Kantianism and Ethics of Teaching Profession

Kantianism and Ethics of Teaching Profession.

Adenigbagbe, Henry A. Ph.D

Department of Educational Foundations and Counselling, University of Ilesa.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0147

Received: 25 February 2025; Accepted: 01 March 2025; Published: 08 April 2025

ABSTRACT

This paper tries to introduce the moral nature of exercises and viewpoints relating to the teaching profession. Its substance is a promise to the cognizance of inspirations and norms dealing with the decision of showing calling and the following liability of its obligation. The study is philosophical, subsequently its method for research is philosophical regarding logical, semantic and critical analyses. The review attempted to zero in on what is morals and its relationship to teaching profession. At long last, the study endorsed Kant’s ethical way of good will and duty into the teaching profession so as to enter in compelling educating among the experts with great moral lead.

Keywords: Teaching, Teachers, Profession, Good Will, Duty

INTRODUCTION

There is different tendency in the strategy of education that longings to put the teaching profession as a need on the policy plan. Regardless, a ton of cultural requests and educational changes reexamine the capability of the teacher (overseeing assortment and social evasion, focusing in on learning results, responsiveness to social and monetary changes, thought of uncommon necessities, casual preparation, the participation of students and dynamic learning) in another way (European Network of Education Council, 2009). Thusly, a conversation on the necessary abilities of educators is irrefutably fundamental. Ashraf, Bano and Ilyas (2013) saw that teaching is fundamental to education without which we can’t have training, and thusly, requires authority.

Teachers have the monster ability to influence the thinking, inspiration and information on their students with the ultimate objective that the educator’s occupation is the compelling working of their students. As an example, students follow their teacher. According to the European Network of Education Council (2009), the concern for good qualified and competent teachers is an essential issue in various education boards. In various countries, there is the tendency to supersede a gigantic proportion of educators resigning in the years to come. In certain nations, there is an issue on the charm of the educating, and there is furthermore a brutal game plan environment for preparing educator and professionalization. A central idea is without a doubt that all member states must make arrangements for teachers to receive deep-rooted education so they can have a consistent continuum of account understanding elementary teacher education, induction into the teaching profession, and career-long professional development. It is against the above establishment that this paper explores how Immanuel Kant’s conceptualization of Good Will and Duty (Obligation) could commit to responsibilities towards the improvement of the teaching profession.

The Teaching Profession

Woldab (2013) presents teaching as a legitimate and objective composed movement, and it is the primary duty of teachers no matter what their time and period of training. Educating is a diverse and frustrated cycle, including grouped instructive abilities and sensibility similarly as coherent norms and present day techniques. Mahmood (2013) explains that educators are the substance of any school system and nature of that school system would be established on various elements, yet, most dire is the nature of teachers. Teacher’s abilities accept a fundamental piece of student’s achievements and execution at all levels of schooling.

Students’ accomplishments can be used to evaluate the presentation of teachers. In this way, Ackerman, Heafner, and Bartz (2006) assume that the teacher’s trademark is the best indicator of a student’s success. Mahmood (2013) explains that educator’s show includes teacher’s insightful capability, nature of teacher preparing, showing encounters, educational practices, proficient improvement, arranging the material ask higher solicitation requests, use student contemplations, and test students’ comments, empathy, coaching, preparing, subject data, commitment, obligation, ability to convey, and class the executives’ ability, etc.

Ubben and Hughes (1992) explains that effective teachers are those that give students the main events to learn. Assume a teacher’s responsibility is to assist others with developing their learning limits. Therefore, administration procedures, authoritative structures, frameworks, and cycles must align with enhanced learning opportunities (Ubben & Hughes, 1992, cited in Mahmood, 2013). According to Harden and Crosby (2000), the teacher’s changing function is verifiable in the widely acknowledged and extensive changes in education. Twelve jobs of the educator have been perceived in such way, and these can be collected in six zones in the model presented:

*The information provider.

