A Data-Driven Approach to Anonymizing Customer Personal Information in Banking Systems for Privacy Preservation
Authors
Department of Computer science. Abubakar Tatari Ali Polytechnic, Bauchi, Bauchi State Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Department of Computer science. Abubakar Tatari Ali Polytechnic, Bauchi, Bauchi State Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Department of Computer science. Abubakar Tatari Ali Polytechnic, Bauchi, Bauchi State Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Department of Management and Information Technology. Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi State Nigeria. (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000218
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 3037-3047
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-10
Accepted: 2026-06-15
Published: 2026-07-01
Abstract
The rapid growth of digital technologies has accelerated the adoption of online banking and e-commerce services, enabling fast and convenient financial transactions. However, the extensive collection and processing of customer data have introduced significant cybersecurity and privacy risks, particularly the possibility of re-identification by malicious actors. This study proposes a multi-level anonymity analytics framework to enhance the protection of customer personal information in banking systems. The approach focuses on improving data anonymity to reduce the likelihood of privacy breaches while maintaining data usability. In addition, the research implements a k-anonymity-based method to ensure that sensitive information is adequately protected without compromising its value for operational use. An automated anonymization tool, ARX, is utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The study demonstrates that increasing the k-anonymity level reduces re-identification risks while preserving data utility. The proposed methodology aims to provide a scalable and efficient solution for privacy preservation and can be applied across sectors such as banking, healthcare, and telecommunications where sensitive personal data is handled.
Keywords
Data Anonymization, k-Anonymity, Privacy Preservation, Re-identification Risk, Pitman-Burnham Model
Downloads
References
1. Al-Zoubi, A. M., Al-Zoubi, M., Al-Zoubi, H., & Al-Madi, N. (2025). Advancing image spam detection: Evaluating machine learning models through comparative analysis. Applied Sciences, 15(11), Article 6158. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116158 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alharbi, M., et al. (2024). Data protection compliance frameworks in modern financial ecosystems. Journal of Cybersecurity and Data Governance, 12(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsdg.2024.01.012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Alhogail, A., & Alsabih, A. (2021). Applying machine learning and natural language processing to detect phishing email. Computers & Security, 110, Article 102414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Banday, M. T., & Jan, T. R. (2009). Effectiveness and limitations of statistical spam filters (arXiv:0910.2540). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0910.2540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bansal, C., & Sidhu, B. (2021). Machine learning based hybrid approach for email spam detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (ICRITO '21) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icrito51393.2021.9596149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Cohen, A., Nissim, N., & Elovici, Y. (2018). Novel set of general descriptive features for enhanced detection of malicious emails using machine learning methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 110, 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.05.031 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Cormack, G. V. (2006). Email spam filtering: A systematic review. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 1(4), 335–455. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Debnath, A. (2024). Comparative analysis of machine learning and deep learning models for email spam classification using TF-IDF [Research report]. ResearchGate Publications. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.3456.7890 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). (2014). Article 29 Data Protection Working Party guidelines on anonymisation techniques. European Parliament. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Giweli, N., Shahrestani, S., & Cheung, H. (2013). Enhancing data privacy and access anonymity in cloud computing. Communications of the IBIMA, 2013, Article 462966. https://doi.org/10.5171/2013.462966 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Gupta, S., & Gupta, A. (2019). Dealing with noise problem in machine learning data-sets: A systematic review. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hanif Bhuiyan, B., Tara, K., Tasnim, R., & Islam, M. R. (2018). A survey of existing e-mail spam filtering methods considering machine learning techniques. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 18(2), 238–250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. IJSAT Research Group. (2025). Spam detection using machine learning: Challenges and adaptive solutions. International Journal on Science and Technology, 16(2), 2–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kaggle. (2020). Bank Customer Churn Modeling Dataset. Kaggle Repository. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/shrutimechlearn/churn-modelling [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kmail, A., et al. (In Press). Ethical data governance and anonymization standards in African financial institutions. African Journal of Information Security and Privacy Governance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Mohammed, S., Ahmed, A., & Ibrahim, H. (2013). Classifying Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE) using Python machine learning techniques. International Journal of Hybrid Information Technology, 6(1), 43–56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mujtaba, G., Shuib, L., Raj, R. G., Majeed, N., & Al-Garadi, M. A. (2017). Email classification research trends: Review and open issues. IEEE Access, 5, 9044–9064. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2702187 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Munga, J. O. (2024). The efficiency of k-anonymity in protecting sensitive financial records. In International Conference on Data Risk Metrics (pp. 312–327). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Murugavel, U., & Santhi, R. (2020). Detection of spam and threads identification in e-mail spam corpus using content based text analytics method. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, 3319–3323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.742 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Nandhini, S., & Marseline, D. J. (2020). Performance evaluation of machine learning algorithms for email spam detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ic-ETITE) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ic-ETITE47903.2020.312 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Nayak, R., Amirali Jiwani, S., & Rajitha, B. (2021). Spam email detection using machine learning algorithm. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 8561–8565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.147 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2015). De-identifying government data sets (NIST Internal Report 8053). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8053 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Stanley, R., & Smith, T. (2025). The privacy-utility trade-off in the age of big data analytics. Data Analytics Quarterly, 19(4), 20–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Swamy, C. V., Kumar, A., & Rao, P. (2025). Email spam detection using machine learning. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Research and Development in Information, Communication, and Computing Technologies (ICRDICCT '25) (Vol. 1, pp. 807–811). Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Toma, T., Hassan, S., & Arifuzzaman, M. (2021). An analysis of supervised machine learning algorithms for spam email detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Automation, Control and Mechatronics for Industry 4.0 (ACMI) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACMI53878.2021.9528108 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Kaggle. (2020). Bank Customer Churn Modeling dataset [Data set]. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/shrutimechlearn/churn-modelling [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study