Prevalence of MecA and MecC Genes from Cattle and Livestock Marketers at Shinge Livestock Market in Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria
Authors
Department of Microbiology, College of Biological Sciences, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Federal University of Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Health and Development Support Programme (HANDS) Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria (Nigeria)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1307000346
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/7 | Page No: 4704-4712
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-05
Accepted: 2026-08-10
Published: 2026-08-19
Abstract
Background: Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), one of the main causes of infections is associated with livestock, the community, and healthcare facilities. The mecA gene primarily mediates resistance, and the advent of mecC-positive MRSA presents difficulties for diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify the molecular features of the mecA and mecC genes from cattle and livestock marketers at Shinge livestock market in Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria.
Materials and Methods: In September and October of 2023, a laboratory-based observational study was carried out at the Shinge livestock market. Standard microbiological methods were used to identify MRSA from one hundred (100) cattle skin swabs and one hundred (100) nasal secretions from livestock marketers. The swabs were cultured on Manitol Salt Agar (MSA) at 37℃ for 24 hours. Cefoxitin disk using Kirby-Bauer diffusion technique was used to confirm methicillin resistance. Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was used to detect the mecA and mecC genes molecularly.
Result: Twenty-six (13%) of the 200 samples examined, sixteen (16) from livestock traders and ten (10) from cattle skin swabs were found to be MRSA. Molecular analysis revealed that 19.2% of isolates had mecA and 26.9% had mecC genes.
Conclusion: In the study populations, the prevalence rates of the mecA and mecC genes were 19.2% and 26.9%, respectively. Therefore, increased surveillance is essential to addressing MRSA resistance trends.
Keywords
Methicillin resistancemecAmecCCefoxitinPCR
Downloads
References
1. Abimiku, R. H., Ngwai, Y. B., Nkene, I. H., & Tatfeng, Y. M. (2016). Molecular detection of diarrheagenic pathotypes of Escherichia coli from diarrheic patients in Keffi, Nigeria. Journal of Microbiology and Biomedical Research, 2(3), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Abimiku, R. H., Ngwai, Y. B., Nkene, I. H., Bassey, B. E., Tsaku, P. A., Ibrahim, T., Tama, S. C., Ishaleku, D., & Pennap, G. R. I. (2019). Molecular Diversity and Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase Resistance of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli from Patients Attending Selected Health Care Facilities in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. International Journal of Pathogen Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpr/2019/v3i130084 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Arumugam, V., Vedachalam, D., Murugesan, M. & Parthasarathy, A. A. (2016). Study on the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from various clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital. Indian J Microbiol Res. 3(1):65-69. doi:10.5958/2394-5478.2016.00016.9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Becker, K., Denis, O., Roisin, S., Mellmann, A., Idelevich, E.A., Knaack, D., van Alen, S., Kriegeskorte, A., Köck, R., Schaumburg, F., Peters, G. & Ballhausen, B. (2016). Detection of mecA- and mecC-Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolates by the New Xpert MRSA Gen 3 PCR Assay. J Clin Microbiol. 54(1):180-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02081-15. Epub 2015 Oct 21. PMID: 26491186; PMCID: PMC4702756. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Brakstad, O.G., Aasbakk, K. & Maeland, J.A. (1992). Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:1654–1660. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. (2016). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (26th ed.). Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Collahan, C., Lee, G.R., Zalauf, K., Kirby, J.E., & Arnaout, R. (2021). Nasal swab performance by collection, timing, procedure and methods of transport for patients with SARS-coV-2. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 59(10), e00569-21. http://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00569-21 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Garoy, E. Y., Gebreab, Y. B., Achila, O. O., Tekeste, D. G., Kesete, R., Ghirmay, R., Kiflay, R., & Tesfu, T. (2019). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Prevalence and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern among patients—A multicenter study in Asmara, Eritrea. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 2019, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8321834 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Godwin, N.E. (2016). mecA Gene Profile of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Isolates from Clinical Sources in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences, 4(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20160403.14 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gurusamy, K.S., Koti, R., Toon, C.D., Wilson, P. & Davidson, B.R. (2013). Antibiotic therapy for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in non-surgical wounds. Cochrane Database Systemic Review. 11:CD010427. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010427.pub2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hamim, S. S., & Salman Hamim, S. (2017). Molecular characterization of mecA gene in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In J.Thi-Qar Sci (Vol. 6, Issue 1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325514546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Idakari, C. N., Emelobe, G. M., Nwosu, P. C., Uche-Omovoh, I. C., Agwu, I. F., Ene, C. B., Akpa, W. C., Akpa, C. O., Chioma, O., Ezekwesili, N. M., Amagwu, C. C., Okparaoka, U. S., & Idakari, O. R. (2025). Determination of phenotypic and molecular detection of mecA and mecC genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients admitted in an emergency unit of a tertiary healthcare facility in Lagos, Nigeria. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 33(1), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2025.33.1.0413 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Idrees, M. M., Saeed, K., Shahid, M. A., Akhtar, M., Qammar, K., Hassan, J., Khaliq, T., & Saeed, A. (2023). Prevalence of mecA- and mecC-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Clinical Specimens, Punjab, Pakistan. Biomedicines, 11(3), Article 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11030878 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Lakhundi, S. & Zhang, K. (2018). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 31(4):e00020-18. doi:10.1128/CMR.00020-18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Lee, J.H. (2003). Methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from major food animals and their potential transmission to humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6489–6494. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Murugan, K., Kavitha, K. & Al-Sohaibani, S. (2015). Rifampicin resistance among multi-resistant MRSA clinical isolates from Chennai, India, and their molecular characterization. Genet Mol Res. 14(1):2716-2725. doi:10.4238/2015.March.31.1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Paul, R., Agarwal, S. G., Singh, K., & Sen, V. (2025). Prevalence of mecA- and mecC-associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from different clinical specimens in a tertiary care setting of Central India. Journal of Academy of Medical Sciences, 7(4), 1205–1211. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Rao, S., Linke, L., Magnuson, R., Jauch, L., & Hyatt, D. R. (2022). Antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus collected from livestock, poultry, and humans. One Health, 15, 100407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Shebl, H. R., Zaki, W. K., Saleh, A. N., Ahmed, S., & Salam, A. (2020). Prevalence of MecC Gene Among Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Patients in Ain- Shams University Hospital. 14(December), 2807–2813. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.14.4.56 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Stegger, Á., Andersen, P., Kearns, A., Pichon, B.,Holmes, M., Edwards, G., Laurent, F., Teale, C., Skov, R. & Larsen, A. (2012). Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecALGA251. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Taban, B. M., Hassankhani, A., & Aytac, S. A. (2021). Staphylococcus aureus from raw milk and traditional artisanal dairy foods. International Journal of Food Properties, 24(1), 954–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2021.1950182 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study