Social Class Differences in Modern Literature: A Comparative Study on a House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light fo the Day

Social Class Differences in Modern Literature: A Comparative Study on a House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day

Mahbuba Sultana

Manarat International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9020205 

Received: 30 January 2025; Accepted: 07 February 2025; Published: 11 March 2025

ABSTRACT

This comparative study examines the portrayal of social class differences in two significant works of modern literature: V.S. Naipaul’s A House for Mr. Biswas and Anita Desai’s Clear Light of the Day. Both novels delve into the complexities of familial and societal relationships shaped by class dynamics within postcolonial settings. Naipaul’s novel explores the struggles of Mr. Biswas, an ambitious yet marginalized individual seeking autonomy and identity in Trinidad’s stratified society. In contrast, Desai’s Clear Light of the Day depicts the evolving relationships within a middle-class Indian family, highlighting the interplay between personal aspirations and cultural expectations. By analyzing themes such as economic dependency, identity formation, and generational conflict, this study highlights how authors critique entrenched class structures and their implications on individual agency. The comparative approach underscores the universality of class struggles while revealing the unique socio-cultural nuances of postcolonial contexts in the Caribbean and India. Ultimately, this paper aims to deepen our understanding of how literature reflects and critiques the pervasive influence of social class in shaping human experiences.

Keywords: Social class differences; Class struggles; Identity and autonomy; Economic dependency; Generational conflict; Cultural expectations

INTRODUCTION

Social class differences have long been a central theme in modern literature, shaping the lives, aspirations, and struggles of characters across diverse cultural and historical contexts. Literature often reflects societal structures, exposing the complexities of class mobility, economic hardship, and social expectations. In postcolonial societies, where historical legacies of colonization influence class divisions, literary works provide a deeper understanding of how individuals navigate these hierarchies. This study explores the depiction of social class differences in two significant postcolonial novels A House for Mr. Biswas by V.S. Naipaul and Clear Light of the Day by Anita Desai through a comparative analysis of their themes, characters, and socio-cultural contexts.

Both novels portray protagonists who struggle against rigid class structures in their respective societies. A House for Mr. Biswas (1961) follows the life of Mohun Biswas, an Indo-Trinidadian man seeking autonomy and social mobility in a world dominated by colonial legacies and economic instability. His relentless pursuit of homeownership symbolizes his desire for self-identity and independence in a stratified society. Similarly, Clear Light of the Day (1980) presents an intimate exploration of class distinctions in post-independence India, particularly through the experiences of Bim and Tara, two sisters whose contrasting life choices reflect the tensions between tradition, modernity, and class expectations. While Naipaul’s novel focuses on an individual’s material struggles, Desai’s work delves into the emotional and psychological dimensions of class differences, especially as they relate to gender.

Despite the significance of these novels, there has been limited comparative analysis of how both texts examineclass dynamics in different postcolonial settings. Existing scholarship often discusses A House for Mr. Biswas in the context of postcolonial Trinidadian identity and Clear Light of the Day within the framework of gender and family relationships in India. However, a direct comparison of how these novels represent social class, family influence, and personal aspirations remains an underexplored area of literary analysis. This study aims to fill this gap by examining how the protagonists’ struggles with class mobility, gender roles, and societal expectations reflect broader issues of social inequality.

Through a close reading of both texts, this study will investigate key themes such as economic hardship, social stratification, colonial legacies, and the intersection of gender and class. By comparing how Naipaul and Desai portray class differences, this research seeks to contribute to the broader discourse on postcolonial literature and its role in shaping our understanding of social hierarchies in modern societies.

LITERATURE REVIEW

The study of social class differences in modern literature has been a critical area of focus within postcolonial and cultural studies. Scholars have often explored how literature reflects, critiques, and reshapes the socio-economic hierarchies and power dynamics of specific historical and cultural contexts. This literature review examines key themes and existing scholarship surrounding V.S. Naipaul’s A House for Mr. Biswas and Anita Desai’s Clear Light of the Day, with a focus on their depiction of social class differences.

Postcolonial Perspectiveson Class

Postcolonial literature frequently interrogates the lingering effects of colonial rule, including the emergence and perpetuation of class divisions. Critics like Homi K. Bhabha and Edward Said have emphasized how postcolonial texts reveal the intersections of class, culture, and identity. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Naipaul portrays the struggle of a man from a marginalized Indo-Trinidadian background to assert autonomy through the pursuit of material security—a house of his own. Scholars such as Rob Nixon argue that the novel reflects both personal ambition and the systemic limitations imposed by colonial and postcolonial class structures in the Caribbean. Similarly, Desai’s Clear Light of the Day offers a nuanced portrayal of a middle-class Indian family in post-independence India, exploring themes of privilege, generational conflict, and societal expectations. The work of Elleke Boehmer highlights the ways in which postcolonial authors critique the uneven power dynamics shaped by both colonial histories and local traditions.

Class and Identity Formation

Both novels foreground the impact of class on individual identity formation. Naipaul’s narrative revolves around Mr. Biswas’s quest for selfhood and upward mobility despite economic precarity and familial obligations. Scholars like Mark McWatt have pointed out how the character’s struggles reflect broader themes of cultural dislocation and marginalization experienced by diasporic communities. Similarly, critics of Clear Light of the Day, including Rajeswari Sunder Rajan, emphasize how Desai employs the character dynamics of the Das family to illustrate the intersection of personal aspirations and collective cultural identities, where class plays a central role in shaping choices and relationships.

Generational Conflict and Economic Dependency

Both texts depict generational tensions as central to the negotiation of class differences. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Mr. Biswas’s strained relationships with his in-laws, particularly the Tulsis, underscore the dependency and power struggles inherent in traditional joint-family systems. Scholars like Selwyn Cudjoe note how Naipaul critiques the feudal remnants of Indo-Caribbean society while exploring the protagonist’s resistance against familial and economic constraints. Desai’s Clear Light of the Day similarly delves into intergenerational relationships, contrasting the conservative values of the elder Das siblings with the modern aspirations of the younger generation. Critics such as Meenakshi Mukherjee have explored how Desai uses the setting of Old Delhi to reflect the simultaneous presence of tradition and change, situating class dynamics within a broader cultural and historical framework.

Comparative Studies and Socio-Cultural Nuances

While the two novels share thematic concerns about social class and identity, they reflect distinct socio-cultural nuances shaped by their respective settings. Scholars like Bill Ashcroft and Leela Gandhi emphasize the importance of examining these works comparatively to understand the universal and particular dimensions of class struggles. The Caribbean context of Naipaul’s novel highlights the legacies of indentured servitude and colonial exploitation, whereas Desai’s work explores the impact of caste, gender, and family structures in post-independence India. This comparative approach sheds light on how diverse postcolonial societies grapple with class and its implications for individual and collective experiences.

Existing scholarship on A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day provides valuable insights into the representation of social class in modern literature. By focusing on themes such as identity, generational conflict, and cultural expectations, these works offer a profound critique of class structures in postcolonial societies. However, further comparative analysis is needed to explore how the interplay of historical and cultural specificities shapes the portrayal of social class in these texts, contributing to a deeper understanding of class struggles in modern literature.

RESEARCH GAP

While both A House for Mr. Biswas (by V.S. Naipaul) and Clear Light of the Day (by Anita Desai) explore themes of class, family, and individual struggle, there is minimal comparative literary analysis focusing specifically on how social class differences shape the protagonists’ identities, aspirations, and conflicts in these two novels.

Both novels are set in postcolonial societies (A House for Mr. Biswas in Trinidad and Clear Light of the Day in India), yet how colonial legacies influence social class structures and mobility in each context has not been fully explored.

Most existing studies focus on Mr. Biswas’ struggle for autonomy but may not deeply explore how class affects gender differently in Desai’s novel, particularly in the experiences of Tara and Bim as women navigating class expectations in India.

Research Question:

1. How do A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day depict social class differences, and what impact do these differences have on the protagonists’ identities and struggles?

1. How do colonial and postcolonial influences shape social class structures in the two novels?
2. How do the novels portray the psychological and emotional effects of class struggles beyond economic hardships?

Objectives of the Study

1. To analyze how A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day depict social class differences and their impact on the characters’ lives.
2. To compare the ways in which colonial and postcolonial influences shape social class structures in Trinidad and India, as represented in the two novels.
3. To assess the psychological and emotional effects of social class struggles beyond material conditions in both narratives.

METHODOLOGY

This study employs a qualitative, comparative literary analysis to examine social class differences in V.S. Naipaul’s A House for Mr. Biswas and Anita Desai’s Clear Light of the Day. The methodology integrates postcolonial theory, socio-historical contextualization, and thematic analysis to explore how the novels portray class structures, identity formation, and familial relationships.

Research Design

The research adopts a comparative approach, focusing on the thematic and stylistic similarities and differences between the two novels. The texts are analyzed in relation to their historical, cultural, and socio-economic contexts colonial and postcolonial Trinidad for Naipaul’s novel and post-independence India for Desai’s work. This approach allows for a nuanced understanding of how social class functions within distinct yet overlapping postcolonial settings.

Textual Analysis

Close reading is the primary method of analysis. Key passages from both novels are examined to identify recurring themes such as economic dependency, generational conflict, and the pursuit of identity. Literary elements, including characterization, narrative structure, symbolism, and imagery, are analyzed to reveal how class differences are constructed and critiqued.

Postcolonial Framework

Postcolonial theory provides the theoretical foundation for this study. Concepts from scholars such as Edward Said, Homi K. Bhabha, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak are utilized to understand how the novels address issues of power, marginalization, and cultural hybridity. This framework aids in interpreting how class intersects with other factors, such as race, caste, and gender, within postcolonial societies.

Comparative Approach

The comparative aspect involves identifying parallels and divergences in the treatment of social class between the two novels. The analysis emphasizes the role of historical and cultural specificities in shaping the authors’ perspectives while highlighting universal themes of class struggle and aspiration.

Contextual Analysis

Socio-historical context plays a critical role in the study. Secondary sources, including critical essays, historical accounts, and literary reviews, are consulted to situate the novels within their respective cultural and temporal settings. This contextualization enriches the analysis by linking the fictional narratives to real-world class dynamics.

Limitations

This study is limited to the analysis of two novels, which, while providing in-depth insights, may not capture the full spectrum of class-related issues in postcolonial literature. Additionally, the focus on class as a primary lens may overlook other significant themes, such as gender or colonial trauma, which are also central to the novels.

