Interactive Effects of Variety, Phosphorus–Sulphur Fertilization, and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth and Yield of Mustard (Brassica Spp)
Authors
Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh, Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh, Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh, Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh, Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh, Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh, Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture (BINA), Mymensingh, Bangladesh (Bangladesh)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1306000342
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/6 | Page No: 4602-4611
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-06-03
Accepted: 2026-06-08
Published: 2026-07-10
Abstract
Mustard (Brassica juncea L.), a crucial crop of global nutrition and industry, has become one of the most important crops for agricultural and renewable energy. In this study, we evaluated the influence of mustard variety, levels of fertilizer and AMF inoculation on growth and yield components to maximize mustard productivity. The study was conducted at the BINA substation in Bangladesh to evaluate the impact of these factors on important yield-contributing parameters. Thus, two mustard varieties (BARI sarisha-17 and Binasarisha-9) were evaluated with three fertilizer treatments and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation under field condition. The results showed that BARI sarisha-17 exhibited better vegetative growth, while Binasarisha-9 outperformed BARI sarisha-17 in terms of seed yield indicating higher harvest index. Fifty percent of fertilizer increased plant height and seed weight while both AMF inoculation treatments improved pod length, number of seeds per pod and seed quality. Importantly, the highest seed yield of 1.71 t ha⁻¹ was obtained from the Binasarisha-9 × F50 × I1 cross combination, reflecting that application of specific agronomic practices can enhance mustard productivity. This work offers valuable guidelines for optimizing mustard cultivation through variety, nutrients and microbial treatments towards the enrich of crop output of diverse agronomic environments.
Keywords
Brassica, Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), Phosphorus–sulphur fertilization, Interactive effects, Harvest index
Downloads
References
1. A. Sharma et al., “Biochemical Characterization and their Correlations in Brassica juncea Genotypes,” Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 01, pp. 2408–2417, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.254. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. S. Sharma, M. Bala, G. Kaur, S. Tayyab, and S. R. Feroz, “Chemical Composition of Oil and Cake of Brassica juncea: Implications on Human and Animal Health,” 2022, pp. 29–55. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-91507-0_3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. V. Bawa and S. Kumar Rai, “Nature of Importance of Various Parameters for Ideal Biofuel Crops: Special Reference to Rapeseed Mustard,” in Oilseed Crops - Uses, Biology and Production, IntechOpen, 2023. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.107102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. G. N. Jham et al., “Wild Brazilian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Seed Oil Methyl Esters as Biodiesel Fuel,” J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 917–926, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11746-009-1431-2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. S. Kumar et al., “Soil microbial and nutrient dynamics under different sowings environment of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in rice based cropping system,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 5289, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84742-4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. N. K. Bisen, N. K. Singh, and R. S. Solanki, “Productivity Enhancement of Rapeseed-Mustard through Front Line Demonstration in Seoni District of Madhya Pradesh, India,” Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1983–1989, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2020.904.237. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. D. Jain, H. Kumar, and B. Singh, “Impact of cluster front line demonstration on mustard in Udaipur district of Southern Rajasthan, India,” Int. J. Chem. Stud., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 313–317, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4e.9707. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. N. Basharat et al., “Improving Growth and Nutrient Quality of Mustard Varieties Through Rhizobacterial Inoculation,” Oct. 25, 2024. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5320810/v1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. S. N. Srity, Md. T. Ahmed, S. A. Upama, Md. H. Rashid, Md. R. Uddin, and U. K. Sarker, “Response of Mustard Yield (cv. BARI Sarisha-14) to Different Fertilizer Management Under Subtropical Condition,” Journal of Agroforestry and Environment, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 20–25, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.55706/jae1704. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. R. S. Meena et al., “Response of polymers and nutrient management on growth, yield, and quality of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea),” The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 2237–2240, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.56093/ijas.v90i11.108602. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Md. S. Reza, Md. K. A. Nadim, Md. M. Islam, S.- Al-Mahmud, and M. R. Khan, “Field Evaluation and Biochemical Profiling of Mustard Genotypes for Sustainable Oilseed Production in Satkhira, Bangladesh,” Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, vol. 13, no. s1, pp. 2338–2345, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.24925/turjaf.v13is1.2338-2345.7816. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. N. Meshram and J. Bisen, “Response of inorganic and organic sources of nutrients on growth, yield and quality of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.),” International Journal of Research in Agronomy, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 90–94, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.33545/2618060X.2025.v8.i10b.3957. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. E. Öztürk, “Critical dose of nitrogen and phosphorus for the enhanced growth, yield, and quality components in mustard (sinapsis arvensis L.) in a semi arid environment,” Turkish Journal Of Field Crops, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 244–252, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.17557/tjfc.1038570. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. R. Sharma, S. Sindhu, and S. S. Sindhu, “Bioinoculation of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) with Beneficial Rhizobacteria: A Sustainable Alternative to Improve Crop Growth,” Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., vol. 7, no. 05, pp. 1375–1386, May 2018, doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. S. R. Chaudhuri et al., “Microbe-Based Strategy for Plant Nutrient Management,” in Biological Wastewater Treatment and Resource Recovery, InTech, 2017. doi: 10.5772/67307. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. S. S. Islam, A. T. M. M. Billah, A. K. Hasan, R. Karim, and T. Khomphet, “Evaluating the impact of Trichoderma biofertilizer and planting dates on mustard yield performance using the InfoCrop growth model,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 5, p. e0285482, May 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285482. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. K. J. Jankowski, A. Szatkowski, and D. Załuski, “The effect of nitrogen management on seed yield and quality in traditional and canola-quality white mustard,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 26127, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76582-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. B. Biswal and S. Rawat, “Influence of potassium and boron on growth and yield components of mustard (Brassica juncea L.),” International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research, vol. 9, no. 9S, pp. 197–201, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i9Sc.5518. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. [A. Halim et al., “Field Assessment of Two Micronutrients (Zinc and Boron) on the Seed Yield and Oil Content of Mustard,” Seeds, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 127–137, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/seeds2010010. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. B. Pramanick et al., “An innovative approach to improve oil production and quality of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) with multi-nutrient-rich polyhalite,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 3, p. e13997, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13997. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. A. Sarkar et al., “Growth and quality parameters of Tea (Camellia sinensis) mediated by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi,” Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 232–239, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.36547/nbc.v19i2.673. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. S. Yousefzadeh and N. Sabaghnia, “Growth characters and yield of dragonhead in relation to fe2o3 nano-scale fertilizer and sowing density,” The Journal “Agriculture and Forestry,” vol. 62, no. 2, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.17707/AgricultForest.62.2.04. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. P. Sharma, “Relationship of photosynthesis and related traits to seed yield in oilseed Brassicas,” Journal of Applied and Natural Science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 851–856, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.31018/jans.v7i2.695. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. D. P. Singh, P. K. Upadhyay, M. P. Singh, and A. Srivastava, “Effect of phosphorus and sulphur level on growth, yield and oil content of mustard (Brassica juncea L.),” International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 376–380, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.15740/HAS/IJAS/14.2/376-380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. N. J. Jadav, J. K. Parmar, T. V. Gangwal, and M. V. Patel, “Effect of phosphorus, sulphur and phosphate solubilizing bacteria on yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility after harvest of mustard,” An Asian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 307–317, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.15740/HAS/AJSS/11.2/307-317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. G. M. Abdel-Fattah, W. M. Shukry, M. M. B. Shokr, and M. A. Ahmed, “Application of Mycorrhizal Technology for Improving Yield Production of Common Bean Plants,” Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 191–197, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.3126/ijasbt.v4i2.15103. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. S. Rosalina, I. Sasli, and T. Abdurrahman, “Morphophysiological Response of Edamame Soybean to Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) and Bioactive Compost Charcoal in Tidal Swamp Land,” Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung (Journal of Agricultural Engineering), vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1661–1670, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.23960/jtepl.v14i5.1661-1670. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. D. Potdar, H. Purohit, R. Meena, and K. Ombase, “Effect of phosphorus and biofertilizers with and without FYM on mustard and soil fertility,” Int. J. Chem. Stud., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2948–2951, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1ao.11678. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. S. Dwivedi, M. Singh, R. K. Yadav, P. K. Saini, and H. Tripathi, “Correlation and Path Analysis for Seed Yield and Its Component Traits in Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern and Coss.),” International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1044–1054, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i113253. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. S. Rout, S. A. Kerkhi, and C. Chauhan, “Character Association and Path Analysis among Yield Components in Indian Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss],” Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 50–55, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.007. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. A. Saiyad, P. Patel, J. Patel, K. Prajapati, and B. Patel, “Study of correlation and path coefficient among the quantitative and qualitative characters of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss],” Int. J. Chem. Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2112–2116, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2af.9063. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study