Work Immersion Program and Learners' Performance in Public Senior High Schools in the Division of Cavite Province, Philippines: Basis for a Sustainability Program

The Work Immersion Program is an essential component of the Philippine K to 12 curriculum that provides Senior High School learners with authentic workplace experiences designed to strengthen technical competencies, employability skills, and career readiness. Effective implementation of the program requires meaningful collaboration among schools, industry partners, and other stakeholders to ensure that learners acquire practical knowledge and workplace values aligned with industry standards. This study assessed the implementation of the Work Immersion Program and its relationship to learners' performance in selected public senior high schools in the Division of Cavite Province, as a basis for developing a Sustainability Program. Specifically, it examined the implementation of the Work Immersion Program in terms of work immersion objectives, duration, placement alignment, work immersion activities, learning outcomes, implementation models, partner institutions, program assessment, and monitoring and evaluation system; determined learners' academic and behavioral performance; examined significant differences in respondents' assessments; analyzed the relationship between work immersion implementation and learners' performance; identified implementation challenges; and evaluated the acceptability of the proposed Sustainability Program. A quantitative descriptive-correlational research design was employed, involving 265 respondents, including school heads, work immersion coordinators, and teachers from 12 public senior high schools in Cavite Province. Data were analyzed using frequencies, percentages, weighted means, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and Multiple Regression Analysis. The findings revealed that the Work Immersion Program was implemented to a high degree across all dimensions. Learners likewise demonstrated satisfactory academic and behavioral performance. Significant positive relationships were observed between the implementation of the Work Immersion Program and learners' performance, indicating that effective program implementation contributes to improved learner outcomes. The proposed Sustainability Program was evaluated as highly acceptable. The study concludes that continuous strengthening of school-industry partnerships, monitoring systems, and implementation practices is essential for sustaining the effectiveness of Work Immersion in public senior high schools.

Work Immersion Program, experiential learning, learners' performance, Senior High School, sustainability program, K to 12 education

1. Bandura, A. (2021). Social learning theory and educational practice (Updated ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Billett, S. (2021). Integrating practice-based experiences into learning. Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Commission on Higher Education. (2024). Higher education statistical bulletin. CHED. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Congressional Commission on Education II. (2025). Fixing the foundations: Year Two Report. EDCOM II. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2021). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 25(2), 97–140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Education. (2017). Department Order No. 30, s. 2017: Guidelines for Work Immersion. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Education. (2023). Basic Education Development Plan 2030. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Education. (2024). Basic Education Report 2024. Department of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. International Labour Organization. (2023). Skills and lifelong learning for future employment. ILO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Leithwood, K. (2021). Leadership for equitable learning in schools. Education Sciences, 11(8), 377. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. McCombes, S. (2023). Descriptive research: Definition, design, methods and examples. Scribbr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. OECD. (2021). The state of school education. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. OECD. (2024). Future-ready learners and schools. OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024). Philippine education statistics. PSA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Republic Act No. 10968. (2016). Philippine Qualifications Framework Act. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2023). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101967. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. UNESCO. (2024). Learning for sustainable futures. UNESCO Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023. United Nations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. World Bank. (2022). Improving education quality through experiential learning. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. World Bank. (2023). World Development Report 2023. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. World Bank. (2024). Education systems for resilient societies. World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Yorke, M. (2020). Graduate employability and work-integrated learning. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(4), 381–395. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zepeda, S. J. (2022). Professional development: What works (4th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zhao, Y. (2023). Learner-centered education in the twenty-first century. Corwin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study