Vision-Driven Leadership, Teachers' Engagement, And Organizational Effectiveness in Public Elementary Schools in Cavite Province: Basis For Continuity Development Design
Authors
Jenaldine Rose M. Escaba, Ed.D
Eulogio “Amang” Rodriguez Institute of Science & Technology, Graduate School- DEM Program (Philippines)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000014
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 202-217
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-07-05
Accepted: 2026-07-10
Published: 2026-07-21
Abstract
Educational leadership has become increasingly important in promoting school effectiveness, teacher engagement, and organizational sustainability amid continuing educational reforms. This study examined the influence of vision-driven leadership on teachers' engagement and organizational effectiveness in public elementary schools in Cavite Province as the basis for developing a Continuity Development Design. Guided by Mission-Driven Leadership Theory, the Transformative Educational Leadership Model, and the Visionary Leadership Styles and Teacher Performance Framework, the study assessed vision-driven leadership across strategic goal setting, school culture development, stakeholder alignment, vision communication, change leadership, and monitoring and evaluation. Teachers' engagement was evaluated in terms of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral engagement, as well as professional commitment, while organizational effectiveness served as the outcome variable. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed involving 270 respondents, consisting of six supervisors, seventeen school heads, and 247 teachers selected from public elementary schools in Cavite Province. Data were collected using a validated, researcher-developed questionnaire and analyzed using the weighted mean, one-way analysis of variance, and the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient. Results revealed that vision-driven leadership was Highly Evident (WM = 4.35), teachers were Highly Engaged (WM = 4.77), and the proposed Continuity Development Design was rated Highly Acceptable and Highly Feasible by all respondent groups. Statistically significant differences were found among supervisors, school heads, and teachers regarding their assessments of vision-driven leadership and teacher engagement. The findings underscore the importance of visionary leadership practices in strengthening teacher commitment, organizational effectiveness, and sustainable school improvement. A Continuity Development Design was developed to institutionalize effective leadership practices and support continuous organizational development in public elementary schools.
Keywords
Vision-driven leadership, teacher engagement, organizational effectiveness, educational leadership, public elementary schools, continuity development design.
Downloads
References
1. Abulencia, A. S., & Dela Paz, M. A. (2018). Effective leadership practices of public-school principals in the Philippines. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 50(3), 213–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Aliazas, J. V., Panoy, B. R., & Baguna, A. (2023). Person-environment fit: Empowering leadership practices on teachers' work engagement and motivation. International Journal of Academe and Industry Research, 4(3), 62–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bakker, A. B., & Albrecht, S. L. (2018). Work engagement: Current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Branch, G. F., Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2013). School leaders matter. Education Next, 13(1), 62–69. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Cabrejas, S. D., & Lo, N. S. (2026). Innovative leadership strategies in enhancing teacher engagement. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(2), 5350–5363. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Cheng, Y. C. (2022). School effectiveness and school-based management: A mechanism for development. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Dangdang, N., & Aclao, J. (2026). Educational leaders' preparation for digital and change management in basic education: A qualitative document analysis of policy expectations and preparation pathway. Journal of Education and Learning Reviews. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 44, s. 2015: Guidelines on the enhanced school improvement planning process. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2016: Policy guidelines on daily lesson preparation for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Department of Education. (2022). DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2022: Basic Education Development Plan (BEDP) 2030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Department of Education. (2024). MATATAG Agenda and Basic Education Development Plan 2030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Gamino, A. A., & Casamayor, C. G., Jr. (2026). Pedagogical leadership and workplace spirituality as predictors of teacher engagement. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Technologies, Psychology, and Social Sciences, 2(1), 82–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2021). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership and school improvement: Supporting educational change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 567–569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (2019). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Panique, R. D. R. (2025). Transformational leadership in education: Impacts and practices toward enhancing school performance. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2021). Management (15th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. (2021). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Webber, C. F., Conway, J. M., & van der Vyver, C. P. (2023). Teacher leadership: A rationale and theoretical framework. In C. F. Webber (Ed.), Teacher leadership in international contexts. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. World Bank. (2024). World development report 2024: Learning and educational transformation. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Zimmerman, B. J. (2020). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 55(2), 61–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study