Comparative Investigation of the I–V Characteristics of Photovoltaic Modules Under Varying Environmental Conditions

Authors

Everest Bassey Oyom.

Department of Physics, University of Cross River State, Calabar, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Nsed Ayip Akonjom.

Department of Physics, University of Cross River State, Calabar, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Emmanuel Benjamin Ettah.

Department of Physics, University of Cross River State, Calabar, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Sampson Nsa Edet

Department of Physics, University of Cross River State, Calabar, Nigeria (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000089

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 1208-1222

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-07-04

Accepted: 2026-07-09

Published: 2026-07-29

Abstract

The current–voltage (I–V) characteristics and performance of monocrystalline and polycrystalline photovoltaic (PV) modules under varying environmental conditions across selected locations in Nigeria was investigated. The study aimed to evaluate the electrical performance of both PV technologies under different climatic conditions. Experimental measurements were conducted using monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels, a solar power meter for irradiance, a thermo-hygrometer for ambient temperature and relative humidity, an anemometer for wind speed, and an MPPT solar meter for voltage, current, and output power measurements. Data were collected under outdoor conditions at regular intervals during daylight hours. Performance was assessed using I–V characteristics for both panels, open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current, and power response were all obtained. The results revealed significant variations in PV performance across the selected locations. Monocrystalline modules consistently outperformed polycrystalline modules, recording higher current outputs of approximately 2.8–3.5 A and voltage values between 17.0 and 18.5 V under peak irradiance, whereas polycrystalline modules produced currents of about 2.3–3.0 A within similar voltage ranges. Locations with higher solar irradiance and moderate atmospheric conditions exhibited improved photovoltaic performance, characterized by smoother and more stable I–V curves. In contrast, lower irradiance and cloud cover reduced output current and overall efficiency. Elevated panel temperatures caused slight reductions in voltage due to the thermal behaviour of semiconductor junctions. Comparative analysis showed that increased irradiance enhanced photocurrent generation, while excessive temperature adversely affected voltage performance. Overall, monocrystalline PV modules demonstrated superior operational stability, efficiency, and electrical response under varying environmental conditions. The study concludes that photovoltaic performance in Nigeria is strongly influenced by local climatic conditions and semiconductor material properties, with monocrystalline modules offering greater suitability for outdoor solar energy applications in tropical environments.

Keywords

Photovoltaic Performance, Monocrystalline Module, Polycrystalline Module, Current-Voltage (I–V) Characteristics, Solar Irradiance

Downloads

References

1. Ahmed, I., Shi, L., Pasanen, H., Vivo, P., Maity, P., Hatamvand, M., & Zhan, Y. (2021). There is plenty of room at the top: generation of hot charge carriers and their applications in perovskite and other semiconductor-based optoelectronic devices. Light: Science & Applications, 10(1), 174. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bao, Q., Qian, W., Ma, G., Qiu, X., Zhang, H., Zhou, H., & Chen, M. (2025). Influence of the change direction of total solar irradiance at the inclined surface on power generation performance of photovoltaic power station: A focus on output power and photoelectric conversion efficiency. Energy, 324, 135975. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chanchangi, Y. N., Adu, F., Ghosh, A., Sundaram, S., & Mallick, T. K. (2023). Nigeria's energy review: Focusing on solar energy potential and penetration. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(7), 5755-5796. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chaudhary, O. S., Denaï, M., Refaat, S. S., & Pissanidis, G. (2023). Technology and applications of wide bandgap semiconductor materials: current state and future trends. Energies, 16(18), 6689. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cibira, G. (2018). Relations among photovoltaic cell electrical parameters. Applied Surface Science, 461, 102-107. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Dang, D. N., Le Viet, T., Takano, H., & Duc, T. N. (2023). Estimating parameters of photovoltaic modules based on current–voltage characteristics at operating conditions. Energy Reports, 9, 18-26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ebhota, W. S., & Jen, T. C. (2020). Fossil fuels environmental challenges and the role of solar photovoltaic technology advances in fast tracking hybrid renewable energy system. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 7(1), 97-117. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ettah, E. B., Eno, E. E., & Udoimuk, A. B. (2009). The effects of Solar panel temperature on the power output efficiency in Calabar, Nigeria. Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences, 23(1), 16-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ettah, E. B., Udoimuk, A. B., Obiefuna, J. N., & Opara, F. E. (2012). The effect of relative humidity on the efficiency of solar panels in Calabar, Nigeria. Universal Journal of Management and social sciences, 2(3), 8-11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ettah, E., Ekah, U., Oyom, E., & Akonjom, N. (2021). Performance analysis of monocrystalline and polycrystalline solar panels in a Semi-Arid region. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 10(7), 10-14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ettah, E., Ushie, P., Obiefuna, J., & Nwachukwu, N. (2015). Comparative study of the effects of relative humidity on solar electricity generation in UYO and Port-Harcourt, Nigeria. International Journal of Mathematics and Physical Sciences Research, 3(2), 66-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lutz, J., Schlangenotto, H., Scheuermann, U., & De Doncker, R. (2018). Semiconductor properties. In Semiconductor Power Devices: Physics, Characteristics, Reliability (pp. 21-99). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Njok, A. O., & Ogbulezie, J. C. (2018). Investigation of the performance of photovoltaics installed close to river. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06694. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Okafor, C. C., Ajaero, C. C., Madu, C. N., Nzekwe, C. A., Otunomo, F. A., & Nixon, N. N. (2024). Climate change mitigation and adaptation in Nigeria: A review. Sustainability, 16(16), 7048. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Okono, M. A., Agbo, E. P., Ekah, B. J., Ekah, U. J., Ettah, E. B., & Edet, C. O. (2022). Statistical analysis and distribution of global solar radiation and temperature over southern Nigeria. Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 588-588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Omer, A. (2017). Solar Energy for Buildings: Clean Energies Utilisation and Development. Available at SSRN 2933628. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Oyom, E. B., Ettah, E. B., & Akonjom, N. A. (2023). Impact of dust particles on the output power of photovoltaic modules in Calabar, Cross River State. Science World Journal, 18(3), 380-385. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Oyom, E., & Sampson, N. S. A. (2026). Diurnal Variation of Solar Radiation, Ambient Temperature, Panel Temperature and Relative Humidity across some selected locations in Nigeria. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), 13(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Siva Ramkumar, M., Felshiya Rajakumari, R., Kannan, N., Premkumar, R., Mohanasundaram, S., Purushotham, S., ... & Rajan, K. (2022). Semiconductor materials for solar PV technology and challenges towards electrical engineering. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2022(1), 7272489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Sunday, E. A., Musa, H., Ibrahim, M., & Ezekiel, D. (2026). THERMODYNAMIC AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF BOX-TYPE SOLAR COOKERS: A REVIEW (2015–2025). International Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment, 4(1), 243-261. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Villalva, M. G., Gazoli, J. R., & Ruppert Filho, E. (2009). Comprehensive approach to modeling and simulation of photovoltaic arrays. IEEE Transactions on power electronics, 24(5), 1198-1208. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Woods-Robinson, R., Han, Y., Zhang, H., Ablekim, T., Khan, I., Persson, K. A., & Zakutayev, A. (2020). Wide band gap chalcogenide semiconductors. Chemical reviews, 120(9), 4007-4055. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Yakubu, R. O., Mensah, L. D., Quansah, D. A., Adaramola, M. S., & Hammed, Y. (2022). Performance evaluation of bifacial solar PV modules under different climatic regions in Nigeria. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 354, p. 02006). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Yue, X., Fan, J., & Xiang, Q. (2022). Internal electric field on steering charge migration: modulations, determinations and energy‐related applications. Advanced Functional Materials, 32(12), 2110258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles