Enhancing Creativity and Problem-Solving: Design Principles for Project-Based Learning in Product Design

Enhancing Creativity and Problem-Solving: Design Principles for Project-Based Learning in Product Design

Norarifah Ali¹, Azmir Mamat Nawi^*, and Norashikin Abdul Latiff ³

^1,2College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA Kedah, Kampus Sungai Petani, 08400 Merbok, Kedah, Malaysia

³Kompleks Nasyrul Quran, Jalan P14J, Presint 14, 62675 Putrajaya, Malaysia

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8090310

Received: 30 September 2024; Accepted: 04 October 2024; Published: 25 October 2024

ABSTRACT

This conceptual paper addresses the need for effective pedagogical strategies to enhance creativity and problem-solving skills in product design education. The study aims to explore how Design Principles can be integrated into Project-Based Learning (PBL) to foster these critical skills. Using a comprehensive literature review, the study synthesizes existing theories, focusing on constructivist learning and Design Thinking models. The findings suggest that structured design principles, such as user-centered design and iterative development, significantly improve the efficacy of PBL in developing students’ creativity and problem-solving abilities. However, challenges such as inconsistent PBL implementation and insufficient teacher training limit its effectiveness. The study highlights the need for empirical validation and suggests future research focus on testing the proposed framework in real-world educational settings. The findings have practical implications for educators, providing a structured approach to enhance skill development in product design through PBL.

Keywords— Project-Based Learning (PBL), Design Principles, Creativity in Education, Problem-Solving Skills, Design Thinking

INTRODUCTION

In today’s rapidly evolving global economy, creativity and problem-solving skills are essential for future designers. Product design education must adapt to foster these competencies, with Project-Based Learning (PBL) emerging as a highly effective pedagogical strategy. PBL provides students with real-world challenges, encouraging them to apply design principles, collaborate, and iterate solutions. In recent years, global education trends have increasingly emphasized the development of both hard and soft skills in students, particularly in higher education. While hard skills, such as cognitive knowledge and professional expertise, remain crucial, there is a growing recognition of the importance of soft skills like problem-solving, teamwork, and creativity (Vogler et al., 2018). However, achieving these goals is particularly challenging in traditional learning environments where the transmission of knowledge is primarily teacher-centered, with students playing a passive role (Alorda et al., 2011). This approach often leads to a superficial understanding of disciplinary knowledge, as students struggle to engage fully with the content being taught.

Internationally, educational institutions are increasingly adopting PBL to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. However, challenges remain in ensuring that PBL frameworks are consistently effective across various cultural and economic contexts. In product design, integrating well-defined design principles into PBL frameworks is vital to ensure students develop both creativity and problem-solving skills while aligning with industry demands. This paper explores how design principles can enhance the effectiveness of PBL in product design education, ensuring that students are not only equipped with technical knowledge but also empowered with the innovative mindset required to solve global design challenges.

Moreover, universities, especially research-focused institutions, tend to prioritize research skills over transferable professional skills. This results in a gap between the knowledge students gain in the classroom and the skills they need in the professional world (James & Holmes, 2012). In product design education, where the core function revolves around creative problem-solving, this skills gap is particularly concerning. Product designers must develop artifacts and services by leveraging their understanding of human behavior, brainstorming, ideation, sketching, and engineering to address real-world challenges (Sun & Kim, 2022).

To bridge this gap, PBL has emerged as a highly effective approach in teaching product design. PBL emphasizes active learning through inquiry-based methods, enabling students to engage with authentic, real-world problems (Al-Balushi et al., 2014). By doing so, students not only acquire technical knowledge but also develop problem-solving and decision-making skills. As Wurdinger et al. (2007) highlight, PBL offers a holistic and meaningful learning experience, fostering creativity and practical skills essential for future product designers. Therefore, integrating well-structured design principles for PBL in product design education is critical for nurturing creativity and problem-solving abilities among students.

In the context of Malaysia, higher education institutions have increasingly recognized the importance of preparing students for the rapidly evolving global economy. In product design education, the training goals align with those outlined by  Liu and Zhao (2021), focusing on “innovation + design thinking + professional practice.” This approach supports the development of professional and entrepreneurial skills, which are critical for adapting to social and economic changes. Malaysian universities have begun integrating PBL as a way to engage students in practical, hands-on learning that promotes problem-solving and creativity. According to the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Educationc (Ministry of Education, 2013), efforts to incorporate PBL into curricula have resulted in an increase in graduates with entrepreneurial skills, ready to address local and global challenges through innovation.

Recent statistics show that over 70% of Malaysian higher education institutions are adopting PBL strategies, particularly in design-related fields. These efforts address the nation’s growing demand for skilled graduates in fields such as product design and innovation. This shift in educational focus ensures that students are not only equipped with academic knowledge but are also able to apply creative thinking and problem-solving skills in real-world scenarios, thereby contributing to Malaysia’s goals for sustainable development and innovation in industry.

Numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing creativity, problem-solving, and critical thinking skills among students. Zhang and Ma (2023) showed that PBL significantly improves students’ learning outcomes, fostering deeper academic achievement and more positive affective attitudes. Similarly, Almulla (2020) found that PBL enhances problem-solving abilities and overall student engagement, especially in complex, real-world scenarios, which are vital for product design education.

In addition to improving cognitive skills, PBL also supports the development of creative thinking. A study by Faozi et al. (2020) found that students exposed to PBL could generate more innovative ideas and effectively apply these ideas to practical problem-solving tasks. This aligns with the objectives of product design education, where innovation and creativity are essential to professional practice. Collectively, these studies confirm the effectiveness of PBL in cultivating skills that are directly relevant to both academic success and real-world applications.

Despite the growing recognition of PBL as an effective approach for developing creativity and problem-solving skills in product design education, a significant research gap remains. Specifically, while many studies have explored the general benefits of PBL, there is limited research on the explicit design principles that guide educators in effectively implementing PBL in product design courses. This gap is critical because, without clear guidelines, educators may struggle to align PBL activities with the intended learning outcomes, leading to inconsistent results across different institutions and contexts.

The research objectives of this paper are to: (1) identify and analyze key design principles that can enhance the implementation of PBL in product design education, (2) examine how these principles influence the development of creativity and problem-solving skills among students, and (3) propose a framework for integrating these design principles into product design curricula. By addressing these objectives, this paper aims to provide a structured approach that educators can use to improve the effectiveness of PBL in fostering relevant skills in product design students.

The structure of this article is organized as follows: First, the paper reviews existing literature on PBL and design principles in education. Next, it outlines the methodology used to investigate these principles in a product design context. The results section presents findings related to the identified design principles, followed by a discussion on their implications for teaching product design. Finally, the conclusion highlights key takeaways and suggests future research directions to further refine PBL implementation in design education.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Design Principles

Design principles serve as fundamental guidelines that inform and structure the teaching process. In the context of education, design principles ensure that learning experiences are effective, efficient, and engaging. For teaching product design, these principles include user-centered design, iterative development, and creativity promotion. By adopting these principles, educators create a learning environment that mirrors real-world design challenges, encouraging students to think critically, innovate, and collaborate (Sun & Kim, 2022).

The goal of these principles is to guide the process in a way that not only enhances knowledge retention but also supports the practical application of design theories in solving real-world problems.

Project-Based Learning (PBL)

PBL is an inquiry-based learning model that allows students to acquire deeper knowledge by actively exploring real-world challenges and problems. In a PBL environment, learners work on projects over an extended period, which encourages them to research, problem-solve, collaborate, and engage in reflective thinking (Al-Balushi & Al-Aamri, 2014).

This method aligns perfectly with the objectives of product design education, where the emphasis is on developing creative problem-solving skills. Research shows that PBL leads to significant improvements in student engagement, critical thinking, and innovation (Zhang & Ma, 2023).