*The excellent example at work and in more standard settings for demonstrating  *The facilitator as a guide and learning facilitator, the student assessor and instructive program evaluator, the scholarly program and course coordinator, and the resource material producer, and study oversee creator.

A teacher who exudes skill and eagerness for a substance-free zone may transfer those feelings to the students. Likewise, what the educator relates to the understudies means for the understudies’ association with the class. The teacher’s personality is one of the essential game plans of characteristics to look for in an effective teacher. In the media, teachers have been depicted in a variety of ways, from stifling images to beloved specialists who inspire students to excel. Persuasive teachers should be visible, heard, and recognized. The effective educator’s partakes in talk with students, accomplices, gatekeepers, and heads and dependably shows respect, accessibility, and expertise. Convincing educators are successfully perceived through their dexterous use of tending to and direction given in the classroom. Finally, an onlooker who knows from all sources that this individual has any impact in the classroom can identify the presence of a fruitful teacher. The authentic teacher is an expert of instructor.

What is Ethics?

The term morals comes from the Greek word ethos meaning standard. In general, ethics refers to a standard way of doing things, as opposed to the historical or anthropological way of doing things. Ethics, as defined by Frankena (1973), is a philosophical approach to morality, ethical dilemmas, and moral judgment. Morals is a part of reasoning which studies values and customs of an individual or gathering and covers the examination and work ideas like great and terrible, good and bad and wickedness. Likewise, the philosophical investigation of morals looks to give us general direction concerning what to find and how to treat others (Ewing 1976).

Kant’s Good Will versus Duty

Immanuel Kant (2002) teaches that there is nothing it is possible to think about any put on the globe, or as a general rule anything at all outer it that can be held to be acceptable without obstruction, beside simply a thoughtfulness. Getting, mind, the force of judgment, and like capacities of the mind, anything they might be called, or coarseness, assurance, consistent quality in an objective, as attributes of character, are without question in certain respects gigantic and to be needed; nonetheless, they can similarly end up being incredibly smooth and risky, assuming that the will that is to use these gifts of nature, and whose exceptional constitution is appropriately called character, isn’t satisfactory.

Kant puts it that: Influence, wealth, honor, in any event, prosperity and that genuine success and fulfillment with one’s condition, under the name of happiness, make for grit and in this way routinely furthermore for gaudiness, where there is authentically not a consideration to address their impact on the cerebrum, and subsequently on the principal rule of movement, and make them by and large purposive; likewise that a sensible, fair spectator can never take satisfaction even in seeing the persistent government help of being, assuming that it is upgraded without any nature of a sober and generosity; hence the heart appears to contain the fundamental condition even of the worth to be happy.

As shown by Kant (2002), the service is acceptable not through what it influences or accomplishes, not through its feasibility for achieving any normal end. However, it is to be evaluated much higher than anything that could be achieved by it for any tendency, or indeed, if you like, of the whole, everything being equal, just through its willingness, which is remarkable by itself and considered for itself without correlation. Whether or not through the specific dissatisfaction with regards to fate, or the little gift of a phase sustaining nature, this will be ailing in the resources for come to its meaningful conclusion, in the event that with its most essential effort nothing of it were refined. Simply the consideration was left: by then, it would shimmer like a diamond for itself, as something that has its full worth in itself. That’s what kant cautions: There is, regardless, something so exceptional in this considered unquestionably the worth of the straightforward will, without offering any mercy for utility in its evaluation, that notwithstanding all the simultaneousness with it even of standard clarification, there must, regardless, arise an uncertainty that perhaps it is furtively grounded exclusively on an extreme dream, and that nature might have been wrongly seen in the guide it had in selecting inspiration toward regulate our will.

Kant (2002) explains that in the typical tendencies of a figured out being, i.e., a being organized purposively everlastingly, we expect, generally speaking, that no instrument is to be knowledgeable about it for any end beside that which is the most sensible to and legitimate for it. As of now on the off chance that in a being that has an explanation and a will, it’s shielding, its administration help with a word, its delight was the normal completion of nature, by then nature would have hit on a horrendous game-plan in designating reason in this creature to accomplish the point. For every one of the exercises it requirements to execute toward this point, and the entire norm of its lead, would be prescribed to it impressively more precisely through instinct, and that end could be gotten more safely through it than would happen through clarification; and if, a long ways past this, reason was conceded to the upheld creature.

It would have served it to make it ponder the lively tendency of its propensity, to see the value in it, to celebrate in it, and to make it because of the valid justification for it, but not to uncover its staff of need to that weak and flabbergasting heading, and meddle in the mark of nature; in a word, nature would have held clarification back from breaking out into suitable use and from having the supposition, with its feeble comprehension, to completely consider for itself the endeavor of ecstasy and the strategies for accomplishing it; nature would have taken command over the choice of the completions as well as of the techniques, and with savvy game plan would have depended both solely to motivation.

Kant (2002) keeps up with that since reason isn’t enough fruitful in coordinating the will safely concerning its articles and the satisfaction of all of our requirements, and an implanted ordinary sense would have directed us essentially more emphatically to this end, yet since reason regardless has been presented to us as a valuable faculty, i.e., as one that ought to significantly affect the will, its genuine business should thusly be not to convey volition as a way to another point, yet rather to make a will good in itself, for which reason was absolutely imperative, since any place else nature goes to work purposively in scattering its tendencies. This will may consequently not be the single and entire extraordinary, but it should be the most critical incredible, and the condition for the remainder, regardless, for each premium for fulfillment, wherein case it might be gotten together with the knowledge of nature, when one sees that the lifestyle of reason, which is required, quite far according to various perspectives the achievement of the ensuing point, which is continually adjusted, specifically of bliss, in any event this life, and could diminish it to not generally so much as nothing without nature’s strategy purposively in this; for reason, which sees its most significant down to earth occupation in the laying out of a generosity, is able in accomplishing this point just of a joy after its own sort, explicitly from the fulfillment of an end that again clarification chooses, whether or not this should similarly be bound up with some infringement of the terminations of propensity.

Kant (2002) fights that to develop the possibility of a thoughtfulness, to be respected in itself and with no further point, comparably as it stays at this point in the typically strong perception, which ought not be told yet rather to be enlightened, this thought consistently staying over the evaluation of the entire worth of our exercises and including the condition for all the other things: we will put before ourselves the possibility of commitment, which contains that of a generosity, but under specific unique requirements and obstacles, which, in any case, quite far from concealing it and it unrecognizable, rather raise it on the other hand and let it shimmer forward considerably more magnificently.

As demonstrated by Kant (2002) to be favorable where one can be a commitment, what’s more this there are a couple of spirits so nicely changed that, even with no other reasoning of vanity or utility to self, appreciate spreading rapture around them, and can take completely partake in the bliss of others to the degree that it is their own work. Anyway, Kant (2002) states that in such a case the movement, in any case it could conform to commitment and at any rate friendly it is, eventually has no conspicuous great worth, yet is on comparable equilibrium as various propensities, e.g., the propensity to regard, which, when it fortunately encounters something that really serves the advantage of all and is in congruity with commitment, and is consequently meriting honor, merits acknowledgment and reassurance, yet not respect; for the maxim needs upright substance, to be explicit of doing such exercises not from inclination yet rather from commitment.

According to Kant (2002), it is an obligation to ensure one’s own happiness because the absence of happiness with one’s condition in the midst of numerous difficulties and unmet needs can quickly become an extraordinary compulsion to violate obligations. Notwithstanding, even without looking at commitment, all people reliably have of themselves the most great and inside propensity to fulfillment, considering the way that totally in this thought all propensities are participated in an aggregate. The statute of bliss, on the other hand, is typically established to such an extent that it significantly impinges on particular tendencies; however, the individual is unable to determine or guarantee the idea of the total fulfillment of all, which is referred to as happiness. Kant holds that it isn’t to be stood flabbergasted at that a single propensity, which is determinate concerning what it ensures and the time where its satisfaction can be procured, can surpass a wavering idea; and the individual, e.g., a person with gout, could choose to see the value in what tastes perfect and to persevere through what he ought to, considering the way that according to his revenge, around here in any event has not surrendered the joy in the ongoing second through wants, perhaps unwarranted, of a fulfillment that ought to lie in prosperity. However moreover for this present circumstance, in the event that the general propensity to fulfillment doesn’t choose his will, if for his purposes, anyway, does exclude as so fundamental in his revenge, by then here, as in each and every case, there actually remaining parts a regulation, specifically to propel his euphoria not from propensity yet rather from commitment, and a short time later his direct has out of the blue its genuine moral worth.

Concurring with Kant (2002) an activity from obligation has moral worth not in the point ought to be achieved by it, yet rather in the saying on which it is settled upon; hence that worth depends not on the truth of the object of the action, but essentially on the standard of the volition, according to which the action is finished, no matter what any object of the work force of need. The focuses we might have in activities, and their possessions, as closures and rousing powers of the will, can present to the activities no unconditioned and great worth. The association of the activities with the effect sought after misrepresentations no spot else than in the standard of the will, no matter what the closures that can be impacted through such an activity; for the will is at a convergence, from a certain point of view, between its standard apriori, which is formal, and its inspiration aposteriori, which is material, and since it ought to by somehow be constrained by something, it should be settled through the legitimate rule overall of the volition in case it plays out a movement from obligation, since every material rule has been taken out from it. Kant (2002) believes about that obligation is the need of a movement from respect for the law. For the article, as an effect of a proposed activity, one can clearly have an inclination, but never respect, since it is basically an effect and not the development of a will. Essentially, as pitiful an individual can have respect for propensity all things considered, whether or not his/her own or another’s; an individual can everything considered help it in the chief case, in the second an individual can now and again try and love it, i.e., view it as sure for his/her own piece of elbowroom. That which is related with his/her will just as a ground, never as an Effect, exactly what doesn’t serve the propensity yet surpasses it, or on the other hand if nothing else completely dismisses it from the revenge in a choice, hence the straightforward regulation for itself, can be an object of respect and thus a request.

Kant (2002) states that: As of now an activity from obligation is expected absolutely to extricate from the effect of propensity, and with it each object of the will, so there is nothing left over for the will that can conclude it beside the law as what is level headed and sincerely pure respect for this rational regulation, hence the idiom of adjusting to such a regulation, regardless, when it infringes all of my inclinations. The moral worth of the activity subsequently lies not in the effect not strange from it thusly in that frame of mind of action which necessities to get its reasoning from this typical effect, For all of these effects could be accomplished through various causes, and for them the craving of an ordinary being is thus not needed; in any case, in just it the most raised and unconditioned extraordinary can eventually be capable. Nothing other than the depiction of the law in itself, which plainly happens simply in the sensible being to the degree that it, and not the pursued effect, is the concluding ground of the will, thusly lays out that so pre-popular extraordinary which we call ‘moral’, which is currently present in the singular himself who goes about according to it, yet shouldn’t generally critically be typical from the effect. In this way, Kant explains that: Since I have denied the craving of every inspiration that could have risen up out of the loyalty to any regulation, there is nothing left done except for the comprehensive authenticity of the activity overall which alone is to serve the will as its rule, I ought to never to act beside so I could moreover will that my saying become a general regulation. If duty is not to be where an unfulfilled hallucination and a fanciful idea, then simple legality as a rule (without establishing it on any law deciding certain activities) serves the will as its guideline. Normal human explanation, for sure, concurs impeccably with this in its pragmatic judgment, and has the standard just referred to consistently before its eyes (Kant, 2002).

