Work Environment and Employee Productivity in Selected Higher Education Institutions of Manila

This study investigates the work environment and employee productivity in selected Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Manila, focusing on both faculty and non-academic staff. The research aims to assess how physical, social, and organizational aspects of the workplace influence individual and team productivity, as well as to identify challenges affecting employee performance. Data were collected through structured surveys and semi-structured interviews with 40 faculty members and 40 non-academic staff from three HEIs, using a mixedmethods approach for deeper insights.
The results indicate that employees generally perceive the work environment as favorable, with the social environment rated highest, reflecting positive interpersonal relationships, effective communication, and collegiality. Employee productivity was also rated highly, particularly in terms of individual skills, task efficiency, and teamwork. Significant differences were observed between faculty and non-academic staff, with faculty consistently assigning higher ratings. Correlation analyses further revealed a strong, statistically significant relationship between the work environment and employee productivity, with the organizational environment emerging as the most influential factor. Key challenges identified include excessive workload, limited professional development opportunities, inconsistent supervision, and inadequate resources.
Based on these findings, the study concludes that HEI employees demonstrate strong competence, motivation, and commitment, but targeted interventions are needed to optimize workload distribution, strengthen leadership communication, upgrade facilities, and provide continuous professional development. Implementing these strategies will enhance employee well-being, institutional performance, and long-term sustainability.

Work Environment, Employee Productivity, Higher Education

1. Abun, J. P. (2021). Enhancing employee productivity through self-efficacy and supportive work environments. Journal of Educational Management Research, 15(2), 45-59. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Campbell, D. (2020). Sampling techniques in organizational research: Ensuring validity and reliability. New York, NY: Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Castillo, R., Gomez, L., & Santos, E. (2025). Modernizing resources in higher education institutions: [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Implications for efficiency and service quality. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, 102450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.102450 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Garcia, M., & Santiago, P. (2024). Institutional support and employee efficiency: A study in Philippine higher education. Philippine Journal of Educational Administration, 19(1), 15-30. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hanafi, A., & Syah, R. (2021). Employee motivation and performance in academic institutions: An Indonesian perspective. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 112-126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kurniawanto, A., Dewi, F., & Santoso, H. (2022). Competence, motivation, and performance in higher education: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 44(5), 589-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2022.2084921 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lopez, C., & Dela Cruz, F. (2025). Continuous professional development in Philippine HEIs: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Academic Innovation, 7(1), 77-92. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Nguyen, T., Pham, H., & Le, K. (2023). Leadership and communication in higher education: Effects on staff motivation. International Journal of Educational Leadership, 28(4), 211-230. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Nikolopoulou, K. (2023). Purposive sampling in educational research: Rationale and applications. Educational Research Review, 18(2), 56-71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rahman, S., Ali, M., & Tan, C. (2022). Professional development and employee productivity in universities. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 421-435. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Silud, P., Morales, J., & Reyes, L. (2024). Workload management and employee efficiency in Philippine higher education. Philippine Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(2), 33-48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Villanueva, R., Santos, J., & Cruz, P. (2024). Communication gaps and employee productivity: Evidence from universities. Journal of Organizational Studies, 31(2), 145-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study