG, WLB, CB; where WLB = work-life balance, MR = Manager relationship, PG = Professional Growth, Company Culture, and CB = Compensation and benefits

ANOVA

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Regression 349.249 6 59.442 77.785 .000b
Residual 76.764 198 0.877
Total 426.013 204

a. Dependent Variable: Overall Satisfaction

b. Predictors: (Constant), JS, CC, MR, PG, WLB, CB: where WLB = work-life balance, MR = Manager relationship, PG = Professional Growth, Company Culture, and CB = Compensation and benefits

Coefficients

Source B SE B β t p
(Constant) 11.939 1.150 10.378 .000
CC -2.339 .341 -.615 -7.625 .000
PG .505 .477 .088 .764 .005
MR .777 .512 .855 4.762 .007
CB -6.982 .412 -.783 -10.887 .000
WLB -3.974 .609 -.114 -7.093 .000
IJS -3.779 .564 -.765 -7.009 .000

Dependent Variable: Overall Satisfaction (JS). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed

The regression results show the influence of the independent variables on the dependent variable. The derived regression equation for Overall Job satisfaction, OJS = 8.789 – 2.339CC+ .505 PG + .777MR -2.982CB -3.974WLB -3.779JS. The R^2Value of 0.815 implies that the independent variables explain 81.5% of the variance in the outcome variable with F (6, 198) = 77.785, p < .001. PG and MR have positive relations with job satisfaction PG (ß= .505, t =.764; p < .005), MR (ß = .777, t=.4.762, p < .005. Company culture (CC), Compensation and benefits (CB), Work-life balance (WLB), and Internal Job satisfaction (JS) are negatively related to overall job satisfaction such that CC (ß= -2.339, t =. -7.625; p < .001), CB (ß= -6.982, t =. -10.887; p < .001), WLB (ß= -3.974, t =. -7.093; p < .001), IJS (ß= -3.779, t =. -7.009; p < .001) implying a statistically significant inverse association between company culture (CC), Compensation and benefits (CB), Work-life balance (WLB), internal Job satisfaction (JS), as predictors and Overall Job Satisfaction (OJS) as an outcome.

Pearson correlation: Relationship between Independent Variables and Job satisfaction

Persson Correlation was run to assess the strength of associations between the independent variables and the dependent data variable.

Correlation

Company Culture Professional Growth Manager Relationship Compensation & Benefits Work-Life-Balance Internal Job Satisfaction
Overall Job Satisfaction -.698* .791** .865** -.870** -.885** -.692*

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

CC, PG, MR, CB, WLB, MR, and IJS imply Company culture, Professional Growth, Manager relationship, Compensation and benefits, Work-life balance, and Job satisfaction. Correlation between the independent variables and the dependent variable also indicates strong positive and negative associations and is statistically significant between 0.001 < r < 0.05. The result indicates a strong positive association between PG ( 0.791) and MR (.865). The result further shows a strong inverse relationship between CC, CB, WLB, MR, and IJS with CC (-.698), CB (-.870), WLB (-.885), and IJS (-.692).

Combined Effect of Demographic and Independent Variables on Overall Job Satisfaction

 Sources Frequency Percent
Satisfied 35 17.2
Somewhat Satisfied 10 4.9
Fully Satisfied 6 2.9
Somewhat Dissatisfied 55 27.0
Fully Dissatisfied 98 48.0
Total 204 100.0

On the combined effect of demographic and independent variables on overall job satisfaction, the mean and standard deviation were (M = 3.84, SD = ± 1.495) with 35 of the respondents (17.2%) saying they were satisfied, 10 of them (4.9%) said they were somewhat satisfied, 6 of them (2.9 %) said they are fully satisfied, 55respondents (27%) said they are partially dissatisfied, while 98 (48%) said they are completely dissatisfied. This implies that 75% of respondents are dissatisfied with their jobs. The mean of 3.84 and a standard deviation (SD) of ±1.495 provide valuable insights into the distribution of your data. The Mean indicates the average value of your dataset suggesting that in the context of the 5-point Likert scale used, respondents tend to agree or slightly agree with the statement that demographic and independent variables affect overall job satisfaction. The Standard Deviation (SD) (±1.495) measures the spread or dispersion of the data. A Standard Deviation (SD) of 1.495 indicates moderate variability, with most responses clustering around the mean. Approximately 68% of responses fall within 1 SD (1.495) of the mean, i.e., between 2.345 (3.84 – 1.495) and 5.335 (3.84 + 1.495) implying that respondents normally agree with the statement demographic and independent variables affect overall job satisfaction, but with some variation in opinions. The moderate SD suggests that some respondents are fully satisfied or dissatisfied, while others are somewhat satisfied or dissatisfied and others neutral.

