Harnessing Consumer Patriotism for Economic Growth and Sustainable Development

Harnessing Consumer Patriotism for Economic Growth and Sustainable Development

Olusegun Obasun

Segunobasun Consult, Nigeria

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9020040

Received: 11 January 2025; Accepted: 25 January 2025; Published: 01 March 2025

ABSTRACT

Consumer patriotism, the act of prioritizing locally made products over foreign alternatives, has emerged as a significant tool for driving economic growth and national development. This paper explores how consumer patriotism can catalyze economic transformation, particularly in developing nations like Nigeria. It highlights how such behaviour supports local industries, generates employment, reduces import dependency, and strengthens national identity. By analyzing theoretical frameworks and global examples, this study illustrates how the strategic alignment of consumer behaviour with national economic goals can foster long-term sustainable development.

Keywords: consumer patriotism, economic nationalism, national identity, consumer behaviour, economic development

INTRODUCTION

Consumer Patriotism- A Closer Look

Consumer patriotism refers to the tendency of consumers to prioritize purchasing goods or services produced within their own country or region, often driven by a sense of national pride or loyalty. Several factors, including cultural identity, economic nationalism, quality perceptions, and socio-political influences, shape this behaviour. For many consumers, supporting local products affirms their connection to their country’s culture and heritage. This cultural identity can be a powerful driver of consumer choices, with consumers opting for products that align with their values and traditions.

Economic nationalism is another major force behind consumer patriotism. Consumers often choose domestic brands to support local businesses, create jobs, and promote economic stability within their country. This sentiment is particularly strong in regions where economic self-sufficiency is viewed as crucial to national development. For example, the “Buy Local” movements in various countries encourage consumers to prioritize homegrown products to ensure economic resilience. Perceptions of quality also play a role in consumer patriotism. In specific markets, locally made products are seen as superior or more reliable, often based on long-standing reputations or historical associations with quality craftsmanship. In contrast, foreign goods may be perceived as inferior or lacking cultural authenticity, further driving the preference for domestic brands.

Social and political factors can also influence consumer attitudes. In times of political tension or trade disputes, consumers may reject foreign products as a form of protest, choosing domestic alternatives to assert their national identity. This trend can be seen in various regions where geopolitics has affected trade and consumer behaviour, such as during trade wars or economic sanctions. Examples of consumer patriotism manifest across different industries. Many consumers in the food and beverage sectors prefer locally sourced or produced products, associating them with freshness and quality. In clothing and fashion, brands that emphasize their national heritage or use domestic materials often attract patriotic buyers. The electronics and technology sectors also experience this trend, particularly in countries where national innovation is promoted. In the automotive industry, consumer patriotism is reflected in the preference for domestically manufactured cars, as buying from local brands is seen as a way to support the economy.

While consumer patriotism can be a strong force in national economies, it is important to recognize that it is not always based on rational decision-making. Factors such as price, availability, and actual quality can influence consumer choices, even among those who express strong patriotic sentiments. Furthermore, consumer patriotism can vary across cultures and regions, making it a complex and multifaceted phenomenon. In some cases, marketing and branding strategies may influence consumer loyalty to domestic products more than genuine nationalistic feelings. To sum up, consumer patriotism is a significant driver of purchasing behaviour, influenced by cultural, economic, and social factors. However, its impact is nuanced and can fluctuate depending on broader economic conditions and global trade dynamics. Countries aiming to harness consumer patriotism must enhance product quality and ensure domestic brands meet consumer expectations at home and in the increasingly competitive global market.

Aim of the study:

This study aims to explore how consumer patriotism can act as a catalyst for economic transformation, particularly in developing nations like Nigeria. It adopts a qualitative approach, drawing on case studies, theoretical analysis, and comparative analysis of global examples of consumer patriotism successfully fostering economic growth.

METHODOLOGY

The adoption of a qualitative descriptive design for the study is appropriate because it enables the exploration of how consumer behaviour, when aligned with national economic policies, can foster sustainable development. The study also integrates historical analysis of countries such as Japan and South Korea, which have successfully used consumer patriotism to drive industrial growth and national economic stability. The comparative analysis of different global examples allows for a nuanced understanding of the phenomenon in various cultural and economic contexts.

The study relies primarily on secondary data collected from academic papers, government reports, and market analyses on consumer patriotism. Sources include peer-reviewed journal articles, case studies, and global market reports that investigate the economic impact of consumer behaviour. Specific attention is given to countries like Japan, South Korea, and China, where consumer loyalty to domestic products has driven industrialization and economic growth.

This methodological approach provides a comprehensive framework for exploring how consumer patriotism can contribute to economic growth, specifically focusing on Nigeria. By analyzing historical case studies and theoretical frameworks, the study seeks to demonstrate that consumer patriotism, when effectively harnessed, has the potential to drive industrial growth, reduce dependency on imports, and foster national pride.

Theoretical Framework

This study draws on theories of economic nationalism and consumer behaviour, specifically the impact of national identity on purchasing decisions. It explores how consumer preferences for domestic products, driven by cultural identity and national pride, can help reduce reliance on imports, create local jobs, and strengthen national industries. These theoretical perspectives are essential for understanding the complex interplay between consumer behaviour and national economic policies in the context of globalization.

Ethical Considerations:

As the study relies solely on secondary data, no ethical approval is required for primary data collection. However, the study adheres to academic standards for citing and using publicly available data from reliable sources, ensuring transparency and accuracy in interpreting the findings.

Decoding Consumer Behaviour: Theories Behind Decision-Making and Economic Influence

Consumer behaviour describes the decision-making processes and actions of individuals or groups regarding the selection, purchase, and use of goods and services shaped by consumers’ attitudes and shopping behaviour, which are influenced by macroeconomic conditions outside the control of both producers and retailers or consumers themselves (Ma et al., 2011). These macroeconomic conditions include economic recessions, inflation, and unemployment rates. Consumers respond to these conditions based on their ability, which relates to their financial capacity, and their willingness to buy, which reflects their confidence in the economy and future financial stability. This perspective underscores the dynamic nature of consumer behaviour, which evolves in response to external economic pressures, highlighting the interplay between consumer psychology and broader economic contexts.  Consumer behaviour driven by nationalism, ethnocentrism, and patriotism reflects complex motivations tied to identity, cultural pride, and loyalty. Theories backing up this behaviour include:

Social Identity Theory

Social Identity Theory, developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner, explains that people derive a sense of identity and self-esteem from their group affiliations, such as nationality. This often translates to a preference for domestic products in consumer behaviour that reinforces national identity and pride (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Consumers who identify with their country tend to favour products that symbolize and support that identity and see their purchases as reinforcing their place in a group.

 Social Exchange Theory

George Homans’s Social Exchange Theory suggests that consumers make purchase decisions based on perceived costs and benefits. In the context of nationalism and ethnocentrism, consumers may feel that the benefit of contributing to national welfare outweighs the potential costs of selecting domestic products. This decision-making process is influenced by social values, where the emotional benefit of supporting one’s nation can be viewed as a “reward,” driving preferences for local goods.

Symbolic Interactionism

Symbolic Interactionism is a sociology theory that posits that people assign meaning to products and brands through social interactions. Domestic products can symbolize nationalism, pride, or social values, especially in countries with a strong sense of identity or unity. Consumers driven by this theory make choices that convey their national loyalty or pride, often choosing goods associated with national symbols or cultural heritage.

Economic Nationalism

Economic nationalism is a consumer behaviour that is rooted in the belief that buying locally-made products strengthens national economic independence, reduces reliance on imports, and fosters local job creation and describes the tendency of individuals to prioritize purchasing goods and services from domestic producers to support their country’s economy, industries, and workforce. Economic nationalism promotes consumer choices that prioritize national interests over global economic integration. This concept, grounded in economic theory, argues that consumers and governments should prefer domestic goods to strengthen local industries and protect national resources (Helleiner, 2002). This theory supports policies like tariffs on foreign goods and local purchasing incentives, often translating to consumer preferences for domestic products over imports.

The key drivers of economic nationalism in consumer behaviour are,

• First, Cultural Identity and National pride, with consumers often associating domestic products with their national identity.
• Second are economic factors, which are behaviours that are heightened during periods of economic instability, such as recessions or trade disputes.
• Third is Perceived Threat from Foreign Competition, which comes as a reaction to perceived threats to domestic industries, amplified by tariff policies, trade wars, or anti-globalization movements, and
• Lastly, Government and Industry Campaigns, such as “Make in India” or “Buy American,” reinforce consumer loyalty to domestic products (Helleiner, 2002).

Examples of Economic Nationalism in Consumer Behaviour include the United States’ initiatives like ‘Buy American’ campaigns encouraging consumers to buy locally made goods, especially in the automotive and manufacturing sectors, India’s “Vocal for Local” initiative that emphasizes buying domestic products to reduce dependency on imports and nationalistic sentiment in China which has driven consumers to prefer local brands such as Huawei over foreign competitors like Apple during trade tensions.

Economic nationalism boosts local production and employment and reduces trade deficits by lowering imports. It encourages innovation among domestic producers to meet quality and design standards and creates challenges for foreign brands trying to penetrate nationalistic markets. However, the downside is that economic nationalism overemphasis on domestic goods may lead to inefficiencies if domestic industries cannot meet demand or quality expectations and provoke retaliatory trade measures from other nations. Economic nationalism in consumer behaviour is a powerful tool for fostering local economic development. However, it must balance consumer preferences and global trade realities to avoid adverse economic effects.

Consumer Ethnocentrism Theory

A behaviour where, often due to feelings of loyalty, pride, and a sense of duty to support a country’s economy, individuals show a preference for domestic products over foreign ones is described as consumer ethnocentrism. Consumer ethnocentrism, introduced by Shimp and Sharma through the CETSCALE (Consumer Ethnocentric Tendencies Scale), describes the belief that purchasing domestic products is ethically preferable, supporting local employment and reducing reliance on foreign goods (Shimp & Sharma, 1987). Consumer ethnocentrism tends to be stronger in countries with great national pride. It is especially prevalent in countries with significant import competition or economic vulnerability, where supporting local businesses is seen as a patriotic duty. For individuals exhibiting consumer ethnocentrism, purchasing foreign products is perceived as unpatriotic and potentially harmful to local businesses and workers.

Three factors can influence Consumer Ethnocentrism. These include

(1) Economic impact, where ethnocentric behaviour is driven by concerns about job loss or weakening of local industries, especially in countries experiencing economic challenges;

(2) Cultural identity, where the decision to purchase local is fueled by the quest to maintain cultural values and seeing foreign products as threats to cultural authenticity and

(3) Political climate: Ethnocentrism increases with trade tensions, as consumers associate foreign products with political or economic rivalry. The current trade tension between the US and China, which has led to the rollout of tariffs and export controls from both sides, could escalate consumer ethnocentrism.

A major demerit of consumer ethnocentrism is that while it supports local economies and sustains domestic businesses, it can limit competition and diversity in the market, potentially driving up prices and lowering quality in the absence of foreign competition.

 Patriotism and National Loyalty Theory

Consumer Patriotism describes a concept in consumer behaviour where consumers, motivated by love and pride for their country and the desire to support local businesses and contribute to the national economy, demonstrate the tendency to prefer domestically produced. This behaviour aligns with national loyalty theory, where purchasing decisions are guided by a sense of pride and responsibility to support one’s nation, especially in politically or economically challenging times. Consumer patriotism sees spending as an act of loyalty rather than an obligation, often triggered by external events, like trade conflicts or economic crises, which inspire heightened national pride. Consumer patriotism is often more voluntary and emotional, stemming from a positive regard for domestic products and producers.

Consumer patriotism and ethnocentrism are related but distinct concepts in consumer behaviour, influencing preferences for domestic over foreign products but driven by slightly different motivations. While consumer patriotism is more about support and pride, consumer ethnocentrism adds a layer of moral duty, sometimes creating resistance to foreign products. Consumer Ethnocentrism is rooted in a sense of duty, where consumers believe it is morally wrong to buy foreign products due to perceived threats to the local economy, culture, or job security, hence the necessity to protect one’s country from external economic influences. However, both can coexist, particularly in times of economic or political tension, where support for domestic goods grows in response to perceived threats from globalization or foreign competition.

These theories illustrate that nationalism, ethnocentrism, and patriotism influence consumer behaviour through the lens of personal and collective identity, ethical concerns, and perceived social value. These motivations drive consumers to favour domestic over foreign products, shaping consumption patterns and prioritizing national economic and cultural interests.

Consumer Patriotism: A Global Phenomenon

Consumer patriotism, characterized by a preference for domestically produced goods and services, is a global phenomenon across various nations. Japan, for instance, utilized consumer patriotism as a critical strategy in its post-World War II economic recovery. The government launched “Buy Japanese” campaigns that urged citizens to support local manufacturers, leading to the growth of global brands like Sony and Toyota. Japanese consumers’ strong preference for domestic products, particularly in sectors such as electronics and automobiles, is often linked to the nation’s reputation for high-quality goods and technological innovation. This strategy revitalized Japan’s war-ravaged economy and propelled it into becoming a global industrial powerhouse, illustrating the power of consumer patriotism in fostering national development (Johnson, 1982).

Similarly, South Korea’s economic transformation can be largely attributed to its focus on consumer patriotism. By promoting local goods and brands, the country successfully built a robust domestic market, reduced its reliance on imports, and fostered the rise of global corporations such as Samsung, LG and Hyundai. This strategy, known as “developmental nationalism,” aligns consumer behaviour with national economic goals (Amsden, 1992). South Korean consumers have shown strong loyalty to domestic brands like Samsung and Hyundai, driven by a sense of national pride and a commitment to supporting the country’s economic progress. This consumer mindset not only bolstered domestic industries but also positioned South Korea as a key player in global markets, demonstrating the significant impact of consumer patriotism in advancing national economic priorities.

China’s economic rise can be significantly attributed to its emphasis on consumer patriotism through initiatives like the “Buy Chinese” campaigns. These efforts encouraged citizens to prioritize locally produced goods over foreign imports, fostering the growth of domestic industries and reducing dependency on external markets. This strategy, rooted in the drive for national self-sufficiency, has been crucial in China’s rapid industrialization. By boosting demand for Chinese products, these campaigns supported the development of a wide range of industries, from electronics to automobiles, creating a strong manufacturing base that positioned China as a global leader in industrial production.  Consumer patriotism has also played a vital role in shaping China’s economic policies, mainly promoting “Made in China” products. The Chinese government strategically linked national pride to economic growth, encouraging citizens to contribute to the country’s transformation by supporting domestic enterprises. This approach stimulated local production and created an environment where Chinese companies could compete globally. As a result, China’s industrial output surged, making the country the world’s second-largest economy by nominal GDP. By fostering a culture of consumer patriotism, China was able to build a highly competitive and self-sufficient economy, underscoring the powerful role of consumer behaviour in economic transformation (Huang, 2010). The rise of major Chinese companies, such as Huawei and Haier, further exemplifies the success of this strategy, as these brands have not only captured local markets but also expanded their global footprint, cementing China’s status as a dominant economic force.