Duty and Good Will in Teaching

If we draw in Kant’s view that there is nothing it is possible to think about any put in the world, or without a doubt anything at all outside it that can be held to be satisfactory without obstruction, beside simply a decent, by then we keep up with the teaching profession on how it is laid out on consideration. As Ashraf, Bano and Ilyas (2013) pointed out we observe that teachng is indispensable to schooling without which we can’t have training, and thusly, requires authority. It suggests that for education to succeed, teachers should search for the most essential extraordinary without hindrance in their calling, and this should be the thoughtfulness. Teachers need to have the graciousness to achieve their work and their power is drawn on the grounds of good. We gain from Ashraf, Bano and Ilyas (2013) that teachers have gigantic ability to affect the thinking, motivation and data on their students with the ultimate objective that the instructor’s occupation is huge in character working of their students. Students follow their teacher as good example. Mahmood (2013) explains that teachers are the focal center of any school system and nature of that tutoring structure would be established on various parts yet most crucial is nature of instructors. Educator’s abilities accept a fundamental capability in understudy’s exhibition at all levels of schooling. Teacher’s show includes instructor’s expert ability, nature of educator’s getting ready, showing experiences, teaching practices, capable new development, coordinating the material, ask higher solicitation requests, utilize student’s contemplations, and test student’s comments, sympathy, coaching, preparing, subject data, commitment, duty, ability to confer, and class the leaders’ ability, etc

Regardless, as Kant instructs, without good, these qualities wouldn’t get the targets of educating. Getting, mind, the intensity of judgment, and similar abilities of the brain, whatever they are called, or fortitude, determination, perseverance in an expectation, as characteristics of disposition, are without a doubt in some regards great and to be desired; however, they can also turn out to be incredibly dangerous, if the will that is to use these endowments of nature, whose particular constitution is in this way called character, is not acceptable. Kant warns that getting, mind, the intensity of judgment, and similar abilities

This paper opines that master getting ready isn’t satisfactory to make extraordinary teachers. A couple of individuals could have gone to teaching ensuing to missing jobs of their energy. People who take to teaching as a last resort may/don’t have the graciousness to partake in the teaching profession. They may achieve high capabilities as a result of their preparation, but this may not have been caused by their enthusiasm or kindness for teaching; rather, it may have been prompted by the need to take on additional work. The people who take to showing should see the profession/calling and the entire educating as perfect.

As we gain from Kant (2002), the good is adequate not through what it influences or accomplishes, not through its reasonability for achieving any arranged end, but through its willing, i.e., extraordinary in itself, and considered for itself, without assessment, it is to be surveyed far higher than whatever might be accomplished by it for any propensity. From Kant’s conceptualization of good and duty/obligation/commitment, that’s what we find to recognize thoughtfulness, there is necessity for duty.

Kant (2002) unveils that to develop the possibility of a decent, to be respected in itself and with no further point, likewise as it stays at this point in the typically strong perception, which ought not be educated yet rather to be enlightened, this thought consistently staying over the evaluation of the entire worth of our exercises and including the condition for all the other things; we will put before ourselves the possibility of obligation, which contains that of a generosity, but under specific unique limitations and hindrances, which, regardless, far from covering it and making it unrecognizable, rather that teachers have been portrayed in a variety of courses in the media, from negative pictures to loved specialists of their craft who move students to rule. It is possible to see, hear, and identify persuasive teachers. The suitable teacher partakes in talk with understudies, partners, gatekeepers, and regulators and dependably exhibits regard, availability, and capacity.

Strong teachers are successfully perceived through their talented usage of tending to and direction given in the study hall. Finally, an eyewitness who knows from all sources that this individual truly has any sort of impact in the review lobby can distinguish the presence of a convincing educator. The genuine educator is an expert in their field. In any case, as we gain from Kant’s examples, the significant nature of these qualities of a strong educator could be recognized when the tasks are performed concerning obligation. Agreeing Kant (2002) a movement from commitment has moral worth not in the point ought to be accomplished by it, yet rather in the saying according to which it is settled upon; consequently that worth depends not on the reality of the object of the action, yet on the rule of the volition, according to which the action is finished, no matter what any object of the labor force of need.

