Geospatial and Real-Time Data Integration in Evaluating County-Level Governance Reforms in Africa

This paper has discussed the role of the geospatial/real time data integration on the county level governance reforms in Africa with reference to Kenya devolved governments. The study was inspired due to the radical problems that have existed since time immemorial of lack of transparency, broken data systems, and ineffective institutional coordination that place a premium on evidence-based decision-making in decentralized governance. Although there is a rise in the use of GIS, IoT, and satellite technologies, limited empirical research has been conducted to assess how these technologies influence the results of the reform on the county level. The study, which was based on the Socio-Technical Systems (STS) Theory, assumed that the performance of governance is based on the interplay between technological infrastructure (technical subsystem) and institutional preparedness, leadership and human capacity (social subsystem). These aimed to: (1) assess the application of GIS, satellite, and IoT technologies in assessing county governance; (2) evaluate the influence of real-time data integration on transparency and accountability; and (3) assess the challenges and opportunities of institutionalizing the said tools within African counties. The research design used was a mixed-methods descriptive design, where 75 respondents were studied in Nairobi, Kiambu and Laikipia Counties. The SPSS was used to analyze quantitative data in terms of descriptive statistics, correlations, and regression, and thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data. Findings revealed that geospatial adoption, institutional preparedness and human capacity caused a combined variance of 68.2 in governance performance (R2 = 0.682). The most important predictor of transparency and efficiency in service delivery was to be found in geospatial adoption (b = 0.412, p < .01).

Geospatial Data, Real-Time Monitoring, County Governance

1. Adreani, L., Bellini, P., Fanfani, M., Nesi, P., & Pantaleo, G. (2023). Smart city digital twin framework for real-time multi-data integration and wide public distribution. Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13394 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akbarighatar, P., Müller, B., & Meijer, S. (2023). A sociotechnical perspective for responsible AI maturity. Journal of Responsible Technology. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266709682300040X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Said, R., & Hassan, S. (2024). The role of the Internet of Things (IoT) in achieving sustainable development goals: A systematic review. ACM Digital Library. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3765516 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Barik, R. K., Dubey, H., Samaddar, A. B., Gupta, R. D., & Ray, P. K. (2017). FogGIS: Fog computing for geospatial big data analytics. Preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.02601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Barik, R. K., Tripathy, B. K., & Pattnaik, P. K. (2017). FogGIS: Fog computing for geospatial big data analytics. Future Generation Computer Systems, 82, 480–491. https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.02601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Chandani, Y., Andersson, S., Heaton, A., Noel, M., Shieshia, M., Mwirotsi, A., & Girma, S. (2016). Unlocking bottlenecks in public health supply chains through data dashboards and governance structures: The Kenya experience. Global Health: Science and Practice, 4(2), 311–326. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.08755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. County Government of Laikipia. (2024). Integrating geospatial technologies in development processes: County planning and service delivery. Nanyuki: County Government of Laikipia.https://www.laikipia.go.ke/1157/integrating-geospatial-technologies-in-development-processes/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. E3S Conferences. (2023). Digital revolution in African cities: Exploring governance through IoT, AI, big data and 5G. E3S Web of Conferences, 415, 03007. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/55/e3sconf_acc2023_03007.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Eshetie, G. G., & Ambaye, K. (2024). Geospatial technologies in support of responsible land governance in developing countries. Land Use Policy. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1195103624000144 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Esri. (n.d.). Dashboard streamlines local government operations: Baton Rouge case. Esri Case Study. https://www.esri.com/en-us/landing-page/product/2019/baton-rouge-case-study [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Esri. (n.d.). Enhancing civic participation with performance dashboards: City of Arlington. Esri Local Government Solutions. https://www.esri.com/en-us/cp/gis-local-government-solutions/city-of-arlington-case-study [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Global Partnership for Sustainable Development Data (GPSDD). (2023). Africa Regional Data Cube governance frameworks and operationalization. Nairobi: GPSDD. https://www.data4sdgs.org/sites/default/files/services_files/GPSDD_ARDC%20Governance%20Frameworks.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Granell, C., Mooney, P., Jirka, S., Rieke, M., Ostermann, F., van den Broecke, J., et al. (2022). Emerging approaches for data-driven innovation in Europe: sandbox experiments on the governance of data and technology. JRC Technical Report. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC127730/jrc-tr_ddi_2021_v9_online.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Guay, R., et al. (2022). A comparative analysis of data governance: Socio-technical imaginaries of digital personal data. Big Data & Society. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20539517221112925 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hendriks, A. (2025). Shaping the future: A conceptual review of sociotechnical imaginaries. Futures. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000692 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. https://www.wri.org/research/application-gis-sub-national-energy-planning-kenya-integrating-primary-data-least-cost [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Huntington, S. (2014). The geography of governance in Africa: New tools from satellites, surveys, and mapping initiatives. Journal of Modern African Studies, 52(3), 345–367. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13597566.2014.971774 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kenya Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries & Cooperatives. (2024). Data Governance Framework 2022. https://kilimo.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/MoALFC-Data-Governance-Framework-2022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. KIPPRA. (2025, June 11). Leveraging GIS for enhanced environmental management, urban planning and transport system — lesson from Vihiga County, Kenya. https://kippra.or.ke/leveraging-gis-for-enhanced-environmental-management-urban-planning-and-transport-system-lesson-from-vihiga-county-in-kenya/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kristiani, E., & Marcel. (2024). Improving IT service management capability in small firms: A case study integrated with Socio-Technical Systems Theory. International Journal for Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology. https://journal-isi.org/index.php/isi/article/view/904 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kudina, O., & van de Poel, I. (2024). A sociotechnical system perspective on AI. Minds & Machines, 34, Article 21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11023-024-09680-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Li, S., Batty, M., & Goodchild, M. (2020). Real-time GIS for smart cities. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 34(10), 1886–1899. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13658816.2019.1673397 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Matheus, R., & others. (2020). Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable local government. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X18300303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Mbuh, M. J., Metzger, P., Brandt, P., Fika, K., & Slinkey, M. (2019). Application of real-time GIS analytics to support spatial intelligent decision-making in the era of big data for smart cities. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345382978_Application_of_real-time_GIS_analytics_to_support_spatial_intelligent_decision-making_in_the_era_of_big_data_for_smart_cities [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Miasayedava, L., et al. (2022). Automated environmental compliance monitoring of rivers using sensor data and open-government principles. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479721023458 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mkhitaryan, A., Petrosyan, T., & Sargsyan, L. (2025). Integrating AI and geospatial technologies for sustainable urban governance in Yerevan. Urban Science, 9(10), 389. https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/9/10/389 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Murphy, K., Lyytinen, K., & Somers, T. (2023). A socio-technical model for project-based executive IT governance. SCIREA Journal of Computer, 8(1), 25–48. https://www.scirea.org/journal/PaperInformation?PaperID=8797 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Nezhad, M., Zafarani, M., & Samadi, H. (2025). A GIS-portal platform for integrated energy data management: A governance perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 190, 114284. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125006926 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). Using private sector geospatial data to inform policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Praharaj, S., Han, H., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2025). Command and control governance in India’s 100 Smart Cities: A critical evaluation of integrated data systems. Cities, 154, 105623. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143622825002619 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rajamäe, T., & Nikiforova, A. (2024). Bridging the gap: Unravelling local government data sharing barriers in Estonia and beyond. Government Information Quarterly, 41(2), 102772. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08461 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ronoh, G., Otieno, C., & Mugo, R. (2025). Application of GIS in sub-national energy planning in Kenya: Integrating primary data for least-cost analysis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Rugeiyamu, G., & Msendo, R. (2025). Success, challenges, and prospects of decentralization in Africa: A systematic review. Journal of African Governance Studies, 8(2), 44–67. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388748437_Success_challenges_and_prospects_of_decentralization_in_Africa_a_systematic_review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Safari Bazargani, J. (2021). A survey of GIS and IoT integration: Applications and opportunities. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10365. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/21/10365 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Salis, G., Di Nuzzo, L., & De Santis, A. (2025). IoT-driven governance of urban green spaces: A Campobasso case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 115, 105050. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12106 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Schünemann, C., et al. (2024). Modelling behaviour in socio-technical systems: Comparisons of ABM, SDM, and STM approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262402170X [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Seddeek, M. A., & Amin, H. S. (2025). A governance framework for the geospatial information centres (GICs) in developing countries. Journal of Urban Research, 49(1), 27–44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387434628_A_Governance_Framework_for_the_Geospatial_Information_Centres_GICs_in_Developing_Countries [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Smolka, M., et al. (2023). Responsible innovation ecosystem governance: Co-designing socio-technical integration in energy systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23299460.2023.2207937 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Sofianopoulos, G., Christodoulou, P., & Zervas, P. (2025). SDI-enabled smart governance: A decade review (2015–2025). Land, 14(7), 1399. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1399 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Sourd, G. L. (2025). Cartography for global sustainable development agendas: Mapping progress in developing regions. Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 52(2), 101–119. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23729333.2025.2532942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Space in Africa. (2023). Accelerating Africa’s sustainable development with geospatial intelligence. Space in Africa Reports. https://spaceinafrica.com/2023/02/24/accelerating-africas-sustainable-development-with-geospatial-intelligence/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2022). Smart city governance in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101653. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10173 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). (2022). Geospatial practices for sustainable development in South and Southeast Asia: Compendium. Bangkok: UNESCAP. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/2022-10/Sustainable%20Development%20Compendium_Executive%20Summary_FINAL%20251022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA). (2023). Harnessing geospatial and Earth observation data for effective governance and decision-making in Africa. Addis Ababa: UNECA. https://repository.uneca.org/handle/10855/49068 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. United Nations Global Geospatial Information Management for Asia and the Pacific (UN-GGIM-AP). (2022). Geospatial strategy for national development. Seoul: UN-GGIM-AP. https://un-ggim-ap.org/sites/default/files/media/docs/Geospatial-Strategy-for-National-Development-2022.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Wahome, A. M., Kiema, J. B. K., & Mulaku, G. C. (2023). Kenyan counties geospatial data knowledge to monitor crop production. Journal of Geographic Information System, 15, 629–651. https://www.scirp.org/pdf/jgis_2023121914103015.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Zhao, B. (2023). Digital transparency and citizen participation: Evidence from online crowdsourcing. Government Information Quarterly. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0740624X23000680 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. “City taps GIS tech to enhance urban planning” (2025, June 24). Kenya News. https://www.kenyanews.go.ke/city-taps-gis-tech-to-enhance-urban-planning/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. “GIS Dashboards & Data — Maarifa Centre.” (n.d.). Council of Governors, Kenya. https://maarifa.cog.go.ke/article/gis-dashboards-data [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. “Kenya national digital master plan 2022-2032” (2022). Kenya ICT Authority. https://cms.icta.go.ke/sites/default/files/2022-04/Kenya%20Digital%20Masterplan%202022-2032%20Online%20Version.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. “Kenyan counties embrace advanced GIS training to strengthen land governance” (2025, April 30). RCMRD. https://rcmrd.org/en/component/content/article/kenyan-counties-embrace-advanced-gis-training-to-strengthen-land-governance?Itemid=101&catid=9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. “Open Data Commitment: Publish open data to spur innovation in public service.” (n.d.). Open Government Partnership Kenya. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/members/kenya/commitments/KE0026/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. “Open Data for Development (KE0034).” (n.d.). Open Government Partnership. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/members/kenya/commitments/KE0034/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. “Thirty county governments receive GIS equipment to strengthen food security efforts” (2024, November 7). MyGov Kenya. https://www.mygov.go.ke/thirty-county-governments-receive-gis-equipment-strengthen-food-security-efforts [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study