Organizational Citizenship Behaviour Dimensions as Predictors of Teachers’ Job Performance in Higher Education Institutions
Authors
Research Scholar, B N Bahadur Institute of Management Sciences, University of Mysore (India)
Department of Management Sciences, Yuvaraja College, University of MysoreC (india)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1310000048
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 13/10 | Page No: 678-688
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-10-18
Accepted: 2026-10-23
Published: 2026-10-31
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) and teachers’ job performance in aided and unaided higher education institutions affiliated with the University of Mysore. Data were collected from 500 teachers selected using the sampling procedure described in the methodology. OCB and job performance were assessed by the respective Heads of Department (HODs). Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to examine the associations between the five OCB dimensions and job performance, and regression analysis was used to examine their predictive contribution. All five dimensions were positively and significantly correlated with job performance: altruism (r = 0.728), courtesy (r = 0.729), sportsmanship (r = 0.737), conscientiousness (r = 0.712), and civic virtue (r = 0.635; all p < 0.001). In the simultaneous multiple regression model, the five dimensions accounted together for 71.1% of the variance in teachers job performance ratings (R2 = 0.711, adjusted R2 = 0.708). all the five dimensions had positive and statistically significant regression coefficients. Sportsmanship had the largest standardised coefficient in that model (β = 0.237). These results indicate positive associations and statistical prediction, not causal effects. Because both OCB and job performance were rated by HODs, common-rater bias and possible dependence among ratings require consideration. The regression results and diagnostic checks should be verified against the original statistical output before the manuscript is finalised.
Keywords
Organisational Citizenship Behaviour, Job Performance, Teachers, Aided and Unaided institutions, Higher education, University of Mysore
Downloads
References
1. Abukhait, R., Khattak, M. N., Shaya, N., & Ramanathan, U. (2023). The underlying mechanism between compulsory citizenship behaviours and employee innovative work behaviours and knowledge sharing: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1128499. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1128499 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bastian, A., & Widodo, W. (2022). How Innovative Behaviour Affects Lecturers’ Task Performance: A Mediation Perspective. Emerging Science Journal, 6, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2022-sied-09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Chi, N., Lin, C., Bruning, P. F., & Hung, Y. (2023). Forced to be a good citizen: Exploring the good- and dark-side effects of daily compulsory citizenship behaviours on subsequent proactive helping and interpersonal deviance. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 97(2), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Dedic, S., Hadzaihmetovic, N., & Mujezinovic, M. (2022). The Role of Leadership Styles in Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.20469/ijbas.8.10001-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Eli, A. A., Petru, L. C., Stoffers, J., & Ad, K. (2020). Leadermember exchange, organizational citizenship behaviours and performance of Ghanaian Technical University Lecturers. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 14(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm2019.8884 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Ennida, K., & Allouani, S. A. (2023). Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment of Teacher-Researchers through Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Literature Review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.113011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Fan, Q., Wider, W., & Chan, C. K. (2023). The brief introduction to organizational citizenship behaviors and counterproductive work behaviors: a literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181930. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181930 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Fernandes, P., Pereira, R., Wiedenhöft, G. C., & Costa, P. (2021). The individuals’ discretionary behaviors at work. An overview and analysis of its growing interest. Heliyon, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08175 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gopalakrishnan, M., & Abu, A. (2023). Role clarity, perceived cohesion and felt responsibility as antecedents of altruism and conscientiousness among college teachers in Kerala. Rajagiri Management Journal, 18(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/ramj-01-2023-0012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Hsieh, C., Chien, W.-C., Yen, H.-C., & Li, H.-C. (2022). “Same same” but different? Exploring the impact of perceived organizational support at the school and teacher levels on teachers’ job engagement and organizational citizenship behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1067054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067054 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Huang, J., Sang, G., & He, W. (2023). Motivation to teach and preparedness for teaching among preservice teachers in China: The effect of conscientiousness and constructivist teaching beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1116321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Khan, S. K., Memon, M. A., Cheing, A., & Ting, H. (2021). Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and the Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment: A Study of Private Universities. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(1), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.3160.2021 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Khandelwal, P., & Nair, M. (2022). Is Organizational Citizenship Behaviour of Teachers Related to the Effectiveness of Higher Education Institutions? MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices, 52–71. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2022/v12/i1/2182 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ludwikowska, K., Zakkariya, K. A., & Aboobaker, N. (2024). Academic leadership and job performance: the effects of organizational citizenship behavior and informal institutional leadership. Asian Education and Development Studies, 14(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeds-04-2024-0074 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Luo, J., Ng, L.-P., & Choong, Y. O. (2025). The effect of responsible leadership on organizational citizenship behavior: double mediation of gratitude and organizational identification. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02337-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Muntean, A. F., Curșeu, P. L., & Tucaliuc, M. (2022). A Social Support and Resource Drain Exploration of the Bright and Dark Sides of Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behaviors. Education Sciences, 12(12), 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120895 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Nguyen, P. N.-D., Tran, V. D., & Dong, L. N. T. (2022). Does organizational citizenship behavior predict organizational commitment of employees in higher educational institutions? Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.909263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Purwanto, A., Purba, J. T., Bernarto, I., & Sijabat, R. (2023). Investigating the role digital transformation and human resource management on the performance of the universitie. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4), 2013–2028. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.6.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Rizaie, M. E., Horsey, E. M., Ge, Z., & Ahmad, N. (2023). The role of organizational citizenship behavior and patriotism in sustaining public health employees’ performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 997643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997643 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Sahi, G. K., Mahajan, R., & Jones, P. (2024). Strategic imperatives for new product success: An internal stakeholder perspective. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(1), 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100467 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Singh, S. G., & Kumar, S. V. (2021). Dealing with Multicollinearity Problem in Analysis of Side Friction Characteristics Under Urban Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46(11), 10739–10755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05213-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sun, T., & Yoon, M. (2025). The impact of digital transformation on faculty performance in higher education: the mediating role of digital self-efficacy and the moderating role of task-technology fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1693375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1693375 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Wang, Y., Xu, S., & Ma, E. (2021). Serve perfectly, being happier: A perfectionistic perspective on customer-driven hotel employee citizenship behavior and well-being. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 96, 102984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102984 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Widodo, W., Muhdaliha, E., Firdaus, P. M., Rojikun, A., & Tarmizi, A. (2025). Revealing the effect of quality of work life and organizational justice on Indonesian teachers’ turnover intention: A serial mediation. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 23(3), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(3).2025.36 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Wilhelm, B., Simarasl, N., Riar, F. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2022). Organizational citizenship behavior: understanding interaction effects of psychological ownership and agency systems. Review of Managerial Science, 18(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00610-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Wonda, T. A. (2024). Examination of organizational citizenship behavior influence on employee performance attainment: an empirical investigation. Econstor (Econstor), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2418422 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Yue, M., Jong, M. S., & Ng, D. T. K. (2024). Understanding K–12 teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge readiness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(15), 19505–19536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12621-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study