Sign up for our newsletter, to get updates regarding the Call for Paper, Papers & Research.
Water quality index Assessment of the Ground water of Industrial area and absorption by Polymer Composites
- Dasari Sravani
- Dr. S. Aruna Kumari
- K.Mruduladevi
- 1114-1123
- Jun 13, 2023
- Environment
Water quality Index Assessment of the Groundwater of Industrial area and absorption by Polymer Composites
Dasari Sravani1*, Dr. S. Aruna Kumari2, K.Mruduladevi2
1Associate professor of Chemistry, Aditya College of Engineering and Technology, Surampalem, India
2Associate professor of Chemistry, Aditya Engineering College, Surampalem, India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.70586
Received: 28 April 2023; Revised: 09 May 2023; Accepted: 12 May 2023; Published: 13 June 2023
ABSTRACT:
Introduction: Water play a pivtol role in the existence in the human life. water quality index is assessing the overall quality of water based on location, time and some parameters of water. water quality index is important tool for assessing the quality water on the surface. Water quality index assessing is the important parameter helps in improving the quality of drinking and ground water. Due to anthropogenic activites the quality of ground and drinking water is decreased.
Objective: The main objective of research is to find the water quality index of the ground water and bore water in selected industrial area of the Kakinada and analyse the water quality index of it and absorption of ions by polymer composites for desalination and water treatment.
Methodology: the water quality inex is calculated based on icmr standards.
Results: The research results revealed that the sampling sites S-1,S-2 and S-3 is water quality index is less than 100 which is treated the poor quality of drinking water. The S-4,S-5,-6,S-7S-8,S-9,S-10,S-11,S-12 the water quality index is greater than 100 which is not suitable for drinking water.
Conclusion: The water quality index observed at various stations shows that some places are not fits for drinking S-1,S-2 and S-3 are below 100 are very poor and S4-S12 sites are more polluted and unfit for drinking. The ground water is need to protected from pollution and govt need to take necessary measures to improve the quality of ground water and cyclodextrin polymer composites effective composite for removal of hardness and desalination.
Key words: Water, WQI, ground water, drinking water, polymer composites.
INTRODUCTION
Water is part of source for human existence in the earth crust. water plays as crucial role in the domestic, industrial, agriculture and commercial industries. Water quality index is important parameter for assessing the quality of the drinking water and industrial water. Due to urbanization and industrialisation the quality of water is reduced.
Water quality index is parameter used to measure changes in quality of water in a particular area and make comparisons from different location of Kakinada. This index allows for a general analysis of quality of water in many area and extent of pollution in the ground water environment and also helps govt to take measures for improving the quality of ground and drinking water. Groundwater quality is impacted by natural processes such as irrigation, urbanisation, industrialization, mining, and processes like precipitation, evaporation, ion exchange, and mineral dissolution (8).To meet their domestic needs, people who live close to industrial areas depend on the quality of the water. The only parameter that evaluates the total quality of the water is the water quality index.
The objective of research is to analysis the water quality index parameter for measuring difference in water sample and suggest the measures to increasing the quality of the water and the uasage of the advanced polymer composites for water treatment and desalination.
Polymer composites are made up of two or more natural organic and inorganic materials with high mechanical strength,flexibility,chemical stability and high surface area.These materials are very effective in treatment of water for industrial and domestic applications.Among many composites materials the cyclodextrin and amino hyper branched polymer cotton fibres are more effective for dye removal.(11)
Study area
Figure 1. study location of the map[17]
The water is collected from different areas of the industrial region and rural areas of the Kakinada. the coastal region of Kakinada is hub of industries where the usage of water is more for industries ,drinking and domestic purpose.
The samples at different location are collected in a cleaned the water bottles and store at room temperature for carrying the analysis. To evaluate the water quality at the various stations, many parameters are analysed. The water quality index is the best parameter for assessing the purity of water is fits for drinking. The bureau of indian standards are used to assess the water WQI(8)
METHODOLOGY:
All the water samples are collected at particular area and analysed the important parameters. The water quality which is assessed with various parameter like PH, temperature ,Electrical conductivity, Total dissolved solids, Turbidity, total hardness, Total Alkalinity ,Ca2+,Mg2+,Cl- and Dissolved oxygen with help of Conductivity meter, PH meter, Turbidity meter, Total hardness,Ca2+,Mg2+,Cl- is analysed by titrimetric method. Cholride ions are measured by titration with silver nitrate solution.
RESULTS
Table-1:The physiochemical analysis of water in different sites and the data is cited from (16)
Sample | PH | TEMP | EC | TDS ppt/ppm | Turbidity | T.H ppm | T.A | Ca2+ ppm | Mg2+ ppm | C l- | D.o | |
Ms | NTU | ppm | ppm | ppm | ||||||||
S-1 TMBW | 7.21 | 29 | 3.84 | 152ppm | 0.05 | 400 | 601.5 | 172.3 | 55.33 | 514.84 | 4.60 | |
S-2 TMMW | 7.4 | 29.2 | 2.31 | 872ppm | 0.15 | 395 | 545 | 106.2 | 70.17 | 304.9 | 4.93 | |
S-3 KMBW | 7.3 | 28.7 | 0.903 | 335ppm | 1.93 | 325 | 590 | 82.16 | 59.01 | 24.99 | 3.19 | |
S-4 | 6.4 | 29.1 | 0.424 | 150ppm | 0.35 | 175 | 167.5 | 30.06 | 35.22 | 14.99 | 4.94 | |
kMMW | ||||||||||||
S-5 | 9.01 | 29.3 | 3.29 | 121ppm | 0.02 | 325 | 750 | 104.81 | 53.50 | 25.99 | 5.02 | |
PDBW | ||||||||||||
S-6 | 7.20 | 29.1 | 0.892 | 315ppm | 0.05 | 265 | 250 | 60.72 | 49.64 | 74.97 | 5.56 | |
PDMW | ||||||||||||
S-7 | 7.66 | 29.1 | 3.36 | 145ppm | 0.28 | 555 | 865 | 148.2 | 98.85 | 454.8 | 4.67 | |
YDWW | ||||||||||||
S-8 | 7.50 | 28.9 | 0.554 | 181ppm | 0.15 | 245 | 255 | 60.12 | 44.92 | 99.96 | 4.09 | |
YDMW | ||||||||||||
S-9 | 7.20 | 29.1 | 1.42 | 406ppm | 0.04 | 330 | 445 | 86.1 | 59.26 | 49.98 | 4.61 | |
KDWW | ||||||||||||
S-10 VKBW | 9.20 | 29.1 | 1.23 | 118ppm | 0.04 | 730 | 229 | 370.74 | 87.30 | 524.8 | 4.32 | |
S-11 | 7.92 | 28.9 | 7.45 | 319ppm | 0.65 | 225 | 432 | 102 | 98.4 | 4.52 | 4.28 | |
PNBW | ||||||||||||
S-12 | 7.62 | 29.1 | 1.444 | 641ppm | 0.06 | 234 | 540 | 112 | 84.5 | 5.23 | 3.76 | |
PNMW |
For evaluating the quality of the water, a water quality index was established for each and every month. It helps in analysing the quality of water and suggests changes need to taken in drinking and domestic water.
Eight significant physio-chemical parameters were taken into account using the Central Public Health Environmental Engineering Organization (CPHEEO), 1991, and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), 1975 standards.
Eight crucial factors were taken into consideration when calculating WQI: pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), total dissolved solids (TDS), electrical conductivity (EC), total alkalinity (Alk), total hardness (Har-T), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg).
These factors most significantly impact river quality.
The following are the steps for calculating the water quality index: Weight factor (3.1) Higher legal limit factors are less damaging since they can impair river water quality when present in very high concentrations.
Therefore, a factor’s weight and its allowable limitations have an inverse relationship.
Consequently, Wi = k/Xi or Wi = 1/Xi where k is the proportionality constant.
Wi is the weighting factor.
Xi = the maximum allowable limits as determined by the Public Health Environmental Engineering Organization and the Indian Council of Medical Research K values were calculated as follows: k = 1. 8i = 1. ( 1/ Xi) Where 8i=1 (1/Xi) = 1/Xi (pH), 1/Xi (DO), 1/Xi (EC), 1/Xi (TDS), 1/Xi (Alk), 1/Xi (Hart), 1/Xi (Ca), and 1/Xi (Mg) (1)
Table-2 water quality standards represents the icmr stands and unit weights are represented.
Water quality factors | Icmr stds Xi | Unit weights Wi |
PH | 6.5-8.5 | 0.218176 |
EC | 300 | 0.00618 |
Tds | 500 | 0.003708 |
TH | 300 | 0.00618 |
DO | 5 | 0.37089 |
Ca2+ | 75 | 0.02472 |
Mg2+ | 30 | 0.0618 |
Cl- | 250 | 0.007416 |
Table -3 Qi rating table of water sample
S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | |
PH | 4.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | 12.40 | 4.20 | 4.0 | 12.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 4.40 | 1.84 | 1.24 |
EC | 46.8 | 76.9 | 9.99 | 14 | 106 | 29.6 | 110 | 18.9 | 47.3 | 41 | 248.9 | 48 |
Tds | 0.05 | 174.4 | 67 | 30 | 0.004 | 63 | 0.029 | 36.2 | 81.2 | 0.03 | 63.8 | 128.2 |
TH | 133.3 | 131.6 | 108.3 | 58.3 | 108.3 | 88.3 | 185 | 81.6 | 110 | 243.3 | 375 | 78 |
DO | 104.1 | 100.7 | 118.5 | 118.8 | 349.9 | 94.1 | 103.4 | 109.4 | 108.9 | 107.8 | 82.7 | 223.9 |
Ca2+ | 229.7 | 141.6 | 109.54 | 40 | 139.7 | 80.9 | 197.6 | 80.1 | 114.8 | 493.8 | 136 | 149.3 |
Mg2+ | 184.3 | 233.3 | 196.7 | 117.3 | 178.3 | 165.4 | 329.5 | 149.7 | 197.5 | 291 | 329 | 281.6 |
Cl- | 205.9 | 121.9 | 83 | 46.96 | 86.63 | 249.9 | 181.92 | 333.2 | 19.99 | 209.6 | 1.8 | 2.09 |
PH: PH is crucial for the quality of drinking water. The drinking water’s pH ranges from 6.5 to 7.to 8.5 which is slightly acidic in nature.Qi rating is S-1,S-5,S-6,S-9,S-10,S-11 and S-12 are acidic in nature and sites in S-2,S-4,S-7,S-8 are alkaline nature.
EC: Ec represents the conductivity of ions in water. Ec varies from 300 mhos/cm. Qi rating is higher levels are observed in S-11 site next to s-5 and s-7 are detected. the lower levels of Qi rating are analysed in S-4 and S-9.Average levels of conductivity are observed in S-1,S-2,S-3 and S-10,S-12 sites.
TDS: Total dissolved solids are observed in water samples. TDS varies from 500 ppm. Qi rating of water samples observed in the sites S-2 and S-12 are high, where as least are detected in samples S-1,S-5,S-7,S-10
TH: The Total hardness of water in the parameters are observed as 300 ppm for ground and drinking water respectively. The total hardness of water from S-12,S-11,S-1 respectively. The least hardness of water is observed in S-4 observed.
DO: The dissolved oxygen is found to be standard value 5.in current samples of qi rating is high is observed as S-5 and S-11.
Ca2+ : The calcium content was found to be highest amount in S-10 and S-1 but other station observed as average S-3,S-2,S-5,S-7,S-9,S-11,S-12.the least amount of calcium content was observed in S-4,S-6,S-8 sites.
Mg2+: The magnesium content is higher weight in S-11,S-12,S-10,S-2,S-7 and average weight of magnesium in S-1,S-3,S-4,S-5,S-6,S-7
Chloride ions: the chloride content is maximum weight is S-7,S-10,S-9,S-1 and average weight of chloride ions S-2,S-6,S-5 and leas weight of content in S-3,S-11,S-12.
