Development Supervision Approaches, Teachers' Collaboration, and Organizational Performance in Public Elementary Schools in the Division of Cavite Province: Basis for A Resilience Empowerment Program

The increasing complexity of educational reforms requires school leaders to adopt developmental supervision approaches that strengthen teacher collaboration and sustain organizational performance. Developmental supervision has shifted from traditional inspection toward supportive leadership characterized by coaching, mentoring, professional collaboration, and continuous capacity building. This study examined the development supervision approaches, teachers' collaboration, and organizational performance among selected public elementary schools in the Division of Cavite Province as the basis for developing a Resilience Empowerment Program. Specifically, the study assessed developmental supervision in terms of instructional coaching and mentoring, collaborative professional learning, performance monitoring and feedback, capacity building and development planning, resource and instructional support, participatory and empowering leadership, and ethical and values-based supervision. Teachers' collaboration was likewise examined through the frequency of collaborative activities, the quality of professional dialogue, shared decision-making, trust and congeniality, leadership support for collaboration, the use of collaborative technologies, and the impact on instructional practices. Employing a descriptive-correlational research design, the study involved district supervisors, school heads, and teachers from selected public elementary schools in the Division of Cavite Province. Data were gathered using a validated, researcher-developed questionnaire and a documentary analysis of the Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF) covering the last three school years. Weighted mean, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and documentary analysis were utilized to analyze the data. The findings revealed that developmental supervision approaches and teachers' collaboration were highly evident, while organizational performance consistently remained at a very satisfactory level. Significant positive relationships were established among developmental supervision, teacher collaboration, and organizational performance. Based on these findings, a comprehensive Resilience Empowerment Program was developed to strengthen instructional leadership, collaborative professionalism, and organizational resilience within public elementary schools.

developmental supervision, instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, organizational performance, educational resilience, public elementary schools

1. Aliazas, J. V., Panoy, B. R., & Baguna, A. (2023). Person–environment fit: Empowering leadership practices on teachers' work engagement and motivation. International Journal of Academe and Industry Research, 4(3), 62–81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Asian Development Bank. (2023). Asian development outlook 2023: Investing in human capital for sustainable development. Asian Development Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Corwin Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bush, T., Bell, L., & Middlewood, D. (2019). Principles of educational leadership and management (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2021). Preparing educational leaders: Powerful learning that builds professional practice. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2020). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(2), 221–258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Department of Education. (2015). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2015: Guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) in the Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Department of Education. (2016). DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016: The Learning Action Cell (LAC) as a K to 12 Basic Education Program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Department of Education. (2017). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Department of Education. (2020). DepEd Order No. 25, s. 2020: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Supervisors (PPSS). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Department of Education. (2022). DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2022: Basic Education Development Plan (BEDP) 2030. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Department of Education. (2024). MATATAG Agenda: Bansang Makabata, Batang Makabansa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Gamino, A. A., & Casamayor, C. G. (2024). Pedagogical leadership and workplace spirituality as predictors of teacher engagement. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Technologies, Psychology, and Social Sciences, 2(1), 82–128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). SuperVision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2021). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership and school improvement: Supporting educational change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 567–569. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2024). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Republic Act No. 9155. (2001). Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2021). Management (15th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Schein, E. H., & Schein, P. A. (2021). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Sergiovanni, T. J. (2021). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. World Bank. (2024). World development report 2024: Learning for development. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Yukl, G. (2020). Leadership in organizations (9th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Wang, H., & Chen, L. (2025). Transformational leadership and organizational effectiveness in educational institutions: A meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(1), 58–79. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zulueta, F. M., & Maglaya, A. S. (2023). Developmental supervision and collaborative professionalism among public school teachers in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 7(2), 41–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Nguyen, T. H., Pham, H. T., & Tran, M. N. (2021). Organizational effectiveness in educational institutions: A systems perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 745–761. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study