DISCUSSION

The study determined the level of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction and its associated factors among health professionals in the North Gonja District of the Savannah Region of Ghana. The study found that 75% of the respondents were dissatisfied with their jobs. This discovery connects with the findings of previous studies on job satisfaction (Merga & Fufa 2019; Mulugeta & Ayele 2015) which also found large proportions of job dissatisfaction among respondents. This study matched the combined effect of demographic and independent variables on job satisfaction which was not done in previous studies that ignored the impact of demographic variables (Geta et al. 2021; Akuffo et al. 2021; Scanlan et al. 2021; Qiu et al. 2021; Singh et al. 2019). This current also uncovered a 48% total dissatisfaction rate which depart from studies that other studies (Temesgen et al. 2018). North Gonja District is one of the severely deprived in the Savannah Region, so the high job dissatisfaction rate of 75% (48% total dissatisfaction and 27% partially dissatisfied) presents a serious concern because the more become discontented, a lot of possible outcomes can be anticipated including low productivity, wastage ( transfers, retirement, reposting) inter alia. The key contributors contributing positively to job satisfaction as evidenced in this study comprise prospects for professional growth and manager relationships, while unfriendly company culture, poor compensation and benefits, inconsistent work-life balance, and poor internal job satisfaction were factors that triggered job dissatisfaction among health workers. These discoveries are in tandem with findings of previous studies and extant literature (Akuffo et al. 2021; Guan et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2019; Jin et al. 2019; Bonenberger et al. 2014; Kumar et al. 2013; Mulugeta & Ayele 2015; Gulavani & Shinde 2014). This study also discovered that of the factors contributing to job dissatisfaction among health professionals, poor compensations and benefits (conditions of services), CB (ß= -6.982, t =. -10.887; p < .001), work-life balance WLB (ß= -3.974, t =. -7.093; p < .001), and internal job satisfaction IJS (ß= -3.779, t =. -7.009; p < .001) explained the highest levels of overall job dissatisfaction as was the case in the following studies (Akuffo et al. 2021; Anand et al. 2022; Asegid et al. 2014; Ayalew et al. 2019; Khunou & Davhana-Maselesele 2016; Kumar et al. 2013; Khunou and Davhana-Maselesele, 2016). Unlike many previous studies that found no substantial association between demographic characteristics and overall job satisfaction (Chaulagain & Khadkas 2012; Elsherbeny & El-Masry 2018), this study found significant relationships between demographic characteristics and overall job satisfaction and dissatisfaction (p< 0.05) as is the case of (Ayalew et al. 2019; Lu et al. 2016; Asegid et al. 2014) which also reported some associations between demographic attributes and overall job satisfaction and dissatisfaction indicating that demographic characteristics play a role in employees appreciation of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with their jobs.

CONCLUSION

This study examined the factors determining job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among health professionals in the North Gonja District of the Savannah Region of Ghana. The study concluded that the generally high level of job dissatisfaction found among the health professionals in the North Gonja District of the Savannah Region stemmed from unfriendly company culture, poor compensation and benefits, mismatch of work-life balance, and poor internal job satisfaction. It is also evident that age, level of education, and work experience (demographic factors) have also contributed to dissatisfaction.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the findings, the study recommends that health policymakers, managers, and other stakeholders should develop and ensure the implementation of employee-friendly human resource policies that will lessen staff apprehensions and increase the rates of employee job satisfaction. Health professionals in the district in addition to increased remuneration, should be incentivized prospects of professional growth in areas of competency-based training. Health authorities should also provide work-life balance opportunities like mental health and on-site fitness support programs and insurance schemes to cushion employees during hard times. Employees should be rotated regularly to afford them opportunities to change their workplaces and environments as a means of invigorating them. Regular skill development training, mentorships, or education assistance should be churned out to support staff build their capacity and add value to themselves. In addition to the above recommendations, stakeholders and health managers should embrace a culture of inclusivity to ensure staff have their voice in how issues affecting them and addressed. There should be regular meetings to discuss staff satisfaction-related issues and develop collective approaches to solve them. It is also important to make efforts to increase the staff strength of the district since the total number of 204 staff for the district is woefully inadequate considering the volume of work. The staff inadequacy puts a lot of pressure on the few available ones and consequently saps their energies and makes them dissatisfied with time.

Study limitations

Although in the end, all 204 health professionals in the district participated in the study, there was difficulty in reaching them due to the bad nature of roads and also poor internet connectivity in the area. Some of the staff had to be assembled at vantage points for easy accessibility, which comes with costs to the investigators.

Conflict of Interest

The researchers proclaim no conflict of interest in the study.

Funding

No external funding was secured for the study. The study was funded from the authors’ resources.

Disclaimer

The views, perceptions, and opinions articulated in this article outside literature, empirical evidence, and participants’ responses are exclusively those of the authors and do not essentially replicate the official policy or position of any affiliated agency of the authors or participants.

Further Research

Future studies should focus on other settings outside the Savannah region to discover factors responsible for job satisfaction and dissatisfaction among health professionals to aid a holistic job satisfaction policy for the public health sector.

REFERENCES

  1. Abdelmoula, L & Boudabbous, S. (2021). Determinants of Job Satisfaction in Accounting Professionals in Tunisia. Open access peer-reviewed chapter. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99331.
  2. Abuhashesh, M., Al-Dmour, R., Masa’deh, R., (2019). Factors that Affect Employees Job Satisfaction and Performance to Increase Customers’ Satisfactions, Journal of Human Resources Management Research, 23, Article ID 354277, DOI: 10.5171/2019.354277.
  3. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2015). AHRQ’s patient safety initiative: Building foundations, reducing risk. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/pscongrpt/psini1.html.
  4. Akuffo, K.O., Agyei-Manu, E., Kumah, D.B., Danso-Appiah, A., Mohammed, A.S., Asare, A.K. et al., (2021). ‘Job satisfaction and its associated factors among optometrists in Ghana: A cross-sectional study’, Health and Quality Life Outcomes 19(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01650-3
  5. Amoateng Sabeng, Dominic & Mensah, John. (2023). Job satisfaction and characteristics among staff of public higher educational institutions in Ghana. Cogent Education. 10. 10.1080/2331186X.2023.2226457.
  6. Anand, T., Kaur, G., Gupta, K., Thapliyal, S. & Lal, P., (2022). ‘Job satisfaction among medical officers working in Delhi’, Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 11(1), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_268_21
  7. Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, Kogan Page Ltd
  8. Aziri, B., (2011). Job satisfaction: a literature review, Management Research And Practice, 3(4), 77-86.
  9. Artz, B. & Kaya, I., (2014). The impact of job security on job satisfaction in economic contractions versus expansions, Applied Economics, 46:24, 2873-2890, DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2014.914148
  10. Asegid, A., Belachew, T. & Yimam, E., (2014). ‘Factors influencing job satisfaction and anticipated turnover among nurses in Sidama Zone Public Health Facilities, South Ethiopia’, Nursing Research and Practice 2014, 909768. https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2014/909768
  11. Ayalew, F., Kibwana, S., Shawula, S., Misganaw, E., Abosse, Z., Van Roosmalen J. et al., (2019). ‘Understanding job satisfaction and motivation among nurses in public health facilities of Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study’, BMC Nursing 18, 46. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0373-8
  12. Blaauw, D., Ditlopo, P., Maseko, F., Chirwa, M., Mwisongo, A., Bidwell, P. et al.., (2013). ‘Comparing the job satisfaction and intention to leave of different categories of health workers in Tanzania, Malawi, and South Africa’, Global Health Action 6(1), 19287. 10.3402/gha. v6i0.19287
  13. Block, M. (2011). Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_1720
  14. Bonenberger, M., Aikins, M., Akweongo, P. & Wyss, K., (2014). ‘The effects of health worker motivation and job satisfaction on turnover intention in Ghana: A cross-sectional study’, Human Resources for Health 12(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/ 1478-4491-12-43
  15. Brenninger, H-J., (2015). Employee satisfaction and its impact on company value, Doc-toral thesis. University Of Latvia, Faculty Of Economics and Management, Riga Latvia.
  16. Chaulagain, N. & Khadka, D.K., (2012). ‘Factors influencing job satisfaction among healthcare professionals at Tilganga eye center, Kathmandu, Nepal’, Age 35(56), 74–67.
  17. Cheginy, Z., Isfahani, H. M., Mohseni, M., Khakian, M., & Khosravizadeh, O. (2014). Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction of Employee: a Case Study. Journal of Social Issues & Humanities, Volume 2, Issue 2, February 2014. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281269958
  18. Coursera Staff (Nov 29, 2023). Hospital Administrator: Duties, Pay, and How to Become One https://www.coursera.org/articles/hospital-administrator
  19. Cranny, E.R., Smith, I.I. and Stone, T.U. (2014), Determinants of job satisfaction among police Officers. Int. R. Modern Sociol. 24(1): 109-16.
  20. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
  21. Datuah, J. & Aninanya, Gifty & Habib, I. & Aryee, Paul. (2022). SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CORRELATES OF JOB SATISFACTION AMONG NURSES AND MIDWIVES IN HEALTH FACILITIES IN THE BOLE DISTRICT OF THE SAVANNAH REGION, GHANA. UDS International Journal of Development. 8. 674-687. 10.47740/604.UDSIJD6i.
  22. Duah, Evans & Ephraim, Richard & Amoah, Samuel & Addy, Nii Armah. (2023). Factors affecting job satisfaction and retention of Medical Laboratory Professionals in Ghana. 29. 23. 10.4314/ajmr.v29i1.2.
  23. Elizabeth Hopper [2024, May 14]. “Malow’s Hierarchy of Needs Explained”. ThoughtCo.com. https://www.thoughtco.com/maslows-hierarchy-of-needs-4582571
  24. Elsherbeny, E.E. & El-Masry, R., 2018, ‘Job satisfaction among nurses working in Mansoura University Hospital: Effect of socio-demographic and work characteristics’, Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine 42(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/ 10.21608/ejom.2018.6807
  25. Essays, UK. (November 2013). The relationship between supervisor and employee and job satisfaction. Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/management/the-relationship-betweensupervisor- and-employee-and-job-satisfaction-management- essay.php?vref=1
  26. Geta, A., Biks, G.A., Dellie, E. & Yazachew, L., (2021). ‘Job satisfaction and associated factors among health professionals working at public and private hospitals in Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study’, BioMed Research International 2021, 6632585. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6632585
  27. Golemann, D., Boyatzis, R., McKee, A., (2004). Emotionale Führung, Ullstein Buchver-lage GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  28. Guan, X., Ni, B., Zhang, J., Zhu, D., Cai, Z., Meng, W. et al., (2021). ‘Association between physicians’ workload and prescribing quality in one tertiary hospital in China’, Journal of Patient Safety 17(8), e1860–e1865. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000 000000000753
  29. Gulavani, A. & Shinde, M., (2014). ‘Occupational stress and job satisfaction among nurses’, International Journal of Science and Research 3(4), 733–740.
  30. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time. How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review. 46. (1): 53-62.
  31. Jalagat, Revenio. (2016). Job Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Motivation: A Critical Review of Their Relationship. International Journal of Management and Economics. 5. 36-43.
  32. Javed, M., Balouch, R. & Hassan, F. (2014). Determinants of Job Satisfaction and its Impact on Employee Performance and Turnover Intentions. International Journal of Learning & Development ISSN 2164-4063 2014, Vol. 4, No. 2. 120-140. Doi:10.5296/ ijld.v4i2.6094 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ ijld.v4i2.6094
  33. Jin, Y., Wang, H., Wang, D. & Yuan, B., (2019). ‘Job satisfaction of the primary healthcare providers with expanded roles in the context of health service integration in rural China: A cross-sectional mixed methods study’, Human Resources for Health 17(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0403-3
  34. Kaliski, B.S., (2007). Encyclopedia of Business and Finance, Thompson Gale, Detroit, USA.
  35. Khamisa, N., Oldenburg, B., Peltzer, K. & Ilic, D., (2015). ‘Work-related stress, burnout, job satisfaction and general health of nurses’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12(1), 652–666. https://doi.org/10. 3390/ijerph120100652
  36. Khunou, S.H. & Davhana-Maselesele, M., (2016). ‘Level of job satisfaction amongst nurses in the North-West Province, South Africa: Post occupational specific dispensation’, Curationis 39(1), 1–10. 10.4102/curationis. v39i1.1438
  37. Kumar, R., Ahmed, J., Shaikh, B.T., Hafeez, R. & Hafeez, A., (2013). ‘Job satisfaction among public health professionals working in the public sector: A cross-sectional study from Pakistan’, Human Resources for Health 11(1), 2. https://doi. org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-2
  38. Lane, K., Esser, J., Holte, B., & Anne, M. M. (2010). A study of nurse faculty job satisfaction in community colleges in Florida. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 5(1), 16-26.
  39. Lu, Y., Hu, X.M., Huang, X.L., Zhuang, X.D., Guo, P., Feng, L.F. et al., (2016). ‘Job satisfaction and associated factors among healthcare staff: A cross-sectional study in Guangdong Province, China’, BMJ Open 6(7), e011388. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011388
  40. Maslow, A.H. (1943) A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
  41. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row
  42. Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). Delhi, India: Pearson Education
  43. Mbindyo, P., Gilson, L., Blaauw, D. & English, M., (2009). ‘Contextual influences on health worker motivation in district hospitals in Kenya’, Implementation Science 4(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-43
  44. Merga, H. & Fufa, T., (2019. ‘Impacts of the working environment and benefits packages on the health professionals’ job satisfaction in selected public health facilities in eastern Ethiopia: Using principal component analysis’, BMC Health Services Research 19(1), 494. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4317-5
  45. Mere RA, Simbeni TV, Mathibe M, Mogale MN, Ntuli ST. (2023). Job satisfaction among health professionals in a District of North West province, South Africa. Health SA. 28:2234. doi: 10.4102/hsag. v28i0.2234. PMID: 37292237; PMCID: PMC10244876.
  46. Mengistu, M.M. & Bali, A.G., (2015). ‘Factors associated with job satisfaction among healthcare Workers at Public Hospitals of west Shoa zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia’, Science Journal of Public Health 3(2), 161–167. https://doi. org/10.11648/j.sjph.20150302.12
  47. Morton, D., Topper, K., Bowers, C., Jardien-Baboo, S., Nyangeni, T. & Mabitja, M., (2020). ‘Job satisfaction of nurses working in public hospitals: Perceptions of nurse unit managers in South Africa’, British Journal of Nursing 29(17), 1024–1029. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.17.1024
  48. Mosadegh Rad, A, M. M., & De Moraes, A. (2009). Factors affecting employees’ job satisfaction in public hospitals- Implications for recruitment and retention. Journal of General Management Vol. 34 No. 4 Summer 2009
  49. Mulugeta, M.M. & Ayele, G.B. (2015). ‘Factors associated to job satisfaction among healthcare workers at public hospitals of West Shoa Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study’, Science Journal of Public Health 3(2), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20150302.12
  50. Munyewende, P.O., Rispel, L.C. & Chirwa, T., (2014). ‘Positive practice environments influence job satisfaction of primary health care clinic nursing managers in two South African provinces’, Human Resources for Health 12(1), 1–14. https://doi. org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-27
  51. Ndulue, T.I. & Ekechukwu, H.C. (2016). Impact Of Job Satisfaction On Employees Performance: A Study of Nigerian Breweries Plc Kaduna state branch, Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review. 5(11)13-23
  52. Opkara, J. O. (2002). The Impact Of Salary Differential On Managerial Job Satisfaction. A Study Of The Gender Gap And Its Implications For Management Education And Practice In A Developing Economy. Journal of Business Developing Nations, 65-92.
  53. Payne, A., Koen, L., Niehaus, D.J.H. & Smit, I.M., (2020). ‘Burnout and job satisfaction of nursing staff in a South African acute mental health setting’, South African Journal of Psychiatry 26, 1454. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajpsychiatry. v26i0.1454
  54. Pietroń-Pyszczek, A., (2010). Satysfakcja pracownicza w zmieniającym się przedsię-biorstwie – możliwości i bariery jej kształtowania, In Lewicka D., Zbiegień-Maciąg L., Wyzwania dla współczesnych organizacji w warunkach konkurencyjnej gospo-darki. Wed. AGH, Kraków, Poland, 491-499.
  55. Pushpakumari M. D. (2008). The Impact of Job Satisfaction on Job Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Pp. 89-105 ???? 2008???
  56. Qiu, D., Li, R., Li, Y., He, J., Ouyang, F., Luo, D. et al., (2021). ‘Job dissatisfaction mediated the associations between work stress and mental health problems’, Frontiers in Psychiatry 12, 711263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.711263
  57. Raziq, A., Maulabakhsh, R. (2015). Impact of Working Environment on Job Satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 717-725, DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00524-9.
  58. Rukh, L., Choundhary, M. A., & Abbasi, S. A. (2015). Analysis of factors affecting employee satisfaction: A case study from Pakistan. Work. 2015;52(1):137-52. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152039. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26410229
  59. Saranya , K. (2014). Influence of Job Satisfaction on Employees’ Performance – A general Perspective. International Journal on Global Business Management and Research. Volume 2; Issue 2; March 2014 ; ISSN 2278 8425
  60. Saul McLeod (2018). Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Simple Psychology. https://canadacollege.edu/dreamers/docs/Maslows-Hierarchy-of-Needs.pdf
  61. Scanlan, L.M., Devine, S.G. & Watkins, D.L., 2021, ‘Job satisfaction of mental healthcare workers in multidisciplinary teams’, Journal of Mental Health 30(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2019.1644489
  62. Schroffel, A., (1999). How Does Clinical Supervision Affect Job Satisfaction? The Clinical Supervisor, 18(2), 91-105.
  63. Singh, T., Kaur, M., Verma, M. & Kumar, R., (2019). ‘Job satisfaction among health care providers: A cross-sectional study in public health facilities of Punjab, India’, Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 8(10), 3268–3275. https://doi. org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_600_19
  64. Soonhee, K., (2002). Participative Management and Job Satisfaction: Lessons for Management Leadership, Public Administration Review, 62(2), 231-241, DOI: 0.1111/0033-3352.00173.
  65. Spector, P. (2008). Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Research and Practice, 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  66. Temesgen, K., Aycheh, M.W. & Leshargie, C.T., (2018). ‘Job satisfaction and associated factors among health professionals working at Western Amhara Region, Ethiopia’, Health and Quality Life Outcomes 16(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0898-7
  67. Viñas-Bardolet, C., Velazco, J., & Torrent-Sellens, J. (2013). Determinants of Job Satisfaction, the Role of Knowledge-based work: An illustration from Spain. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268576689
  68. Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: separating evaluations, beliefs, and affective experiences. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 173-194.
  69. Woods, L. (2018). How Job Security Influences Job Satisfaction & Performance. https://work.chron.com/job-security-influences-job-satisfaction-performance-30781.html
  70. World Health Organization, (2016). Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030, https://www.who.int/ publications/i/item/9789241511131.
  71. Yalabik, Y.Z., Popaitoon, P., Chowne, J.A., Rayton, B.A., 2013. Work engagement as a mediator between employee attitudes and outcomes, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2799-2823.
  72. Yamane, T., (1967). Statistics an introductory analysis, 2nd edn., Harper and Row, New York, NY.
  73. Yang, J.H., Liao, Y.F., Lin, W.B. & Wu, W., (2019). Prescribing errors in electronic prescriptions for outpatients intercepted by pharmacists and the impact of prescribing workload on error rate in a Chinese tertiary-care women and children’s hospital’, BMC Health Services Research 19(1), 1013. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12913-019-4843-1

Additional References

  1. Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, Tenth Edition, Kogan Page Publishing, London, p. 264
  2. Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction, Harper and Brothers, New York, p. 47
  3. Statt, D. (2004). The Routledge Dictionary of Business Management, Third edition, Routledge Publishing, Detroit, p. 78
  4. Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation, John Wiley and Sons, New York, p.99
  5. Christen, M., Iyer, G. and Soberman, D. (2006). Job Satisfaction, Job Performance, and Effort: A Reexamination Using Agency Theory, Journal of Marketing, January, Vol. 70, pp. 137-150
  6. Lawler, E.E. III and Porter, L.W. (1967). The Effect of Performance on Job Satisfaction, Industrial Relations, pp. 20-28
  7. Locke, E.A. and Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance, Prentice Hall, p.4

APPENDIX

Study Instrument/Questionnaire: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeTkUMWY54A893zFloT-vytPSxxAADWyk81P8sJWsn9CtGCiQ/viewform?usp=sharing

Article Statistics

Track views and downloads to measure the impact and reach of your article.

0

PDF Downloads

5 views

Metrics

PlumX

Altmetrics

Paper Submission Deadline

GET OUR MONTHLY NEWSLETTER

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter, to get updates regarding the Call for Paper, Papers & Research.

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter

    Sign up for our newsletter, to get updates regarding the Call for Paper, Papers & Research.