Teachers in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Demographic Influences in Research Innovation

Authors

John Michael T. Talingting

College of Teacher Education, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern Philippines Foundation, Cebu City, Please Choose State (Philippines)

Steven A. Eguin

College of Teacher Education, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern Philippines Foundation, Cebu City, Please Choose State (Philippines)

Marry Ann M. Aclao

College of Teacher Education, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern Philippines Foundation, Cebu City, Please Choose State (Philippines)

Nina Louren Rosales

College of Teacher Education, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern Philippines Foundation, Cebu City, Please Choose State (Philippines)

Dr. Evita Jane Ngo

College of Teacher Education, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern Philippines Foundation, Cebu City, Please Choose State (Philippines)

Dr. Janet A. Arcana

Research Adviser, University of Southern Philippines Foundation (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000059

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 789-814

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-04

Accepted: 2026-07-10

Published: 2026-07-27

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly reshaped higher education, particularly in enhancing research innovation and academic productivity. This study assessed the attitudes and behaviors of College of Teacher Education Arts and Sciences teachers toward innovative research using AI and examined the relationship between these variables and their demographic profiles. Employing a descriptive-comparative-correlational survey design, the study involved 22 faculty members who responded to a structured questionnaire measuring demographic characteristics, attitudes, and behavioral engagement with AI-based research tools.
Findings revealed that teachers generally exhibit a favorable attitude and active behavioral engagement toward AI-supported research, with mean scores of 2.92 for attitude and 2.94 for behavior. However, statistical analysis showed no significant relationship between attitude and behavior (p = 0.60), indicating that positive perceptions do not necessarily translate into consistent behavioral application. Furthermore, results indicated no significant differences in attitude and behavior when grouped according to demographic variables such as age, gender, and educational attainment, as all p-values exceeded the 0.05 threshold. These outcomes suggest a relatively uniform acceptance of AI across demographic groups within the institution.
The study concludes that while AI is generally embraced in academic research practices, its integration remains more practice-driven than attitude-driven. The lack of a significant attitude-behavior link highlights the need for targeted interventions that strengthen the alignment between perception and actual use. It is recommended that continuous professional development, institutional AI support systems, and curriculum-based AI literacy programs be implemented. Future research should further explore the relationship between AI adoption, research productivity, and pedagogical impact in higher education contexts.

Keywords

Academic Research, Artificial Intelligence, AI Integration

Downloads

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K. K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: A quantitative analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3449–3468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 9, 100–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). The impact of AI in education on teachers’ professional practice. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100–115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on teachers’ professional development and research practices. Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202304_26(2).0004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The role of faculty in research innovation. Computers & Education, 195, 104728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104728 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Desjardins, R., & Ioannidou, A. (2021). The political economy of adult learning systems. European Journal of Education, 56(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Desjardins, R., & Warnke, A. J. (2022). Ageing and skills: The role of experience in professional development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 41(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2021.1960925 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., et al. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges, and implications of generative conversational AI. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., et al. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on generative AI. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2021). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 31, 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09539-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kohnke, L. (2023). Teachers’ acceptance of artificial intelligence in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2022). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13140 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Nazaretsky, T., et al. (2022). Teachers’ attitudes toward AI-based educational tools. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107–135. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2024). Conceptualizing AI literacy: Implications for teacher education and research. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100150 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nguyen, T., & Habok, A. (2022). Digital innovation and teachers’ research engagement. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(2), 1–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. OECD. (2023). AI in education: Challenges and opportunities for teachers and learners. https://www.oecd.org/education/ai-in-education [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. OECD. (2023). OECD digital economy outlook 2023. https://www.oecd.org/digital/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Porter, S. R., & Whitcomb, M. E. (2021). Non-response in student surveys: The role of demographics. Research in Higher Education, 62(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09587-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Tahiru, F. (2021). AI in education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(3), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W. F. (2021). Digital competence and teachers’ research productivity. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(5), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. UNESCO. (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022. https://www.unesco.org/en/education/gem-report [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. UNESCO. (2023). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. https://www.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. UNESCO. (2025). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. World Bank. (2022). Digital development and education in developing countries. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/edutech [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2021). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00239-5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2020). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00203-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of AI in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of AI applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. (2021). AI literacy and teacher readiness. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles