Experiential Learning and Life Skills Development in Higher Education: A Practice-Based Framework for Developing Self-Directed Learners in VUCA Environments
Authors
Education, Central University of Gujarat, Ahmedabad, Gujarat (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1309000015
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/9 | Page No: 159-187
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-09-09
Accepted: 2026-09-15
Published: 2026-09-29
Abstract
Contemporary higher education is expected to prepare learners for far more than disciplinary examinations. Graduates increasingly enter professional and social environments characterised by volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity (VUCA), in which previously learned procedures are frequently insufficient for unfamiliar problems (Lemoine et al., 2017; Rouvrais et al., 2018). Employer surveys similarly indicate that analytical thinking, resilience, flexibility and collaborative capability are among the competencies most in demand, and that a substantial proportion of currently required skills are expected to change within a five-year horizon (World Economic Forum, 2025). In such environments learners require transferable life skills, including critical thinking, decision-making, communication, collaboration, self-management, emotional coping, adaptability and the capacity to reflect on experience (OECD, 2018; World Health Organization, 1997). Experiential Learning Theory (ELT), particularly the model articulated by Kolb (1984, 2015), provides a useful pedagogical lens because it situates experience, reflection, conceptual understanding and experimentation within an iterative learning process.
This paper develops a practice-based framework for understanding how experiential learning can create opportunities for life-skills development in undergraduate education. It analyses two educational cases: a business simulation and an overseas experiential-learning programme. Rather than treating participation in an activity as proof of skill development, the paper distinguishes among exposure to a skill, opportunities to practise the skill, perceived learning, observed behaviour and demonstrated competency. This distinction responds directly to the need for stronger methodological alignment between claims and evidence (Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2006; Shadish et al., 2002).
The paper expands the conceptual relationship between the four ELT processes Concrete Experience, Reflective Observation, Abstract Conceptualisation and Active Experimentation and six life-skill domains. It further explains the role of facilitation, structured reflection, feedback, assessment and transfer (Fanning & Gaba, 2007; Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Perkins & Salomon, 1992). The previously reported improvement of more than 15% in assessment scores is retained only as a descriptive observation unless cohort, assessment-equivalence and statistical information are supplied. Similarly, student reports from the overseas programme are interpreted as perceptions rather than causal evidence (Podsakoff et al., 2003). The paper concludes with an expanded framework and a proposed empirical design using validated instruments, pre-post measurement, authentic performance tasks, qualitative evidence and delayed follow-up (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018; Gulikers et al., 2004).
Keywords
Experiential Learning Theory; life skills; higher education; Kolb; business simulation; overseas experiential learning; self-directed learning; VUCA; reflection; transfer; facilitation
Downloads
References
1. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Anderson, P. H., Lawton, L., Rexeisen, R. J., & Hubbard, A. C. (2006). Short-term study abroad and intercultural sensitivity: A pilot study. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.10.004 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bergsteiner, H., Avery, G. C., & Neumann, R. (2010). Kolb’s experiential learning model: Critique from a modelling perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 32(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370903534355 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Botvin, G. J., Mihalic, S. F., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1998). Life skills training: Blueprints for violence prevention (Book 5). Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, University of Colorado at Boulder. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Kogan Page. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Desai, P., Bhandiwad, A., & Shettar, A. (2018). Impact of experiential learning on students’ success in undergraduate engineering. In 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 46–48). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2018.00018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Eyler, J. (2009). The power of experiential education. Liberal Education, 95(4), 24–31. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). American Philosophical Association. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Fanning, R. M., & Gaba, D. M. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simulation in Healthcare, 2(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Faria, A. J., Hutchinson, D., Wellington, W. J., & Gold, S. (2009). Developments in business gaming: A review of the past 40 years. Simulation & Gaming, 40(4), 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108327585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Granlund, H. M. (2008). Experiential learning in computer-based simulation training: Experiences from research on team decision making. In 2008 International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (pp. 52–55). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSSE.2008.407 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.46787/elthe.v1i1.3362 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L.-F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 227–247). Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Lemoine, P. A., Hackett, P. T., & Richardson, M. D. (2017). Global higher education and VUCA — Volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity. In S. Mukerji & P. Tripathi (Eds.), Handbook of research on administration, policy, and leadership in higher education (pp. 549–568). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0672-0.ch022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Moon, J. A. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. RoutledgeFalmer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning — A systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. O’Flynn, E., Stephens, S., Cunningham, I., Burke, A., & McLaughlin, C. (2023). Experiential learning and the entrepreneurial university: An Irish case study. Industry and Higher Education, 37(5), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221151146 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 6452–6457). Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Phan, N. (2024). Bridging the gap: A framework for experiential learning in higher education. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241292009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Rouvrais, S., Gaultier Le Bris, S., & Stewart, M. (2018). Engineering students ready for a VUCA world? A design based research on decisionship. In Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference (pp. 872–881). Kanazawa Institute of Technology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Seaman, J., Brown, M., & Quay, J. (2017). The evolution of experiential learning theory: Tracing lines of research in the JEE. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(4), NP1–NP21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825916689268 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. World Health Organization. (1997). Life skills education for children and adolescents in schools: Introduction and guidelines to facilitate the development and implementation of life skills programmes (WHO/MNH/PSF/93.7A.Rev.2). World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. World Health Organization. (2020). Life skills education school handbook: Prevention of noncommunicable diseases. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. Yorke, M. (2006). Employability in higher education: What it is — what it is not. Higher Education Academy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study