The focuses we might have in exercises, and their possessions, as terminations and catalysts of the will, can present to the exercises no unconditioned and great worth. The moral worth of the action accordingly lies not in the effect typical from it; thus, in no standard of movement which requirements to get its expectation from this ordinary effect. For all of these effects could be accomplished through various causes and for them the longing of a prudent being is thusly not needed; nonetheless, in just it the most raised and unconditioned extraordinary can regardless be capable.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Duty is the need of an action from respect for the law. The so-called “moral,” which is already present in the individual who acts in accordance with it, but should not above all else be normal from the impact, is established by nothing other than the portrayal of the law in itself, which clearly happens only in the judicious being to the extent that it, rather than the desired impact, is the deciding ground of the will. Here it is basic legitimateness, generally speaking (without laying out it on any regulation choosing specific exercises) that serves the will as its standard, and moreover ought to so serve it, on the off chance that doty isn’t to be any place an unfilled fantasy and a whimsical thought; ordinary human clarification, as a matter of fact, Kant’s examples on the spot of duty and the law in portraying the moral nature of a movement proposes that the showing calling should highlight the law as given. Teacher should conform to the regulations similarly as principles directing their commitment, which is to teach. It is the point at which their exercises, oozing from great as directed by obligation and the law that the showing action should have been visible as great. While teaching is viewed as great, it becomes satisfactory and such activity has higher chances of achieving its targets. Considering that teaching is basic to education without which we can’t have training, and consequently, requires authority (Ashraf, Bano and Ilyas 2013), a moral demonstration of teaching as inspected makes the teaching/calling the main impetus of training.

CONCLUSION

The paper is isolated into three basic sections. Section one makes an  embodies of the teaching profession; section two presents Kant’s conceptualization of Good Will and Duty, while fragment three inspects teaching profession as Good Will and  Duty/Obligation. From its discussions, this paper assumes that the teaching is key in any teaching practice. In similarity of compelling teaching, tries ought to highlight teaching as both good and obligation (duty). In this manner, as a significant piece of society teacher, ought to be moral by following the set of rules of teaching calling. Subsequently, Kant’s ethical way of thinking of good will and duty ought to be integrated into the ethics of teaching profession

REFERENCES

1. Ackerman, T., Heafner, T., & Bartz, D. (2006). “Teacher Effect Model for Impacting Student Achievement.” Paper presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.
2. Ashraf, S., Bano, H., Ilyas, A. (2013). “Students’ Preferences for the Teachers Characteristics and Traits in Character Building of Students with Special Needs”. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 4 No 4. MCSER- CEMAS-Sapienza University of Rome. March 2013
3. Ewing, A. C., Ethics (Great Britain, Hodder and Stoughton, 1976), p.1.
4. European Network of Education Councils (2009). The Teaching Profession Changes, challenges and perspectives. Report of the conference of the European Network of Education Councils, Vilnius, 13-15 October 2008 with the support of the European Commission DG Education and Culture Brussels, January 2009
5. Frankena, W. K., Ethics. (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1973).
6. Harden, R., M., Crosby, J. (2000). The good teacher is more than a lecturer – the twelve roles of the teacher. Medical Teacher 22(4): 334-347. Scotland.
7. Lynn Bell Kant, 1. (2002). Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Edited and translated by Allen W. Wood. New Haven and London. Yale University Press.
8. Mahmood, T. (2013). “Assessing the Pedagogical Competences of Teacher Educators in the Teacher Education Institution of Pakistan.” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 2 No 1. MCSER-CEMAS-Sapienza
9. University of Rorne. March 2013 Ubben, G. C., Hughes, W. L. (1992) “The Principal Creative Leadership for Effective Schools”. Boston: Allen and Bacon.
10. Woldab, Z., E (2013). “Constructivist Didactics in Teaching Economics: A Shift in Paradigm to be Exemplary Teacher.” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol 2 No 1. MCSER-CEMAS- Sapienza University of Rome. March 2013. Contemporary Educational Issues, Vol 1 Issue 2, 2000.