In recent years, Indian consumers have increasingly preferred domestic brands, particularly in sectors like automobiles, consumer electronics, and textiles. This shift is largely driven by a sense of economic nationalism and a growing desire to support local industries in the face of globalization. The rise of movements like “Make in India,” initiated by the government in 2014, further encouraged consumers to prioritize Indian products, fostering a renewed sense of national pride linked to economic self-sufficiency (Kumar & Singh, 2020). This initiative not only seeks to boost manufacturing but also aligns with broader goals of economic independence and job creation, directly influencing consumer behaviour. In the automobile sector, domestic brands like Tata Motors and Mahindra have gained significant traction among Indian consumers, positioning themselves as national innovation and quality symbols. Similarly, brands like Micromax and Lava have received growing support in consumer electronics as consumers shift towards products that promote national industry over foreign alternatives (Mukherjee, 2018). This movement has been further fueled by India’s increasing emphasis on reducing reliance on foreign goods and enhancing its local production capabilities. This trend of consumer patriotism is also supported by India’s broader economic strategies, which emphasize import substitution and the promotion of domestic industries. The Indian government’s push to strengthen local manufacturing, combined with consumer initiatives like “Vocal for Local,” has resonated with a population eager to contribute to the country’s economic resurgence (Khandelwal & Oberoi, 2021). Consumer patriotism in India is further amplified by factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the need for domestic resilience and self-reliance in critical sectors.

In Europe, German consumers strongly prefer domestically produced cars, such as Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes-Benz. This preference is rooted in the country’s strong automotive industry and national pride. French consumers strongly support domestic luxury brands like Louis Vuitton, Chanel, and Hermès, and this support is often attributed to the country’s rich cultural heritage and a desire to preserve traditional craftsmanship. Influenced by quality perception, nostalgia, and a sense of national identity, British consumers often prefer brands in the food, beverages, and fashion sectors.

While the United States boasts one of the largest and most diverse consumer markets globally, consumer patriotism is still prevalent across various sectors. A notable example is the automobile industry, where many American consumers prefer to purchase vehicles from domestic manufacturers such as Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. This preference is rooted in brand loyalty, a broader sense of national pride, and a desire to support American jobs and manufacturing (Hise, 2020). The “Buy American” sentiment, particularly prominent after economic downturns like the 2008 financial crisis, has played a significant role in maintaining consumer patriotism within the U.S. market. Campaigns that encourage the purchase of domestically produced goods often focus on keeping jobs within the country, enhancing economic resilience, and reinforcing national identity (Char, 2018).

Similarly, in Canada, consumer patriotism is most evident in the food and beverage sector, where many consumers strongly prefer domestically produced products. Factors such as concerns over food safety, support for local farmers, and a sense of national identity heavily influence these purchasing decisions. Canadian consumers often perceive domestically sourced food as healthier, safer, and higher quality than imported alternatives (Charlebois & Sumner, 2019). This has led to significant demand for local produce, meats, and beverages, with campaigns like “Buy Local, Eat Fresh” encouraging consumers to support their national agriculture industry. Canadian patriotism in the food industry is also bolstered by regulations that ensure higher food safety standards for locally produced goods. The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified this trend, as supply chain disruptions increased awareness of the importance of local food security and self-sufficiency (Gracia, 2021). Both the U.S. and Canadian examples highlight that, despite the global nature of modern consumer markets, patriotism still plays a crucial role in shaping purchasing behaviour, particularly regarding national identity, economic support, and perceived product safety.

These trends illustrate that consumer patriotism is a global phenomenon, not confined to cultural or symbolic expressions but emerging as a powerful economic driver. Across various nations, consumer preferences for locally produced goods have played a significant role in supporting national industries, preserving jobs, and reinforcing economic independence. In many advanced economies, such as the U.S. and Canada, consumer choices are closely linked to broader concerns about national identity, job security, and health. These preferences, often manifested in sectors like automobiles and food, demonstrate how consumer patriotism fosters a sense of national responsibility while providing economic stability.

Similarly, the rise of economic nationalism and consumer patriotism in countries like India reflects a broader global trend where nations aim to reduce dependency on foreign imports and strengthen local economies. As seen in India, where movements like “Make in India” and “Vocal for Local” encourage consumers to prioritize domestic brands, these behaviours directly contribute to national economic growth and development. By aligning individual purchasing decisions with national economic goals, consumers play a pivotal role in fostering local industry growth, reducing trade imbalances, and enhancing self-sufficiency. Globally, consumer patriotism is a strategic tool that reinforces national identity and drives long-term economic transformation, as demonstrated by countries like Japan, South Korea, and China, where consumer preferences for local products helped these nations achieve significant industrial growth and global competitiveness.

The Role of Consumer Patriotism in Economic Development

Consumer patriotism is rooted in the desire to support domestic jobs, strengthen local economies, and promote national self-sufficiency. It aligns with sociological and economic theories that suggest consumer patriotism can bolster economic resilience by increasing demand for locally produced goods, which, in turn, encourages the growth of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and reduces reliance on imported goods (Verlegh, 2007). Consumer patriotism is often a form of economic nationalism, where consumers take active roles in shaping national economic policies by aligning their spending with domestic interests (Helleiner, 2002).

When consumers consciously choose domestic products over foreign alternatives, they directly contribute to the expansion of local industries. This phenomenon has been observed in various nations. For instance, promoting local textiles, agricultural products, and other goods in Nigeria through consumer patriotism can create jobs, stimulate the economy, and reduce reliance on imports (Osakwe, 2020). South Korea offers another striking example: consumer patriotism helped foster the growth of major global companies such as Samsung and Hyundai. The government encouraged citizens to support local businesses, which strengthened South Korea’s industrial base and contributed to its rapid post-war economic growth (Chung & Eichengreen, 2021).

Job creation is one of the most significant benefits of consumer patriotism. By supporting local businesses, consumers help stimulate demand, leading to expanded production and, consequently, more employment opportunities. This is particularly relevant in developing countries with high unemployment rates and limited formal job market. In sectors like manufacturing and agriculture, consumer patriotism can act as a key mechanism to unlock employment opportunities (Batra & Keller, 2016). The increased demand for local products encourages companies to hire more workers, reducing poverty and fostering inclusive economic growth.

Another critical aspect of consumer patriotism is its role in reducing import dependency. Developing nations often face trade imbalances due to heavy reliance on imported goods, which can drain national resources. Promoting consumer patriotism can mitigate these challenges by reducing import bills and keeping wealth within the local economy. A notable example is China, where campaigns such as “Buy Chinese” have historically encouraged citizens to prioritize local products. This strategy significantly reduced reliance on imports, allowing local businesses to scale up and contributing to China’s rapid industrialization and economic transformation (Breznitz & Murphree, 2013).

Beyond the economic impacts, consumer patriotism is crucial in fostering national identity and unity. By choosing domestic products, consumers reaffirm a collective identity rooted in shared national values and historical experiences. This is particularly impactful in countries with a history of colonialism or external domination, where reclaiming economic sovereignty is an essential part of the national narrative (Huang, 2010). In such contexts, consumer patriotism strengthens local economies and reinforces cultural pride and a sense of belonging, contributing to national cohesion.

Consumer Patriotism in China: A Case Study of Luckin Coffee and Huawei

The inclination of consumers to favour domestic products or services has become a prominent trend in China. This consumer patriotism phenomenon is evident in various sectors, including the coffee and technology industries. The preference for Luckin Coffee over Starbucks and Huawei over Apple are illustrative examples of this trend. Luckin Coffee, a Chinese coffee chain founded in 2017, has rapidly gained popularity among Chinese consumers. Its success is partly attributed to its aggressive expansion strategy and competitive pricing. However, a more significant factor is the growing sentiment of consumer patriotism among Chinese consumers. Many Chinese consumers view supporting domestic brands as contributing to the nation’s economic development and technological advancement. Luckin Coffee has capitalized on this sentiment as a homegrown brand, positioning itself as a symbol of Chinese entrepreneurial spirit and innovation.

Similarly, Huawei, a Chinese multinational technology company, has experienced tremendous growth and global recognition. Its success can be attributed to its investment in research and development, innovative product offerings, and a strong focus on the Chinese market. However, consumer patriotism has played a crucial role in Huawei’s ascent. Many Chinese consumers have preferred Huawei products over foreign alternatives, such as Apple, to support domestic industries and contribute to China’s technological self-sufficiency.

The preference for Luckin Coffee and Huawei over their foreign counterparts can be attributed to several factors. First, Chinese consumers have a growing sense of national pride, and supporting domestic brands is seen as a way to express this patriotism. Second, the Chinese government has actively promoted the development of domestic industries, providing incentives and support to encourage consumers to choose Chinese products. Third, there is a perception that Chinese brands are more aligned with Chinese cultural values and preferences. While consumer patriotism plays a significant role in the Chinese market, it is not always straightforward or consistent, as various factors can shape consumer behaviour. Elements such as price, quality, and brand reputation often influence purchasing decisions. Additionally, the prevalence of consumer patriotism may differ across demographics and regions within China. As the Chinese economy grows and develops, consumer patriotism will likely remain a significant driver of domestic consumption.

Consumer Patriotism and Government Influence: Shaping Economic Outcomes

Globally, Governments leverage consumer behaviour as a strategic tool to achieve national economic goals, fostering sustainable development and resilience. This alignment often manifests through initiatives rooted in economic nationalism and cultural symbolism, encouraging consumers to prioritize domestically produced goods. Examples like India’s “Vocal for Local” and the US’s “Buy American” campaigns illustrate how these strategies promote consumer loyalty, positioning local products as embodiments of national pride and economic self-sufficiency. Similarly, China’s “Buy Chinese” campaigns have been instrumental in its industrial ascent, linking national pride to economic participation and growth.

Economic Nationalism and Consumer Campaigns

Economic nationalism has become a cornerstone of strategies designed to reshape consumer behaviour. Initiatives like India’s “Make in India” and the United States’ “Buy American” align consumer purchasing decisions with domestic economic objectives (Balabanis et al., 2001). These campaigns frame domestic products as symbols of self-reliance and patriotism, resonating with nationalistic sentiments. China’s rapid economic development exemplifies the impact of these strategies. The government’s “Made in China” campaigns have fostered consumer patriotism, encouraging citizens to support domestic industries as a means of national transformation (Shimp & Sharma, 1987). These efforts reflect a strategic alignment of consumer behaviour with policy goals, contributing significantly to China’s industrial and economic expansion.

Symbolic Interactionism and Consumer Behaviour

The sociological theory of symbolic interactionism offers a lens to understand consumer choices. According to this framework, products and brands are imbued with symbolic meanings through social interactions. In the context of economic nationalism, domestic goods often represent cultural heritage, resilience, and national pride (Tajfel & Turner, 1986). Campaigns such as “Buy American” capitalize on these associations, portraying locally manufactured goods as symbols of patriotism. This symbolic framing can lead consumers to prioritize domestic products over imports, even when the latter may be more cost-effective or of higher quality. Such behaviour highlights the complex interplay between cultural narratives and economic incentives in shaping consumer decisions.

Furthermore, symbolic interpretations of economic policies can shape both public perception and policy outcomes. The recent US government’s decision to block Nippon Steel’s acquisition of US Steel, for instance, was partially driven by a desire to preserve US Steel as a symbol of industrial strength and national pride. This decision underscores how economic policies can intertwine with cultural narratives, influencing both domestic and international economic dynamics (Atlantic Council, 2023).

Tariffs and Sanctions as Strategic Tools by the US: A Case for Consumer Patriotism and Ethnocentrism

Tariff policies can foster a sense of duty among Americans to prioritize homegrown goods, aligning personal spending habits with broader economic goals. Patriotic consumption is seen as a collective effort to enhance job creation, industrial growth, and economic resilience. The imposition of tariffs and sanctions by the US, especially under the Trump administration, can be interpreted as strategic tools aimed at reshaping local consumer behaviour. These measures are not merely economic policies but are also deeply entwined with political and social objectives to foster consumer patriotism or ethnocentrism—encouraging citizens to prioritize domestically produced goods over foreign imports. Research by Balabanis et al. (2001) shows that patriotic consumers are more likely to purchase local products when economic conditions are perceived as threatened. Tariff policies reinforce this behaviour by aligning individual consumption with national goals.

Strategic Implications of Tariffs and Sanctions

Encouraging Domestic Manufacturing

Tariffs make imported goods more expensive, creating a price advantage for domestic manufacturers. This tactic aligns with theories of trade protectionism that aim to bolster domestic industries. According to Krugman (1987), protectionist measures can temporarily protect nascent industries until they achieve economies of scale, effectively reshaping consumer preferences toward local products. For instance, high tariffs on imported vehicles incentivized Japanese automakers like Toyota and Honda to expand production facilities in the US (Kumar, 2019). This not only circumvented tariff costs but also contributed to local job creation, further embedding these companies in the American economic fabric.

Strengthening National Identity through Consumerism

Tariffs can act as a rallying cry for consumer patriotism. Consumer patriotism aligns purchasing decisions with nationalistic sentiments. By framing domestic consumption as a patriotic act, governments leverage social identity theories, which suggest that individuals derive pride from their group affiliations (Tajfel & Turner, 1986). The “buying American” narrative appeals to a sense of national pride and economic independence. Tariffs reinforce this sentiment by portraying foreign goods as economic threats. Empirical studies show that patriotic appeals significantly influence purchasing decisions. For example, Sharma et al. (1995) found that nationalistic marketing campaigns increased the perceived value of domestic products among ethnocentric consumers. Policies emphasizing the protection of domestic industries resonate with consumers who view their purchasing decisions as a means of supporting national interests.

Reinforcing Economic Sovereignty

Economic sanctions and import restrictions, particularly against nations like China, aim to curtail dependency on foreign supply chains. This aligns with strategic trade theory, which posits that nations can gain a competitive advantage by fostering key industries (Grossman & Helpman, 1991). This approach also supports efforts to localize production and foster innovation within the US, creating an ecosystem where domestic alternatives are not only available but also competitive. The US seeks to secure its economic sovereignty by localizing production while encouraging consumers to align with these national objectives.

Case Study: The Auto Industry and Japanese Automakers

The threat of tariffs under the Trump administration placed Japanese automakers in a difficult position. Faced with potential export reductions and financial losses, they had two main choices: increase domestic production in the US or redirect trade to other markets. Exporting fewer vehicles to the US would have resulted in significant financial losses or required costly adjustments to their global trade strategies. This situation clearly demonstrated the crucial importance of the American market for Japanese automakers, highlighting the effectiveness of tariffs as a lever in trade negotiations.

Many Japanese automakers chose to expand their manufacturing operations within the US to mitigate the impact of tariffs. This strategy avoided tariffs and created American jobs, directly addressing the administration’s objectives. Furthermore, it helped to reduce the perception of foreign dominance within the US auto industry. This approach aligns with the “infant industry argument” (Krugman, 1987), which suggests that protectionist measures can incentivize foreign firms to integrate into domestic economies. For example, Toyota’s significant expansion of its Kentucky plant serves as a prime illustration of how tariff threats can shift foreign production to domestic soil. This not only mitigated the impact of tariffs but also created American jobs, aligning with the administration’s goals (Kumar, 2019).

Broader Implications

The strategic use of tariffs and sanctions to reshape consumer behaviour underscores their dual role as economic tools and social instruments. Increasing the cost of foreign goods and emphasizing the benefits of domestic alternatives encourage consumers to adopt purchasing habits aligned with national priorities. While this approach promotes consumer patriotism and supports local industries, it risks fostering ethnocentrism, which can lead to trade protectionism and international tensions.

Anti-Consumer Patriotic Behaviour of Nigerians: A Conundrum

Over the years, Nigerians have demonstrated an unexplained propensity for anything foreign: countries, food, assets, and goods, as well as disdaining domestically sourced products. How the nation came to this point is hard to explain. History retold that the King of Saudi Arabia used to come down to UCH Ibadan for medical tourism. Today, all middle- to high-income Nigerian earners only want to visit foreign hospitals for treatment and medical check-ups, which has enormous implications for the country’s foreign reserves. This category includes all government appointees and public and civil servants who deliberately rolled out policies that have destroyed health care provision in Nigeria. In October 2017, the former Nigerian First Lady, Aisha Buhari, experienced a neck sprain. Despite her initial preference for domestic treatment, she faced significant pressure to travel to London for medical care immediately. However, she chose to seek treatment within Nigeria but sadly encountered difficulties accessing adequate medical care at the Presidential State House Clinic. Despite the substantial annual budget allocation, the clinic’s X-ray machine was not working. As a result, she was compelled to seek medical attention at a hospital in Nigeria that is entirely owned and operated by foreign entities

The Nigerian government’s tacit encouragement of flooding the local market with cheap, low-quality foreign products has devastated the nation’s budding and thriving manufacturing industries. A striking example was recounted by a Nigerian business owner in 2007, who described her experience in a Chinese market. She entered a shop selling high-quality goods, only to be informed that Nigerian buyers typically avoid such shops, favouring low-quality products that offer greater quantity. Her insistence on purchasing quality goods surprised the sellers. This preference for inferior imports, coupled with a lack of government intervention, has allowed Nigerian traders to sell these products at exorbitant markups for excessive profits. Local manufacturers, unable to compete with these cheap imports, have been forced out of business. Consequently, Nigeria’s once-vibrant manufacturing sector—a critical driver of urban migration and employment—has largely collapsed. Today, the country resembles a manufacturing graveyard, with abandoned factories littering cities like Lagos, Ibadan, Kano, Onitsha, Aba, Port Harcourt, and Kaduna

Some foreign embassies in Nigeria subject desperate Nigerians to all manner of indignities and humiliations, with the government looking the other way in a bid to secure traveling visas. The unanswered question is why Nigerians willingly subject themselves to these humiliations. Those in government are not batting eyelids because they are exempted from the humiliation, except for countries like the UAE that until recently placed a blanket ban on Nigerians. The reactions of Nigerians who could afford to travel to UAE during these challenging economic times to the ban were very pathetic, moaning as if their candy had been taken away. It is just shameless, with no sense of pride in Nigeria and no willingness to spend in Nigeria the money they have been prevented from spending in Dubai for economically unrewarding parties, meetings, weddings, and tourism.

Several consumer behaviour theories help explain a lack of nationalism, ethnocentrism, and patriotism in consumption choices, mainly when consumers prefer foreign products, as is prevalent in Nigeria.

• The Cognitive dissonance Theory suggests that when consumers face conflicting beliefs, they will take action to resolve discomfort, often by aligning with socially or personally acceptable norms (Festinger, 1957). Nigerian consumers who perceive local products as inferior may experience cognitive dissonance when encouraged to “buy Nigerian.” This dissonance can be resolved by favouring foreign products, reinforcing the belief that foreign goods provide better value or prestige, and reducing the effect of nationalistic appeals in purchasing decisions.

• The Consumer acculturation Theory describes how consumers adopt foreign cultural norms and consumption patterns, especially when foreign culture is seen as more modern or desirable (Peñaloza, 1994). In Nigeria, particularly among the youths, there has been a strong trend of consumer acculturation toward Western and Asian brands. As Nigerian consumers interact with global markets and media, they may adopt consumption patterns that favour foreign products, associating them with progress, innovation, or sophistication.

• Global Consumer Culture Theory (GCCT) explains that global media, branding, and marketing foster a globalized consumer identity, where consumers see foreign brands as part of a cosmopolitan lifestyle (Alden, Steenkamp, & Batra, 1999). In Nigeria, exposure to Western advertising and global branding creates aspirations tied to foreign lifestyles, which often promote American, European, or Asian brands. GCCT argues that consumers adopt foreign brands as part of their identity, aligning more with a global than a national culture.

• The Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) suggests that intentions formed through attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control influenced behaviour (Ajzen, 1991). Nigerian consumers’ preference for imported goods over locally-made alternatives may have been influenced by the formation of an attitude that foreign products are of higher quality or more reliable. In addition, social norms favouring imported brands can further strengthen this preference, with the belief that foreign goods confer social status or prestige. Nigerian elites, particularly its political class, have demonstrated this proclivity to rejecting locally assembled Innoson Motor vehicles for Japanese vehicles despite the implication on the wobbling economy. Despite the bad roads that litter the country, the elite class is fond of purchasing exotic cars that may have no chance of maximizing usage.

• The Experiential consumption Theory emphasizes the role of emotions and sensory appeal in driving purchase decisions (Holbrook & Hirschman, 1982). In Nigeria, foreign brands often offer a differentiated brand experience through unique designs, packaging, and marketing, which local brands may not always replicate. This preference for experience-driven consumption over national loyalty shows that Nigerian consumers may prioritize unique or novel brand experiences over patriotic consumption.

• The Perceived Quality Theory posits that consumers evaluate products based on quality perceptions rather than objective measures (Zeithaml, 1988). In Nigeria, the perceived quality of foreign brands often overshadows domestic ones, particularly in sectors like electronics, automobiles, and fashion. This preference for foreign goods may be rooted in historical experiences or a belief that foreign brands are manufactured to higher standards. Such perceptions drive a lack of consumer ethnocentrism, as the quality associated with foreign brands tends to outweigh national loyalty in purchasing decisions.

• Thorstein Veblen’s theory of conspicuous consumption and Bourdieu’s concept of “social capital” suggest that people buy goods as status symbols to signal wealth or taste (Veblen, 1899; Bourdieu, 1984). In Nigeria, foreign brands often symbolize affluence and social standing. High-end foreign brands like Gucci, Mercedes-Benz, and Apple are used as social markers, particularly among the middle and upper classes. This creates a consumption culture where imported goods represent status, diminishing the role of nationalism or patriotism.

• Postcolonial Consumer Behavior: The historical impact of British colonization instilled a preference for foreign goods, often associated with higher quality, sophistication, and status. The colonial system disrupted indigenous production systems, positioning Western goods as superior and indigenous goods as inferior. These perceptions persist in postcolonial societies like Nigeria, where foreign brands are often considered aspirational symbols of modernity and progress (Peñaloza, 1994). Colonial education and media portrayed local cultures and goods as primitive or backward, fostering a colonial mentality (Bhabha, 1994). This alienation has led to a lack of pride in Nigerian-made products, with consumers seeking foreign goods to align with global standards. Aspirational consumption further reinforces this behavior, as foreign brands are used to signal affluence and global identity.

• Dependency Theory explains how postcolonial nations like Nigeria are integrated into a global economic system that perpetuates reliance on foreign goods and services. Colonial economic structures favoured resource extraction and imports, leaving local industries underdeveloped and unable to compete effectively (Cardoso & Faletto, 1979). Foreign goods dominate Nigerian markets due to their perceived superior quality and the underdeveloped infrastructure and technology within local industries. Dependency theory highlights how the unequal global economic structure limits Nigeria’s ability to invest in and improve its manufacturing capabilities (Bagwell & Staiger, 2001).

Challenges to Consumer Patriotism in Nigeria: Building a Self-Reliant Economy

Consumer patriotism is a vital catalyst for economic self-reliance but faces significant challenges in Nigeria due to deep-seated perceptions, policy inconsistencies, and global market dynamics.

A Persistent Preference for Foreign Products

One of Nigeria’s most pervasive obstacles to consumer patriotism is the widespread perception that foreign goods are superior in quality. This perception is especially pronounced in industries such as technology, automobiles, and luxury items, where local products are often seen as inferior due to lower production standards, lack of innovation, or inadequate branding (Steenkamp, 2019). For example, foreign electronics, often seen as more reliable than domestic alternatives, dominate Nigerian markets despite local production efforts. This is because consumers in these markets frequently associate imported goods with advanced technology, durability, and better craftsmanship, negatively impacting domestic products’ competitiveness. Historical factors compound this preference. The influx of foreign goods during colonial rule established a pattern of dependency and eroded confidence in locally made products. Even today, limited branding, poor packaging, and inconsistent quality control contribute to the perception that Nigerian products cannot compete globally (Batra & Keller, 2016).

NNPC and the Petroleum Industry: A Missed Opportunity

Consumer patriotism prioritizes locally made products to support national industries and holds significant potential for Nigeria’s economic development. However, its implementation faces multiple challenges, particularly in industries where foreign products dominate the market. The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) case epitomizes anti-consumer patriotism. Despite the presence of domestic refineries like Dangote Refinery, NNPC’s insistence on the importation of petroleum products after failing for over three decades to revive its four comatose refineries exemplifies a systemic aversion to consumer patriotism.

Rather than investing in domestic refining capacity, NNPC’s reliance on imported petroleum products sends a message that foreign suppliers are favoured over domestic entrepreneurs like Dangote. This practice undermines local industries and incurs higher consumer costs due to additional expenses such as transportation and tariffs. By continuing to import products that could be refined domestically, NNPC stifles the growth of Nigeria’s petroleum sector and misses out on significant opportunities to create jobs and boost local production (Bala-Gbogbo, 2020). In this context, NNPC’s importation decisions exemplify a broader issue of economic sabotage, where domestic industries are undercut by reliance on foreign goods and services.

Although arguments exist for maintaining a degree of importation to ensure supply chain stability, especially during peak demand or local disruptions, such policies ultimately limit the growth of Nigeria’s refining industry. Concerns about quality control and infrastructure limitations, such as outdated pipelines and storage facilities, have been raised as justifications for continued imports. Nevertheless, these challenges could be addressed through strategic investment in domestic capacity, promoting consumer patriotism to achieve economic self-sufficiency (Adediran & Dauda, 2019).

Tourism and the Brain Drain Effect

In the 1980s, domestic tourism thrived as Nigerians visited destinations like Jos Wildlife Park, Lagos Bar Beach, Erin-Ijesha Waterfalls, Obudu Cattle Ranch, Ikogosi Warm Springs, Yankari Game Reserve, and Kainji National Park, reinvesting money into local economies. In stark contrast, today’s elites prefer international travel, often relocating their wealth and families abroad (Akintoye, 2022). The decline in consumer patriotism is compounded by a lack of trust in the government and perceived better opportunities abroad. This shift undermines the local economy and accelerates the “brain drain” phenomenon as younger Nigerians sell off assets to fund their emigration, further weakening the country’s capacity for innovation and development.

As Nigerian consumers increasingly spend on foreign goods and services, they inadvertently invest in developing other economies while Nigeria suffers unemployment, poverty, and underdevelopment. This economic leakage deprives Nigeria of much-needed resources and accelerates brain drain as skilled Nigerians emigrate for better opportunities. To reverse this trend, targeted policies promoting local consumption and tourism are necessary, alongside efforts to revitalize key domestic industries like manufacturing and hospitality. South Korea and Japan have shown that fostering consumer patriotism through government initiatives can help build a robust domestic industrial base, driving long-term economic growth and reducing dependency on foreign imports (Chung & Eichengreen, 2021).

Economic Constraints and Policy Inconsistencies

Despite the apparent potential benefits of consumer patriotism, several challenges hinder its broader implementation in Nigeria. First, the economic reality for many Nigerians, marked by low disposable income and high inflation, makes foreign goods more attractive when they are cheaper or perceived as better quality.  Perceptions of quality play a critical role in consumer decision-making, and many Nigerians prefer foreign products due to their perceived superiority in reliability, features, and branding (Batra & Keller, 2016). Economic barriers, including higher production costs and lack of government incentives, make local products less competitive.

Moreover, inconsistent government policies surrounding taxes, investment, import duties, tariffs, and local content requirements also exacerbate the situation, creating uncertainty for local businesses and disincentivizing investments in quality improvement and innovation, amplifying consumer reliance on foreign goods. This reliance erodes opportunities for local manufacturers to innovate and scale production. Furthermore, the increasing globalization of markets allows foreign products to flood the Nigerian market, often at lower prices than their domestic counterparts, making it harder for Nigerian businesses to compete (Stiglitz, 2002). Lastly, a lack of awareness about the benefits of supporting domestic products and limited access to information on locally made goods contributes to weak consumer loyalty to Nigerian brands.

Conflict with the Principle of Free Trade

Consumer patriotism can conflict with the principles of free trade and globalization. Encouraging citizens to prioritize local products may inadvertently foster protectionist attitudes that clash with international trade agreements. This consequent tension can lead to trade disputes, as promoting local products over imports might be perceived as an unfair trade practice, inviting retaliation from trade partners. For instance, under World Trade Organization (WTO) regulations, discriminatory policies favouring domestic over foreign goods could result in sanctions or tariffs from affected countries (Bagwell & Staiger, 2001).

From an economic and sociopolitical standpoint, consumer patriotism can act as a unifying force, fostering national resilience. However, striking a balance between promoting domestic industries and maintaining healthy international relations is crucial to maintaining healthy international trade relations and ensuring sustainable economic growth. Balancing consumer patriotism with the principles of free trade is a delicate task. Governments must ensure that efforts to promote local products do not result in protectionist measures that could harm international relations or stifle competition. Instead, they should focus on building global competitiveness for domestic industries by improving product quality and promoting local innovation. In this way, local producers can compete globally, not just through patriotism-driven demand, but by offering superior products that appeal to domestic and international consumers (Stiglitz, 2002).

DISCUSSION

There are instances where consumer patriotism has gained traction in Nigeria. Many Nigerians prioritize locally produced staples such as rice, pepper, beans, cassava, yam, palm wine and palm oil in the food and beverage sector. Nigerian beer and snack brands have also grown in popularity, demonstrating that local products can compete with foreign alternatives when marketed effectively (Osakwe, 2020). In the fashion industry, the “Buy Naija to Grow Naija” movement has helped promote Nigerian designers and textile manufacturers, further strengthening the local economy. The tech sector, too, has seen a rise in consumer patriotism, with Nigerian tech startups gaining increased attention from domestic consumers for their innovative products and services (Adediran & Dauda, 2019). Similarly, while developing, the Nigerian automotive industry has begun promoting the assembly and production of locally made vehicles, contributing to job creation and the growth of domestic manufacturing capabilities.

The Nexus Between Consumer Patriotism and Economic Development

Consumer patriotism holds significant potential for fostering economic development, particularly through its impact on industrialization, job creation, and market development. In developing economies like Nigeria, where reliance on imports and external markets remains high, consumer patriotism can help strengthen domestic industries, promote self-sufficiency, and reduce vulnerability to global economic shocks.

Industrialization and Technological Advancement: Consumer patriotism is crucial in stimulating domestic demand, which can catalyze industrialization. When consumers actively prioritize locally made products, they create a robust market for domestic goods, which, in turn, encourages manufacturers to invest in production capacity and innovation. This dynamic can help reduce reliance on imports, enabling countries to foster self-sufficiency and develop a more resilient economy (Osakwe, 2020). Moreover, consumer patriotism can lead to technological advancement. Domestic industries are incentivized to invest in research and development to stay competitive when they receive sustained support. This can drive technological innovation and improve the quality of local products, allowing domestic firms to meet local demand and compete globally (Breznitz & Murphree, 2013). For example, the “Buy Chinese” campaigns led to significant technological improvements and industrial growth in China, helping the country emerge as a global economic powerhouse.

Job Creation and Economic Expansion: One of the most direct impacts of consumer patriotism is job creation. When consumers support local businesses, demand for domestically produced goods increases, necessitating the expansion of domestic industries. This growth creates jobs across multiple sectors, including manufacturing, retail, and services, reducing the country’s unemployment rate and fostering more inclusive economic development (Chung & Eichengreen, 2021). In Nigeria, for instance, supporting local industries such as textiles and agriculture could create many jobs, reducing dependence on foreign goods and labour outsourcing. By favouring domestic products, consumer patriotism can also help curb capital flight, ensuring that wealth generated within the country stays within the local economy, creating a virtuous cycle of growth and development.

Market Development and Entrepreneurial Growth: Consumer patriotism can also lead to market diversification and the creation of a competitive business environment that encourages innovation and product development. As local industries receive more support, they can develop more substantial brand equity and build a reputation for quality, which can attract both domestic and international consumers. For example, in South Korea and Japan, consumer loyalty to local brands such as Samsung and Toyota contributed to these companies’ global success, transforming them into international competitors (Amsden, 1992). Furthermore, consumer patriotism provides opportunities for entrepreneurship and small business growth. Supporting local businesses fosters a conducive environment for innovation and entrepreneurship, as more consumers are willing to try locally-made goods. This expansion of entrepreneurial activity is crucial for developing economies like Nigeria, where SMEs form a significant part of the economic structure (Verlegh, 2007).

Anti-Consumer Patriotism in Nigeria: The Implications and Recommendation

While consumer patriotism offers many benefits, Nigeria has also witnessed anti-consumer patriotism, particularly among its elite class. A notable example is the refusal of Nigerian legislators and the presidency to purchase locally manufactured vehicles, such as those produced by Innoson Motors, in favour of foreign brands. This behaviour undermines local industries and sends a negative message regarding the government’s commitment to fostering domestic economic growth (Adediran & Dauda, 2019). Anti-consumer patriotism has significant socio-economic implications. Failure to support local industries can stifle their growth, leading to missed opportunities for job creation, technological advancement, and the development of local supply chains. It can also increase Nigeria’s dependence on imports, causing the loss of foreign exchange reserves and greater vulnerability to external shocks (Osakwe, 2020).

From a social perspective, anti-consumer patriotism erodes national pride and undermines the development of a sense of self-sufficiency. The elite’s preference for foreign brands contributes to growing inequality, as the wealth generated from imported goods benefits foreign economies rather than Nigeria’s local industries. Moreover, it can exacerbate the public’s disillusionment with the government, as a lack of support for domestic industries may indicate corruption or inefficiency, further eroding public trust and confidence (Akintoye, 2022).

Policy Recommendations for Nigeria

To foster economic growth and reverse the trend of anti-consumer patriotism, the Nigerian government must prioritize policies that encourage the consumption of local products. Policies could include the following:

Enhancing Product Quality: Governments and businesses must invest in modernizing production facilities, improving quality control, and upgrading branding efforts to compete with global standards.

Incentivizing Domestic Industries: Tax breaks, grants, stricter import controls, and subsidies could encourage local manufacturers to invest in research and innovation.

Consumer Awareness Campaigns: Public education initiatives highlighting local products’ economic and social benefits can help shift consumer attitudes. Public campaigns that inform consumers about the benefits of supporting local products—such as job creation, national economic growth, and reduced carbon footprints from shorter supply chains—can help align patriotic purchasing behaviour with broader social and economic goals (Schroeder & Salzer-Morling, 2016). By fostering a culture of informed consumerism, nations can cultivate loyalty to domestic brands while encouraging healthy competition within a global marketplace.

Tourism Revival: To promote local tourism and support long-term economic growth, Nigeria must invest in infrastructure that facilitates the development of local industries and engage in marketing locally and internationally to encourage Nigerians to reinvest in their country. For instance, improving transportation links to major domestic tourism destinations, such as a railway connection to Obudu Cattle Ranch from Calabar, could significantly boost local tourism and stimulate job creation in the hospitality and service sectors. This would encourage more Nigerians to explore and invest in their own country rather than spending their wealth abroad, fostering a culture of consumer patriotism (Akintoye, 2022).

Like Switzerland’s scenic railway routes, Peru’s Hiram Bingham Express, and Canada’s Rocky Mountaineer, a railway connection to Obudu Cattle Ranch could enhance accessibility and attract more tourists to the region. Such a railway could offer a more efficient and sustainable transportation option compared to the poor state of existing roads while also boosting tourism and local economic activity. A railway connection would increase tourist inflow, create hospitality and transportation jobs, stimulate economic development in surrounding areas, and improve overall infrastructure. Additionally, the environmental benefits of reducing road traffic and air pollution align with global sustainability goals, further contributing to long-term development. Therefore, investing in transportation infrastructure could transform Obudu Cattle Ranch into a major tourism hub and promote consumer patriotism by encouraging Nigerians to explore their own country.

Reducing Import Dependency: Strategic tariffs and regulations should balance protection for domestic industries while fostering fair competition.

The government must lead by example by purchasing locally made products, which would set a precedent for consumer behaviour among citizens (Adediran & Dauda, 2019). Consumer patriotism remains essential for Nigeria’s long-term economic development. Supporting local products can help create jobs, reduce import dependency, and encourage local innovation and entrepreneurship, which are crucial for sustained economic growth (Verlegh, 2007). By promoting the consumption of Nigerian-made goods, the country can also preserve its cultural heritage and traditions, ensuring that economic development aligns with national identity.

CONCLUSION

Consumer patriotism presents a compelling opportunity for nations, particularly developing ones like Nigeria, to stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and foster national pride. Encouraging the consumption of locally made products can reduce dependency on imports, diversify economies, and build resilience against global economic shocks. However, the realization of these benefits requires coordinated efforts among governments, private sectors, and consumers. Strategic policies to strengthen local industries, enhance product quality, and foster innovation are critical to ensuring competitiveness in a globalized marketplace. While consumer patriotism offers significant advantages, its practical implementation faces challenges. Factors such as perceived product quality, cost competitiveness, and international trade dynamics often influence consumer decisions, even among those with strong patriotic inclinations. Governments must address these challenges by investing in infrastructure, facilitating access to capital, and incentivizing businesses to produce high-quality, competitively priced goods. For Nigeria and similar nations, these efforts are vital for fostering industrial diversification and establishing a robust economic base.

The cultural and social dimensions of consumer patriotism are equally significant. By aligning economic policies with cultural narratives, nations can strengthen cultural identity and national unity, especially in contexts with colonial histories or external dominance. Examples from South Korea, Japan, and China demonstrate how sustained consumer loyalty to domestic products has driven industrialization, bolstered economies, and instilled national pride. These countries exemplify the potential of consumer patriotism to contribute to long-term self-sufficiency and economic transformation when integrated into broader development strategies. Lessons from these global success stories highlight the importance of public-private partnerships, strategic marketing, and quality improvement in overcoming challenges. For instance, South Korea’s support for brands like Hyundai and Samsung and Japan’s emphasis on “Made in Japan” campaigns showcase the transformative impact of aligning government policies and business practices. Governments must actively collaborate with businesses to enhance product quality, invest in modern manufacturing technologies, and build consumer trust through quality assurance programs and transparent practices.

In conclusion, while the challenges of global competition and consumer perceptions must be addressed, the potential of consumer patriotism to drive sustainable economic growth, cultural unity, and national resilience is undeniable. By combining consumer patriotism with strategic investments and policies, nations can build inclusive, innovative, and self-sufficient economies that deliver tangible benefits to their citizens while navigating the complexities of international trade and economic interdependence.

REFERENCES

1. Adediran, O., & Dauda, R. (2019). Economic implications of consumer patriotism in Nigeria. African Journal of Economic Development, 32(3), 251–267.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
3. Akintoye, A. (2022). Tourism potential and the Nigerian economy: A study of Obudu Cattle Ranch. Journal of Sustainable Tourism Development, 15(1), 78–92.
4. Alden, D. L., Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Batra, R. (1999). Brand positioning through advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe: The role of global consumer culture. Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252002
5. Amsden, A. H. (1992). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press.
6. Atlantic Council. (2023). National security considerations in U.S. foreign investment decisions. Retrieved from www.atlanticcouncil.org
7. Bagwell, K., & Staiger, R. W. (2001). Domestic policies, national sovereignty, and international economic institutions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 519–562.
8. Balabanis, G., Diamantopoulos, A., Mueller, R. D., & Melewar, T. C. (2001). The impact of nationalism, patriotism, and internationalism on consumer ethnocentric tendencies. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 157-175.
9. Batra, R., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Consumer preferences for domestic versus foreign brands in emerging markets: The influence of quality and cultural affinity. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5), 523–539.
10. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
11. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Breznitz, D., & Murphree, M. (2013). Run of the red queen: Government, innovation, globalization, and economic growth in China. Yale University Press.
13. Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. University of California Press.
14. Charlebois, S., & Sumner, A. (2019). Food security and consumer behaviour in Canada: The role of consumer patriotism. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(2), 289–302.
15. Chung, W., & Eichengreen, B. (2021). The Korean economy: From a mercantilist state to an open economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
16. Feenstra, R. C. (2018). Globalization and its discontents: Exploring the impact of trade on American consumers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(1), 21–42.
17. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Gracia, A. (2021). Consumer behaviour during COVID-19: The rise of local food preferences in Canada. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(3), 489–499.
19. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. MIT Press.
20. Helleiner, E. (2002). Economic nationalism in a globalizing world. Cornell University Press.
21. Helleiner, E. (2002). The making of national money: Territorial currencies in historical perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22. Hise, R. (2020). Brand loyalty and consumer patriotism in the U.S. automobile industry: An analysis of post-recession trends. American Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 307–325.
23. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906
24. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behaviour as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/ 222355
25. Huang, Y. (2010). Capitalism with Chinese characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the state. Cambridge University Press.
26. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975. Stanford University Press.
27. Krugman, P. (1987). Is free trade passé? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 131-144.
28. Khandelwal, R., & Oberoi, P. (2021). Consumer behaviour in the post-COVID era: Insights from the Indian market. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 15–22.
29. Kumar, S. (2019). The impact of U.S. tariffs on Japanese automakers: A strategic analysis. International Trade Journal.
30. Kumar, S., & Singh, A. (2020). Impact of ‘Make in India’ on Indian manufacturing sector: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Global Economy, 16(3), 46–58.
31. Ma, Y., Ailawadi, K. L., Gauri, D. K., & Grewal, D. (2011). An empirical investigation of the impact of gasoline prices on grocery shopping behaviour. Journal of Marketing, 75(2), 18–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.2.18
32. Mukherjee, A. (2018). Changing dynamics of consumer behaviour: The case of Indian electronics market. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(2), 125–135.
33. Osakwe, C. (2020). The role of SMEs in Nigeria’s economic development. African Development Review, 32(3), 394–410.
34. Peñaloza, L. (1994). Atravesando fronteras/border crossings: A critical ethnographic exploration of the consumer acculturation of Mexican immigrants. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1086/209381
35. Schroeder, J. E., & Salzer-Morling, M. (2016). Brand culture. Routledge.
36. Shimp, T. A., & Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 280-289.
37. Sharma, S., Shimp, T. A., & Shin, J. (1995). Consumer ethnocentrism: A test of antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 26–37.
38. Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2019). Global brand strategy: World-wise marketing in the age of branding. Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W.W. Norton & Company.
40. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
41. Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: Macmillan.
42. Verlegh, P. W. (2007). Home country bias in product evaluation: The complementary roles of economic and sociocultural identity. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(3), 361–373.
43. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302