Table-4 WQI rating table of water sample of different location sites
S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | |
PH | 8.72 | 17.44 | 13.08 | 270.32 | 91.56 | 8.72 | 26.6 | 21.8 | 8.72 | 95.92 | 40.1 | 27.03 |
EC | 0.28 | 4.61 | 0.59 | 0.84 | 6.36 | 1.77 | 6.6 | 1.13 | 2.83 | 2.46 | 14.9 | 2.88 |
Tds | 0.0015 | 5.232 | 2.01 | 0.9 | 0.0012 | 1.89 | 0.0887 | 1.086 | 2.43 | 0.0009 | 1.914 | 3.846 |
TH | 7.99 | 7.89 | 6.498 | 3.498 | 6.49 | 5.29 | 11.1 | 4.89 | 6.6 | 14.5 | 22.5 | 4.68 |
DO | 38.5 | 37.52 | 43.84 | 129.46 | 129.46 | 94.1 | 103.4 | 109.4 | 108.9 | 107.8 | 82.7 | 223.9 |
Ca2+ | 4.59 | 2.83 | 2.19 | 0.96 | 2.79 | 1.61 | 3.95 | 2.17 | 2.15 | 9.87 | 2.72 | 2.98 |
Mg2+ | 11.05 | 13.99 | 11.8 | 7.02 | 10.6 | 9.92 | 19.77 | 8.98 | 11.85 | 17.46 | 19.74 | 16.89 |
Cl- | 1.43 | 0.84 | 0.58 | 0.32 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 0.13 | 1.4 | 0.01 | 0.14 |
the graphical representation of WQI rating of different parameter in different sites collected sample water from Fig A to Fig H
5. Total quality index of different sites are reperesented in TABLE-5
Sample | Station | WQI |
S1 | TMBW | 72.5 |
S2 | TMMW | 90.32 |
S3 | KMBW | 80.54 |
S4 | KMMW | 419 |
S5 | PDBW | 247.8 |
S6 | PDMW | 125 |
S7 | YDWW | 172.7 |
S8 | YDMW | 151.7 |
S9 | PDMW | 143.6 |
S10 | VKBW | 137.6 |
S11 | PNBW | 184.5 |
S12 | PNMW | 281.3 |
Fig 2: The Graph representation of Water quality index in the various sites.
The WQI observed at less S-1 site is 72.5,S-2 as 90.5,S-3 site as 80.5, S-4 as 419,S-5 as 247.8,S-6 as 125 S-7 as 172.7,S-8 as 151.7,S-9 as 143.7,S-10 as 137.6,S-11 as 184.5 and S-12 as 281.2.
Table 6: Status of water quality based on WQI. (4)
S.NO | WQI rating | Quality |
1 | 0-25 | Excellent |
2 | 26-50 | Good |
3 | 51-75 | Poor |
4 | 76-100 | Very Poor |
5 | 100 and above | Unsuitable for drinking |
DISCUSSIONS:
The water quality index is highest in KMMW,PNMW and KMMW areas which makes not suitable for the drinking. The sampling sites of PDMW,YDWW,YDMW,PDMW,VKBW and PNBW are also high that is why it is not suitable for drinking. The sampling sites S-1,S-2 and S-3 is water quality index is less than 100 which is treated the poor quality of drinking water. The S-4,S-5,S-6,S-7,S-8,S-9,S-10,S-11,S-12 the water quality index is greater than 100 which is not suitable for drinking water. The ground water observed in Nigeria is good quality(6).several lastest methods are developed for assessing the quality of water quality index in which best method is additive regression give best results.(10).Geographical information system is another method for assessing the quality of water index.(9 ).
Polymer composites are most effective materials for removal of hardness and salts from water. there are different types of polymer composites present in removal of salts such as polymer clay composite, polymer based activated carbon composites, polymer graphene composites and polymer based adsorbents for dye removal.
Polymer clay composite polymer: clay are low cost natural materials used for purification of micropolluants. clay composites draws attention that in water treatment because of wide pores, wide surface area, with high stiffness and stability and regeneration is easier.
Polymer based activated carbon composites: Activated carbon is powdery solid made up of graphite structure.it is also one of the important material for purification of water and desalination because it is low cost and easily produced from the agro wastes.
Polymer graphene CNT composites: CNT due to high surface area making as effective in water purification and removal of salts and disadvantage of low adsorption capacity.
Polymer based adsorbents for dye removal: artificial synthesized dye material are not effective than natural synthesized polymer composites. Because of their remarkable physiochemical characteristics and voids, cyclodextrin-based composites are particularly effective at removing metals. ( 13-14)
Fig 3 the above figure is obtained from source(15)
Abbreviations: WQI: water quality index, Qi: quality rating, PH:PH scale, EC: Electric conductivity, Tds: Total dissolved solids, DO: Dissolved oxygen, TH: Total hardness,Ca2+:calcium ions,Mg2+:magnesium ions, Cl-:chloride ions.
CONCLUSION :
The research results reveals that the water quality index observed at various stations shows that some places are not fits for drinking S-1,S-2 and S-3 are below 100 are very poor and S4-S12 sites are more polluted and unfit for drinking.the water in the ground water is need to protected from pollution.so that people can effectively make use of water resources for the domestic purposes, agriculture and drinking purpose and the beta cyclodextrin is effective polymer composite for removal of salts and purification of water.
Declaration of interest: The authors declare there is no conflict of interest in submitted manuscript.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
I extend my sincere gratitude towards My guide, Coguide and My Aditya Educational Instistutions and Aditya college of Engineering and Technology in carrying out my research work.
REFERENCES
- Akkaraboyina, M. K., & Raju, BA Comparative study of water quality indices of River Godavari. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development,2012; 2(3), 29-34.
- Srivastava, A. K., Mishra, D. K., Tripathi, S., & Singh, P. Determination of water quality index and suitability of ground water in a college in Balrampur, U. P. Nature, Environment and Pollution Technology, 2007; 6(2), 315-319.
- Rao, K. N., Latha, P. S., & Kumarc, P. R. Groundwater quality assessment for irrigation use in the Godavari delta region of east coast India using IRWQI and GIS.
- Chatterjee, C., & Raziuddin, M. Determination of Water Quality Index(WQI) of a degraded river in Asansol industrial area(West Bengal). Nature, Environment and pollution technology, 2002; 1(2), 181-189.
- Negrel, P., Petelet-Giraud, E., Barbier, J. & Autier, E. Surface water–groundwater interactions in an alluvial plain: chemical and isotopic systematics. J. Hydrol. 2003; 277, 248–267.
- Mostaza-Colado, D., Carreño-Conde, F., Rasines-Ladero, R. & Iepure, S. Hydrogeochemical characterization of a shallow alluvial aquifer: 1 baseline for groundwater quality assessment and resource management. Sci. Total Environ. 2018; 639, 1110–1125.
- Akakuru,. C., Eze, C. U., Okeke,. C., Opara, A. I., Usman,., Iheme, O., … & Iwuoha, P. Hydrogeochemical evolution, water quality indices, irrigation suitability and pollution index of groundwater (PIG) around eastern Niger Delta, Nigeria. International Journal of Energy and Water Resources, 2022; 1-23.
- Neelanjan Dutta, Barun Kumar Thakur, Md Nurujjaman, Kanish Debnath, Debi Prasad Bal,An assessment of the water quality index (WQI) of drinking water in the Eastern Himalayas of South Sikkim, India,Groundwater for Sustainable Development,2022; 17, 100735
- Sunitha, V., & Reddy, B. M. Geochemical characterization, deciphering groundwater quality using pollution index of groundwater (PIG), water quality index (WQI) and geographical information system (GIS) in hard rock aquifer, South India. Applied Water Science, 2022; 12(3), 1-20.
- Elbeltagi, A., Pande, C. B., Kouadri, S., & Islam, A. R. M. Applications of various data-driven models for the prediction of groundwater quality index in the Akot basin, Maharashtra, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022;29(12), 17591-17605.
- X,YUE,f.jiang,Dzhang,H.Lin, and Y.chen,”preparation of adsorbent based on cotton fibre for removal of dyes,’Fibres and polymer, 2017;18( 11),2102-2110.
- Y.Zhou,Y.Hu W.Huang,G.Cheng,C.Cui, and J.LU,” A novel amphoteric Beta cyclodextrin based adsorbaent for simultaneous removal of cationic/anionic dyes and bisphenol A,’ chemical Engineering journal, 2018;341, 47-57.
- W.huang, Y.Hu, Y.Li et al.,Citric acid crosslinked beta cyclodextrin for simultaneous removal of bis phenol a,methylene blue and copper:the roles of cavity and surface functional groups,”journal of the Taiwan instistue of chemical Engineers, 2018;82,189-197.
- Q.liu Y.zhou,Y.Zhou,J lei and S.PU,”cyclodextrin modified filter apaper for removal of cationic dyes/cu ions from aqueous solutions,”water science and technology, 2019;78 (12).2553-2563
- Caldera, F.; Nisticò, R.; Magnacca, G.; Matencio, A.; Khazaei Monfared, Y.; Trotta, F. Magnetic Composites of Dextrin-Based Carbonate Nanosponges and Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Potential Application in Targeted Drug Delivery. Nanomaterials 2022; 12, 754.
- D.Sravani, K.mrudula devi,ch ramya harika Assessment of Ground water quality from industrial area of East godavari region, International journal of science technology and engineering 2018; 5(6): 35-39
- depositphotos.com/163626984/stock-illustration-andhra-pradesh-administrative-and-political.html
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Sign up for our newsletter, to get updates regarding the Call for Paper, Papers & Research.