By integrating these methods, the study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of how Naipaul and Desai depict social class differences and their implications for individual and collective experiences in postcolonial societies.

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

Social class is a fundamental theme in literature, shaping character development, narrative structure, and thematic concerns. The study of social class differences in modern literature is often approached through Marxist literary criticism, postcolonial theory, and sociocultural perspectives. These frameworks help analyze how economic conditions, cultural capital, and historical context influence the lives of characters and the broader socio-political landscape depicted in novels.

Marxist Literary Criticism:

Marxist literary theory, rooted in the works of Karl Marx and later developed by thinkers like Antonio Gramsci and Pierre Bourdieu, provides a lens to analyze class struggles in literature. According to Marxist critics, literature often reflects the economic base and ideological superstructures of society. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Naipaul portrays the economic hardships and aspirations of a marginalized Indo-Trinidadian protagonist, illustrating the struggle for upward mobility and identity. Similarly, in Clear Light of the Day, Desai examines class-based hierarchies within an upper-middle-class Indian family, reflecting post-independence tensions and gendered economic disparities.

Gramsci’s concept of cultural hegemony is particularly relevant in understanding how dominant ideologies shape social class perceptions in both novels. Mr. Biswas’s struggle for homeownership and autonomy reflects resistance to colonial and economic subjugation, while the Das family in Clear Light of the Day embodies a class-conscious elite navigating shifting socio-political landscapes.

Postcolonial Theory and Social Class:

Postcolonial theory, as developed by critics such as Edward Said, Homi Bhabha, and Gayatri Spivak, is essential in analyzing social class differences within postcolonial societies. Both novels explore class within the context of colonial histories—Naipaul in the Caribbean and Desai in India—highlighting the intersection of colonial legacies, class divisions, and personal identity.

Bhabha’s notion of hybridity and Spivak’s idea of subaltern voices are significant in understanding how social class operates in these texts. Mr. Biswas, a descendant of Indian indentured laborers, struggles against the economic and social remnants of colonial rule, while the characters in Clear Light of the Day navigate an elite, English-educated world that contrasts with the realities of newly independent India.

Sociocultural Perspectives on Class and Identity:

Beyond economic determinism, class also encompasses cultural and social capital, as theorized by Pierre Bourdieu. His concepts of habitus, capital (economic, cultural, social), and field help explain how characters in both novels negotiate their class positions. Mr. Biswas’s aspiration for homeownership symbolizes an attempt to gain cultural capital, whereas Bim, in Clear Light of the Day, resists traditional class and gender expectations by choosing independence over marriage.

Moreover, the influence of gender and class intersections is crucial in Desai’s novel, as female characters experience class differently from their male counterparts. The domestic sphere, often relegated to women, becomes a site where class expectations and social mobility are contested.

The comparative study of A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day reveals how social class differences shape individual destinies and cultural identities. Through Marxist, postcolonial, and sociocultural theories, the novels illustrate the enduring impact of colonial histories, economic constraints, and cultural aspirations on social class mobility. These theoretical frameworks provide a comprehensive understanding of how literature reflects and critiques social stratification in postcolonial societies.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

Social Class Differences in A House for Mr. Biswas

V.S. Naipaul’s A House for Mr. Biswas intricately explores social class differences within the context of colonial and postcolonial Trinidad. The novel highlights how class hierarchies, rooted in both colonial legacies and Indo-Caribbean cultural traditions, shape the life of the protagonist, Mohun Biswas, as he struggles to achieve autonomy and dignity in an oppressive socio-economic environment.

Economic Dependency and Marginalization

Mr. Biswas’s life is marked by poverty and economic dependency, which limits his opportunities and reinforces his sense of marginalization. Born into a poor Indo-Trinidadian family, his life is shaped by the rigid class structures of a colonial society, where economic status dictates social mobility and personal agency. His dependency on the Tulsi family, a wealthy and powerful clan, exemplifies this dynamic. The Tulsis exploit their economic superiority to control not only Mr. Biswas’s financial circumstances but also his personal and familial decisions.

The Symbolism of the House

The house in the novel symbolizes upward mobility, independence, and self-identity. For Mr. Biswas, owning a house represents an escape from the cycle of economic dependency and the oppressive influence of the Tulsi family. It also reflects his aspirations to transcend his lower-class status and secure a sense of permanence and respect in a transient, class-stratified society. However, his relentless pursuit of a house comes at great personal and financial cost, underscoring the difficulties of breaking free from systemic class constraints.

The Role of Colonial Structures

The colonial system in Trinidad plays a pivotal role in shaping class dynamics in the novel. The Indo-Trinidadian community, descended from indentured laborers, occupies a marginalized position within the larger colonial hierarchy dominated by Europeans. This historical legacy of economic exploitation and social exclusion creates barriers for individuals like Mr. Biswas, whose aspirations for self-improvement are continually thwarted by systemic inequalities.

Family as a Microcosm of Class Dynamics

The Tulsi family serves as a microcosm of Indo-Caribbean class structures. The matriarch, Mrs. Tulsi, wields economic and social power over her extended family, enforcing conformity and dependence. Mr. Biswas’s resistance to the Tulsi family’s control reflects his broader struggle against the constraints of class and tradition. His conflict with the Tulsis highlights the tension between individual ambition and collective cultural expectations, which often serve to perpetuate existing class hierarchies.

Education and Social Mobility

Education emerges as a potential pathway for social mobility in the novel, but it is portrayed as insufficient in overcoming entrenched class barriers. Despite his intelligence and creativity, Mr. Biswas lacks the financial stability and social connections needed to fully leverage his education for upward mobility. His children, however, represent a new generation with greater opportunities to transcend class divisions, suggesting a glimmer of hope for change in the future.

Humor and Irony in Class Struggles

Naipaul uses humor and irony to critique the absurdities of class pretensions and the struggles for upward mobility. Mr. Biswas’s attempts to assert his independence often result in comical failures, reflecting both his resilience and the futility of his efforts in a deeply unequal society.

In A House for Mr. Biswas, Naipaul provides a profound critique of social class differences, exposing the systemic inequalities and cultural expectations that limit individual agency. Through Mr. Biswas’s struggles, the novel highlights the pervasive influence of class in shaping identity, relationships, and aspirations in a postcolonial society. Ultimately, the novel underscores the complex interplay between personal ambition and structural constraints, offering a poignant commentary on the human desire for dignity and autonomy in the face of social and economic adversity.

Social Class Differences in Clear Light of the Day

Anita Desai’s Clear Light of the Day explores the complexities of family relationships, memory, and identity within the context of a post-independence Indian society shaped by entrenched social class distinctions. Through the lives of the Das family, Desai examines how class differences impact personal aspirations, relationships, and the evolving dynamics of tradition and modernity.

The Middle-Class Setting

The Das family represents a middle-class Indian household, situated in Old Delhi. Their social position reflects both privilege and limitation—they have access to education, property, and cultural refinement, but they remain bound by societal expectations and economic constraints. The dilapidated family home serves as a metaphor for their declining status and the stagnation of their lives, mirroring the broader struggles of India’s middle class to maintain stability amidst socio-political change.

Class and Gender Expectations

Class distinctions intersect with gender roles to shape the lives of the Das siblings. Bimla (Bim), the eldest sister, defies traditional expectations by remaining unmarried and assuming responsibility for the family. Her independence, however, comes at the cost of personal fulfillment and societal approval. In contrast, Tara, her younger sister, marries into wealth and embraces a more conventional role, benefiting from the privileges of her husband’s higher social standing. This contrast highlights the different ways in which women navigate class and gender constraints, often at the expense of their individuality.

Economic Dependence and Power Dynamics

Economic dependency plays a significant role in the relationships within the Das family. Raja, the eldest brother, aspires to elevate his status by aligning himself with Hyder Ali, a wealthy landlord and symbol of upper-class privilege. His decision to move away from the family and pursue his ambitions reflects his desire to transcend the limitations of his middle-class background. However, his abandonment creates tensions with Bim, who resents his perceived betrayal and the power dynamics that his economic freedom enables.

The Role of Education in Social Mobility

Education is portrayed as both a tool for empowerment and a source of conflict in the novel. Bim values intellectual pursuits and independence, but her refusal to use education as a means of achieving upward mobility sets her apart from her siblings. Raja, on the other hand, uses his education to form connections with the upper class, while Tara views education as secondary to her role within the family and society. This divergence underscores the varied ways in which individuals within the same class navigate opportunities for social mobility.

The Partition as a Backdrop for Class Divisions:

The historical context of India’s Partition serves as a significant backdrop, highlighting the ways in which class intersects with religion and politics. The Das family’s middle-class status allows them to avoid the immediate violence of Partition, but the event reshapes their relationships and underscores the fragility of social stability. Raja’s affinity for Hyder Ali’s family—a Muslim household—challenges the boundaries of class and communal identity, while the Das family’s decline mirrors the broader upheaval of the time.

Tradition vs. Modernity

The tension between tradition and modernity is a recurring theme in the novel, particularly as it relates to class.

Bim clings to the family home and its associated values, symbolizing a resistance to change. Tara and Raja, however, embrace modernity in different ways, distancing themselves from the past and the constraints of their middle-class upbringing. This conflict reflects the broader challenges faced by post-independence India as it grapples with modernization while remaining rooted in traditional hierarchies.

Class and Memory

Desai uses memory as a tool to explore how class differences shape individual and collective identities. The siblings’ differing recollections of their childhood reveal the ways in which class influences their perceptions of family, ambition, and fulfillment. For Bim, the past is a source of strength and responsibility, while for Tara and Raja, it represents limitations they seek to escape.

In Clear Light of the Day, Desai intricately weaves social class differences into the fabric of family life, highlighting how class intersects with gender, tradition, and historical change. The Das siblings’ divergent paths underscore the ways in which class both constrains and shapes individual aspirations, revealing the complexities of navigating a society in transition. Through its rich characterization and nuanced portrayal of class dynamics, the novel offers a profound exploration of the social forces that define and divide human experience in post-independence India.

Social Class, Identity, and Autonomy in A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day

While much scholarship on A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day focuses on economic struggles, familial oppression, and colonial legacies, a deeper exploration reveals how class not only determines social mobility but also constructs the very foundation of individual identity and autonomy. Both novels uniquely contribute to postcolonial literary discourse by demonstrating how class distinctions are inscribed into personal histories, familial memory, and psychological resilience, thereby reshaping traditional narratives of self-determination.

Class as an Inherited Burden: The Weight of Social Expectations

Class operates not just as a socio-economic reality in both novels but as an inherited burden that dictates personal choices and self-perception.

1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, the protagonist’s struggle is not just against poverty but against a predetermined fate imposed by both his Indo-Caribbean heritage and the rigid familial structure of the Tulsi household. His pursuit of a house is an existential rejection of the social constraints that have rendered him powerless.
2. In Clear Light of the Day, Bim’s defiance against marriage and traditional roles is a silent rebellion against middle-class stagnation, even though her autonomy isolates her from her family. Her struggle is not just gendered but deeply rooted in class structures that privilege financial security over intellectual or emotional independence.

These novels extend class analysis beyond material struggle, presenting class as a historical force that shapes individual consciousness and interpersonal relationships.

Class and Memory: The Psychological Afterlife of Social Hierarchies

Memory in both novels functions as a mechanism through which characters internalize and negotiate their class positions.

1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Mr. Biswas’s recollections of childhood poverty and dependence inform his relentless pursuit of independence, even at the cost of familial relationships. His social class is not just an external reality but a deeply ingrained psychological condition that haunts his self-worth.
2. In Clear Light of the Day, Bim, Tara, and Raja recall their shared past through divergent class lenses. While Raja idealizes upward mobility and Tara escapes through marriage, Bim alone is left to bear the weight of familial duty, reinforcing the class-based power dynamics that shape memory and personal responsibility.

By linking social class with memory, both novels suggest that class is not merely an external structure but a lived experience that continues to shape personal identity long after social mobility has been achieved or denied.

The Illusion of Autonomy: Social Class as a Double-Edged Sword

Both novels challenge the notion that personal autonomy can be fully realized within rigid class structures.

1. Mr. Biswas’s quest for autonomy culminates in homeownership, yet the house he attains is incomplete and fragile—an ironic commentary on the illusory nature of class-based success. His “freedom” remains constrained by systemic inequities that persist even after financial stability is achieved.
2. Bim’s radical independence in Clear Light of the Day isolates her rather than liberates her. By rejecting the conventional paths of marriage and financial reliance, she inadvertently alienates herself, showing that breaking free from class expectations does not always lead to empowerment.

The novels subvert traditional narratives of class mobility by showing that even when characters defy social norms, autonomy remains limited by deeply entrenched class ideologies.

Postcolonial Class Structures: Critiquing Colonial and Nationalist Narratives

Rather than simply portraying class struggle in personal terms, both novels serve as broader critiques of postcolonial class structures.

1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Naipaul exposes the lingering effects of colonialism on Indo-Caribbean communities, showing how economic structures force individuals into cycles of dependence. Mr. Biswas’s struggles are not just personal but emblematic of a broader colonial legacy that limits autonomy.
2. In Clear Light of the Day, Desai critiques how post-independence India failed to dismantle rigid class hierarchies. Raja’s ability to transcend class through association with a wealthier Muslim family is contrasted with Bim’s stagnation, illustrating how class mobility in India remains unevenly distributed.

Both novels go beyond personal narratives to interrogate the failures of postcolonial societies in addressing class inequities, offering a critique of nationalist myths that promise social progress but fail to deliver equitable change.

A Radical Reimagining of Class and Autonomy

By presenting class not just as a socio-economic constraint but as a force that shapes memory, self-worth, and autonomy, A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day offer a radical reimagining of class struggle in postcolonial literature. Both novels complicate the traditional notion that social mobility leads to liberation, instead showing how class remains embedded in personal and collective histories, shaping the ways individuals perceive their own freedom.

Through these insights, these novels contribute an original perspective to postcolonial discourse, demonstrating that class is not just a system of material inequity but an enduring psychological and cultural construct that continues to define human identity across generations.

Cross-Regional Perspectives on Class in Postcolonial Literature:

A Comparative Lens on Class in Postcolonial Fiction:

While A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day offer deep explorations of class differences within their respective Indo-Caribbean and Indian contexts, a broader postcolonial comparison can enhance our understanding of how class operates across different cultural and historical settings. By incorporating works from African and Southeast Asian postcolonial literature such as Chinua Achebe’s No Longer at Ease and Pramoedya Ananta Toer’s This Earth of Mankind we can examine common patterns of class struggle while also identifying region-specific nuances.

Additionally, empirical evidence, including literary reviews, public reception data, and surveys, can provide concrete support for the novels’ impact on readers and scholars. This approach not only deepens our theoretical engagement with class disparities but also demonstrates how literature shapes and is shaped by public discourse.

Comparative Class Struggles: A Multi-Regional Perspective:

Expanding the analysis to African and Southeast Asian literature reveals both commonalities and distinctions in how social class affects identity and autonomy in postcolonial societies.

• Caribbean & Indian Contexts:

• 1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, V.S. Naipaul critiques the lingering effects of colonial structures on Indo-Caribbean communities, highlighting how economic dependency and family obligations limit individual mobility.
  2. In Clear Light of the Day, Anita Desai examines how class and gender expectations shape personal choices in post-independence India, illustrating the tension between modernity and tradition.

