The Effect of Digital Learning Tools on Secondary Students’ Achievement in Mathematics: A Systematic Literature Review

The world education systems are compulsory and Mathematics can be significant in enabling the students to gain analytical and critical thinking profiles. However, there are many concerns regarding the performance of learners in Mathematics in the secondary schools in most countries and even in the global performance tests such as PISA and TIMSS, the gaps have been maintained. Increased rate of information and communication technology (ICT) development has resulted in integration of various digital learning tools to teaching and learning activities in Mathematics. Relying solely on conventional teaching methods is increasingly not considered a sufficient means of meeting the multiple and active learning requirements of 21st century learners. Thus, it is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) research paper that explores deeper the effects of the use of digital learning tools on the achievement of Mathematics among the secondary students. The major aims of this paper are to identify the most common form(s) of digital learning tool(s) discussed in the literature, analyse the impact of digital learning tool(s) on student achievement and make recommendations and interventions to improve student achievement in Mathematics from low to high levels in secondary schools. This was done using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items of systematic Reviews and meta-Analyses) flow diagram methodology and carried out in Google Scholar, ERIC and Web of Science. One hundred and sixteen articles were analysed and 10 articles were selected by the selection criteria. The results of the study indicate that the digital learning tools have a generally positive impact on students' performance, especially when used in an active manner, with a good feedback system and with the support of the teacher. The critical moderating variables consist of the quality of technology access, digital competency of teachers, student motivation and the quality of instruction design. The proposed solutions to the holistic approach to the realization of Mathematics among high school students are numerous online teaching techniques and the participation of technology-savvy teachers and equal availability of technology as the key recommendations. One would hope that the findings of this study will contribute greatly towards the national education agenda of narrowing achievement gaps and enhancing quality of Mathematics teaching and learning in the secondary schools.

Digital Learning Tools, Mathematics Achievement, Secondary School, Systematic Literature Review, Educational Technology

1. Agostini, D., Lazareva, A. & Picasso, F. 2024. Advancements in technology-enhanced assessment in tertiary education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10122 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alakayleh, A. S. (2025). The effect of AI-personalized education on achievement among students at the secondary stage in Jordan: A future vision. International Journal of Educational Science and Computing (IJESC). https://doi.org/10.21608/ijesc.2025.435740.1005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barkley, E. F. & Cross, K. P. 2021. Interactive learning environments in secondary mathematics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bozkurt, G. & Ruthven, K. 2018. The activity structure of technology-based mathematics lessons: A case study of three teachers in English secondary schools. Research in Mathematics Education 20(3): 254–272. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chan, J. Y.-C., Byrne, C., Jerusal, J., Liu, A. S., Roberts, J., & Ottmar, E. (2023). Keep DRAGging ON: Is solving more problems in DragonBox 12+ associated with higher mathematical performance during the COVID-19 pandemic? British Journal of Educational Technology, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13304 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chytas, C., van Borkulo, S.P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E. & Tolboom, J.L.J. 2024. Computational thinking in secondary mathematics education with GeoGebra: Insights from an intervention in calculus lessons. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education 10: 228–259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Fabian, K., Topping, K. J., & Barron, I. (2022). Mobile technology and mathematics: Effects on students' attitudes, engagement and achievement. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(2), 165-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00214-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Guldaray Akhmetzhanova, Syrym Zhanzhigitov, Botagoz Bermukhambetova, Serikkhan Zhuzeyev & Manat Zhailauova. 2025. Assessing the role of online mathematics tools in enhancing student learning and engagement. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 2025(1): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.55056/etq.874 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gusenbauer, M. & Haddaway, N. R. 2020. Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science. Research Synthesis Methods 11(2): 181–217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hayrol Azril, M. S. et al. 2021. Systematic literature review in educational research: Methodological perspectives and applications. Journal of Educational Research and Practice 11(1): 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hetmanenko, L., & Khoruzha, L. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance mathematics education and overcome instructional challenges. Innovaciencia, 13(1), e5075. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.5075 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hetmanenko, L., & Khoruzha, L. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance mathematics education and overcome instructional challenges. Innovaciencia, 13(1), e5075. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346075X.5075 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. & Bond, A. 2020. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review 27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Holman, K., Marino, M., Vasquez, T., Taub, M., Hunt, J. & Tazi, Y. (2025). Artificial intelligence interventions in mathematics education: A systematic literature review. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 22(1), 65–91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ion, T.-C., & Popescu, E. 2025. An innovative distance learning platform for mathematics education in secondary schools: Design, development and preliminary studies. Education and Information Technologies 30(5): 5529–5560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13040-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Jayalekshmi Janardhanan & M. Aron Antony Charles. 2024. Exploring the role of innovation in enhancing mathematics achievement in higher secondary students. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology 8(6): 5659–5671. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Jiali, S. 2024. The impact of artificial intelligence on personalized learning in education: A systematic review. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(2): 7412–7428. https://doi.org/10.57239/pjlss-2024-22.2.00560 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Karantzas, G. C. 2019. Enhancing the rigor of systematic reviews: Applications of PRISMA framework. Educational Research Review 26: 100–110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2026). Rancangan Pendidikan Malaysia (RPM) 2026–2035. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Li, Q. & Ma, X. 2021. A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review 33(1): 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2022). Laporan tahunan 2022: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. MOE Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Mohd Yatim, S.S.K., Saleh, S., Zulnaidi, H., Yew, W.T. & Yatim, S.A.M. 2022. Effects of Brain-Based Teaching Approach Integrated with GeoGebra (BGeo Module) on students’ conceptual understanding. International Journal of Instruction 15(1): 327–346. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Mollakuqe, V., & Mollakuqe, E. (2025). A matrix-based analysis of pedagogical efficacy compared to traditional instructional approaches integrating GeoGebra in mathematics education. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(2), em0821. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/15936 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mosia, M., & Egara, F. O. (2025). Enhancing achievement and retention in circle geometry through digital storytelling for senior secondary learners. Education and Information Technologies, 30, pp. 25081–25111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13702-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Ngien Hock Wuong, Murugan Rajoo & Noor Azah. 2022. Application of systematic literature review in educational research: A practical guide. International Journal of Academic Research in Education 8(2): 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. OECD. 2023. PISA 2022 Results: Learning Outcomes and Trends in Global Education. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Pg Abu Bakar, D. N. N., Shahrill, M., & Zakariya, Y. F. (2023). Digital escape game and students’ learning outcomes in mathematics: Experience from Brunei. SAGE Open, October-December 2023, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231216838 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Plodkaew, K., Pankaew, K., Suwanreung, C., & Komat, C. (2025). Development of interactive multimedia to enhance national educational test results at the basic level in mathematics for educational opportunity expansion schools in Lampang Province. Higher Education Studies, 15(4), 154. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v15n4p154 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Powers, K. 2017. Selecting and reviewing research articles: A guide for systematic literature reviews. Journal of Research Practice 13(2): 1–10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Putri, A. D., Juandi, D., Turmudi & Suparman (2025). Blended learning and math achievement: A meta-analytic review highlighting the effectiveness and heterogeneity. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 23(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.1.3781 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Sarah Nur Nurja & Maslida, Y. 2022. The role of systematic literature review in educational research development. Malaysian Journal of Education 47(1): 15–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Segrist, J. A. 2023. Gamification and narrative intervention strategies for low-achieving math students. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogies, 15(3): 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2023.03.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Son, T. 2024. Intelligent tutoring systems in mathematics education: A systematic literature review using the substitution, augmentation, modification, redefinition model. Computers 13(10): 270. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Tengku Farahnorfadhilah Engku Azman & Norah Md Noor. 2023. Tahap kemahiran penggunaan alat teknologi pendidikan dalam kalangan guru sains dan matematik di sekolah menengah. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal 7(1): 90–105. https://doi.org/10.11113/itlj.v7.127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zakaria, M. I., Carol, W. W. S., Hanid, M. F. A., Adnan, M. F., Raimi, N. F., & Azman, S. M. S. (2024). Integrating geometrical design with GeoGebra: Effects on motivation and academic performance among secondary students. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 16(5), pp. 186-217. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study