Islam and the Future of Global Values

This paper examines how Islamic intellectual and ethical traditions can contribute to shaping the future of global values in an era marked by moral uncertainty, epistemic fragmentation, and competing visions of justice. Contemporary global discourse—often structured around frameworks such as human rights, liberal governance, and sustainability—has achieved broad normative influence, yet continues to face criticism for its limited cultural inclusivity and uneven global application. In response, this study revisits key Islamic concepts, including ʿadl (justice), ʿilm (knowledge), and maṣlaḥah (public good), to explore their relevance within current global debates.
Adopting a qualitative and analytically grounded approach, the paper draws on classical and contemporary Islamic intellectual traditions to examine how these concepts have historically informed legal, ethical, and institutional practices. It further situates these principles within ongoing discussions on global ethics, governance, and knowledge production, highlighting both convergences and tensions between Islamic perspectives and dominant global paradigms.
The analysis demonstrates that ʿadl offers a substantive and ethically grounded conception of justice that extends beyond procedural equality, emphasizing moral accountability and social balance. Similarly, maṣlaḥah functions as a flexible yet principled framework for addressing evolving societal needs, particularly in the context of public policy and global development. In addition, Islamic approaches to knowledge integrate reason, ethical responsibility, and purpose, presenting an alternative to purely instrumental models of knowledge that often characterize contemporary systems.
By situating Islamic thought within broader global conversations, this paper argues that Islamic ethical traditions are not merely reactive to modernity but actively contribute to shaping its moral foundations. It ultimately proposes a dialogical framework through which Islamic values can engage constructively with global ethical systems, fostering more inclusive, pluralistic, and context-sensitive approaches to shared global challenges.

Islamic ethics, Global values, Justice (ʿadl), Public good (maṣlaḥah), Social justice, Epistemology, Governance and public good, Moral philosophy, Pluralism.

1. Pahlevi, A. R. et al. (2025). Islam and global values integration. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Kamila, R. (2026). Islamic ethics in AI governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Muhsin, S. M. et al. (2026). Islamic bioethics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hamza, S. M. (2025). Religiosity and sustainability. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Walusimbi, A. (2023). Islamic HR ethics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ayyat, R. (2025). Islamic management ethics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ghafran, C. (2020). Ethical governance in Islam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Khan, A. (2021). AI ethics global review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Younas, A. (2025). Cultural co-genesis ethics. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Rawls, J. (1971). Theory of justice. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hallaq, W. (2009). Islamic law. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Esposito, J. (2010). Future of Islam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Sardar, Z. (2011). Reading Qur’an. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Capabilities approach. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. March, A. (2013). Liberal citizenship. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Abu Zayd, N. H. (1990). Rethinking Qur’an. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Al-Ghazali. Ihya Ulum al-Din. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ibn Khaldun. Muqaddimah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. OECD (2023). Global governance report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. UNDP (2024). Human development report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. World Bank (2024). Inequality report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. UNESCO (2023). Ethics of AI. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Pew Research (2024). Religion and society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Islamic Development Bank (2023). Ethics report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study