Pedagogical Approaches in Science Education and Students’ Science, Technology, and Society (STS) Orientation: A Multidimensional Quantitative Correlational Inquiry

In the current classrooms, science education focuses on not just acquisition of content knowledge but also learners' construction of relationships among science-technology-society (STS). The pedagogical strategies of IBSE, SSI and CST are hypothesized to reinforce students’ STS orientation by establishing scientific knowledge within authentic social, moral and technological frameworks. A quantitative correlational research design was used to investigate the relationship between pedagogical orientations in science education and NSTS orientation among students. Data for this study were obtained from a researcher-designed pedagogical approaches questionnaire and an amended Science, Technology, and Society orientation instrument developed based on the Views on Science–Technology–Society (VOSTS) framework. Descriptive statistics and the correlation analysis were employed for checking strength and direction of relations between variables. The results revealed that inquiry and SSI-based pedagogical strategies were correlated positively with student STS-oriented instruction, whereas teacher-centered practices had a weak or even insignificant correlation. The results indicate that pedagogical practices in science classrooms have a strong impact on the development of students’ sociotechnical awareness and scientific literacy for citizenship.

science education, pedagogical approaches

1. Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: “Views on Science– Technology–Society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760503 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Hodson, D. (2011). Looking to the future: Building a curriculum for social activism. Sense Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study