Challenges in Product Design Education

Despite the benefits of PBL, teaching product design comes with unique challenges. First, the complexity of design projects can overwhelm students, especially when they lack prior experience. Moreover, balancing creativity with technical constraints remains a key challenge in product design education. Students must learn to integrate design thinking with engineering principles, which requires a delicate balance of both creativity and precision. Additionally, access to resources—such as prototyping tools and real-world case studies—may be limited in many educational settings, impacting the depth of learning experiences (Alorda et al., 2011). The gap between academic instruction and industry expectations is another challenge, as students often lack exposure to the evolving demands of professional design environments (James & Holmes, 2012).

Relevant Theories and Models

Several theories and models support the application of PBL and design principles in teaching product design:

Constructivist Learning Theory

Constructivism underpins PBL, suggesting that learners construct knowledge actively, rather than passively receiving it. In product design education, this theory emphasizes the importance of hands-on learning, where students engage with real-world design problems, iterate, and reflect on their experiences (Jonassen, 2011). This approach allows students to connect new information to their existing knowledge and skills, fostering deeper understanding and application.

Design Thinking Model

The Design Thinking Model focuses on human-centered design and encourages creativity, collaboration, and iteration. It is particularly relevant in product design education, as it promotes empathy with users and fosters iterative problem-solving. Students are encouraged to go through cycles of ideation, prototyping, and testing—key elements in the product design process (Brown, 2009). Integrating this model into PBL provides a structured framework that allows students to develop innovative solutions to complex design challenges.

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom’s Taxonomy offers a hierarchical model of cognitive skills, from lower-order thinking (remembering and understanding) to higher-order thinking (evaluating and creating). When applied to product design education, this model helps educators structure lessons that gradually increase in complexity, guiding students from acquiring basic design knowledge to applying that knowledge in complex, real-world contexts (Krathwohl, 2002).

Research Gaps and Conclusion

While there is ample research on the benefits of PBL and the theories that support it, there is a significant gap in the explicit design principles that guide its implementation in product design education. Many studies focus on the general effectiveness of PBL but fail to address the nuanced, discipline-specific strategies that can help educators tailor PBL to meet the unique demands of product design. This gap is critical because without clear guidelines, educators may struggle to align PBL activities with the intended learning outcomes, resulting in inconsistent educational experiences (Zhang & Ma, 2023).

Furthermore, little research has been done on how to effectively balance technical and creative requirements in product design education using PBL frameworks. Given the increasing complexity of the product design industry, this is an area that warrants further exploration. Additionally, more studies are needed to explore the impact of resource limitations on the effectiveness of PBL in developing countries, where access to cutting-edge design tools may be scarce (Alorda et al., 2011).

In conclusion, while PBL offers significant advantages in teaching product design, its effectiveness depends on the integration of well-structured design principles. Future research should focus on addressing the existing gaps by developing explicit design guidelines that align with the unique challenges of product design education. By doing so, educators can better equip students with the creative problem-solving and technical skills required to thrive in the global design industry.

Table 1

The Table 1 presents a comprehensive overview of recent studies over the past five years have explored the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) in teaching product design, highlighting its impact on creativity, problem-solving, and innovation. Zhang and Ma (2023) conducted a quantitative study that revealed how PBL significantly improves student creativity, problem-solving skills, and academic outcomes. Similarly, Sun and Kim (2022), through mixed methods, emphasized the role of iterative design in fostering creativity, particularly in complex problem-solving scenarios. Al-Balushi and Al-Aamri (2021), using a qualitative case study, found that PBL enhances critical thinking and innovation, aligning well with the objectives of product design education. Jiang (2020) in an action research study, discussed how design-based learning promotes self-directed learning, encouraging students to innovate. Lastly, Hawari (2020) explored the pedagogical design of PBL in STEAM education through descriptive research, noting that PBL improves engagement and collaboration, essential for developing creative thinking in product design projects.

These studies consistently affirm that integrating PBL into product design education enhances students’ creative abilities and problem-solving skills, making it an essential approach for developing the necessary competencies for future designers.

Fig. 1 Conceptual Framework Diagram

Based on Figure 1, the conceptual framework is structured around four key components: Design Principles, Project-Based Learning (PBL), Creativity, and Problem-Solving Skills.

The Design Principles serve as the foundational guidelines that direct how PBL activities are conducted. PBL acts as the primary pedagogical strategy, allowing students to engage in real-world challenges that facilitate active learning and skill development.

This active engagement fosters Creativity, as students are encouraged to ideate, prototype, and refine their solutions.

In parallel, Problem-Solving Skills are developed through the iterative processes inherent in both design thinking and PBL, where students continuously test and improve their designs. The interplay between these components highlights how structured design principles in a PBL framework enhance both creative and problem-solving capabilities, which are essential in product design education (Jia et al., 2023; Yu, 2024).

METHODOLOGY

Research Design, Population, Sample Size, and Sampling Technique

This study adopts a conceptual research design to synthesize existing theories and literature to develop a framework for enhancing creativity and problem-solving in product design through Project-Based Learning (PBL). The research investigates the relationship between structured design principles, PBL, and the development of creativity and problem-solving skills.

The study’s population consists of educators and students from higher education institutions offering product design courses. To strengthen the reliability and generalizability of future empirical findings, a random probability sampling method is proposed. This sampling technique ensures that all individuals within the target population have an equal chance of being selected, thereby minimizing biases and enhancing the representativeness of the results.

Population and Sample Size

The population of interest consists of educators and students in higher education institutions offering product design courses.  The sample size is anticipated to include 100 participants (50 educators and 50 students), which is considered adequate for exploring diverse perspectives on PBL and its role in product design education.

Scope of the Study

The study specifically focuses on integrating design principles within PBL frameworks to enhance creativity and problem-solving skills in product design education. The scope is bounded by the conceptual nature of the research, as the study primarily draws on theoretical synthesis rather than empirical data collection. This framework aims to provide practical guidelines for educators, although empirical testing will be necessary to determine its effectiveness across various educational contexts.

Sampling Technique

The sampling technique employed will be use of a random probability sampling method in future empirical investigations. Such a sampling technique will ensure a more balanced and unbiased selection of participants, which is critical for enhancing the validity of findings in quantitative and mixed-method research settings (Taherdoost, 2021).

Data Collection

Data collection is designed to incorporate both quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative data will be gathered through structured surveys, employing a Likert-scale to measure participants’ perceptions of the effectiveness of PBL in fostering creativity and problem-solving. The surveys will be constructed based on previously validated instruments (McCombes, 2021).

Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews to gain deeper insights into the experiences of educators and students with PBL. This mixed-method approach aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of PBL design principles on learning outcomes.

Data Analysis

Quantitative Data Analysis:

Quantitative data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify patterns and key trends, as well as inferential statistical methods (e.g., regression analysis) to examine the relationships between variables, such as the application of design principles and outcomes in creativity and problem-solving. Measures like mean scores, standard deviations, and correlation coefficients will be utilized to elucidate the impact of design principles in PBL settings.

Qualitative Data Analysis:

Qualitative data from interviews will be subjected to thematic analysis to identify recurring themes and patterns in participants’ experiences with PBL and the application of design principles. This will involve coding and categorizing responses to derive meaningful insights into how PBL supports or challenges the development of creativity and problem-solving skills in product design (Taherdoost, 2021).

Variables and Measurement

The independent variable of the study is the implementation of design principles within PBL, and the dependent variables are the outcomes in creativity and problem-solving skills. The survey instrument will be developed to measure these relationships, with a Likert-scale questionnaire used to assess participant perceptions of PBL effectiveness, based on validated scales for creativity and problem-solving (McCombes, 2021).

Reliability and Validity of Questionnaire Constructs

To ensure the reliability of the survey instrument, Cronbach’s alpha will be used to measure internal consistency, with a threshold of 0.7 or higher deemed acceptable. Validity will be established through content validation, whereby experts in product design education will review the questionnaire to ensure that it comprehensively captures all aspects of creativity and problem-solving (Goundar, 2022).

DISCUSSION

The discussion section of this conceptual paper focuses on how Project-Based Learning (PBL), guided by structured Design Principles, enhances creativity and problem-solving skills in product design education. A comprehensive review of the literature supports this assertion, showing the effectiveness of PBL in fostering active learning and critical thinking in students.

According to Dolmans (2019), PBL is effective in bridging the gap between theory and practice, emphasizing student autonomy, investigation, and the application of knowledge to real-world problems. This aligns with the constructivist approach, where learners actively construct their knowledge. Similarly, Miller et al. (2021) identifies that integrating well-defined design principles into PBL frameworks not only motivates teaching but sustains changes in educational practice by focusing on iterative design, collaboration, and problem-solving.  Such an approach to learning fosters creativity by enabling students to engage in cycles of ideation, prototyping, testing, and refinement.

Despite these benefits, challenges remain in ensuring that PBL effectively enhances creativity. Sukackė et al. (2022) highlights that while PBL improves cognitive outcomes, its implementation can be inconsistent due to varying levels of institutional support and teacher preparedness.  Furthermore, research by Hafeez (2022) points out that the lack of structured design principles can hinder the development of critical skills like creativity and problem-solving.

The findings suggest that while PBL is widely recognized for its pedagogical benefits, it is the application of specific design principles that ensures its success in fostering creativity and problem-solving skills in product design. The literature supports the need for further research to address challenges related to implementation and teacher training, ensuring that PBL achieves its full potential.

FUTURE WORK

Future research should focus on empirical studies that test the effectiveness of the proposed design principles in various educational settings. Specifically, studies could explore how different configurations of PBL influence creativity and problem-solving across diverse student populations and disciplines. Additionally, research should examine teacher training programs to determine how educators can be better equipped to implement PBL effectively, addressing the challenges of inconsistent application.

Finally, further studies could investigate the long-term impacts of PBL on students’ professional skills in the workplace, particularly in creative industries like product design. These insights could inform curriculum development and lead to more effective educational strategies in design education.

CONCLUSION

This study explored the integration of Design Principles into Project-Based Learning (PBL) for enhancing creativity and problem-solving skills in product design education. The key findings suggest that the application of structured design principles in PBL leads to improved student engagement, deeper learning, and enhanced creativity and problem-solving capabilities.

Studies by Almulla (2020) demonstrated that PBL increases student engagement and knowledge sharing, while Zhang and Ma (2023) highlighted significant improvements in learning outcomes and cognitive skills through PBL.

THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Theoretical Implications

Theoretically, this study contributes to the growing body of research on constructivist learning theory, where learners construct knowledge actively through engagement in practical tasks. The study also aligns with Design Thinking models, emphasizing the iterative, hands-on approach crucial in PBL.

By providing a structured framework of design principles, the study enhances the understanding of how creativity and problem-solving skills can be developed through a process-oriented, learner-centered model of education.

Practical Implications

Practically, the study offers valuable insights for educators in product design and similar fields. It suggests that structured design principles should be integrated into PBL to ensure consistency and effectiveness across different educational contexts.

The findings indicate that well-implemented PBL can promote innovation and improve students’ ability to tackle complex design challenges. However, teacher training is critical for effective PBL execution, as inconsistent implementation can undermine its potential.

LIMITATIONS AND DELIMITATIONS OF THE RESEARCH

This study, focusing on enhancing creativity and problem-solving through design principles within Project-Based Learning (PBL), carries certain limitations and delimitations that shape the scope and applicability of its findings.

Limitations

One of the primary limitations of this research is its conceptual nature. As the study relies heavily on a theoretical framework and existing literature, the conclusions drawn may not fully translate into practical, real-world settings without empirical validation. While the conceptual analysis provides insights into the potential impact of design principles on PBL, there is a lack of direct empirical evidence to support the proposed framework’s effectiveness in diverse educational contexts.

Additionally, the variability in PBL implementation across different educational institutions may influence the generalizability of the findings. Factors such as the availability of resources, institutional support for active learning, and educator preparedness to implement PBL effectively can significantly affect the outcomes. Therefore, these variations present a challenge when applying the study’s conclusions universally to all higher education environments.

Another limitation pertains to the time constraints of conducting comprehensive research. Due to the limited time available, the study could not explore the full spectrum of factors influencing the application of design principles in PBL, potentially leaving out important nuances in how these principles operate in varied educational settings.

Delimitations

The study’s delimitations are shaped by its focus on specific aspects of product design education. First, the research is confined to examining the role of structured design principles within PBL, such as user-centered design and iterative development. It does not extend to other educational strategies or pedagogical models that may also influence creativity and problem-solving skills. This focus allows for a deeper exploration of the relationship between design principles and PBL but limits the study’s applicability to these particular teaching approaches.

Furthermore, the research is centered on the context of higher education, particularly within product design courses. As such, the study’s findings may not be transferable to secondary or primary educational settings, where the dynamics of PBL and the application of design principles may differ significantly.

REFERENCES

1. Al-Balushi, M., S., & Al-Aamri, S. S. (2014). The effect of environmental science projects on students’ environmental knowledge and science attitudes. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2014.927167
2. Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
3. Alorda, B., Suenaga, K., & Pons, P. (2011). Design and evaluation of a microprocessor course combining three cooperative methods: SDLA, PjBL and CnBL. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1876–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.004
4. Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2019). How theory and design-based research can mature PBL practice and research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(5), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-019-09940-2
5. Faozi, A. K. A., Hobri, Fatekurohman, M., Aini, K., & Yuniar, D. (2020). Student’s problem solving abilities in Project Based Learning (PjBL) based on Learning Community (LC). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1538(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012070
6. Goundar, S. (2022). Chapter 3 – Research Methodology and Research Method. Cloud computing. Research Methodology and Research Method, Chapter3, 84–193. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333015026_Chapter_3_-_Research_Methodology_and_Research_Method/comments
7. Hafeez, M. (2022). Challenges and research gap in project-based learning – A review. International Journal of New Trends in Social Sciences, 6(1), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijss.v6i1.5633
8. James, S., & Holmes, C. (2012). Developing Vocational Excellence : Learning Environments within Work Environments Developing Vocational Excellence : Learning Environments within Work Environments SKOPE Research Paper No . 112 November 2012. 112.
9. Jia, L., Jalaludin, N. A., & Rasul, M. S. (2023). Design Thinking and Project-Based Learning (DT-PBL): A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(8), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.8.20
10. Liu, X., & Zhao, Y. (2021). Research on the Application Strategy of Project-Based Learning Teaching Mode in Practical Teaching of Product Design. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Modern Education Management, Innovation and Entrepreneurship and Social Science (MEMIESS 2020), 523(Memiess 2020), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210206.002
11. McCombes, S. (2021). What is a research design | Types, guide & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/research-design/
12. Miller, E. C., Severance, S., & Krajcik, J. (2021). Motivating Teaching, Sustaining Change in Practice: Design Principles for Teacher Learning in Project-Based Learning Contexts. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(7), 757–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1864099
13. Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 – 2025. Education, 27(1), 1–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
14. Sukackė, V., Guerra, A. O. P. de C., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., Blanch, S., Marbà-Tallada, A., & Brose, A. (2022). Towards Active Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955
15. Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research; A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 2021(1), 10–38. https://hal.science/hal-03741847
16. Vogler, J. S., Thompson, P., Davis, D. W., Mayfield, B. E., Finley, P. M., & Yasseri, D. (2018). The Hard Work of Soft Skills: Augmenting the Project-Based Learning Experience with Interdisciplinary Teamwork. An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 46, 457–488.
17. Wurdinger, S., Haar, J., Hugg, R., & Bezon, J. (2007). A qualitative study using project-based learning in a mainstream middle school. Improving Schools, 10(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207078048
18. Yu, H. (2024). Enhancing creative cognition through project-based learning: An in-depth scholarly exploration. Heliyon, 10(6), e27706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27706
19. Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: a meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(July), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728