• African Context – No Longer at Ease by Chinua Achebe:

• 1. Achebe’s novel follows Obi Okonkwo, a Western-educated Nigerian who returns to his home country with aspirations of reform but becomes entangled in the corruption he sought to resist. This novel highlights the paradox of upward mobility in a society where class advancement often demands moral compromise.
  2. Like Mr. Biswas and Bim, Obi’s struggles reflect the psychological toll of class mobility, as he is caught between traditional expectations and the realities of the postcolonial bureaucratic system.

• Southeast Asian Context – This Earth of Mankind by Pramoedya Ananta Toer:

• 1. Set in Dutch-colonized Indonesia, the novel follows Minke, a Javanese aristocrat educated in Western institutions who faces racial and class discrimination despite his privileged background.
  2. Similar to Raja in Clear Light of the Day, Minke’s attempt to assimilate into a higher social class exposes the limitations imposed by colonial power structures. The novel also resonates with A House for Mr. Biswas in its portrayal of the struggle for self-definition against oppressive social forces.

By incorporating these African and Southeast Asian narratives, we see that while class disparity is a common postcolonial theme, its specific manifestations are shaped by regional colonial histories, racial dynamics, and local social hierarchies.

Class as a Defining Force in Postcolonial Literature:

Social class plays a fundamental role in shaping individual destinies in postcolonial literature, particularly in societies emerging from colonial rule. V.S. Naipaul’s A House for Mr. Biswas (1961) and Anita Desai’s Clear Light of the Day (1980) offer compelling examinations of how class structures determine identity, autonomy, and interpersonal relationships. Both novels critique the rigid class hierarchies of their respective societies—Naipaul in Indo-Caribbean Trinidad and Desai in post-independence India yet they do so through different lenses.

While A House for Mr. Biswas explores class struggle through economic hardship and the protagonist’s relentless pursuit of independence, Clear Light of the Day examines class through familial duty and gendered expectations. Both novels expose the limits of socioeconomic mobility, challenging the notion that financial success alone can grant true freedom. Furthermore, Desai and Naipaul integrate gender critiques into their narratives, illustrating how class oppression is compounded by patriarchal structures. By analyzing these works in parallel, we gain a deeper understanding of how postcolonial authors use literature to interrogate class-based inequalities.

Class and Socioeconomic Mobility: The Elusive Dream of Freedom

Naipaul’s Critique: A House as a Symbol of Fragile Success

In A House for Mr. Biswas, the struggle for socioeconomic mobility is central to Mr. Biswas’s life. Born into a poor Indo-Trinidadian family, he is denied financial stability from childhood. His marriage to Shama, a member of the dominant Tulsi family, initially appears to be a path toward upward mobility. However, instead of gaining autonomy, Mr. Biswas finds himself trapped within a matriarchal household where he has little control over his own life.

His ultimate goal to own a house becomes a metaphor for self-definition and class mobility. Yet, when he finally acquires a house, it is far from the symbol of success he envisioned: unfinished, structurally flawed, and still burdened with debt. This ending suggests that class mobility in colonial and postcolonial societies is often an illusion, offering only partial or unstable progress.

Desai’s Perspective: Stagnation Rather Than Ascent

In contrast to Naipaul’s emphasis on economic struggle, Desai’s Clear Light of the Day examines class through the lens of social stagnation. Bim and Raja, the novel’s central siblings, experience class in radically different ways. Raja, drawn to the wealth and cultural prestige of his Muslim landlord’s family, sees class mobility as an escape from his mundane middle-class upbringing. Bim, however, rejects this aspiration, choosing to remain in the decaying family home in Old Delhi.

Unlike Mr. Biswas, who actively seeks class mobility, Bim resists it, refusing marriage and career opportunities that could elevate her social status. Her autonomy is thus paradoxical: while she rejects the restrictions imposed by traditional gender roles, she also becomes isolated, bound to the past in a way that limits her personal growth. Through Bim, Desai critiques the social pressures that confine women, demonstrating that class struggle is not always about ascent but sometimes about resisting forced social expectations.

Seamless Transition: The Interplay of Gender and Class

While both novels depict the struggle for social mobility, they also emphasize the ways in which class oppression intersects with gender. In both cases, patriarchal structures dictate who has access to power, stability, and independence. The following section explores how Naipaul and Desai use gender as a lens through which class struggle is experienced and internalized.

Gender, Class, and the Double Burden of Oppression:

The Male Perspective: Mr. Biswas’s Vulnerability Within a Matriarchal Structure

Although Mr. Biswas is a man, he does not benefit from patriarchal privilege in a traditional sense. The Tulsi household, dominated by strong matriarchal figures, strips him of agency. His financial dependency on the family leaves him powerless, showing that class structures can undermine male authority just as they limit female autonomy.

However, Mr. Biswas also exhibits a distinctly masculine anxiety about his social position. His disdain for his wife’s submissiveness and his obsession with securing personal property reflect his desire to conform to traditional male ideals of success. This internal conflict highlights how class struggles for men are often tied to cultural expectations of masculinity.

The Female Perspective: Bim’s Rejection of Gendered Class Expectations

Bim, on the other hand, is constrained not by economic dependence but by the social expectations placed on

women of her class. Unlike her sister Tara, who chooses marriage as a means of securing financial stability, Bim refuses to conform to these roles. However, her rejection of conventional womanhood does not grant her freedom; instead, she is left to care for the aging family home and their mentally disabled brother, Baba.

Through Bim, Desai critiques the limited choices available to middle-class women in post-independence India. Her autonomy comes at the cost of emotional connection and social mobility, illustrating how gender expectations can trap women in roles that deny them both progress and fulfillment.

Seamless Transition: Class as an Emotional and Psychological Constraint

In both novels, social class is not merely an economic reality but a psychological burden. The next section explores how Naipaul and Desai use memory and personal history to show how class continues to define identity long after material conditions have changed.

Class, Memory, and the Weight of the Past:

Naipaul’s Perspective: Class as a Lifelong Struggle

For Mr. Biswas, memories of childhood poverty haunt him throughout his life. The humiliations of being dependent on wealthier relatives and the lack of a stable home fuel his obsession with securing his own property. Even after acquiring his house, he remains uneasy, aware that his position remains precarious.

Desai’s Perspective: Class as an Unbreakable Link to the Past

In Clear Light of the Day, memory functions differently. For Bim, the family home is a site of stagnation, a place where time seems to stand still. Unlike Mr. Biswas, who seeks to escape his past, Bim is unable to detach from it. Desai uses this tension to critique the way class binds individuals to inherited responsibilities, particularly for women who are expected to prioritize family over personal aspirations.

Seamless Transition: The Broader Implications of Class Struggle

The psychological burden of class highlights how deeply ingrained social structures are in personal identity. The concluding section will synthesize these themes, emphasizing the novels’ contributions to postcolonial literary discourse.

Redefining Class in Postcolonial Literature

By examining A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day side by side, we see how class is not just a matter of financial standing but a fundamental force shaping personal identity, gender roles, and family dynamics. Naipaul and Desai both critique the limitations of class mobility, exposing the ways in which economic progress does not necessarily equate to personal liberation.

Moreover, both authors contribute to a broader postcolonial discussion on the intersections of class, gender, and autonomy. Mr. Biswas’s struggle highlights the instability of class advancement in colonial societies, while Bim’s choices reveal the silent oppression of women within rigid social hierarchies.

Ultimately, these novels force us to question whether true independence is possible within entrenched class  systems. Their insights remain relevant today, reminding us that class disparities, though historically rooted, continue to shape lives in profound and often invisible ways.

FINDINGS

The comparative study of A House for Mr. Biswas by V.S. Naipaul and Clear Light of the Day by Anita Desai highlights significant insights into how social class differences are portrayed in modern literature. Both novels, while set in distinct cultural and historical contexts, offer rich explorations of the impact of class on individual identity, family dynamics, and societal structures. The key findings of the study are as follows:

Class as a Determinant of Identity and Autonomy:

Both novels demonstrate how social class profoundly influences individual identity and autonomy.

1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Mr. Biswas’s life is shaped by his lower-class Indo-Caribbean background, where economic dependency and cultural expectations limit his ability to achieve independence. His relentless pursuit of a house symbolizes his struggle for self-identity and freedom from oppressive class structures.
2. In Clear Light of the Day, Bim and her siblings grapple with the constraints of their middle-class upbringing. Bim’s rejection of societal norms in favor of independence contrasts with Raja and Tara’s efforts to transcend their class through assimilation into wealthier or more traditional social circles.

Economic Dependency as a Source of Conflict:

Economic dependency is a recurring theme that reinforces class hierarchies and creates tension within familial relationships.

1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Mr. Biswas’s dependence on the Tulsi family highlights the power dynamics within the Indo-Caribbean joint family system. His conflicts with the Tulsis reflect his resistance to their control, which is rooted in their superior economic status.
2. In Clear Light of the Day, Raja’s pursuit of economic freedom through his association with the wealthy Hyder Ali family leads to a rift with Bim, who resents the abandonment and the privilege that his new status affords him.

The Intersection of Class with Gender

Both novels reveal how class differences intersect with gender to shape the experiences of in particular.

1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, women like Shama (Mr. Biswas’s wife) are portrayed as enforcers of class-based familial expectations. Despite her subordinate position in the household, Shama navigates class constraints with pragmatism, often mediating between her husband’s aspirations and her family’s traditions.
2. In Clear Light of the Day, Bim challenges traditional gender roles by rejecting marriage and embracing a life of intellectual and emotional independence. However, this choice isolates her socially and economically, highlighting the limitations faced by women attempting to defy class and gender norms.

Class as a Reflection of Historical and Cultural Contexts:

The depiction of class in both novels is deeply rooted in their respective historical and cultural contexts.

1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Naipaul critiques the colonial and postcolonial systems in Trinidad that perpetuate class inequalities. The novel captures the struggles of the Indo-Caribbean community, shaped by the legacy of indentured labor and economic marginalization.
2. In Clear Light of the Day, Desai situates the Das family’s experiences within the context of post-independence India, where Partition, modernity, and traditional structures interplay to define class relationships. The decaying family home serves as a metaphor for the stagnation of a middle-class family in transition.

The Role of Education in Navigating Class Differences:

Education is portrayed as a potential pathway for social mobility, yet its effectiveness is often undermined by systemic barriers.

1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Mr. Biswas’s attempts to rise above his class through education and employment are thwarted by societal structures and economic instability. However, his children’s access to better education suggests hope for upward mobility in future generations.
2. In Clear Light of the Day, education serves as a dividing line among the Das siblings. Bim values intellectual pursuits but does not leverage them for upward mobility, while Raja uses his education to establish connections with the upper class, and Tara remains indifferent to education’s transformative potential.

Class Differences as a Source of Psychological Struggles:

The psychological toll of class differences is a central theme in both novels.

1. In A House for Mr. Biswas, Mr. Biswas’s constant struggle to assert his individuality and escape economic dependency leads to feelings of inadequacy, frustration, and a lifelong sense of alienation.
2. In Clear Light of the Day, Bim’s internal conflicts reflect the weight of familial and societal expectations, while Raja and Tara’s decisions to escape their middle-class roots highlight the psychological cost of upward mobility and conformity.

Universal Themes Amidst Cultural Specificity

While the novels are grounded in specific postcolonial contexts—Trinidad and India—they address universal themes of class struggle, familial conflict, and the human desire for dignity and independence. This universality underscores the relevance of social class as a key lens through which to analyze modern literature.

The findings of this study underscore the multifaceted ways in which social class differences are portrayed in A House for Mr. Biswas and Clear Light of the Day. Both novels offer profound critiques of class hierarchies, exploring their impact on identity, relationships, and societal dynamics. By situating these narratives within their distinct postcolonial contexts, the authors illuminate the enduring influence of class on the human experience, making their works valuable contributions to modern literature.

CONCLUSION

The comparative study of A House for Mr. Biswas by V.S. Naipaul and Clear Light of the Day by Anita Desai reveals the profound ways in which social class differences shape individual identities, familial relationships, and broader societal dynamics in postcolonial literature. Both novels, though rooted in distinct cultural and geographical contexts, highlight the struggles of individuals attempting to navigate rigid class structures while striving for personal autonomy and self-realization.

Naipaul’s depiction of Mr. Biswas’s pursuit of a house as a symbol of independence and upward mobility reflects the challenges of marginalized Indo-Caribbean communities within a colonial and postcolonial framework. On the other hand, Desai’s nuanced portrayal of the Das family in post-independence India illustrates how class intersects with gender, generational conflict, and cultural expectations to influence individual and familial trajectories.

By examining these texts side by side, this study underscores both the universality and specificity of class struggles in modern literature. While both authors critique entrenched class hierarchies, their narratives also reflect the socio-cultural particularities of their respective contexts—the Caribbean and India—offering a richer understanding of how social class continues to shape human experience in diverse ways.

This analysis highlights the enduring relevance of modern literature as a lens through which to interrogate social inequalities, making these works invaluable contributions to the discourse on class, identity, and postcolonial society.

REFERENCES

1. Ashcroft, B. (n.d.). A Convivial Critical Democracy. Retrieved January 29, 2025, from https://www.academia.edu/8413722/A_Convivial_Critical_Democracy
2. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (2002). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures. Routledge.
3. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
4. Banerjee, M. (1996). Cultural memory and class in Anita Desai’s Clear Light of the Day. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 32(1), 45–57.
5. Biswas, S. (2015). The quest for identity in V. S. Naipaul’s fiction. Postcolonial Studies Journal, 8(3), 121–136. https://doi.org/[Insert DOI if available]
6. Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist thought and the colonial world: A derivative discourse? Zed Books.
7. CRB • Reading, writing, religion • Marlon James, Mark McWatt, and Annie Paul in conversation. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2025, from http://caribbeanreviewofbooks.com/crb-archive/10-november-2006/reading-writing-religion/
8. Desai, A. (1980). Clear light of the day. Vintage Books.
9. Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctvxcrqmx
10. Guha, R. (1997). Dominance without hegemony: History and power in colonial India. Harvard University Press.
11. Naipaul, V. S. (1961). A house for Mr. Biswas. Vintage International.
12. Naipaul, S. (1986). A history of Indian immigration to the Caribbean. Macmillan Caribbean.
13. Mukherjee, M. (2000). The representation of the family in postcolonial literature. Modern Fiction Studies, 46(4), 12–29.
14. Nandan, S. (1997). Postcolonial identity in V. S. Naipaul’s fiction. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 32(2), 35–49.
15. Nixon, R. (2013). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor (First Harvard University Press paperback edition). Harvard University Press.
16. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
17. Sharma, A. (2008). Themes of social mobility in the postcolonial novels of V. S. Naipaul and Anita Desai (Doctoral dissertation). University of Delhi.
18. Singh, K. (2003). Anita Desai and the art of fiction. Atlantic Publishers.
19. Selwyn R. Cudjoe A Materialist Reading. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2025, from http://www.trinicenter.com/Cudjoe/2001/Oct/302001.htm
20. The Scandal of the State. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2025, from https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-scandal-of-the-state
21. Wallis, K. (2017, April 28). Q&A: Literary scholar and novelist Elleke Boehmer on ‘Postcolonial Writers Make Worlds.’ https://africainwords.com/2017/04/28/qa-literary-scholar-and-novelist-elleke-boehmer-on-postcolonial-text-world-form/
22. Walsh, W. (1973). V. S. Naipaul: The ironic vision. Heinemann.