Measurement of Modulus of Rupture (MoR) of Some Locally Available Tile Samples in Nigeria using a Developed MoR Testing Machine

Authors

Adeniyi Olugbenga

Department of Science Technology, The Federal Polytechnic Ado, P.M.B 5351, Ado Ekiti. (Nigeria)

T. Ewetumo

Department of Physics, The Federal University of Technology, P.M.B 704, Akure. (Nigeria)

K. D. Adedayo

Department of Physics, The Federal University of Technology, P.M.B 704, Akure. (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000045

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 540-549

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-14

Accepted: 2026-08-19

Published: 2026-08-31

Abstract

Measurement of modulus of rupture (MoR) of brittle materials is one of the important tasks that must be carried out on the materials in order to predict their likelihood to fail under an applied load or force. Accurate determination of this property requires reliable and well-calibrated testing machines. Meanwhile, the machines with which MoR of materials can be measured are not readily available in our institutions and research laboratories in Nigeria. This paper therefore presents the design, construction, calibration, and performance evaluation of a Modulus of Rupture (MOR) testing machine intended to be used for measuring the flexural strength of some tile samples available locally in Nigeria. The developed machine comprises of sturdy metallic framework, arduino board (Atmega 328), a motorized loading system incorporated with standard load cell, load cell amplifier, dc motor, dc motor controlling unit, IR sensor, a 20x4 I2C liquid crystal display (LCD), switches, veroboard, connecting wires and automatic data acquisition unit. The constructed machine was tested, calibrated and used to measure the modulus of rupture of six different samples of tiles. Calibration results demonstrated excellent measurement accuracy, with a maximum percentage error of only ±0.20%, indicating that the load cell and force measurement system provide reliable and precise load measurements over the operating range of 500N. The measured modulus of rupture of the tile samples ranges from 32.13 MPa to 44.93 MPa for 3-point bending test method and 22.55 MPa to 29.00 for 4-point bending test method. The results of the measurements using 3-point bending test method are higher than those obtained using 4-point bending test method. The differences agree with the literatures on the relationship between the two methods. The successful construction of the modulus of rupture machine provides an affordable alternative for educational institutions and small-scale laboratories, facilitating effective material strength testing and research applications.

Keywords

modulus, rupture, strength, machine, calibration, bending, tiles.

Downloads

References

1. ASTM International. (2018). ASTM C78/C78M-18: Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading). ASTM International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R., DeWolf, J. T., & Mazurek, D. F. (2020). Mechanics of Materials (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Callister, W. D., & Rethwisch, D. G. (2020). Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction (10th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Echezona, A. A., Gbasouzor, A. I., Atanmuo, P., & Chima, L. O. (2011). Development of a local flexural assessment apparatus. International Journal of Engineering Technology, 4(3), 169–177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Gere, J. M., & Goodno, B. J. (2018). Mechanics of Materials (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hajjaj, M. S., Alamoudi, R. A. A., Babeer, W. A., Rizg, W. Y., Basalah, A., Alzahrani, S. J., & Yeslam, H. E. (2024). Flexural strength, flexural modulus and microhardness of milled versus fused deposition modeling printed zirconia: Effect of conventional versus speed sintering. BMC Oral Health, 24, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03829-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hibbeler, R. C. (2020). Mechanics of Materials (11th ed.). Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hinge, M., Johnson, J. A., & Henriksen, M. L. (2021). A low-cost tabletop tensile tester with optical extensometer. Materials Advances, 2(19), 6339–6343. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lupercio, A., Moshkelgosha, E., Winters, R., Doyle, C., Mamivand, M., Nelson, A. T., & Jaques, B. (2021). Ball-on-ring test validation for equibiaxial flexural strength testing of engineered ceramics. International Journal of Ceramic Engineering & Science, 3(3), 128–139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mindess, S., Young, J. F., & Darwin, D. (2003). Concrete (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Neville, A. M. (2011). Properties of Concrete (5th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Zandinejad, A., Das, O., Barmak, A. B., Kuttolamadom, M., & Revilla-León, M. (2022). The flexural strength and flexural modulus of stereolithography additively manufactured zirconia with different porosities. Journal of Prosthodontics, 31(5), 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13430. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Zenthöfer, A., Ilani, A., Schmitt, C., Rammelsberg, P., Hetzler, S., & Rues, S. (2024). Biaxial flexural strength of 3D-printed 3Y-TZP zirconia using a novel ceramic printer. Clinical Oral Investigations, 28, Article 145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles