The Imperative for a New EU-China Functional Relationship?
Authors
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań ul. Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 5 61-614 Poznań POLAND (Poland)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000320
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 4358-4381
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-06
Accepted: 2026-08-11
Published: 2026-08-18
Abstract
The main aim of the paper is the imperative for a new EU-China functional relationships? What indicates the importance and innovativeness of the research is the presentation of the technical progress especially in China, the growth of economic ties with the European Union and the benefits resulting from liberalized of the China foreign trade policy under WTO. Realistic point is important trends in the trade regime between EU and China. Their commercial relations are too important to become hostage to political grandstanding or airy rhetoric by politicians performing for domestic galleries. Europe is China’s largest export market, and China now ranks second on Europe’s list of key trading partners. Trade with China dwarfs any other trade relation Europe has with emerging Asia. Disturbing this relationship would have ramifications for sales, growth and employment. Economic growth is generally preferable in China to military and extensive expansion. With new investments, a country can transform its position through industrial expansion at home and sustain it through international trade. China is especially sensitive to the advantages of intensive growth and will not wish to disrupt essential economic arrangements that have been crucial to her success. The Chinese government is less concerned today about Western criticisms of China’s autocratic system, but the Chinese people have grown more nationalistic and represent a potentially greater threat to commercial relations. Commercial interests in autocratic regimes cause political dilemmas. EU-China trade has grown increasingly one-sided, and this is not sustainable. It is EU and China mutual interest that trade relations are balanced and fair, to benefit current and future generations. EU hope to go through other sectors of bilateral cooperation and how the EU and China can tackle global challenges. European Union must have a realistic assessment to what extent it can somehow magically change the Chinese government’s outlook and political choices. Chinese and European leaders must find a new normal – a functional relationship that works for both sides.
Keywords
European Union, China, technical progress, foreign trade policy, new EU-China functional relationship
Downloads
References
1. Crookes P.I. (2013), Resetting EU–China relations from a values-based to an interests-based engagement, Contemporary China Studies Program, School of Interdisciplinary Area Studies, University of Oxford, 74 Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HP, UK. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Erixon F. & Messerlin P. (2009) Containing Sino-European Protectionism, Institute of Economic Affairs. Published by Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. García-Herrero A. (2025), Toward EU-China non-summit? The EU-China relationship is caught in a cycle of disgruntlement – and it doesn’t appear to be getting any better Publishing date July 09, Bruegel. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Kugler, J., (2006), The Asian Ascent: Opportunity for Peace or Precondition for War? “International Studies Perspectives, A Journal of the International Studies Association”, Volume 7, Number 1, February. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Puślecki Z.W. (2020), New Tendency in the Foreign Trade Policy in Relations between European Union and China and Their Perspectives, Book Publisher International, Londyn/Tarakeswar. . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Puślecki Z.W., (2023), The new protectionism between the USA and China and international trade policy amid worldwide geopolitical turbulence, „Ekonomista” nr 2., ss. 125–151, DOI: 10.52335/ekon/166624 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Rosecrance, R., (2006), Power and International Relations: The Rise of China and Its Effects, “International Studies Perspectives, A Journal of the International Studies Association”, Volume 7, Number 1, February. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Wu T. (2020), Bigger Brother. “The New York Review of Books”. April 9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Xi Jinping (2019), Zarządzanie Chinami, Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek, Foreign Languages Press, Toruń 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Zeneli V (2025), What the EU and China want from the summit that neither seems to want, By Atlantic Council experts, Atlantic Council’s Europe Center, July 21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study