Awareness and Challenges of Teachers in Implementing Indian Knowledge Systems into Classrooms

Authors

Dr. Namrata Kamble ORCID icon for Dr. Namrata Kamble

Associate Professor School of Education & Research, MIT Art Design & Technology University, Loni Kalbhor (India)

Dr. Vindi Pujari

Director- Nerva Education Foundation (India)

Dr. Neeta Mhavan

Associate Professor School of Education & Research, MIT Art Design & Technology University (India)

Ms. Pushpa Atole

Associate Professor School of Education & Research, MIT Art Design & Technology University (India)

Article Information

DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000130

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 13/8 | Page No: 2502-2513

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-08-21

Accepted: 2026-08-26

Published: 2026-09-09

Abstract

The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 positions the integration of Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS) as a foundational reform to promote holistic, culturally grounded, and multidisciplinary learning. Encompassing India's intellectual traditions—from the Vedas and classical sciences to mathematics, arts, ecology, and philosophy—IKS holds immense potential to deepen students' conceptual understanding and cultural identity. However, teachers are the crucial mediators between policy and classroom practice, making their awareness, preparedness, and confidence the critical determinants of successful implementation. This study explores (1) the level of awareness teachers possess regarding IKS, (2) the challenges they face in integration, and (3) the strategies they adopt. An exploratory sequential mixed-method design was employed, using structured questionnaires with 62 SSC board teachers in Pune for quantitative data and semi-structured interviews with 14 teachers for qualitative insights. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Findings indicate a significant policy-practice gap: while 64.5% of teachers are aware of the NEP mandate, only 38.7% can confidently explain IKS domains. Major barriers include a lack of training (82.26%), limited resources (74.19%), and an exam-centric system (59.68%). Qualitative data revealed themes of "Conceptual Ambiguity," "The Training and Resource Chasm," and "Grassroots Innovation," where teachers resort to storytelling and local contextualization despite systemic hurdles. The study concludes that successful IKS integration is contingent upon a systemic, teacher-centric approach. Actionable recommendations are provided, including structured, hands-on teacher professional development, the creation of curated resource banks, systemic curriculum-alignment, and fostering school-community partnerships. These insights are essential for achieving NEP 2020's vision of transforming IKS from a policy directive into a functional and transformative element of school education.

Keywords

Indian Knowledge Systems (IKS), NEP 2020, Teacher Preparedness, Curriculum Integration, Indigenous Knowledge, Educational Policy Implementation.

Downloads

References

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Banks, J. A. (2004). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 3–29). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kanu, Y. (2011). Integrating Aboriginal perspectives into the school curriculum: Purposes, possibilities, and challenges. University of Toronto Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Paradigm Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Zed Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles